Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:AQUEDUCT (See also:Lat. aqua, See also:water, and ducere, to See also:lead; Gr. apaymryeiov, apayeeywov, vlrovopos) , a See also:term properly including artificial See also:works of every See also:kind by means of which See also:water is conveyed from one See also:place to another, but generally used in a more limited sense . It is, in fact, rarely employed except in cases where the See also:work is of considerable magnitude and importance, and where the water flows naturally by See also:gravitation . The most important purpose for which aqueducts are constructed is that of conveying pure water, from See also:sources more or less distant, to large masses of See also:population . Aqueducts are either below ground, on the See also:surface, or raised on walls either solid or pierced with See also:arches; to the last the term is often confined in popular See also:language . The choice of method naturally depends on the See also:contour of the See also:country . I . See also:Ancient Aqueducts.—In See also:Egypt, Babylonia and See also:Assyria—See also:flat countries traversed by big See also:rivers and subject to floods—water was supplied by means of open canals with large basins . In See also:Persia devices of all kinds were adopted according to the nature of the country . In relation to the achievements of See also:Greece and See also:Rome, the Phoenicians are the most important among pre-classical See also:engineers . In See also:Cyprus water was supplied to temples by See also:rock-cut subterranean conduits carried across intervening valleys in siphons . Such conduits have been found near See also:Citium, See also:Amathus, &c . (See also:Cesnola, Cyprus, pp .
187, 341)
.
In See also:Syria the most striking of Phoenician waterworks is the well
of See also:Ras-el-See also:Ain near See also:Tyre, which consisted of four strong octagonal
towers through which rises to a height of r8 to 20 ft. the water
from four deep artesian See also:wells
.
The water thus accumulated was
carried off in conduits to reservoirs near the See also:shore, and thence in vessels or skins to the See also:island
.
The See also:aqueduct across to the island is, of course, of See also:Roman work
.
It is not possible in all cases to find a satisfactory date for the numerous conduits which have supplied See also:Jerusalem; some probably go back to the times of the See also:kings of See also:Judah
.
Jerusalem
.
The See also:principal See also:reservoir consists of the three Pools of
See also:Solomon which supplied the old aqueduct; the highest is about 20 ft. above the See also:middle one and 40 above the lowest
.
These pools collected the water from Ain Saleh and other springs, and sent it to the See also:city by two conduits
.
The higher of these—probably the older—was partly a rock-cut See also:canal, partly carried on See also:masonry; the See also:siphon-See also:pipe See also:system was adopted across the See also:lower ground near See also:Rachel's See also:Tomb, where the pipe (15 in. wide) is formed of large pierced stones embedded in See also:rubble masonry
.
The lower conduit is still See also:complete; it winds so much as to be altogether some 20 m. See also:long
.
Near the Birket-es-See also:Sultan it passes over the valley of Hinnom on nine See also:low arches and reaches the city on the See also:
It is interesting to See also:note in the See also:case of the underground, See also:tunnel which brought water from the Virgin's See also:Fountain to the See also:pool of Siloam, that the two See also:boring parties had no certain means of keeping the See also:line; there is See also:evidence that they had to make shafts to discover their position, and that ultimately the parties almost passed one another
.
Though the See also:direct distance is ttoo ft., the length of the conduit is over 1700 ft
.
See also:Perrot and Chipiez incline to attribute the Pools of Solomon to the 'Asmonaeans, followed by Roman See also:governors, whereas the earlier tunnels of the Kedron and Tyropeon valley may be Punic-Jewish (see also Palest
.
Explor
.
Fund Mem., " Jerusalem," pp
.
346-365)
.
Besides these conduits excavation has discovered traces of many other cisterns, tunnels and conduits of various kinds
.
Many of them point to periods of See also:great prosperity and See also:engineering enterprise which gave to the city a water-See also:supply far See also:superior to that which exists at See also:present
.
See the publications of the See also:Palestine Exploration Fund; A
.
S
.
