Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

ADOPTION (Lat. adoptio, for adoptalio...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V01, Page 214 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

ADOPTION (See also:Lat. adoptio, for adoptalio, from adoptare, to choose for oneself)  , the See also:act by which the relations of paternity and filiation are recognized as legally existing between persons not so related by nature . Cases of See also:adoption were very frequent among the Greeks and See also:Romans, and the See also:custom was accordingly very strictly regulated in their See also:laws . In See also:Athens the See also:power of adoption was allowed to all citizens who were of See also:sound mind, and who possessed no male offspring of their own, and it could be exercised either during lifetime or by testament . The See also:person adopted, who required to be himself a See also:citizen, was enrolled in the See also:family and demos of the adoptive See also:father, whose name, however, he did not necessarily assume . In the See also:interest of the next of See also:kin, whose rights were affected by a See also:case of adoption, it was provided that the See also:registration should be attended with certain formalities, and that it should take See also:place at a fixed See also:time—the festival of the See also:Thargelia . The rights and duties of adopted See also:children were almost identical with those of natural offspring, and could not be renounced except in the case of one who had begotten children to take his place in the family of his adoptive father . Adopted into another family, children ceased to have any claim of kindred or See also:inheritance through their natural father, though any rights they might have through their See also:mother were not similarly affected . Among the Romans the existence of the patria potestas gave a See also:peculiar significance to the custom of adoption . The See also:motive to the act was not so generally childlessness, or the gratification of See also:affection, as the See also:desire to acquire those See also:civil and agnate rights which were founded on the patria potestas . It was necessary, however, that the adopter should have no children of his own, and that he should be of such an See also:age as to preclude reasonable expectation of any being See also:born to him . Another See also:limitation as to age was imposed by the See also:maxim adoptio imitatur naturam, which required the adoptive father to be at least eighteen years older than the adopted children . According to the same maxim eunuchs were not permitted to adopt, as being impotent to beget children for themselves .

Adoption was of two kinds according to the See also:

state of the person adopted, who might be either still under the patria potestas (See also:alien See also:juris), or his own See also:master (sui juris) . In the former case the act was one of adoption proper, in the latter case it was styled adrogation, though the See also:term adoption was also used in a See also:general sense to describe both See also:species . In adoption proper the natural father publicly sold his See also:child to the adoptive father, and the See also:sale being thrice repeated, the maxim of the Twelve Tables took effect, Si See also:pater filium ter venunduit, filius a patre See also:liber esto . The See also:process was ratified and completed by a fictitious See also:action of recovery brought by the adoptive father against the natural See also:parent, which the latter did not defend, and which was therefore known as the cessio in jure . Adrogation could be accomplished originally only by the authority of the See also:people assembled in the See also:Comitia, but from the time of See also:Diocletian it was effected by an imperial rescript . See also:Females could not be adrogated, and, as they did not possess the patria potestas, they could not exercise the right of adoption in either See also:kind . The whole See also:Roman See also:law on the subject of adoption will be found in Justinian's Institutes, See also:lib. i. tit . 11 . In See also:Hindu law, as in nearly every See also:ancient See also:system, See also:wills were formerly unknown, and adoptions took their place . (See See also:INDIAN LAW.) Adoption is not recognized in the laws of See also:England, See also:Scotland or the See also:Netherlands, though there are legal means by which one may be enabled to assume-the name and arms and to inherit the See also:property of a stranger . (See Nam .E.) In See also:France and See also:Germany, countries which may be said to have embodied the Roman law in their See also:jurisprudence, adoption is regulated according to the principles of Justinian, though with several more or less important modifications, rendered necessary by the usages of these countries respectively . Under See also:French law the rights of adoption can be exercised only by those who are over fifty years of age, and who, at the time of adoption, have neither children nor legitimate descendants .

They must also be fifteen years older than the person adopted . In See also:

German law the person adopting must either be fifty years of age, or at least eighteen years older than the adopted, unless a See also:special See also:dispensation is obtained . If the person adopted is a legitimate child the consent of his parents must be obtained; if illegitimate, the consent of the mother . Both in Germany and France the adopted child remains a member of his See also:original family, and ac-quires no rights in the family of the adopter other than that of See also:succession to the person adopting . In the See also:United States adoption is regulated by the statutes of the several states . Adoption of minors is permitted by See also:statute in many of the states . These statutes generally require some public See also:notice to be given of the intention to adopt, and an See also:order of approval after a See also:hearing before some public authority . The consequence commonly is that the person adopted becomes, in the eyes of the law, the child of the person adopting, for all purposes . Such an adoption, if consummated according to the law of the See also:domicile, is equally effectual in any other state into which the parties may remove . The relative status thus newly acquired is ubiquitous . (See Whitmore, Laws of Adoption; See also:Ross v . Ross, 129 See also:Massachusetts Reports, 243.) The See also:part played by the legal fiction of adoption in the constitution of See also:primitive society and the See also:civilization of the See also:race is so important, that See also:Sir See also:Henry S .

See also:

Maine, in his Ancient Law, ex-presses the See also:opinion that, had it never existed, the primitive See also:groups of mankind could not have coalesced except on terms of See also:absolute superiority on the one See also:side and absolute subjection on the other . With the institution of adoption, however, one people might feign itself as descended from the same stock as the people to whose sacra gentilicia it was admitted; and amicable relations were thus established between See also:stocks which, but for this expedient, must have submitted to the arbitrament of the See also:sword with all its consequences .

End of Article: ADOPTION (Lat. adoptio, for adoptalio, from adoptare, to choose for oneself)
[back]
ADOPTIANISM
[next]
ADORATION (Lat. ad, to, and os, mouth; i.e. " carry...

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.