|
ANTINOMIANS (Gr. avri, against, v6 tos, See also: term apparently coined by See also: Luther to stigmatize Johannes See also: Agricola (q.v.) and his following, indicating an interpretation of the
See also: anti-thesis between See also: law and gospel, recurrent from the earliest times
.
Christians being released, in important particulars, from conformity to the Old Testament polity as a whole, a real difficulty attended the See also: settlement of the limits and the immediate authority of the See also: remainder, known vaguely as the moral law
.
Indications are not wanting that St See also: Paul's See also: doctrine of See also: justification by faith was, in his own See also: day, mistaken or perverted in the interests of immoral licence
.
Gnostic sects approached the question in two ways
.
Marcionites, named by See also: Clement of Alexandria Antitactae (revolters against theDemiurge) held the Old Testament See also: economy to be throughout tainted by its source; but they are not accused of licentiousness
.
Manichaeans, again, holding their spiritual being to be unaffected by the See also: action of See also: matter, regarded carnal sins as being, at worst, forms of bodily disease
.
Kindred to this latter view was the position of sundry sects of See also: English fanatics during the See also: Commonwealth, who denied that an elect See also: person sinned, even when committing acts in themselves See also: gross and evil
.
Different from either of these was the Antinomianism charged by Luther against Agricola
.
Its starting-point was a dispute with See also: Melanchthon in 1527 as to the relation between repentance and faith
.
Melanchthon urged that repentance must precede faith, and that knowledge of the moral law is needed to produce repentance
.
Agricola gave the initial place to faith, maintaining that repentance is the See also: work, not of law, but of the gospel-given knowledge of the love of See also: God
.
The resulting Antinomian controversy (the only one within the Lutheran See also: body in Luther's lifetime) is not remarkable for the precision or the moderation of the combatants on either See also: side
.
Agricola was apparently satisfied in See also: conference with Luther and Melanchthon at See also: Torgau, See also: December 1527
.
His eighteen Positiones of 1537 revived the
II
controversy and made it acute
.
Random as are some of his statements, he was consistent in two See also: objects: (I) in the See also: interest of solifidian doctrine, to place the rejection of the Catholic doctrine of See also: good See also: works on a sure ground; (2) in the interest of the New Testament, to find all needful guidance for Christian duty in its principles, if not in its precepts
.
From the latter See also: part of the 17th century charges of Antinomianism have frequently been directed against Calvinists, on the ground of their disparagement of " deadly doing " and of " legal preaching." The virulent controversy between Arminian and Calvinistic Methodists produced as its ablest outcome See also: Fletcher's Checks to Antinomianism (1771–1975)
.
See G
.
Kawerau, in A
.
Hauck's Realencyklopadie (1896); Riess, in I
.
Goschler's Dict
.
Encydop. de la theol. cath
.
(1858); J
.
H
.
Blunt
.
Dict. of Doct. and Hist . Theol . (1872); J . C . L . Gieseler, Ch . Hist . (NewSee also: York ed
.
1868, vol. iv.)
.
|
|
|
[back] ANTIMONY (symbol Sb, atomic weight 120.2) |
[next] ANTINOMY (Gr. avri, against, v6uos, law) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.