See also: (Eng. trans., 1890), pp . 321 ff.; other authorities quoted under JERUSALEM . The earliest attempts in See also:Europe to solve the problems of water-supply were made by the Greeks, who perhaps derived their ideas from the Phoenicians . It has generally See also:Creek. been held, partly on the strength of a passage in See also:Strabo (v 3 . 8, p . 235), and partly owing to the See also:comparative unimportance of the remains discovered, that the See also:Greek works were altogether inferior to the Roman . See also:Research in the Greek towns of See also:Asia See also:Minor, together with a juster appreciation of the remains as a whole, must be held to modify this view . Among the earliest examples of Greek work are the tunnels or emissaria which drained See also:Lake Copais in See also:Boeotia; these, though not strictly aqueducts, were undoubtedly the precursors of such works, consisting as they did of subterranean tunnels (iirovo,uot) with See also:vertical shafts (*peariat), sixteen of which are still recognizable, the deepest being about 150 ft . They may be compared with that described by See also:Polybius as conveying water from See also:Taurus to Hecatompylos, and with numerous other remains in Asia Minor, Syria, . See also:Phoenicia and See also:Palmyra . Popular See also:legend ascribed them to See also:Cadmus, just as See also:Argos referred the See also:irrigation of its lands to Danaiis . They are undoubtedly of great antiquity . The insufficiency of water, supplied by natural springs and cisterns hewn in the rock, which in an See also:early See also:age had satisfied the small communities of Greece, had become a pressing public question by the See also:time of the Tyrants, of whom See also:Polycrates of See also:Samos and See also:Peisistratus of See also:Athens were distinguished for their See also:wisdom and enterprise in this respect . The former obtained the services of See also:Eupalinus, an engineer celebrated for the skill with which he had carried out the works for the water-supply of See also:Megara (see Athen . Mittheil. See also:xxv., L900, 23) under the direction of the See also:Tyrant Theagenes (c . 625 B.c.) . At Samos the difficulty See also:lay in a hill which See also:rose between the See also:town and the water source . Through this hill Eupalinus cut a tunnel 8 ft. broad, 8 ft. high Phoenician . and 4200 ft. long, See also:building within the tunnel a channel 3 ft. broad and II ells deep . The water, flowing by an accurately reckoned declivity, and all along open to the fresh See also:air, was received at the lower end by a conduit of masonry, and so led into the town, where it supplied fountains, pipes, See also:baths, cloacae, &c., and ultimately passed into the See also:harbour (See also:Herod. iii . 6o) . In Athens, under the See also:rule of the Peisistratids (c . 56o-510 B.C.), a similarly extensive, if less difficult, See also:series of works was completed to bring water from the neighbouring hills to supplement the inadequate supply from the springs . From See also:Hymettus were two conduits passing under the See also:bed of the Ilissus, most of the course being cut in the rock .
See also:Pentelicus, richer in water, supplied another conduit, which can still be traced from the See also:modern See also:village of Chalandri by the air shafts built several feet above the ground, and at a distance apart of 13o-16o ft.; the See also:diameter of these shafts is 4-5 ft., and the number of them still preserved is about sixty
.
Tributary channels conveyed into the See also:main stream the See also:waters of the See also:district through which it passed
.
Outside Athens, those two conduits met in a large reservoir, from which the water was distributed by a ramification of underground channels throughout the city
.
