Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:ABERRATION (See also:Lat. ab, from or away, errare,, to wander) , a deviation or wandering, especially used in the figurative sense: as in See also:ethics, a deviation from the truth; in See also:pathology, a See also:mental derangement; in See also:zoology and See also:botany, abnormal development or structure . In See also:optics, the word has two See also:special applications: (I) See also:Aberration of See also:Light, and (2) Aberration in See also:Optical Systems . These subjects receive treatment below . I . ABERRATION OF LIGHT This astronomical phenomenon may be defined as an apparent See also:motion of the heavenly bodies; the stars describing annually orbits more or less elliptical, according to the See also:latitude of the See also:star; consequently at any moment the star appears to be displaced from its true position . This apparent motion is due to the finite velocity of light, and the progressive motion of the observer with the See also:earth, as it performs its yearly course about the See also:sun . It may be familiarized by the following illustrations . See also:Alexis See also:Claude Clairaut gave this figure: Imagine See also:rain to be falling vertically, and a See also:person carrying a thin perpendicular See also:tube to be See also:standing on the ground . If the See also:bearer be stationary, rain-drops will See also:traverse the tube without touching its sides; if, however, the person be walking, the tube must be inclined at an See also:angle varying as his velocity in See also:order that the rain may traverse the tube centrally . J . J . L. de See also:Lalande gave the See also:illustration of a'roofed See also:carriage with an open front: if the carriage be stationary, no rain enters; if, however, it be moving, rain enters at the front .
The " See also:umbrella " See also:analogy is possibly the best known figure
.
When stationary, the most efficient position in which to hold an umbrella is obviously See also:vertical; when walking, the umbrella must be held more and more inclined from the vertical as the See also:
That it was unexpected there can be no :doubt; and it was only by extraordinary perseverance and perspicuity that Bradley was able to explain it in 1727
.
Its origin is seated in attempts shade to See also:free from doubt the prevailing discordances as to whether the stars possessed appreciable parallaxes
.
The Copernican theory of the See also:solar See also:system—that the earth revolved annually about the sun—had received See also:confirmation by the observations of Galileo and Tycho See also:Brahe, and the mathematical' investigations of See also:Kepler and See also:Newton
.
As See also:early as 1573, See also:
When James Bradley and See also:Samuel See also:Molyneux entered this See also:sphere of astronomical See also:research in 1725, there consequently prevailed much uncertainty as to whether stellar parallaxes had been observed or not; and it was with the intention of definitely answering this question that these astronomers erected a large See also:telescope at the See also:house of the latter at See also:Kew
.
They determined to reinvestigate the motion of y Draconis; the telescope, constructed by See also:George See also:Graham (1675-1751), a celebrated See also:instrument-maker, was affixed to a vertical See also:chimney stack, in such manner as to permit a small oscillation of the eyepiece, the amount of which, i.e. the deviation from the vertical, was regulated and measured by the introduction of a See also:screw and a plumb-See also:line
.
The instrument was set up in See also:November 1725, and observations on y Draconis were made on the 3rd, 5th, 11th, and 12th of See also:December
.
There was apparently no shifting of the star, which was therefore thought to be at its most southerly point
.
On the 17th of December, however, Bradley observed that the star was moving southwards, a motion further shown by observations on the loth
.
These results were unexpected, and, in fact, inexplicable by existing theories; and an examination of the telescope showed that the observed anomalies were not due to instrumental errors
.
The observations were continued, and the star was seen to continue its southerly course until See also:
" Nutation, the only See also:form of oscillation imagined by Bradley, postulates that while' the earth's
c A
axis is fixed with respect to the earth, i.e. the north and south poles occupy permanent See also:geographical positions, yet the axis is not directed towards a fixed point in the heavens; variation of latitude, however, is associated with the shifting of the axis within the earth, i.e. the geographical position of the north pole varies
.
Nutation of the axis would determine a similar apparent motion for all stars: thus, all stars having the same polar distance as y Draconis should exhibit the same apparent motion after or before this star by a See also:constant See also:interval
.
Many stars satisfy the See also:condition of equality of polar distance with that of y Draconis, but few were See also:bright enough to be observed in Molyneux's telescope
.
One such star, however, with a right See also:ascension' nearly equal to that of y Draconis, but in the opposite sense, was selected and kept under observation
.
This star was seen to possess an apparent motion similar to that which would be a consequence of the nutation of the earth's axis; but since its declination varied only one See also:half as much as in the case of y Draconis, it was obvious that nutation did not See also:supply the requisite solution
.
The question as to whether the motion was due to an irregular See also:distribution of the earth's See also:atmosphere, thus involving abnormal variations in the refractive See also:index, was also investigated; here, again, negative results were obtained
.
Bradley had already perceived, in the case of the two stars previously scrutinized, that the apparent difference of declination from the ihaximum positions was nearly proportional to the sun's distance from the equinoctial points; and he realized the See also:necessity for more observations before any generalization could be attempted
.
For this purpose he repaired to the Rectory, See also:Wanstead, then the See also:residence of Mrs See also:Pound, the widow of his See also:uncle James Pound, with whom he had made many observations of the heavenly bodies
.
Here he had set up, on the rgth of See also:August 1727, a more convenient telescope than that at Kew, its range extending over 6',-° on each See also:side of the zenith, thus covering a far larger See also:area of the See also:sky
.
Two See also:hundred stars in the See also:British See also:Catalogue of Flamsteed traversed its See also:
Sailing on the See also:river See also:Thames, Bradley repeatedly observed the
shifting of a See also:vane on the See also:mast as the See also:boat altered its course;
and, having been assured that the motion of the vane meant
that the boat, and not the See also:wind, had altered its direction, he
realized that the position taken up by the vane was determined
by the motion of the boat and the direction of the wind
.
The
application of this observation to the phenomenon which had so
See also:long perplexed him was not difficult, and, in 1727, he published
his theory of the aberration of light—a corner-See also: |
|
|
[back] JOHN ABERNETHY (1764-1831) |
[next] ABERSYCHAN |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.