|
ARISTOCRACY (Gr. apuvror, best; «paria, See also: rule of the best," a See also: form of See also: government variously defined and appreciated at different times and by different authorities
.
In See also: Greek See also: political philosophy, aristocracy is the government of those who most nearly attain to the ideal of human perfection
.
Thus See also: Plato in the Republic See also: advocates the rule of the " philosopher-See also: king " who, in the social scheme, is analogous to Reason in the intellectual, and alone is qualified to control the active principles, i.e. the fighting population and the artisans or workers
.
Aristocracy is thus the government by those who are
See also: superior both morally and intellectually, and, therefore, govern directly in the interests of the governed, as a See also: good See also: doctor See also: works for the good of his patient
.
See also: Aristotle classified good governments under three heads—monarchy, aristocracy and See also: commonwealth (lroXcreia), to which he opposed the three perverted forms—tyranny or See also: absolutism, oligarchy and democracy or See also: mob-rule
.
The distinction between aristocracy and oligarchy, which are both necessarily the rule of the few, is that whereas the few apcovoi will govern unselfishly, the oligarchs, being the few wealthy (" plutocracy " in See also: modern terminology), will allow their See also: personal interests to predominate
.
While Plato's aristocracy might be the rule of the wise and benevolent despot, Aristotle's is necessarily the rule of the few
.
Historically aristocracy develops from See also: primitive See also: monarchy by the gradual progressive See also: limitation of the See also: regal authority
.
This See also: process is effected primarily by the nobles who have hitherto formed the council of the king (an excellent example will be found in Athenian politics, see See also: ARCHON), whose triple prerogative—religious, military and judicial-is vested, e.g., in a magistracy of three
.
These are either members of the royal See also: house or the heads of See also: noble families, and are elected for See also: life or periodically by their peers, i.e. by the old royal council (cf. the See also: Areopagus at Athens, the Senate at See also: Rome), now the See also: sovereign power
.
In practice this council depends primarily on a See also: birth qualification, and thus has always been more or less inferior to the Aristotelian ideal; it is, by definition, an " oligarchy " of birth, and is recruited from the noble families, generally by the addition of emeritus magistrates
.
From the earliest times, therefore, the word "aristocracy " became practically synonymous with " oligarchy," and as such it is now generally used in opposition to democracy (which similarly took the place of Aristotle's 7roXcreia), in which the ultimate See also: sovereignty resides in the whole citizen See also: body
.
The aristocracy of which we know most in See also: ancient See also: Greece was that of Athens See also: prior to the reforms of See also: Cleisthenes, but all the Greek city-states passed through a See also: period of aristocratic or oligarchic government
.
Rome, between the regal and the imperial periods, was always more or less under the aristocratic government of the senate, in spite of the gradual growth of democratic institutions (the See also: Lat. optimates is the See also: equivalent of apurroc)
.
There is, however, one feature which distinguishes these aristocracies from those of modern states, namely, that they were all slave-owning
.
The See also: original relation of the slave-population, which in many cases outnumbered the See also: free citizens, cannot always be discovered
.
But in some cases we know that the slaves were the original inhabitants who had been overcome by an influx of racially different invaders (cf
.
See also: Sparta with its See also: Helots); in others they were captives taken in war
.
Hence even the most democratic states of antiquity were so far aristocratic that the larger proportion of the inhabitants had no See also: voice in the government
.
|
|
|
[back] ARISTOBULUS |
[next] ARISTODEMUS (8th century s.c.) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.