These latter channels vary in See also:form, being partly See also:round, partly square, and generally walled with See also: Buttigliara) of the Anapus (mod . Anapo); it carried the water up to the See also:top of Epipolae, where the channel was open, and thence down to the city and finally into the harbour . The other also ascends to the top of Epipolae, skirts the city on the See also:north, and then proceeds along the See also:coast . Its course is marked by rectangular shafts (spiragli) at the bottom of which water is still visible . An example of what appears to have been the earliest form of aqueduct in Greece was discovered in the island of See also:Cos beside the fountain Burinna (mod . Fountain of See also:Hippocrates) on See also:Mount Oromedon . It consists of a See also:bell-shaped chamber, built under-ground in the hill-See also:side, to receive the water of the See also:spring and keep it cool; a See also:shaft from the top of the chamber supplied fresh air . From this reservoir the water was led by a subterranean channel, 114 ft. long and 61 ft. high . (J . M . M.) In comparing Greek and Roman aqueducts, many writers have enlarged on the greatness of the latter as an example of Roman . Roman contempt for natural obstacles, or even of Roman See also:ignorance of the See also:laws of nature . Now, in the first place, the See also:Romans were not unacquainted with the See also:law that water finds its own level (see See also:Pliny, Hist . Nat. xxxi . 57, " subit altitudinem exortus sui "), and took full See also:advantage of it in the construction of lofty fountains and the supplying of the upper floors of houses . That they built aqueducts across valleys in preference to carrying pipes underground was due simply to See also:economy . Pipes had to be made of See also:lead which was weak, or of See also:bronze which was expensive; and the Romans were not sufficiently See also:expert in the casting of large pipes which would stand a very great pressure to employ them for the whole course of a great aqueduct . Secondly, the water was so extremely hard that it was important that the channels should be readily accessible for repair as well as for the detection of leak-age.l Moreover, as we shall see, the Roman aqueducts did not, in fact, preserve a straight Iine regardless of the configuration of the country . A striking example is the aqueduct of Nemausus (See also:Nimes), the springs of which are some to m. from the town, though the actual distance traversed is about 25 . Other devices, such as changing the level and then modifying the slope, and siphon arrangements of various kinds, were adopted (as in the aqueduct at See also:Aspendus) . Sextus See also:Julius See also:Frontinus, appointed See also:curator aquarum in A.D . 97, mentions in his See also:treatise de aquaeductibus urbis Romae (on the aqueducts of the city of Rome) nine aqueducts as being in use in his time (the lengths of the aqueducts as given here follow his measurements) . These are: (I) AQUA See also:APPIA, which took its rise between the 6th and 7th milestones of the Via Collatina, and measured from its source to the Porta Trigemina 11 Roman See also:miles, of which all but about 300 ft. were below ground . It appears to have been the first important enterprise of the kind at Rome, and was the work of the See also:censor Appius See also:Claudius Caecus, from whom it derived its name .
The date of its construction was 312 B.C
.
(2) ANIO VETUS, constructed in 272—269 B.C. by the censor Manius Curius See also:Dentatus
.
From its source near See also:Tivoli, on the See also:left side of the Anio, it flowed some 43 m.,2 of which only 'Too ft. was above ground
.
At the distance of 2 M. from Rome (Frontinus, i
.
21), it parted into two courses, one of which led to the horti Asiniani, and was thence distributed; while the other (rectus ductus) led by the See also:temple of See also:Spes to the Porta Esquilina
.
(3) AQUA MARCIA, reconstructed in 1869-187o under the name of Acqua Pia or Marcia-Pia after Pius IX
.
(though from Tivoli to Rome the modern aqueduct takes an entirely different course), rising on the left side of the Via See also:Valeria near the 36th milestone
.
It traversed 6i 4 m., of which 544 were underground, and for the remaining distance was carried partly on substructions and partly on arches
.
It was the work of the See also:praetor See also:Quintus Marcius Rex (144-140 B.C.), not of Ancus Marcius, the See also:fourth See also: (4) AQUA TEPULA, from its source (now known as Sorgente Preziosa) in the district of See also:Tusculum, to Rome, was some 11 m. in length . The first portion of its course must have been almost entirely subterranean and is not now traceable . For the last 62 m. it ran on the same series of arches that carried the Aqua Marcia, but at a higher level . It was the work of the censors Cn . Servilius See also:Caepio and L . See also:Cassius See also:Longinus, and was completed in the See also:year 125 B.C . Its water is warm (about 63 Fahr.) and not of the best quality . (5) The AQUA JULIA, from a source 2 M. from that of the Tepula, joined its course at the xoth milestone of the Via See also:Latina . The combined stream, after a distance of 4 m., was received in a reservoir, and then once more divided into two channels . The entire length of the Julia was 151 m . It was constructed in the year 33 B.C. by M . Vipsanius See also:Agrippa, who also built the (6) AQUA See also:VIRGO which, from its origin at a copious spring in a See also:marsh on the Via Collatina, measured 14 M. in length; it was conveyed in a channel, partly under and partly above ground . It was begun in the year 33 B.C. and was celebrated for the excellence of its waters . It was restored to use by Pius V. in 1570 . (7) AQUA ALSIETINA Or AUGUSTA, the source of which is the Lacus Alsietinus (mod . Lago di Martignano), to the north of Rome, was over 22 M. in length, of which 358 paces were on arches . It was the work of Augustus, probably with the See also:object of furnishing water for his naumachia (a basin for sham See also:sea-fights), and not for drinking purposes . Its course is 1 There have been found at Caerwent, in See also:Monmouthshire, clear traces of wooden pipes (See also:internal diameter about 2 in.) which must have carried drinking-water, and almost certainly a pressure supply from the surrounding hills . Some patches of lead also have been found obviously nailed on to the pipes at points where they had burst (see Archaeologia, 1908) . 2 This distance will not agree with the length given on some of the cippi (Lanciani, See also:Bull . See also:Corn., 1899, 38) . unknown, as no remains of it exist, but an inscription See also:relating to it is given in Notizie d . Scavi (1887), p . 182 . (8, 9) The AQUA CLAUDIA and ANIO Novus were two aqueducts begun by Caligula in A.D . 38 and completed by Claudius in A.D . 52 . The springs of the former belonged to the same See also:group as those of the Marc* and were situated near the 38th milestone of the Via Sublacensis, not far from its divergence from the Via Valeria, while the See also:original intake of the latter from the See also:river Anio was 4 M. farther along the same road . As the water was thick it was collected in a purifying tank, and 4 M. below, a See also:branch stream, the Rivus Herculaneus, was added to it . According to Frontinus, over to m. of the course of the Claudia and nearly 92 of that of the Anio Novus were above ground . Seven miles out of Rome they See also:united and ran from that point into Rome, following a natural See also:isthmus formed by a See also:lava stream from the See also:Alban See also:volcano, upon a line of arches, which still forms one of the most conspicuous features of the Campagna . The original inscription of Claudius (A.D . 52) on the Porta See also:Maggiore, by which the Aqua Claudia and Anio Novus crossed the Via See also:Praenestina and the Via See also:Labicana, gives the length of the Aqua Claudia as 45 m., and that of the Anio Novus as 62 m . Frontinus, on the other See also:hand, gives 46.4o6 m . (i.e. about 43 See also:English miles) and 58.700 m . (i.e. about 54 English miles) . Albertini (Melangesdel'EcoleFrancaise, 1906, 305) explains the difference as due to the fact that Frontinus was calculating the length of the Claudia from the farthest spring, the Fons Albudinus, and that of the Anio Novus from the new intake constructed by See also:Trajan in one of the three lakes constructed by See also:Nero for the adornment of his See also:villa above See also:Subiaco . Two other See also:inscriptions on the Porta Maggiore See also:record restorations by See also:Vespasian in A.D . 70, and by Titus in A.D . 80 . That the aqueducts should be spoken of as vetustate dila psi so soon after their construction is not a little surprising, and may be attributed either to hasty construction in See also:order to complete them by a fixed date, or to jobbery by the imperial freedmen who under Claudius were especially powerful, or to the fact that a line of arches intended originally in all See also:probability for the Aqua Claudia alone was made to carry the Anio Novus as well . The See also:size of the channels (specus) of the principal aqueducts varies considerably at different points of their course . The Anio Novus has the largest of them all, measuring 3 to 4 ft. wide and 9 ft. high to the top of the roof, which is pointed . They are lined with hard See also:cement (See also:opus signinum) containing fragments of broken See also:brick . Those aqueducts of which the most conspicuous remains exist in the neighbourhood of Rome are the four from the upper valley of the Anio, the two which took their supply and their name from the river itself, and the Marcia and the Claudia, which originated from the same group of springs, in the See also:floor of the Anio valley 6 m. below Subiaco . Those of the Anio Vetus, which travelled at a considerably lower level than the other three, are the least conspicuous, while the Claudia and Anio Novus as a rule kept See also:close together, the latter at the highest level of all . The ruins of See also:bridges and substructions iri the Anio valley down to Tivoli, though comparatively little known, are of great importance . In all the aqueducts the original construction of the bridges was in opus quadratum (masonry), while the substructions are in brick-faced See also:concrete; but the bridges are as a rule strengthened (and often several times) with See also:rein-forcing walls of concrete faced with opus reticulatum or. brick-work . Below Tivoli, where the Anio leaves its narrow valley, the aqueducts sweep round towards the Alban hills, and pass through some very difficult country between Tivoli and Gallicano, alternately See also:crossing ravines, some of which are as much as 300 ft. deep, and tunnelling through hills.' The engineering skill displayed is remarkable, and one wonders what See also:instruments were employed—probably the so-called chorobates, an improvement upon the See also:ordinary water-level (See also:Vitruvius viii . 6), though this would be slow and complicated . The See also:optical properties of See also:glass lenses were, however, unknown to ' The course of the Aqua Claudia was considerably shortened by the cutting of a tunnel 3 M. long under the See also:Monte Affliano in the time of See also:Domitian (T . See also:Ashby, in Papers of the See also:British School at Rome, iii, 133).the ancients, and the dioptra, or See also:angle measure, was considered by Vitruvius less trustworthy than the chorobates for the planning of aqueducts (cf . E . Hultsch, s.v. in Pauly-Wissowa, Realencyclopadie) . The aqueducts as a rule were carried on See also:separate bridges, though all four united at the See also:Ponte Lupo, a huge structure, which after the addition of all the four, and with the inclusion of all the later strengthening walls that were found necessary in course of time, See also:measures 105 ft. in height, 5o8 in length, and 46 in thickness at the bottom, without including the buttresses . From Gallicano onwards the course of these four aqueducts follows the lower slopes of the Alban Hills . Previous writers on the subject have been unable to determine their course, which is largely subterranean; but it can be followed step by step with the indications given by the presence of the calcareous See also:deposit which was thrown out at the putei or shafts (which were, as a rule, placed at intervals of 240 ft., as were the cippi) when the specus was cleaned; and remains of bridges, though less important, owing to the less difficult See also:character of the country, are not entirely absent (cf. the works by T . Ashby cited in bibliography) ? Near the 7th milestone of the Via Latina at Le Capanelle, the Aqua Claudia and Anio Novus emerge from their underground course, and run into Rome upon the long series of arches already mentioned, passing over the Porta Maggiore . The Claudia sent off an important branch from the Porta Maggiore over the Caelian to the See also:Palatine, but the main aqueduct soon reached its termination . A mile farther on the Aqua Marcia also, owing to the See also:gradual slope of the ground towards Rome, begins to be supported on arches, which were also used to carry the Aqua Tepula and the Aqua Julia (of the two latter, before their junction with the Marcia, no remains exist above ground, but inscribed cippi of the last named and its underground channel have been found at Le Capanelle, and cippi also close to its springs, which are a little way above See also:Grottaferrata at Gli Squarciarelli) . The Anio Vetus followed the same line, but kept underground (as was natural at the early See also:period at which it was constructed) until the immediate neighbourhood of Rome, near the locality known as "ad Spem veterem " (from a temple of Spes, of which no remains are known) close to the Porta Maggiore . At this point, besides the aqueducts named, the Aqua Appia, as we are told by Frontinus, entered the city, and received an important branch, the Appia Augusta . No remains of either have been discovered outside the city . The Aqua Alexandrina must also have entered the city here, though its channel, which lay at some See also:depth below ground, has not been discovered . Considerable remains of its brick aqueducts exist in the district between the Via Praenestina and the Via Labicana . Of the two aqueducts on the right See also:bank of the See also:Tiber, the Alsietina, as we have said, has no remains at all, while those of the Traiana are not of great importance . The line of the aqueducts was marked by cippi, inscribed (in the case of the Anio Vetus, Marcia, .Tepula, Julia and Virgo—those of the Claudia and Anio Novus are uninscribed, and those of the Traiana are differently worded) with the name of the aqueduct, the distance from the next See also:cippus (generally 240 ft.) and the number, counting from Rome (not from the springs) . These boundary stones were erected in pairs, to See also:mark off the See also:strip of See also:land 30 ft. in width reserved for the aqueduct, and for the road or path which generally followed it . The shafts (putei) often stood, but not necessarily, at the same points as the cippi . To these nine must be added the two following, constructed after Frontinus's time: (1o) AQUA TRAIANA, from springs to the north-west of the Lacus Sabatinus (Lago di See also:Bracciano), constructed by Trajan in A.D . 109, about 362 English miles in length .
It was restored by See also:Paul V. in 1611, who made use of and largely transformed the remains of the ancient aqueduct; he allowed some of the inferior water of the lake to flow into the channel, and it is thus no longer used for drinking
.
(II) AQUA ALEXANDRINA,
2 About 3 M. south-See also:east of this point the presence of large quantities of deposit and a sudden fall in the level of the channels seems to indicate the existence of settling tanks, of which no actual traces can be seen
.
rising about 14 English miles from Rome, between the Via Praenestina and the Via Labicana, the work of See also: To allow the water to purify itself before being distributed in the city, filtering and settling tanks (piscinae limariae) were built outside the walls . These piscinae were covered in with a vaulted roof, and were sometimes on a very large See also:scale, as in the example still preserved at See also:Fermo, which consists of two stories, each having three oblong basins communicating with each other; or the See also:Piscina Mirabilis at Baiae, which is covered in by a vaulted roof, supported on See also:forty-eight pillars and perforated to permit the See also:escape of foul air . Two stairs lead by forty steps to the bottom of the reservoir . In the middle of the basin is a sinking to collect the deposit of the water . The walls and pillars are coated with a See also:stucco so hard as to resist a See also:tool . The oversight of aqueducts was placed, in the times of the See also:republic, under the aediles, who were not, however, the constructors of them; of the four aqueducts built during this period, three are the work of censors, one (the Marcia) of a praetor . Under the See also:empire this task devolved on See also:special officials styled Curatores Aquarum, instituted by Augustus, who, as he himself says, " ri 'os aquarum omnium refecit " (inscription on the See also:arch by which the Aqua Marcia crossed the Via See also:Tiburtina) . (T . As.) Among the aqueducts outside See also:Italy, constructed in Roman times and existing still, the most remarkable are: (1) the aqueduct at Nimes (Nemausus), erected probably by Vipsanius Agrippa in the time of Augustus, which rose to 16o ft . The See also:Pont du See also:Gard, as this aqueduct is now called, consists of three tiers of arches across the valley of the river Gardon . In the lowest tier are six arches, of which one has a span of 75 ft., the others each 6o ft . In the second tier are eleven arches, each with a span of 75 ft . In the third tier are See also:thirty-five smaller arches which carried the specus . As a See also:bridge, the Pont du Gard has no See also:rival for lightness and boldness of See also:design among the existing remains of works of this class carried out in Roman times . (2) The aqueduct bridges at See also:Segovia (Merckel, Ingenieurtechnik, pp . 566-568), See also:Tarragona (ibid . 56; 566), and See also:Merida in See also:Spain, the former being 2400 ft. long, with 109 arches of See also:fine masonry, in two tiers, and reaching the height of 102 ft . The bridge at Tarragona is 876 ft. long and 83 ft. high . (3) At See also:Mainz are the ruins of an aqueduct 7000 yds. long, about See also:half of which is carried on from 500 to 600 pillars (Archaeological See also:Journal, xlvii., 1890, pp . 211-214) . This aqueduct was built by the XIVth See also:legion and was for the use of the See also:camp, not for the t |