|
APPERCEPTION ( See also: term used to describe the presentation of an See also: object on which See also: attention is fixed, in relation to the sum of consciousness previous to the presentation and the mind as a whole
.
The word was first used by Leibnitz, practically in the sense of the See also: modern Attention (q.v.), by which an object is apprehended as " not-self " and yet in relation to the self
.
In Kantian terminology apperception is (I) transcendental—the perception of an object as involving the consciousness of the pure self as subject, and (2) empirical,—the cognition of the self in its concrete existence
.
In (I) apperception is almost See also: equivalent to self-consciousness; the existence of the ego may be more or less prominent, but it is always involved
.
According to J
.
F
.
Herbart (q.v.) apperception is that See also: process by which an aggregate or " mass " of presentations becomes systematized (apperceptionssystem) by the accretion of new elements, either sense-given orproduct of the inner workings of the mind
.
He thus emphasizes in apperception the connexion with the self as resulting from the sum of antecedent experience
.
Hence in See also: education the teacher should fully acquaint himself with the See also: mental development of the pupil, in See also: order that he may make full use of what the pupil already knows
.
Apperception is thus a general term for all mental processes in which a presentation is brought into connexion with an already existent and systematized mental conception, and thereby is classified, explained or, in a word, understood; e.g. a new scientific phenomenon is explained in the See also: light of phenomena already analysed arid classified
.
The whole intelligent See also: life of See also: man is, consciously or unconsciously, a process of apperception, inasmuch as every See also: act of attention involves the appercipient process
.
See Karl See also: Lange, Ueber Apperception (6th ed. revised, See also: Leipzig, 1899; trans
.
E . E . See also: Brown,
See also: Boston, 1893); G
.
F
.
Stout, Analytic Psychology (See also: London, 1896), bk. ii. ch. viii., and in general text books of psychology; also PSYCHOLOGY
.
|
|
|
[back] APPENZELL |
[next] CHARLES JAMES APPERLEY (1777-1843) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.