Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

APOLOGETICS

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V02, Page 194 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

APOLOGETICS  , in See also:

theology, the systematic statement of the grounds which Christians allege for belief in (at least) a super-natural See also:revelation and a divine redemption (cf. e.g . Heb. i . 1-3) . The See also:majority of apologists in the past have further believed in an infallible See also:Bible; but they admit this position can only be reached at a See also:late See also:stage in the See also:argument . We should See also:note, how-ever, that even a liberal orthodoxy, while saying nothing about See also:infallibility, is pledged to the essential authority of the Bible; it cannot e.g. simply ignore the Old Testament with F . E . D . See also:Schleiermacher . See also:Catholic apologetics must further give a central position to See also:Church authority, which See also:Roman Catholics explicitly define as infallible; but this position too is debated in a late See also:section of their See also:system . On the other See also:hand, there may be a See also:Christianity which seeks to extricate the " spiritual " from the" supernatural " (See also:Arnold See also:Toynbee, characterizing T.H.See also:Green) . It would only See also:lead to confusion, however, if we called this method " apologetic." Any single effort in apologetics may be termed " an See also:apology." More elaborate contrasts have been proposed between the two words, but are of little See also:practical importance . 1 .

The Word itself.—In See also:

Greek, ItiroXoryia is the See also:defendant's reply (personally, not through a lawyer) to the speech for the See also:prosecution—uarnyopia . Sometimes defendants' speeches passed into literature, e.g . See also:Plato's splendid version of the Apology of See also:Socrates . Thus, in view of persecution or See also:slander, the See also:Christian church naturally produced See also:literary " Apologies." The word has never quite lost this See also:connotation of See also:standing on the defensive and rebutting See also:criticism; e.g . See also:Anselm's Apologia contra insipientem Gaunilonem (c. r Too) ; or the Lutheran Apology for the See also:Augsburg See also:Confession (1531); or J . H . See also:Newman's Apologia See also:pro vita sua (1864); or A . B . See also:Bruce's Apologetics; or Christianity Defensively Stated (1892) . Of course, See also:defence easily passes into See also:counter-attack, as when See also:early apologists denounce Greek and Roman phase of See also:Platonism, however, was much more slowly adopted . The earlier apologists dispute the natural See also:immortality of the soul; See also:Athanasius himself, in De Incarnatione Dei, §§ 4, 5, tones down the teaching of See also:Wisdom; and the somewhat See also:eccentric writer See also:Arnobius, a layman—from See also:Justin See also:Martyr downwards apologetics has always been largely in the hands of laymen—stands for what has recently been called " conditional immortality "—eternal See also:life for the righteous, the See also:children of See also:God, alone . Allied with this more empiricist stand-point is the assertion that Greek See also:philosophy borrowed from See also:Moses; but in studying the Fathers we constantly find that groundless assertion uttered in the same breath with the dominant Idealist view, according to which Greek philosophy was due to incomplete revelation from the divine See also:Logos .

On purely defensive lines, early apologists rebut charges of See also:

cannibalism and sexual promiscuity; the Christians had to meet in See also:secret, and the See also:gossip of a rotten See also:age See also:drew See also:malignant conclusions . They make counter attacks on polytheism as a folly and on the shamefulness of obscene myths . Here they are in See also:line with non-Christian writers or culture-mockers like See also:Lucian of See also:Samosata; or graver See also:spirits like See also:Porphyry, who champions Neo-Platonism as a See also:rival to Christianity, and does See also:pioneer See also:work in criticism by attacks on some of the Old Testament books . Turning to Christian See also:evidence proper, we are struck with the continued prominence of the argument from prophecy . The Old Testament was an immense religious asset to the early church . Their enemies had nothing like it; and—the N.T. See also:canon being as yet but See also:half formed—the Old Testament was pushed into See also:notice by dwelling on this imperfect " argument," which See also:grew more extravagant as the partial See also:control exercised by Jewish learning disappeared . An argument from miracles is also urged, though with more reserve . Formally, every one in that age admitted the supernatural . The question was, whose supernatural ? And how far did it carry you ? See also:Miracle could not be to a 3rd See also:century writer what it was to W . See also:Paley—a conclusive and well-nigh solitary See also:proof .

