Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

ANNALS (Annales, from annus, a year)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V02, Page 61 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

ANNALS (Annales, from annus, a See also:year)  , a concise See also:historical See also:record in which events are arranged chronologically, See also:year by year . The See also:chief See also:sources of See also:information in regard to the See also:annals of See also:ancient See also:Rome are two passages in See also:Cicero (De Oratore, ii . 12 . 52) and in Servius (ad Aen. i . 373) which have been the subject of much discussion . Cicero states that from the earliest See also:period down to the pontificate of Publius Mucius See also:Scaevola (c . 131 B.C.), it was usual for the See also:pontifex See also:maximus to record on a See also:white tablet (See also:album), which was exhibited in an open See also:place at his See also:house, so that the See also:people might read it, first, the name of the consuls and other magistrates, and then the noteworthy events that had occurred during the year (per singulos See also:dies, as Servius says) . These records were called in Cicero's See also:time the Annales Maximi . After the pontificate of Publius, the practice of compiling annals was carried on by various unofficial writers, of whom Cicero names See also:Cato, Pictor and See also:Piso . The Annales have been generally regarded as the same with the See also:Commentarii Pontifccum cited by See also:Livy, but there seems See also:reason to believe that the two were distinct, the Commentarii being See also:fuller and more circumstantial . The nature of the distinction between annals and See also:history is a subject that has received more See also:attention from critics than its See also:intrinsic importance deserves . The basis of discussion is furnished chiefly by the above-quoted passage from Cicero, and by the See also:common See also:division of the See also:work of See also:Tacitus into Annales and Historiae .

Aulus See also:

Gellius, in the Noctes Atticae (v . 18), quotes the grammarian Verrius See also:Flaccus, to the effect that history, according to its See also:etymology (ioropeiv, inspicere, to inquire in See also:person), is a record of events that have come under the author's own observation. while annals are a record of the events of earlier times arranged according to years . This view of the distinction seems to be See also:borne out by the division of the work of Tacitus into the Historiae, See also:relating the events of his own time, and the Annales, containing the history of earlier periods . It is more than questionable, however, whether Tacitus himself divided his work under these titles . The See also:probability is, either that he called the whole Annales, or that he used neither designation . (See TACITUS, See also:CORNELIUS.) In the See also:middle ages, when the See also:order of the liturgical feasts was partly determined by the date of See also:Easter, the See also:custom was See also:early established in the Western See also:Church of See also:drawing up tables to indicate that date for a certain number of years or even centuries . These See also:Paschal tables were thin books in which each See also:annual date was separated from the next by a more or less considerable See also:blank space . In these spaces certain monks briefly noted the important events of the year . It was at the end of the 7th See also:century and among the Anglo-See also:Saxons that the compiling of these Annals was first begun . Introduced by missionaries on the See also:continent, they were re-copied, augmented and continued, especially in the See also:kingdom of See also:Austrasia . In the 9th century, during the See also:great See also:movement termed the Carolingian See also:Renaissance, these Annals became the usual See also:form of contemporary history; it suffices to mention the Annales Einhardi, the Annales Laureshamenses (or " of Lorsch "), and the Annales S . Bertini, officially compiled in order to preserve the memory of the more interesting acts of See also:Charlemagne, his ancestors and his successors .

Arrived at this See also:

stage of development, the Annals now began to lose their See also:primitive See also:character, and henceforward became more and more indistinguishable from the See also:Chronicles . In See also:modern literature the See also:title annals has been given to a large number of See also:standard See also:works which adhere more or less strictly to the order of years . The best known are the Annales Ecclesiastici, written by See also:Cardinal See also:Baronius as a rejoinder to and refutation of the Historia ecclesiastica or " Centuries " of the See also:Protestant theologians of See also:Magdeburg (12 vols., published at Rome from 1788 to 1793; Baronius's work stops at the year 1197) . In the 19th century the annalistic form was once more employed, either to preserve year by year the memory of passing events (Annual See also:Register, Annuaire de la Revue See also:des deux mondes, &c.) or in See also:writing the history of obscure See also:medieval periods (Jahrbiicher der deutschen Geschichte, Jahrbucher des deutschen Reiches, See also:Richter's Reichsannalen, &c.) . (C .

End of Article: ANNALS (Annales, from annus, a year)
[back]
ANNALISTS (from Lat. annas, year; hence annales, sc...
[next]
ANNAM, or ANAM

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.