See also:AKKAD (Gr. versions apxat and hXab)
, a See also:Hebrew name,
mentioned only once in the Old Testament (Gen. x. to), for one of the four See also:chief cities, See also:Akkad, See also:Babel, See also:Erech and Calneh, which constituted the See also:nucleus of the See also:kingdom of See also:Nimrod in the See also:land of Shinar or Babylonia
.
This Biblical See also:city, Akkad, was most probably identical with the See also:northern Babylonian city known to us as Agade (not Agane, as formerly read), which was the See also:principal seat of the See also:early Babylonian See also:- KING
- KING (O. Eng. cyning, abbreviated into cyng, cing; cf. O. H. G. chun- kuning, chun- kunig, M.H.G. kiinic, kiinec, kiinc, Mod. Ger. Konig, O. Norse konungr, kongr, Swed. konung, kung)
- KING [OF OCKHAM], PETER KING, 1ST BARON (1669-1734)
- KING, CHARLES WILLIAM (1818-1888)
- KING, CLARENCE (1842–1901)
- KING, EDWARD (1612–1637)
- KING, EDWARD (1829–1910)
- KING, HENRY (1591-1669)
- KING, RUFUS (1755–1827)
- KING, THOMAS (1730–1805)
- KING, WILLIAM (1650-1729)
- KING, WILLIAM (1663–1712)
king See also:Sargon I
.
(.argani-garali), whose date is given by Nabonidus, the last Semitic king of
Babylonia (555—537 B.c.), as 3800 B.C., which is perhaps too old by 700 or 1000 years.' The probably non-Semitic name
Agade occurs in a number of inscriptions2 and is now well attested as having been the name of an important See also:ancient See also:capital
.
The later Assyro-Babylonian Semitic See also:form Akkadu ("of or belonging to Akkad ") is, in all likelihood, a Semitic See also:loan form from the non-Semitic name Agade, and seems to be an additional demonstration of the identity of Agade and Akkad
.
The usual signs denoting Akkadu in the Semitic narrative See also:inscriptions were read in the non-Semitic See also:idiom See also:uri-ki or ur-ki, " land of the city," which simply meant that Akkadu was the land of the city See also:par excellence, i.e. of the city of Agade of Sargon I., which remained
for a See also:long See also:period the leading city of Babylonia.'
It is quite probable that the non-Semitic name Agade may
mean "See also:crown (See also:aga) of See also:fire (de)"' in allusion to Istar, " the brilliant goddess," the tutelar deity of the See also:morning and evening See also:star and the goddess of See also:war and love, whose cult was observed in very early times in Agade
.
This fact is again attested by Nabonidus, whose See also:record 5 mentions that the Istar See also:worship of Agade was later superseded by that of the goddess Anunit, another personification of the I"star See also:idea, whose See also:shrine was at Sippar
.
It is significant in this connexion that there were two cities named Sippar, one under the See also:protection of See also:Shamash, the See also:sun-See also:god, and one under this Anunit, a fact which points strongly to the probable proximity of Sippar and Agade
.
In fact, it has been thought that Agade-Akkad was situated opposite Sippar on the See also:left See also:bank of the See also:Euphrates, and was probably the See also:oldest See also:part of the city of
Sippar
.
In the Assyro-Babylonian literature the name Akkadu appears
as part of the royal See also:title in connexion with See also:Sumer; viz. non-Semitic: lugal Kengi (ki) Uru (ki)=.f ar See also:mat Sumeri u Akkadi, " king of Sumer and Akkad," which appears to have meant simply " king of Babylonia." It is not likely, as many scholars have thought, that Akkad was ever used geographically as a distinctive appellation for northern Babylonia, or that the name Sumer (q.v.) denoted the See also:southern part of the land, because See also:kings who ruled only over Southern Babylonia used the See also:double title " king of Sumer and Akkad," which was also employed by northern rulers who never established their sway farther See also:south than See also:Nippur, notably the See also:great See also:Assyrian conqueror Tiglathpileser III
.
(745—727 B.C.)
.
See also:Professor McCurdy has very See also:reason-ably suggested 6 that the title "king of Sumer and Akkad " indicated merely a claim to the ancient territory and city of Akkad together with certain additional territory, but not neces-
sarily all Babylonia, as was formerly believed
.
A discussion of the interesting question See also:relating to the non-
Semitic so-called Sumero-Akkadian See also:language and See also:race will be found in the See also:article SUMER
.
See also:Prince, Nabonidus, p. v
.
2 In the Sargon inscriptions; Bab
.
Exped. of the Univ. of See also:Penn. i. pl
.
1, nr
.
1, See also:line 6; pl
.
2, nr
.
2, line 5; pl
.
3, nr
.
3, line 3b; also xi. pl
.
49, nr
.
119 and in Nebuchadnezzar, See also:col. ii. line 50 (Hilprecht, Freibrief Neb.); Cun
.
Texts from Bab
.
Tablets, pl
.
1, nr
.
91146, line 3
.
See also:Rogers, See also:History of Babylonia and See also:Assyria, i. pp
.
365, 373-374
.
Prince, " Materials for a Sumerian See also:Lexicon," pp
.
23, 73, See also:Journal of Biblical Literature, 1906
.
6 I
.
Rawl
.
69, col. ii
.
48 and iii
.
28
.
" History, Prophecy and the Monuments, i
.
§ I I0
.
End of Article: