See also:ARISTOCRACY (Gr. apuvror, best; «paria, See also:government)
, etymologically, the " See also:rule of the best," a See also:form of See also:government variously defined and appreciated at different times and by different authorities
.
In See also:Greek See also:political See also:philosophy, See also:aristocracy is the government of those who most nearly attain to the ideal of human perfection
.
Thus See also:Plato in the See also:Republic See also:advocates the rule of the " philosopher-See also:- KING
- KING (O. Eng. cyning, abbreviated into cyng, cing; cf. O. H. G. chun- kuning, chun- kunig, M.H.G. kiinic, kiinec, kiinc, Mod. Ger. Konig, O. Norse konungr, kongr, Swed. konung, kung)
- KING [OF OCKHAM], PETER KING, 1ST BARON (1669-1734)
- KING, CHARLES WILLIAM (1818-1888)
- KING, CLARENCE (1842–1901)
- KING, EDWARD (1612–1637)
- KING, EDWARD (1829–1910)
- KING, HENRY (1591-1669)
- KING, RUFUS (1755–1827)
- KING, THOMAS (1730–1805)
- KING, WILLIAM (1650-1729)
- KING, WILLIAM (1663–1712)
king " who, in the social See also:- SCHEME (Lat. schema, Gr. oxfjya, figure, form, from the root axe, seen in exeiv, to have, hold, to be of such shape, form, &c.)
scheme, is analogous to See also:Reason in the intellectual, and alone is qualified to See also:control the active principles, i.e. the fighting See also:population and the artisans or workers
.
Aristocracy is thus the government by those who are See also:superior both morally and intellectually, and, therefore, govern directly in the interests of the governed, as a See also:good See also:doctor See also:works for the good of his patient
.
See also:Aristotle classified good governments under three heads—See also:monarchy, aristocracy and See also:commonwealth (lroXcreia), to which he opposed the three perverted forms—tyranny or See also:absolutism, See also:oligarchy and See also:democracy or See also:mob-rule
.
The distinction between aristocracy and oligarchy, which are both necessarily the rule of the few, is that whereas the few apcovoi will govern unselfishly, the oligarchs, being the few wealthy (" See also:plutocracy " in See also:modern terminology), will allow their See also:personal interests to predominate
.
While Plato's aristocracy might be the rule of the See also:wise and benevolent See also:despot, Aristotle's is necessarily the rule of the few
.
Historically aristocracy develops from See also:primitive monarchy by the See also:gradual progressive See also:limitation of the See also:regal authority
.
This See also:process is effected primarily by the nobles who have hitherto formed the See also:council of the king (an excellent example will be found in Athenian politics, see See also:ARCHON), whose triple See also:prerogative—religious, military and judicial-is vested, e.g., in a magistracy of three
.
These are either members of the royal See also:house or the heads of See also:noble families, and are elected for See also:life or periodically by their peers, i.e. by the old royal council (cf. the See also:Areopagus at See also:Athens, the See also:Senate at See also:Rome), now the See also:sovereign See also:power
.
In practice this council depends primarily on a See also:birth qualification, and thus has always been more or less inferior to the Aristotelian ideal; it is, by See also:definition, an " oligarchy " of birth, and is recruited from the noble families, generally by the addition of See also:emeritus magistrates
.
From the earliest times, therefore, the word "aristocracy " became practically synonymous with " oligarchy," and as such it is now generally used in opposition to democracy (which similarly took the See also:place of Aristotle's 7roXcreia), in which the ultimate See also:sovereignty resides in the whole See also:citizen See also:body
.
The aristocracy of which we know most in See also:ancient See also:Greece was that of Athens See also:prior to the reforms of See also:Cleisthenes, but all the Greek See also:city-states passed through a See also:period of aristocratic or oligarchic government
.
Rome, between the regal and the imperial periods, was always more or less under the aristocratic government of the senate, in spite of the gradual growth of democratic institutions (the See also:Lat. optimates is the See also:equivalent of apurroc)
.
There is, however, one feature which distinguishes these aristocracies from those of modern states, namely, that they were all slave-owning
.
The See also:original relation of the slave-population, which in many cases outnumbered the See also:free citizens, cannot always be discovered
.
But in some cases we know that the slaves were the original inhabitants who had been overcome by an influx of racially different invaders (cf
.
See also:Sparta with its See also:Helots); in others they were captives taken in See also:war
.
Hence even the most democratic states of antiquity were so far aristocratic that the larger proportion of the inhabitants had no See also:voice in the government
.
End of Article: