|
See also: historical record in which events are arranged chronologically, See also: year by year
.
The chief See also: sources of information in regard to the See also: annals of See also: ancient See also: Rome are two passages in See also: Cicero (De Oratore, ii
.
12
.
52) and in Servius (ad Aen. i
.
373) which have been the subject of much discussion
.
Cicero states that from the earliest See also: period down to the pontificate of Publius Mucius See also: Scaevola (c
.
131 B.C.), it was usual for the See also: pontifex See also: maximus to record on a See also: white tablet (
See also: album), which was exhibited in an open place at his See also: house, so that the See also: people might read it, first, the name of the consuls and other magistrates, and then the noteworthy events that had occurred during the year (per singulos See also: dies, as Servius says)
.
These records were called in Cicero's See also: time the Annales Maximi
.
After the pontificate of Publius, the practice of compiling annals was carried on by various unofficial writers, of whom Cicero names See also: Cato, Pictor and See also: Piso
.
The Annales have been generally regarded as the same with the See also: Commentarii Pontifccum cited by See also: Livy, but there seems reason to believe that the two were distinct, the Commentarii being See also: fuller and more circumstantial
.
The nature of the distinction between annals and See also: history is a subject that has received more See also: attention from critics than its intrinsic importance deserves
.
The basis of discussion is furnished chiefly by the above-quoted passage from Cicero, and by the See also: common division of the See also: work of Tacitus into Annales and Historiae
.
Aulus See also: Gellius, in the Noctes Atticae (v
.
18), quotes the grammarian Verrius See also: Flaccus, to the effect that history, according to its etymology (ioropeiv, inspicere, to inquire in See also: person), is a record of events that have come under the author's own observation. while annals are a record of the events of earlier times arranged according to years
.
This view of the distinction seems to be See also: borne out by the division of the work of Tacitus into the Historiae, See also: relating the events of his own time, and the Annales, containing the history of earlier periods
.
It is more than questionable, however, whether Tacitus himself divided his work under these titles
.
The probability is, either that he called the whole Annales, or that he used neither designation
.
(See TACITUS, CORNELIUS.)
In the See also: middle ages, when the See also: order of the liturgical feasts was partly determined by the date of See also: Easter, the See also: custom was early established in the Western See also: Church of
See also: drawing up tables to indicate that date for a certain number of years or even centuries
.
These See also: Paschal tables were thin books in which each See also: annual date was separated from the next by a more or less considerable See also: blank space
.
In these spaces certain monks briefly noted the important events of the year
.
It was at the end of the 7th century and among the Anglo-See also: Saxons that the compiling of these Annals was first begun
.
Introduced by missionaries on the continent, they were re-copied, augmented and continued, especially in the See also: kingdom of See also: Austrasia
.
In the 9th century, during the See also: great See also: movement termed the Carolingian See also: Renaissance, these Annals became the usual See also: form of contemporary history; it suffices to mention the Annales Einhardi, the Annales Laureshamenses (or " of Lorsch "), and the Annales S
.
Bertini, officially compiled in order to preserve the memory of the more interesting acts of Charlemagne, his ancestors and his successors
.
Arrived at this stage of development, the Annals now began to lose theirSee also: primitive character, and henceforward became more and more indistinguishable from the See also: Chronicles
.
In See also: modern literature the title annals has been given to a large number of See also: standard See also: works which adhere more or less strictly to the order of years
.
The best known are the Annales Ecclesiastici, written by See also: Cardinal See also: Baronius as a rejoinder to and refutation of the Historia ecclesiastica or " Centuries " of the See also: Protestant theologians of See also: Magdeburg (12 vols., published at Rome from 1788 to 1793; Baronius's work stops at the year 1197)
.
In the 19th century the annalistic form was once more employed, either to preserve year by year the memory of passing events (Annual See also: Register, Annuaire de la Revue See also: des deux mondes, &c.) or in writing the history of obscure See also: medieval periods (Jahrbiicher der deutschen Geschichte, Jahrbucher des deutschen Reiches, See also: Richter's Reichsannalen, &c.)
.
(C
.
|
|
|
[back] ANNALISTS (from Lat. annas, year; hence annales, sc... |
[next] ANNAM, or ANAM |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.