Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:ACCIDENT (from See also:Lat. accidere, to happen) , a word of widely variant meanings, usually something fortuitous and unexpected; a happening out of the See also:ordinary course of things . In the See also:law of See also:tort, it is defined as " an occurrence which is due neither to See also:design nor to See also:negligence "; in See also:equity, as " such an unforeseen event, misfortune, loss, See also:act or omission, as is not the result of any negligence or misconduct." So, in criminal law, " an effect is said to be accidental when the act by which it is caused is not done with the intention of causing it, and when its occurrence as a consequence of such act is not so probable that a See also:person of ordinary prudence ought, under the circumstances, to take reasonable precaution against it " (See also:Stephen, See also:Digest of Criminal Law, See also:art . 210) . The word may also have in law the more extended meaning of an unexpected occurrence, whether caused by any one's negligence or not, as in the Fatal Accidents Act 1846, See also:Notice of Accidents Act 1894 . See also See also:CONTRACT, CRIMINAL LAW, EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY, See also:INSURANCE, TORT, &C . In See also:logic an " See also:accident " is a quality which belongs to a subject but not as See also:part of its essence in Aristotelian See also:language Kara ovj . 3e(3nKbs, the scholastic per accidens) . Essential attributes are necessarily, or causally, connected with the subject, e.g. the sum of the angles of a triangle; accidents are not deducible from the nature, or are not part of the necessary See also:connotation, of the subject, e.g. the See also:area of a triangle . It follows that in-creased knowledge, e.g. in See also:chemistry, may show that what was thought to be an accident is really an essential attribute, or See also:vice versa . It is very generally held that, in reality, there is no such thing as an accident, inasmuch as See also:complete knowledge would establish a causal connexion for all attributes . An accident is thus merely an unexplained attribute . Accidents have been classed as (1) " inseparable," i.e. universally See also:present, though no causal connexion is established, and (2) " separable," where the connexion is neither causally explained nor universal . Propositions expressing a relation between a subject and an accident are classed as " accidental," " real " or " See also:ampliative," as opposed to " verbal " or " See also:analytical," which merely See also:express a known connexion, e.g. between a subject and its connotation (q.v.) . |
|
|
[back] ACCIDENT |
[next] ACCIDENTALISM |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.