Other apologies are by See also:

Aristides (recently recovered in See also:translation), See also:Athenagoras ("elegant "), See also:Eusebius of Caesarea, See also:Cyril of See also:Alexandria; in Latin by Minucius See also:Felix, See also:Tertullian (a masculine spirit and phrase-coiner like T . See also:Carlyle, if bitterer still), Lactantius Firmianus, &c., &c.' As Christianity wins the See also:day, a new objection is raised to it . The age is full of troubles; Christianity is ruining the See also:empire ! Besides notices elsewhere, we find the See also:charge specially dealt with by St See also:Augustine and his See also:friends . See also:Paulus See also:Orosius argues that the See also:world has always been a vale of tears . See also:Salvian contends that not the See also:acceptance of Christianity, but the sins of the See also:people are bringing trouble upon them; and he gives ugly evidence of the continued prevalence of See also:vice . Most impressive of all was Augustine's own contribution in The See also:City of God . See also:Powers created by worldliness and See also:sin are crumbling, as they well may; "the city of God remaigeth!" Whether he meant it so or not, the See also:saint's argument became a See also:programme and an apologia for the imperializing of the Western Church under the leadership of See also:Rome during the See also:middle ages . IV . Middle Ages.—From the point of view of apologetics, we may See also:mass together the See also:long stretch of See also:history which covers the See also:period between the disappearance and the re-See also:appearance of See also:free discussion . When emperors became converts, the church, so lately a victim and a pleader for See also:liberty, readily learned to persecute . Under such conditions there is little See also:scope for apologetics .

Force kills argument and drives doubt below the smooth See also:

surface of a nominal conformity . But there were two influences beyond the See also:bounds or beyond the See also:power of the christianized empire . The See also:Jew remained, as always, stubbornly unconvinced, and, as often, fond of slanders . Many of the See also:principal See also:medieval attempts in apologetics are directed chiefly against him, e.g. the Pugio Fidei of See also:Raymond See also:Martini (c . 128o), ' While these writings are of See also:great See also:historical value, they do not, of course, represent the Christian argument as conceived to-day . The Church of Rome prefers medieval or See also:modern statements of its position; Protestantism can use only modern statements.which became one of See also:Pascal's See also:sources (see V. below), or See also:Peter See also:Abelard's Dialogus inter Judaeum Philosophum et Christianum . And the Moslem came on the scenes bringing, as a See also:gift for Christendom, See also:fuller knowledge of classical, especially Aristotelian, texts . The See also:Jews, less bitterly opposed to Mahommedanism than the Christians were, caught See also:fire more rapidly, and in some cases served as an intermediate See also:link or channel of communication . These two religions anticipated the discussion of the problem of faith and See also:reason in the Christian church . According to the great See also:Avicenna and See also:Maimonides, faith and the highest reason are sure to coincide (see ARABIAN PHILOSOPHY) . According to Ghazali, in his Destruction of Philosophers, the various See also:schools of philosophy See also:cancel each other; reason is bankrupt; faith is 'everything . (So nearly Jehuda See also:Halevi.) According to See also:Averroes, reason suffices, and faith, with (what he considers) its dreams of immortality and the like, is useful only for the ignorant masses .

Christian theology, how-ever, strikes out a line of its own . Moslems and Jews were applying Aristotelian philosophy to rigorously monotheistic faiths; Christianity had been encouraged by Platonism in teaching a trinity of divine persons, and Platonism of a certain See also:

order long dominated the middle ages as See also:part of the Augustinian tradition . In sympathy with this Platonism, the medieval church began by assuming the entire mutual See also:harmony of faith and reason . Such is the teaching, along different lines, alike of St Anselm and of Abelard . But, when increased knowledge of See also:Aristotle's texts (and of the commentaries) led to the victory of a supposed Aristotelianism over a supposed Platonism, Albertus See also:Magnus, and his still more distinguished See also:pupil See also:Thomas See also:Aquinas, See also:mark certain doctrines as belonging to faith but not to reason . They adhere to the See also:general position with exceptions (in the See also:case of what had been considered Platonic doctrines) . From the point of view of philosophy, this was a See also:compromise . Faith and reason partly agree, partly diverge . The tendency of the later middle ages is to add to the number of the doctrines with which philosophy cannot See also:deal . Thomas's great rival, See also:Duns Scotus, does this to a large extent, at times affirming " two truths." The latter position, ascribed by the schoolmen to the Averroists, becomes dominant among the later Nominalists, See also:William of See also:Occam and his disciples, who withdraw all doctrines of faith from the See also:sphere of reason . This was a second and a more audacious compromise . It is not exactly an See also:attempt to See also:base Christian faith on rational See also:scepticism .

It is a consistent policy of harbouring inconsistencies in the same mind . A statement may be true in philosophy and false in theology, or vice versa . To the standpoint of Aquinas, however, the Church of Rome (at least in regard to the basis of See also:

doctrine) has more and more returned . The See also:councils of See also:Trent and of the Vatican mark the Two Truths See also:hypothesis as heretical, when they affirm that there is a natural knowledge of God and natural certainty of immortality . Along with this See also:affirmation, the Church of Rome (if less decisively) has adopted the limitations of the Thomist theory by the condemnation of " Ontologism "; certain mysterious doctrines are beyond reason . This cautious compromise sanctioned by the Church does not represent the extremes' reaction against See also:nominalism . Even in the nominalistic See also:epoch we have Raymond of Sabunde's Natural Theology (according to the See also:article in See also:Herzog-Hauck, not the See also:title of the See also:oldest See also:Paris MS., but found in later See also:MSS. and almost all the printed See also:editions) or See also:Liber Creaturarum (c . 1435) . The See also:book is not what moderns (schooled unconsciously in See also:post-See also:Reformation developments of Thomist ideas) expect under the name of natural theology . It is an attempt once more to demonstrate all scholastic dogmas out of the book of creation or on principles of natural reason . At many points it follows Anselm closely, and, of course, very often " makes See also:light work" of its task . The Thomist compromise—or even the more sceptical view of "two truths "—has the merit of giving filling of a See also:kind to the See also:formula "supernatural revelation "—mysteries inaccessible to reason, beyond See also:discovery and beyond comprehension .

According to earlier views—repeatedly revived in Protestantism —revelation is just philosophy over again . Can the choice be fairly stated ? If revelation is thought of as God's See also:

personal word, and redemption as his personal See also:deed, is it reasonable to view them either as open to a sort of scientific prediction or as capricious and unintelligible ? Even in the middle ages there were not wanting those—the St Victors, See also:Bonaventura—who sought to vindicate mystical if not moral redemption as the central thought of Christianity . V . Earlier Modern Period.—It will be seen that apologetics by no means reissued unchanged from the long period of authority . The compromise of Aquinas, though not unchallenged, holds the See also:field and that even with Protestants . G . W . See also:Leibnitz devotes an See also:introductory See also:chapter in his Thgodicge, 1710 (as against See also:Pierre See also:Bayle), to faith and reason . He is a See also:good enough Lutheran to quote as a "See also:mystery" the See also:Eucharist no less than the Trinity, while he insists that truths above are not against reason . Stated thus baldly, has the distinction any meaning ?

The more celebrated and central thesis of the book—this finite universe, the best of all such that are possible—also restates positions of Augustine and Aquinas . Before modern philosophy began its career, there was a great revival of See also:

ancient philosophy at the See also:Renaissance; sometimes See also:anti-Christian, sometimes pro-Christian . The latter furnishes apologies by Marsilio See also:Ficino, See also:Agostino See also:Steuco, J . L . See also:Vives . Early in the modern period occurs the great name of Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) . A staunch Roman Catholic, but belonging to a school of Augustinian enthusiasts (the Jansenists), whom the Church put down as heretics, he stands See also:pretty much apart from the general currents . His Pensges, published posthumously, seems to have been meant for a systematic See also:treatise, but it has come to us in fragments . Once again, a See also:lay apologist ! A layman's work may have the See also:advantage of originality or the See also:drawback of imperfect knowledge . Pascal's work exhibits both characters . It has the originality of rare See also:genius, but it borrows its material (as industrious editors have shown) from very few sources—the Pugio Fidei, M. de See also:Montaigne, P .

See also:

Charron . Ideas as well as learning are largely Montaigne's . The latter's cheerful See also:man-of-the-world scepticism is transfigured in Pascal to a deep distrust of human reason, in part, perhaps, from anti-See also:Protestant motives . But this attitude, while not without See also:parallels both earlier (Ghazali, Jehuda Halevi) and later (H . L . See also:Mansel), has peculiarities in Pascal . It is fallen man whom he pursues with his fierce scorn; his view of man's nature—See also:intellect as well as See also:character—is to be read in the light of his unflinching Augustinianism . Again, Pascal, unlike most apologists, belongs to the small See also:company of saintly souls . This philosophical sceptic is full of humble joy in salvation, of deep love for the Saviour . Another See also:French Roman Catholic apologist, P . D . See also:Huet (163o–1721)—within the conditions of his age a See also:prodigy of learning (in apologetics see his Demonstratio Evangelica)—is not uninfluenced by Pascal (Traitg de la faiblesse de l'esprit humaine) .

As we might expect, Protestant lands are more busily occupied with apologetics . Intolerant reliance upon force presents greater difficulties to them; soon it grows quite obsolete . See also:

Benedict See also:Spinoza, the eminent Jewish pantheist (1632-1677), to whom miracle is impossible, revelation a phrase, and who renews pioneer work in Old Testament criticism, finds at least a See also:fair measure of liberty and comfort in See also:Holland (his See also:birth-See also:land) . Bayle, the historical sceptic, lectured and published his learned Dictionnaire (1696) at See also:Rotterdam . From Holland, earlier, had proceeded an apologetic work by a man of See also:European fame . See also:Hugo See also:Grotius's De Veritate Christianae Religionis (1627) is partly the medieval tradition:—Oppose Mahommedans and Jews ! It is partly practical:—See also:Arm Christian sailors against religious danger ! But in its cool spirit it forecasts the coming age, whose See also:master is See also:John See also:Locke . His Reasonableness of Christianity (1695) is the thesis of " a whole century " of theologians . And his See also:Essay on the Human Understanding (1690) is almost a Bible to men of See also:education during the same period; its lightest word treasured . Locke does not break with the compromise of Aquinas . But he transfers See also:attention from contents to proof .

Reason proves that a revelation has been made—and then submits . Leibnitz has to supplement rather than correct Locke on this point . In such an See also:

atmosphere, See also:deism readily uttered its protest against mysterious revelation . Deism is, in fact, the Thomist natural theology (more clearly distinguished from dogmatic theology than in the middle ages, alike by Protestants and by the post-Tridentine Church of Rome) now dissolving See also:partnership with dogmatic and starting in business for itself . Or it is the doctrine of unfallen man's " natural See also:state "—a doctrine intensified in Protestantism—separating itself from the theologians' See also:grave doctrine of sin . If Socinianism had challenged natural theology—See also:Christ, according to it, was the See also:prophet who first revealed the way to eternal life—it had glorified the natural powers of man; and the learning of the Arminian divines (friends of Grotius and Locke) had helped to modernize Christian apologetics upon rational lines . Deism now taught that reason, or " the light of nature," was all-sufficient . Not to dwell upon earlier See also:continental " Deists " (mentioned by Viret as quoted first in Bayle's See also:Dictionary and again in the introduction to See also:Leland's View of the Deistical Writers), See also:Lord See also:Herbert of Cherbury (De Veritate, 1624; De See also:Religion Gentilium, 1645?—according to J . G . See also:Walch's Bibliotheca Theologica (1757) not published See also:complete until 1663) was universally understood as hinting conclusions hostile to Christianity (cf. also T . See also:Hobbes, See also:Leviathan, 1651, ch. xxxi.; Spinoza, Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, 167o, ch. xiv.) . Professedly, Herbert's contention merely is that non-Christians feeling after the " supreme God and the See also:law of righteousness must have a See also:chance of salvation .

Herbert was also epoch-making for the whole 18th century in teaching that priests had corrupted this See also:

primitive faith . During the 18th century deism spread widely, though its leaders were " irrepressible men like See also:Toland, men of mediocre culture and ability like See also:Anthony See also:Collins, vulgar men like See also:Chubb, irritated and disagreeable men like See also:Matthew See also:Tindal, who conformed that he might enjoy his See also:Oxford fellowship and wrote anonymously that he might relieve his See also:conscience " (A . M . See also:Fairbairn) . More distinguished sympathizers are See also:Edward See also:Gibbon, who has the deistic spirit, and See also:David See also:Hume, the historian and philosophical sceptic, who has at least the See also:letter of the deistic creed (Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion), and who uses Pascal's See also:appeal to " faith " in a spirit of mockery (Essay on Miracles) . In See also:France the new school found powerful speaking-trumpets, especially See also:Voltaire, the idol of his age—a great denier and scoffer, but always sincerely a believer in the God of reason—and the deeper but wilder spirit of J . J . See also:Rousseau . Others in France See also:developed still more startling conclusions from Locke's principles, E . B . See also:Condillac's See also:sensationalism—Locke's philosophy purged of its more ideal if less logical elements—leading on to See also:materialism in J . O. de la Mettrie; and at least one of the Encyclopedists (P .

H. von See also:

Holbach) capped materialism with confessed See also:atheism . In See also:Germany the parallel See also:movement of " See also:illumination " (H . S . See also:Reimarus; J . S . See also:Semler, pioneer in N.T. criticism; and a layman, the great See also:Lessing) took the See also:form of " See also:rationalism " within the church—interpreting Bible texts by See also:main force in a way which the age thought " enlightened " (H . E . G . Paulus, 1761–1851, &c.) . Among the innumerable See also:English anti-deistic writers (see W . Law, The Case of Reason; R . See also:Bentley, or " Phileleutherus Lipsiensis "; &c., &c.), three are of See also:chief importance .

Nathaniel See also:

Lardner (Arian, 1684–1768) stands in the front See also:rank of the scholarship of his See also:time, and uses his vast knowledge to maintain the genuineness of all books of the New Testament and the perfect accuracy of its history . See also:Joseph See also:Butler, a very See also:original, careful and honest thinker, lifts controversy with deists from details to principles in his See also:Analogy of Religion both Natural and Revealed to the Constitution and Course of Nature (1736) . This title introduces us to a new conception . Deists and orthodox in those days agreed in recognizing not merely natural theology but natural religion—" essential religion," Butler more than once styles it; the expression shows how near he stood intellectually to those he criticized . But morally he stood aloof . In part i.—on Natural Religion—he defends a moral or punishing Deity against the sentimental softness of the age . The God of Nature, whom deists confess, does punish in time, if they will but look at the facts; why not in eternity ? "Morality, as others have confessed, is " the nature of things "t Not the Being of God is discussed—Butler will not See also:waste words on triflers (as he thinks them) who deny that—but God's character . Unfortunately (perhaps) Butler prefers to argue on admitted principles; holds much of his own moral belief in reserve; tries to reduce everything to a question of probable fact . If this hampers him in part i., the situation appears still worse in part ii., which is directly occupied with the defence of Christianity . Butler says nothing about incomprehensible mysteries, and protests that reason is the only ground we have to proceed upon . But by treating the See also:atonement simply as revealed (and unexplained) See also:matter of fact—in spite of some partial analogies in human experience, a thing essentially anomalous—Butler repeats, and applies to the moral contents of Christianity, what Aquinas said of its speculative doctrines .

Phoenix-squares

(Whether one calls the unknowable a revealed mystery or an unexplained and in-explicable fact makes little difference.) William Paley (1743--1805) borrows from many writers; he borrows Lardner's learning and Butler's " particular evidence for Christianity," viz. miracles, prophecy and " history "; and he states his points with perfect clearness . No man ever filled a typical position more exactly than Paley . Eighteenth-century See also:

ethicsSee also:Hedonism, with a theological background . Empiricist Natural Theology—the argument from See also:Design . Christian Evidences—the strong See also:probability of the resurrection of Christ and the consequent authority of his teaching . Horae Paulinae—mutual confirmations of Acts and Epistles; better, though one-sided . When such exclusively " See also:external " arguments are urged, the contents of Christianity go for next to nothing . VI . Later Modern Period.—Towards the end of the 18th century a new epoch of reconstruction begins in the thought and life of See also:civilization . The See also:leader in speculative philosophy is Immanuel See also:Kant, though he includes many agnostic elements, and draws the inference (which some things in the letter of Butler might seem to See also:warrant) that the essence of Christianity is an ethical See also:theism . While he thus created a new and more ethical " rational-ism," Kant's many-sided See also: