Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:ALLITERATION (from See also:Lat. ad, to, and littera, See also:letter)
, the commencing of two or more words, in See also:close juxtaposition, with the same See also:sound
.
As See also:Milton defined See also:rhyme to be " the jingling sound of like endings," so See also:alliteration is the jingle of like beginnings
.
All See also:language has a tendency to jingle in both ways, even in See also:prose
.
Thus in prose we speak of " near and dear," " high and dry," " See also:health and See also:wealth." But the initial See also:form of jingle is much more See also:common—" safe and sound," " thick and thin," " weal or woe," " See also:fair or foul," " spick and span," " See also:fish, flesh, or See also:fowl," " kith and See also:kin." The poets of nearly all times and See also:tongues have not been slow to seize upon the emphasis which could thus be produced
.
Although mainly Germanic in its See also:character, alliteration was known to the Latins, especially in See also:early times, and See also:Cicero blames See also:Ennius for See also:writing " 0 See also:Tite tute, See also:Tati, tibi See also:tanta, tyranne, tulisti." See also:Lucretius did not disdain to employ it as an See also:ornament
.
We read in See also:Shakespeare:
" Full See also:fathom five thy See also:father lies:
Of his bones are See also:corals made."
In See also:Pope:
" Here files of pins extend their shining rows, Puffs, powders, patches, bibles, See also:billet-doux." In See also: Of the four accented syllables, the first three should begin with the same See also:letter; the See also:fourth is free and may start with any letter . Those who wish for a more See also:minute See also:analysis of the laws of alliterative verse, as practised by the Anglo-Saxon and early English poets, may consult an exhaustive See also:essay on the subject by See also:Professor W . W . See also:Skeat, prefixed to vol. iii. of See also:Bishop See also:Percy's See also:Folio See also:Manuscript; only the reader must be on his guard against an See also:error which pervades it, and which this able writer seems to have derived from See also:Rask . The question arises—What is the nature of the See also:cadence in alliterative verse ? Now all metrical See also:movement is of two kinds, according as the See also:beat or emphasis begins the movement or ends it . If the beat is initial, we say in classical language that the movement is See also:trochaic or dactylic, according to the number of its syllables; and if the beat is final, we in like manner say that the movement is See also:iambic or anapaestic . Skeat and many others See also:object with some See also:reason to use the classical terms, and therefore brushing them aside, let us put the question in the simplest form—Has the movement of alliterative verse got the initial or the final beat ? In the middle of the 18th See also:century Bishop Percy decided this question with sufficient accuracy, though he mixed up his statement with a blunder which it is not easy to See also:account for . He points out how the poets began to introduce rhyme into alliterative verse, until at length rhyme came to predominate over alliteration, and " thus was this See also:kind of See also:metre at length swallowed up and lost in the common See also:burlesque Alexandrine or anapaestic verse, as " A cobbler there was, and he lived in a See also:stall." Percy made a serious See also:mistake when he gave the name of Alexandrine to anapaestic verse; but he is quite right in his See also:general statement that alliterative verse became lost in a measure the movement of which had the final beat . See also:Conybeare has stated the fact still more accurately . " In the Saxon poetry a trochaic character is predominant . In Piers the Plowman there is a prevailing tendency to an anapaestic cadence." It is the result of a See also:change in the language—the loss of See also:inflexion . Take the word See also:man . The genitive in Saxon would be mannes, a trochee; in English, of man, an iambus . The tendency of the language was thus to pass from a metrical movement, in which the beat was initial, to one in which it was final . It may therefore be quite right to speak of Anglo-Saxon alliterative poetry as trochaic or dactylic, and quite wrong to apply the same terms to the cadence of our later alliterative verse . And this is precisely the error into which Skeat has fallen . He says—" Lines do not always begin with a loud syllable, but often one or two and sometimes (in early English especially) even three soft syllables precede it . These syllables are necessary to the sense, but not to the scansion of the line." That is just the point at issue . By leaving out of account the See also:light syllable or syllables at the beginning of a line, and taking his start from the first syllable that has the alliterative beat, Skeat may certainly prove that all the later alliterative poetry has a movement of initial beat . But English ears will not submit to this rule . It is those light syllables of no account which have altered the See also:rhythm of English descant from one of initial to one of final beat . |
|
|
[back] WILLIAM BOYD ALLISON (1829-1908) |
[next] ALLIUM (Lat. for " garlic ") |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.