Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
ARMS AND See also:ARMOUR (See also:Lat. arma, from the See also:Aryan See also:root ar, to join or See also:fit; cf. Gr. &ppbs, See also:joint; the See also:form armour, from Lat. armatura, should strictly be armure) . Under this heading are included weapons of offence (See also:army) and defensive equipment (See also:armour) . The See also:history of the development of arms and armour begins with that of the human See also:race; indeed, combined with domestic implements, the most See also:primitive weapons which have been found constitute the most important; if not the only, tangible See also:evidence on which the history of primitive See also:man is based . It is largely from the materials and characteristics of the weapons and utensils found in caves, tombs and various strata of the See also:earth's crust, coupled with See also:geological considerations, that the ethnological and See also:chronological classifications of prehistoric man have been deduced . For a detailed See also:account of this See also:classification and the evidence see See also:ARCHAEOLOGY; See also:BRONZE See also:AGE; See also:FLINT IMPLEMENTS, &e., and articles on See also:special weapons . Offensive weapons may be classified roughly, according to their shape (i.e. the See also:kind of See also:blow or See also:wound which they are intended ctasslf!- to inflict), and the way in which they are used, as cation . follows:—(1) Arms which are wielded by See also:hand at See also:close quarters . These are subdivided into (a) cleaving weapons, e.g. axes; (b) crushing, e.g. clubs, maces and all See also:hammer-like arms; (c) thrusting, e.g. pointed swords and daggers; (d) cutting, e.g. sabres (such weapons frequently combine both the cut and the thrust, e.g. swords with both edge and point); (e) those weapons represented by the See also:spear, See also:lance, See also:pike, &c., which See also:deal a thrusting blow but are distinguished from (c) by their greater length . (2) Purely missile weapons, e.g. darts, javelins and spears . Frequently these weapons are used also at close quarters as thrusting weapons; the typical example of these is the See also:medium-length spear of not more than about 6 ft. in length . (3) Arms which See also:discharge missiles, e.g. bows, catapults and See also:fire-arms generally . (See See also:ARCHERY and See also:section Fire-arms below.) The weapons in (2) and (3) are designed to avoid hand-to-hand fighting .
Weapons are also classified in a variety of other ways
.
Thus we have small-arms, i.e. all weapons in classes (1) and (2) with those in (3) which do not require carriages
.
See also:Side-arms are those which, when not in use, are worn at the side, e.g. daggers, swords, bayonets
.
Armes blanches is a See also:term used for offensive weapons of See also:iron and See also:steel which are used at close quarters
.
Defensive armour consists of See also:body armour, protections for the See also:head and the limbs, and various types of See also:shield
.
1
.
See also:
Later on we find polished implements (See also:Neolithic) progressively more elaborate in See also:design and workmanship, such as socketed stones with wooden handles and knives or daggers of flaked flint with handles
.
Besides flint the commonest materials are See also:diorite, greenstone, See also:serpentine and indurated See also:clay-See also:slate; there are also weapons of See also:horn and See also:bone (daggers and spear-heads)
.
Spear-heads and arrow-points (See also:leaf-shaped, See also:lozenge-shaped, tanged and triangular) were chipped in flint with such skill as to be little inferior to their See also:metal successors
.
They have accurately flaked barbs and tangs, and in some cases their edges are minutely chipped
.
The heads appear to have been fastened to the shafts by See also:vegetable fibre and See also:bitumen
.
See also:Knife-daggers of flint, though practically of one single type, exhibit much variety of form
.
They vary in See also:size also, but seldom exceed 12 in. in length
.
They are sometimes obtuse-edged like a scraping-See also:tool, sometimes delicately chipped to a straight edge, while the flakes are so regularly removed from the See also:convex See also:part of the blade as to give a wavy See also:surface, and the corners of the handle are delicately crimped
.
The daggers attain their highest perfection in the See also:short, leaf-shaped form,—the precursor of the leaf-shaped See also:sword which is peculiarly characteristic di the Bronze Age,—and, the curved knives found especially in See also:Great See also:Britain and See also:Russia, and also in See also:Egypt
.
The precise See also:object of the sharpening of both convex and See also:con-
See also:cave edges in the curved variety is not clear
.
There have also been found See also:sling-stones, and, in See also:Scotland and See also:Ireland, balls of stone with their " surfaces divided into a number of more or less projecting circles with channels between them.” These latter, See also:Sir See also: Of defensive armour of stone there is none . The only approximation is to be found in the small rectangular plates of slate, &c., perforated with holes at the corners, which are supposed to have been See also:bound on to the See also:arm to protect it from the recoil of the See also:bow-See also:string . Similar wristlets or bracers are in use among the Eskimos (of bone) and in See also:India (of See also:ivory) . These plates measure generally about 4 in. by 11 in . 2 . Bronze Age.—It is impossible to assign any date as the beginning, of the Bronze Age; indeed, archaeology has shown that the See also:adoption of metal for weapons was very See also:gradual . Tie stone weapon perseveres alongside the bronze, and there exist stone axes which, by their shape, suggest that they have been copied from metal axes . In the earliest interments in which the weapons deposited with the dead are of other materials than stone, a See also:peculiar form of bronze See also:dagger occurs . It consists of a well-finished, thin, knife-like blade, usually about 6 in. in length, broad at the hilt and tapering to the point, and attached to the handle by massive rivets of bronze . It has been found associated with stone cells; both of the roughly chipped and the highly polished kind, showing that these had not been entirely disused when bronze became available . A later type of bronze dagger is a broad, heavy, curved weapon, usually from 9 to 15 in. in length; with massive rivets for See also:attachment to an equally massive handle . The leaf-shaped sword, however, is the characteristic weapon of the Bronze Age . It is found all over Europe, from See also:Lapland to the Mediterranean . No warlike weapon of any See also:period is more graceful in form or more beautifully finished . The finish seems to have been given in the See also:mould without the aid of hammer or See also:file, the edge being formed by suddenly reducing the thickness of the metal, so as to produce a narrow border of extreme thinness along Dagger . both sides of the blade from hilt to point . The handle-See also:plate and blade were See also:cast in one piece, and the handle itself was formed by side plates of bone, horn or See also:wood, riveted through the handle-plates . There was no guard, and the weapon, though short, was well balanced, but more fitted for stabbing and thrusting than for cutting with the edge . The Scandinavian variety is not so decidedly leaf-shaped, and is longer and heavier than the See also:common See also:British form; and instead of a handle-plate, it was furnished with a tang on which a See also:round, See also:flat-topped handle was fastened, like that of the See also:modern Highland See also:dirk, sometimes surmounted by a See also:crescent-like See also:ornament of bronze . A narrow, See also:rapier-shaped variety, tapering from hilt to point, was made without a handle-plate, and attached to the hilt by rivets like the bronze daggers already mentioned . This form is more common in the British Isles than in Scandinavia, and is most abundant in Ireland . The spear-heads of the Bronze Age See also:present a considerable variety of form, though the leaf-shaped predominates, and barbed examples are extremely rare . Some British weapons of this form occasion-ally reach a length of 27 in . The larger varieties are often beautifully designed, having segmental openings on both sides of the central See also:ridge of the blade, and elaborately ornamented with See also:chevron patterns of chased or inlaid See also:work both on the socket and blade . Arrow-points are much rarer in bronze than in flint . ' In all See also:probability the flint arrow-point (which was equally effective and much more easily replaced when lost) continued to be used throughout the Bronze Age . See also:Shields of bronze, circular, with hammered-up bosses, concentric ridges and rows of studs, were held in the hand by a central handle underneath the See also:boss . The transition period between the Bronze and Iron Ages in central Europe is well defined by the occurrence of iron swords, which are simple copies of the leaf-shaped weapon, sometimes with flat handle-plate of bronze . These have been found associated with articles assigned to the 3rd or 4th See also:century B.C . An important distinction between the characteristic bronze swords peculiar to See also:southern peoples and the swords both of iron and of bronze found together in the See also:Hallstatt cemeteries Hallstatt (in the Salzkarnmergut, See also:Austria, See also:ancient See also:Noricum) is weapons . that whereas the former invariably have short handles (2; to 21 in.), the latter are provided with handles from 3 to 32 in. See also:long, terminating in a round or See also:oval See also:pommel; the grip of one of the bronze swords even reaches a length of 4 in . The hilts are decorated with ivory, See also:amber, wood, bronze, horn, and the decoration of blade and See also:scabbard is often elaborate . The length of these swords is sometimes as much as 30 to 33 in . Again at La Tene on See also:Lake See also:Neuchatel iron swords have been found to the number of one See also:hundred, with handles of 4 to 71 in. long and a See also:total length varying from 30 to 38 in . Similar remains have been found in See also:France at See also:Bibracte and See also:Alesia, and even in Ireland (cf . See also:Munro, The Lake-dwellings of Europe, pp .
282, 383)
.
The occurrence at Hallstatt of bronze swords together with iron, having the characteristic long handle, has led to the hypo-thesis that the See also:graves are those of an immigrant (probably See also:Celtic) See also:people of See also:northern extraction which had conquered and overlaid a smaller-framed Bronze Age people, and had introduced the use of iron while continuing to use the bronze of their predecessors with the necessary modifications
.
This theory derived from tangible remains is corroborated by See also:literary evidence
.
Thus See also:Polybius (ii
.
33, iii
.
114) describes the Celtic peoples as fighting with a long pointless iron sword, which easily See also:bent and was in any See also:case too large to be used easily in a melee
.
The graves at Hallstatt yielded in addition to these important swords a much larger number of spears
.
Of these two only were of bronze, the head of the larger being 71 in. long
.
The much more numerous iron heads range up to as much as 2 ft. in length, and are all fastened to the See also:shaft by rivets
.
All the arrow-headsfound are of bronze, while of the axes the great See also:majority are of iron; a few have iron edges fitted in a See also:bed of bronze
.
These examples are sufficient to show that the transition from bronze to iron was very slow
.
The fact that they were found in a See also:district which is known to have been directly in the See also:line of See also: See Sir John Evans, Ancient Stone Implements tend. ed,, 1897), Bronze Implements; W . Ridgeway, See also:Early Age of See also:Greece; and See also:works quoted under ARCHAEOLOGY . 3 . Early See also:Greek Weapons,—The See also:character of the weapons used by the early peoples of the See also:Aegean in the periods known as Minoan, Mycenaean and Homeric is a problem which has given rise of See also:recent years to much discussion . The Mycenaean controversy is an important part of the Homeric an :merle. question as a whole, and the various theories of the weapons used in the Trojan See also:War See also:hinge on wider theories as to the date and authorship of the Homeric poems . One widely accepted See also:hypothesis, based on the important monograph by Dr Wolfgang Reichel, UberhomerischeWaffen . Archaologische Untersuchungen (See also:Vienna, 1894), is that the Homeric heroes, like those who created the See also:civilization known as Mycenaean, had no defensive armour except the Mycenaean shield, and used weapons of bronze . This view is derived to a great extent from the Homeric poems them-selves, in which the metal most frequently mentioned is xa)vcos (bronze), and involves the See also:assumption that all passages which describe the use of corslets, breastplates, small shields and See also:greaves are later interpolations . It is maintained on the other hand (e.g. by Prof . W . Ridgeway, Early Age of Greece, i. See also:chap . 3), that the Homeric See also:Achaeans (whom he regards as the descendants of the central See also:European peoples, the makers of the Hallstatt iron swords) were far advanced into the Iron Age, and that the use of bronze weapons is merely another instance of the fact that the introduction of a new See also:element does not necessarily banish the older . This theory would See also:separate the Homeric from the Mycenaean altogether, and is part of a much more comprehensive ethnological hypothesis . According to another hypothesis, the Homeric poems are true descriptions of a single age, or, in other words, the weapons of the Homeric age were far more diverse and elaborate than is supposed by Reichel . Very few traces of iron have been found in the Mycenaean settlements, nor have any examples of body armour been found except the ceremonial See also:gold breastplates at See also:Mycenae . The Mycenaean soldiers carried apparently a bronze spear, a bronze sword and a bow and arrows . The arrow-heads are first of See also:obsidian and later of bronze . It would appear that only the chief warriors used spear and shield, while the majority fought with bows . The swords found at Mycenae are two-edged, of rigid bronze, and as long as 3 ft. or even more; from representations of battles it would seem that they were perhaps used for thrusting mainly . They are highly ornamented and some have hilts of wood, bone or ivory, or even gold mounting . Later swords became shorter and of a type like that of early iron swords found in Greece; Moreover in a few cases there have been found in pre-Mycenaean (See also:late Minoan III.) tombs a few examples of short iron swords together with bronze remains . All Mycenaean spears are of bronze and, apparently, their shafts, unlike the Homeric, had no See also:butt-piece . In the See also:absence of any metal helmets in the tombs we may perhaps assume that the Mycenaean See also:helmet was a See also:leather cap, possibly strengthened with tusks, such as appears in See also:Homer (Iliad, x.) also . The Mycenaean shield (generally, perhaps, made of leather) has given rise to much controversy, which hinges largely on the See also:interpretation of the evidence provided by the See also:representation on the See also:Warrior See also:Vase and the Painted See also:Stele from Mycenae and pottery found at See also:Tiryns .
See also:Professor Ridgeway regards these as describing See also:post-Mycenaean conditions, and maintains that the true Mycenaean shield was always long (from See also:neck to feet), and that it was either in the form of a figure-of-eight targe, or rectangular and sometimes incurved like the section of a See also:cylinder; whereas the Homeric shield was round (e.g
.
KwKX67-Epos, €v,weXOS, &c.)
.
Dr Reichel's followers believe that the Homeric shield was long ("like a See also:tower") and
incurved in the centre like the Mycenaean, that Homer knew nothing of the small round shield, and that the epithets implying roundness used in the poems are to be explained as meaning " well-balanced " or as late interpolations
.
On the whole we must conclude that the Mycenaean age is by no means a single homogeneous whole (see AEGEAN CIVILIZATION), and that the weapons are not exclusively of bronze, nor of any single type
.
The Homeric warrior in full armour, according to the Homeric poems, wore: (I) shield (&Oafs, o'aKOS), (2) greaves (KV77µtSES), (3) See also:band (N,ua), (4) See also:belt (("worilp)and See also:mitre, (5) See also:tunic (Xcruw), (6) helmet (KOpis), (7) breastplate (Bwprl ), (8) sword (ti os)
.
The Xacvijiov was a See also:protection worn by the archers in See also:place of a shield
.
According to the usual view, the Homeric shield was, as we have seen, bent in about See also:half way up each side (in the form of a figure-of-eight) to give freedom to the arms, and large enough to protect the whole body
.
The two curves were held rigid by two wooden (probably) staves inside
.
It was composed of layers of ox-hide overlaid with bronze, forming a boss in the centre, and sometimes had studs upon it
.
Reichel's view is that it was the See also:weight of these huge shields which led to the use of the See also:chariot as a means of going rapidly from one part of the See also:
On the other hand Mycenaean bronze greaves have been found at Enkomi (See also:Cyprus) and at Glassinatz (Glasinac), and therefore it is not necessary, following Reichel, to cut out Homer's references to the " bronze-greaved " Achaeans (Iliad, vii
.
41), a phrase which has been taken as evidence for regarding the passage as See also:spurious
.
The See also:tin greaves of See also:Achilles are obviously exceptional
.
The thorex again is the subject of controversy
.
Reichel, arguing that the great shield rendered any breastplate unnecessary, regarded the word as a See also:general term for body clothing, but Ridgeway strongly maintains the older theory that it was a bronze breastplate, and See also:Andrew See also:Lang points out that, on Reichel's theory, a word which originally meant the " See also:breast " was transferred to mean " See also:loin-See also:cloth " (which, to See also:judge from the See also:artistic representations, was all that the Mycenaean warrior wore), and subsequently in historic times returned to its natural use for the breastplate—a most unlikely See also:evolution
.
The passages in Homer which describe it as a breastplate are regarded by Reichel's school as later interpolations
.
See also: The sword has already been mentioned . Ridgeway, in spite of the almost invariable mention of bronze as the material of the Homeric weapons, believes that it was generally .of iron, but, while the presence of iron in the Homeric age is admitted in the case of implements, it is generally held that weapons were all of bronze . Except for one arrow-head (Iliad, iv . 123), and the See also:mace of Areithoiis, mentioned as a unique example by See also:Nestor (Iliad, vii . 141), no reference to an iron weapon proper occurs in the Homeric poems . 13ut the sword was used only when the favourite spear or See also:javelin had failed to decide the contest . It must be admitted that the problem of pre-Homeric armour and Homeric armour must always be largely a matter of inference, based on a See also:comparative study of the evidence literary and archaeological . Unless we are prepared to adopt the theory that the Homeric poems consist of a See also:mosaic of See also:interpolation informed by an archaizing editor, we must assume that they describe a single period of transition intermediate between the Mycenaean See also:prime and the See also:dawn of history proper . In this case we shall believe that the Homeric warrior has so far adapted to changing conditions the simple appliances of the Mycenaean that he has evolved a feeble corslet with See also:minor pieces of body armour, while retaining the big See also:double-bellied shield as a protection against the arrows which are still the chief weapon of the See also:rank and file and are even used on occasion by the chiefs . If we further believe that the iron at his disposal was similar to that used by the Celts of Polybius, it is natural to believe also that he preferred the harder bronze for his weapons, though iron was common for domestic and other implements . On early Greek arms in general see, besides Reichel and Ridgeway op. cit.: A . Lang, Homer and his Age (See also:London, 1906; and criticisms in Classical See also:Review, See also:February 1907); G . G . A . Murray, The Rise of the Greek Epic (See also:Oxford, 1907), chap. vi,; R . M . Burrows, Discoveries in See also:Crete (2nd ed., London, 1907); Leaf and Bayfield, Iliad, i.–xii . Appendix A (follows Reichel) ; W . Helbig, Homerische Epos (1884 and 1899), and La Question mycenienne (1896); C . See also:Robert, Studien zur Ilias (See also:Berlin, 1901); Chr . Tsountas and J . I . Manatt, The Mycenaean Age (1897); V . See also:Berard, See also:Les Pheniciens et l'Odyssee (See also:Paris, 1902) ; Cauer, Grundfrager d . Homerkritik (See also:Leipzig, 1895) ; much valuable discussion will be found in articles in Journ . See also:Hell, See also:Stud., Classical Rev. and Journ. of Anthropol . Instit . ; see also See also:editions of Iliad and Odyssey (espec . D . B . See also:Monro), and works quoted under AEGEAN CIVILIZATION; HOMER; MYCENAE . 4 . Greek, See also:Historical.—The equipment does not differ generic-ally from that described in the Homeric poems, except when we come to the reforms of the Macedonians . The hoplites, who formed the See also:main army, wore helmet, body armour, greaves and shield, and fought with pike and sword . The helmets were (1) the Corinthian, which covered the See also:face to the See also:chin, with slits for the eyes, and often had no plume or See also:crest; (2) the Athenian, which did not See also:cover the face (though sometimes it had cheek-plates which could be turned up if necessary), had crests, some-times triple, with plumes of feathers, horsehair or leather; (3) a steel cap (See also:ram) without crest, plumes or cheek-plates . The last seems to have been most common in the Spartan army . The body armour consisted of breast and back plates fastened together by thongs or straps and buckles; sometimes poverty compelled a man to be content with a leather See also:jerkin (OaoXas). partly strengthened by metal plates, or even a quilted See also:linen or stuffed shirt . Greaves were.of pliant bronze fastened at the back above the See also:ankle and below the knee . Shields were of the small round or oval type, adapted to the new conditions in which the bow and arrow had given place to hand-to-hand fighting . They were held by means of two handles (6xava), the See also:left hand being thrust through the first and grasping the second . In the 5th and 4th centuries the shield See also:bore a See also:device or initial representing the See also:state and also the individual's own crest . The hoplite's pike, about 8 ft. long, unlike the Homeric weapon, was hardly ever thrown . In the Macedonian See also:phalanx a pike (ae.pcosra), certainly 18 ft., and perhaps later in the 3rd and 2nd centuries even 24 ft. long, was introduced . The sword was straight, See also:sharp-pointed, short, sometimes less than zo in., and rarely more than 2 ft. long . It was double-edged and used for both cut and thrust . A less common type was the s6. acpa or curved sabre used by the Spartans, with one sharp edge . The hoplite had no other offensive weapons . The See also:cavalry were heavy-armed like the hoplites except that they carried a smaller shield, or, more usually, none at all . They were armed with a lance which they wielded freely (i.e. not " in See also:rest ") and occasionally threw . The Macedonian cavalry had a o•icpu r ra . The See also:light-armed (yuµvi rec, tiGcXoi.) were (I) &See also:Kovno-See also:rat, armed with a javelin (3 to 5 ft. long) and a small shield; (z) ro orat, archers; and (3) vOEVSovilrac, slingers, whose missiles were balls of See also:lead, stones and hardened clay pellets . Between the heavy and the light armed were the peltasts . The pelta, from which they took the name, was a light shield or See also:target, made of skin or leather on a wooden or wickerwork See also:frame . The Athenian See also:Iphicrates armed them with linen corslet and a larger spear and sword than those of the hoplites; he also invented a new footgear (called after him iphicratules) to replace the older greaves . 5 . See also:Roman.—The equipment of the Roman soldier, like the organization of the army (see ROMAN ARMY), passed through a great number of changes, and it is quite impossible to summarize it as a single subject . In the period of the See also:kings the See also:legion was the old Greek phalanx with Greek armour; the front ranks wore the Greek See also:panoply and fought with long spears and the circular Argolic shield . The early Roman sword, like that of the Greeks, Egyptians and Etruscans, was of bronze . We have no See also:direct statement as to its form, but in all probability it was of the See also:ordinary leaf-shape . We gather from the monuments that, in the 1st century B.C., the Roman sword was short, worn on the right side (except by See also:officers, who carried no shield), suspended from a See also:shoulder-belt (balteus) or a See also:waist-belt (cingutum), and reaching from the hollow of the back to the See also:middle of the thigh, thus representing a length of from 22 in. to 2 ft . The blade was straight, double-edged, obtusely-pointed . On the See also:Trajan See also:column (A.D . 114) it is considerably longer, and under the See also:Flavian emperors the long, single-edged spatha appears frequently along with the short sword . The second period ending with the Punic See also:wars witnessed a See also:change . The hastati and the principes are both heavily armed, but the round shield has given way to the oblong (scutum), except for one-third of the hastati who bore only the spear and the light javelin (gaesa) . The third period—that described by Polybius—is characterized by greater complexity of armour, due no doubt in part to the experience gained in conflicts with a wider range of peoples, and in part to the assimilation of the methods peculiar to the new See also:Italian See also:allies . Thus we find the skirmishers (velites) armed with a light javelin 3 ft. long and 1 in. thick, with an iron point g in. long; this point was so fragile that it was rendered useless by the first cast . For See also:defence they wore a hide-covered headpiece and a round buckler 3 ft. in See also:diameter . The heavy-armed carried a scutum formed of two boards glued together, covered with See also:canvas and skin, and incurved into the shape of a half-cylinder; its upper and lower edges were strengthened with iron rims and its centre with a boss (umbo) . A greave was worn on the right leg, and the helmet was of bronze with a crest of three feathers . The wealthier soldiers wore the full See also:cuirass of See also:chain armour (lorica), the poorer a See also:brass plate 9 in. square . For offence they carried a sword and two javelins . The former was the See also:Spanish weapon, straight, double-edged and pointed, for both thrust and cut, in place of the old Greek sword . The characteristic weapon, however, was the pilum (Gr. boo-6s) . The form of this weapon and the mode of using it have been minutely described by Polybius (vi . 23), but his description has been much misunderstood in consequence of the rarity of representations or remains of the pilum . It is shown on a See also:monument of St Remy, in See also:Provence, assigned to the age of the first emperors, and in a bas-See also:relief at See also:Mainz, on the See also:grave-stone of See also:Quintus Petilius See also:Secundus, a soldier of the 15th legion . A specimen of the actual weapon is in the museum at See also:Wiesbaden . It is a javelin with a stout iron head (9 in.), carried on an iron See also:rod, about 20 in. in length, which terminates in a tang for insertion in the wooden shaft . As represented on the monuments, the iron part of the weapon is about one-third of its entire length (61 ft.) . It was used primarily as a missile . When the point pierced the shield the weight of the stave pulled the shield downwards and rendered it useless . At close quarters it answered all the purposes, offensive and defensive, of the modern See also:bayonet when " fixed." See also:Vegetius, in his Rei militaris instituta, describes it in a modified form as used in the armies of the lower See also:empire, and in a still more modified form it reappears as the " See also:argon " of the See also:Franks . This equipment was characteristic of hastati, principes and triarii(See also:save that the latter used the hasta instead of the pilum) . We thus see how great is the change from the See also:time when the hastati were the light-armed (from hasta) of the Greek phalanx . The cavalry, which had originally been protected only by a light ox-hide shield and the most fragile spears, adopted, about Polybius's time, the full Greek equipment of buckler, strong spear and breastplate . In thelastperiod of the See also:republic the pilum became the universal weapon of the heavy-armed, while the auxiliaries (all foreigners, the velites having disappeared) used the hasta and the long single-edged sword (spatha) . Under the empire the heavy-armed, according to See also:Josephus, had helmet, cuirass, a long sword worn on the left side, and a dagger on the right, pilum and scutum . The special detachment detailed to attend the See also:commander had a round shield (clipeus) and a long spear . The cavalry wore armour like that of the See also:infantry, with a broadsword, a buckler slung from the See also:horse's side, a long See also:pole for thrusting, and several javelins, almost as large as spears, in a sheath or See also:quiver . See also:Arrian, See also:writing of a period some fifty years later, gives further particulars from which we gather that of the cavalry some were bowmen, some polemen, 'while others wielded lances and axes . For the arms and armour of other peoples of antiquity see e.g . See also:PERSIA: History, Ancient, section v . " The See also:Persian Empire of the Achaemenids "; BRITAIN, Anglo-Saxon, section v . " Warfare "; See also:ETRURIA; EGYPT, &c . (J .
M
.
M.)
6
.
See also:English from the See also:Norman See also:Conquest.—It is unnecessary here to trace in detail the history of European armour in the middle ages and after, but its use and See also:fashion in See also:England may illustrate the broad lines of the gradual perfection and the hurried See also:abandonment of the ancient war-See also:harness
.
Each See also:country gave its armour something of the See also:national character, the Spanish harness being touched with the Moorish See also:taste, the Italian with the classical See also:note borrowed from the monuments of old time, and the See also:German with the See also:Teutonic feeling for the See also:grotesque
.
To understand the development of English arms and armour it is well for us to consider carefully the fashion of these things at the time of that landmark of history, the Norman fifth-Conquest
.
Poets, chroniclers and See also:law-makers give century us material for their description, and in the great See also:Bayeux See also:embroidery of Bayeux, with its more than six hundred See also:tapestry. lively figures, we have pictured all the circumstances of war
.
We find that weapons and war See also:gear have advanced little or nothing beyond the age which saw the Dacian warrior armed from See also:crown to foot
.
A See also:knight is reckoned fully armed if he have helmet, hawberk and shield; his weapons are sword and lance, although he sometimes carries See also:axe or mace and, more rarely, a bow
.
The coat of fence, which the Norman called hawberk and the English byrnie, hangs from neck to knee, the sleeves loose and covering the See also:elbow only, the skirt slit before and behind for ease in the See also:saddle
.
The Bayeux artists (see fig
.
4) commonly show these skirts as though they were short breeches, the hawberk taking the fashion at first sight of a man's See also:swimming See also:dress, but other authorities set us right, and to-wards the end of the tapestry we see men stripping hawberks from the slain by pulling them over the head
.
Back and front are so much alike that he who armed See also:Duke See also: The hawberk might be See also:mail of See also:woven rings, of rings sewn upon leather or See also:cotton, of overlapping scales of leather, horn or iron, of that jazerant work which was formed of little plates sewn to canvas or linen, or of thick cotton FIG . 4.-From the Bayeux and old linen padded and quilted Tapestry. in lozenges, squares or lines, There are indications that the hawberk was sometimes reinforced at the breast probably by a small oblong plate fastened underneath . Its weight is shown in the See also:scene where William's men carry arms to the See also:ships, each hawberk being See also:borne between two men upon a pole thrust through the sleeves . The helmet is a brimless and pointed cap, either all of metal or of leather or even wood framed and strengthened with metal . Its characteristic piece is the guard which protects the See also:nose and brow from swinging cuts, so disguising the knight that William must needs take off his helmet to show his men that he had not fallen . Such a nasal appears in a loth-century See also:illumination; at the time of the Conquest it was all but universal . It grows rare and all but disappears in the 13th century, although examples are found to the end of the middle ages . The helmet is laced under the chin, and under it the knight often wore a See also:hood of mail or quilting which covered the See also:top of the head, the ears and neck, but left the chin See also:free—in two or three cases he has this hood without the helmet . A close See also:coif was probably worn beneath it when it was of ringed mail, to spare the fretting of the metal on the head . The knights' legs are shown in most cases as unprotected save by stout See also:hose or leg-bands: only in two or three instances does the tapestry picture a warrior with armed legs, and it is perhaps significant of the rarity of this defence that the duke is so armed . The feet are covered only by the leather See also:boot, the heels having prick spurs . Broad-bladed swords with See also:cross-hilts of straight or drooping quills are fastened with a strap and See also:buckle See also:girdle to the left side . They have a short grip, and the blade would seem to be from 22 to 3 ft. in length . The chieftain unarmed in his See also:house is often seen with unbuckled and sheathed sword See also:sceptre-See also:wise in his hands, carrying it as an See also:Indian See also:raja will See also:nurse his sheathed tulwar . The ash spears brandished or couched by the knights as they See also:charge seem from 7 to 8 or 9 ft. in length . In a few cases a three-forked pennon flutters at the end . The axe, a weapon which the See also:Normans, in spite of their Norse ancestry, do not carry in the See also:battle, is of the type called the Danish axe, longshaf ted, the large blade boldly curved out . Maces, such as that with which the See also:bishop of Bayeux rallies his See also:young men, seem knotted clubs of simple form . Short and strong bows are See also:drawn to the breast by the Norman archers . Of the shields in the fight, four or five borne by the English are of the old English form--large, round bucklers of See also:linden-wood, bossed and ribbed with iron . For the rest the horsemen See also:bear the Norman shield, See also:kite-shaped, with tapering foot, and long enough to carry a dead warrior from the field . On the inner side are straps for the hand to grip and a long strap allowed the knight to hang the shield from his neck . Let us note that although See also:wyvern-like monsters, crosses, roundels and other devices appear on these shields, none of them has any indication of true armory, whose origins must be placed in the next century . The 12th century, although an age of See also:riding and warring, affects but little the fashion of armour .
The picture of a king on
12th his See also:seal may well stand for the full-armed knight of his
centery. age, but See also: This helm is crested with a semicircular ridge from which See also:spring two wings, or rows of feathers See also:fan-wise . On its side the ridge bears a single See also:leopard, the forerunner of the coming crests . For 13th-century arms, although but poor scraps remain of See also:original material, we have authority in plenty—pictures, seals and See also:carving, and, above all, the See also:effigies in stone or V3th brass which give us each visible See also:link, strap and orna- century. ment . All these have for a commentary See also:chronicles, poems and account books, so that the history of armour may be followed in detail . The long, sleeveless surcoat seen over King John's mail on his broad seal goes through the century and is often embroidered with arms . The shield becomes flat-topped the better to receive armorial charges . The great helm is common, although many knights on the See also:day of battle like better the freedom of the mail hood with a steel cap worn over or under its crown, keeping for the tourney-yard the great helm which towards the century-end begins to carry its towering crest . Great variety is seen in the forms of the flat or round-topped helm, some being in one piece, pierced for sight and See also:air, others having hinged or movable ventailes . At the end of the century a See also:sugar-See also:loaf type is the established form . The knight's hawberk is worn over a gambeson of linen, quilted linen or cotton, which lesser men See also:wear with a steel cap for all defence . Breast and back plates also are some-times borne under the hawberk, and the first plates in sight at last appear in those knee-cops which protect the joining of the 'upper and lower hose, and in a few examples of bainbergs or greaves of metal or leather . At, the end of Henry III.'s reign we have the admirable illustrations of a See also:manuscript of See also:Matthew Paris's Lives of the Off as, with many pictures of knights . (See fig 5.) Here we see knights with knee-cop and greave and a From The Ancestor, by permission of A . See also:Constable & Co . Ltd . FtG . 5.-Knights' Armour, c . 1250 . plenty of curious headpieces, the See also:plain mail hood and mail hoods with a plate ventaile to cover the face, barrel-helms and round-topped helms and even round-topped helmets with the Norman nose-guard . In the last half of the 13th century appears the curious defence known as alettes . This name is given to a pair of leather plates generally oblong in form and tagged to the back of the shoulder . As a See also:rule they are borne to display the wearer's arms, but being sometimes plain they may have had some slight defensive value, covering a weak spot at the armpit and turning a sweeping sword-cut at the neck . They-disappear in the earlier years of See also:Edward III . Surcoat, shield and trapper have the arms of their owner .
The See also:rowel-See also:spur makes a rare See also:appearance
.
Weapons change little
.
although the sword is often longer and heavier
.
Richard I. had favoured the cross-bow, in spite of papal denuncidtions of that weapon hateful to See also:God, and its use is common through all the 13th century. after which it makes way for the national weapon of the long-bow
.
In the 14th century, the high-day of See also:chivalry, the age of See also:Crecy and See also:Poitiers, of the See also:Black See also:Prince and See also:Chandos, the age which saw
enrolled the See also:noble See also:company of the Garter, the See also:art of the ~ecmry. armourer and weapon-See also: A rerebrace of plate defends the See also:outer side of the upper arm, plain elbow-cops the elbow, and round bosses in the form of leopard heads guard the shoulder and the crook of the elbow . The fore-arm is covered with the plates of a vambrace which appears from under the hawberk sleeve . Large and decorated knee-cops cover the knees, ridged greaves the shins, and the upper part of the foot from pointed toe to ankle is fenced with those articulated and overlapping plates the perfection of which in the next century enabled the full-harnessed knight to move his body as freely as might an unarmed man . Under the plates the mail hose show themselves and the heels have rowelled spurs . He has a hawberk of mail whose front skirt ends in a point between the knees, the loose sleeves between wrist and elbow . Under this is a haketon of some soft material whose folds fall to a line above the height of the knee . Over the hawberk is a garment, perhaps of leather with a dagged skirt-edge, and over this again is a sleeveless gambeson or pour-point of leather or quilted work, studded and enriched . Over all is the sleeveless surcoat, the skirt before cut squarely off at the height of the See also:fork of the leg, the skirt behind falling to below the knee . The loose folds of this surcoat are gathered at the waist by a narrow belt, the sword See also:hanging from a broader belt carried across the See also:hip . Before 1350 the long surcoat of the 13th century was still further shortened, the tails being cut off squarely with the front . The See also:fate of Sir John Chandos, who in 1369 stumbled on a slippery road, his long coat " armed with his arms " becoming tangled with his legs, points to the fact that an old soldier might cling to an old fashion . The See also:desire for a better defence than a steel cap and camail and a less cumbrous one than the great helm, in which the knight rode half stifled and half See also:blind, brought in as a fighting headpiece the basinet with a movable viser . This is found throughout this century, disappearing in the next when the salet and its varieties displaced it . But there were many knights who still fought with the great helm covering basinet and camail, a fact which speaks eloquently of the mighty blows given in this warlike age . The many monumental See also:brasses of the last half of the 14th century show us for the most part knights in basinet and camail with the face exposed, but their heads are commonly pillowed on the great helm and in any case the viser would hinder the artist's desire to show the knight's features . The fully-armed man of the latter half of the 14th centuryseems to have worn a rounded breastplate and a back-plate over his chain hawberk . See also:Chaucer's Sir Thopas must always be cited for the defences of this age, the See also:hero wearing the quilted haketon next his shirt, and over that the habergeon, a lesser hawberk of chain mail . His last defence is a See also:fine hawberk "full strong of plate" showing that "hawberk" some-times served as a word for the body plates . Over all this is the " cote-armure " or surcoat . Many passages from the chroniclers show that the three coats of fence one over the other were in common use in the field, and See also:Froissart tells a See also:tale of a knight struck by a dart in such wise that the head pierced through his plates, his coat of mail and his haketon stuffed with See also:twisted See also:silk . The surcoat in the age of Edward III. became a scanty garment sitting tightly to the body, laced up the back or sides, the close skirts ending at the fork of the leg with a dagged or slittered edge . The waistbelt is rarely in sight, but the broad belt across the hips, on which the dagger comes to hang as a See also:balance to the sword, grows richer and heavier, the best work of the See also:goldsmith or silversmith being spent upon it . Arms and legs and feet become cased in plate of steel or studded leather, and before the mid-century the shoulder-plates, like the steel shoes, are of overlapping pieces and the elbow also moves easily under the same defence . (See fig . 7.) Such harness, ever growing more beautiful in its See also:rich details, serves our champions until the. beginning of the 15th century, when the fashion begins to turn . The scanty surcoat 13th tends to disappear . It may be that during the See also:bitter century. feuds and fierce slaughters of the Wars of the See also:Roses men were unwilling to display on their breasts the See also:bearings by which their mortal foe might know them afar . The horseman's shield went with the surcoat, its disuse hastened by the perfection of armour, and the See also:banners of leaders remained as the only armorial signs commonly seen in war . But at jousts and tourneys, where See also:personal distinction was eagerly sought, the loose See also:tabard, which, after the middle of the century, bore the arms of the wearer on back, front and both sleeves, was still to be seen, with the crest of See also:parchment or leather towering above 3t' helm whose See also:mantle, from the ribbon-like See also:strip of the early 13th century, had grown into a fluttering cloak with wildly slittered edge streaming out behind the charging knight . When a See also:score of years of this 15th century had run we find the knight closed in with plates, no edge of chain mail remaining in sight . The surcoat being gone we see him armed in breast and back plate, his loins covered by a skirt of " tonlets," as the defence of overlapping See also:horizontal bands comes to be named (fig . 8) . The chain camail has gone out of fashion, the basinet continuing itself with a chin and cheek plate which joins a See also:gorget of plate covering the See also:collar-bone, a movable viser shutting in the whole head with steel . The gussets of chain mail sewn into the leathern or See also:fustian doublet worn below the body armour are unseen even at the See also:gap at the hollow of the arm where the plates must be allowed to move freely, for a little plate, round, oval or oblong, is tagged to each side to fence the weak point . These plates often differ in size and shape one from the other, the sword-arm side carrying the smaller one . Fio . 6.-Brass of Sir John de Creke . From \Caller's Monu- See also:mental Brasses . John de Foxley . From See also:Waller's Monumental Brasses . 588 Soon after this the six or eight " tonlets " grow fewer, being continued on the lower edge by the so-called tuilles, small plates strapped to the tonlets and swinging with the movement of the legs . A fine suit of armour is shown in the monument of See also:Count See also:Otto IV. of Henneberg (fig . 9) . Knightly armour takes perhaps Otto IV. of Henneberg . its last expression of perfection in such a noble harness as that worn by Richard See also:Beauchamp, See also:earl of See also:Warwick, whose armed effigy was wrought between 1451 and 1454 (fig. lo) . In this we see the characteristic feature of the great elbow-cops, whose channelled and fluted edges overlapping vambrace and rerebrace become monstrous fan-like shapes in the brass of Richard Quartremayns, graven about 146o . At this time the harness of the left shoulder is often notably reinforced, as compared with that of the sword-arm shoulder . Towards the latter part of the century chain mail reappears as a skirt or See also:breech of mail, showing itself under the diminished tonlets, and, when helm and gorget are removed, as a high-See also:standing collar . The See also:articulation by overlapping plates extends even to the breastplate, whose front is thus in two or more pieces . Very long-necked rowel-spurs are often found, and the toes of the sabbatons or steel shoes are sharply pointed . The characteristic helmet of the latter half of the century is the salet or See also:salade, a large steel cap, whose edge is carried out from the brows and still more boldly at the back of the neck . Knights abandon the great helm in war, but it is perfected for use in the tilt-yard, taking for that purpose an enormous size, to enable two See also:good inches of stuffing to come between head or face and the steel plate . Such a helm sits well down on the shoulders, to which it is locked before and behind by strong buckles or rivets . The note of the 15th century in armour is that of fantastically elaborate forms boldly outlined and a splendour of See also:colour which gained much from the See also:custom of wearing over the full harness short cloaks or rich coats turned up with furs, or from another fashion of covering the body plates or brigandines with rich velvets studded with gold . The details of the harness take a thousand curious shapes, and even amongst the simpler jacks and steel caps of the archers the same glorious variety is seen . If the note of the 15th century be variety of form, that of the 16th century, the last important See also:chapter in the history of armour, is surface decoration, the harness of great folk atoning cetntm.y. in some measure for loss of the beautiful See also:medieval sense of line by elaborate enrichment . Plain See also:engraving, See also:niello, russet work, See also:golden inlay and beaten ornament are common methods of en- richment . The great plume of See also:ostrich FIG. to . —Brass of feathers flows from the helmet crown Richard Beauchamp, of leaders in war . As in the reign of earl of Warwick . Edward III., See also:costume's fashion affects From See also:Stothard's Monumental the forms of armour, the broad toe of the Ejjigies Henry VIII. See also:shoe being imitated in steel, as the wide fluted skirts of the so-called See also:Maximilian armour imitate the German fashion in See also:civil dress which the Imperial See also:host popularized through northern Europe (fig . II) . These skirts have been called " lamboys " by modern writers on military antiquities, but the From See also:Hewitt's Arms and Armour . word seems an antiquarianism of no value, apparently a misreading of the word " jambeis " in some early document . So many notable examples of the armour of this 16th century are accessible in European collections, other illustrations occurring in great plenty, that its details See also:call for little discussion; a fine and characteristic suit is that by the famous English armourer, See also:Jacob Topf (fig . 12), which belonged to Sir See also:Christopher See also:Hatton . Into this century the arquebusier See also:marches, demanding a chief place in the line of battle, although it is a common See also:error that the improvement in fire-arms drove out the fully armed warrior, whose plates gave him no protection . Until the See also:rifle came to the soldier's hands, plate armour could easily be made shot-See also:proof . It was driven from the field by the new See also:strategy which asked for long marches and rapid movements of armies . This century's armour for the tilt-yard gives such protection to the See also:champion, with its many reinforcing pieces, that unless the caged helm were used—the same which cost Henry II. of France his See also:life—the risks of the tilt-yard must have fallen much below those of the See also:polo-field . The horse with crinet, chafron and bards of steel was as well covered from harm . Before the end of the 16th century the full suit of war harness is an See also:antique survival . Long boots take the place of greaves and steel shoes, and early in the 16th century the military pedants are heard to bewail the common laying aside of other pieces . The mounted See also:cavalier — cuirassieror pistolier- might take the field, even as late as the Great See also:Rebellion,armed at all points save the backs of the thighs and the legs below the knee; but a combed and brimmed cap, breast and back plate and tassets equipped the pikeman, and the musketeer would march without any metal on him save his headpiece, for it was soon found that heavily armed See also:mus- keteers, after a long trudge through summer dust or See also:winter mud, were readier to rest than to shoot . Everywhere there was revolt against the See also:burden of plates, and as early as 1593 Sir Richard See also:Hawkins found that his adven- turers would not use even the light corslets provided by him, " es- teeming a pot of See also:wine a better defence." Gervase See also:Markham, in his Souldier's See also:Accidence of 1645, asks that at least the See also:captain of See also:cuirassiers should be armed " at all peeces, cap a pee, " but he would have found few 'such captains, and Markham is a great praiser of noble old custom . The famous figure of a pikeman of 1668 (fig . 13) in See also:Elton's Art Military has steel cap, corslet and tassets, but he stands for a fashion dead or dying . The last noteworthy helmet was what is now termed the See also:lobster-tail helmet, a headpiece with round top, flat brim before, a broad articulated brim behind, cheek-pieces hanging by straps and a See also:grate of upright bars to cover the face, some having in place of the grate a movable nose-guard to be raised or lowered at will . The close resemblance of this helmet to that worn by the See also:Japanese, with whom the Dutch were then trading, is See also:worth remark, although each of the two pieces seems to have had its separate origin . Thus, save for a steel cap here and a corslet there, especially to be found amongst the See also:guards of sovereigns who must cling to something of antique tradition, armour departs out of the civilized See also:world . When in the reign of See also:Queen See also:Victoria her mounted guardsmen were given back their breast and back plates, the last piece of body armour had been the tiny gilt crescent worn at suretvalof the See also:throat by officers of foot, which crescent was the armour . shrunken See also:symbol of that great gorget of plate that came in with the 15th century . The shining plates of the Guards are See also:parade pieces only, but a curious revival of an old defence was carried by English cavalry in the field at the end of the loth century, when small gussets of chain mail were attached to the shoulders of certain cavalrymen as a defence against sword cuts . Through all the age of modern warfare inventors have pressed the claims of various See also:bullet-proof breastplates, but where they have been effective against rifle fire their weight has made them too heavy an addition to the soldier's burden . (See, however, ARMOUR PLATES, ad fin.) Last of all we may reckon those See also:secret coats of mail which are said to be worn on occasion by modern rulers in dread of the See also:assassin . The London detective See also:department has such coats of fence in its armoury ; and. on the other side it may be remembered that the See also:Kelly gang of bushrangers, driven to See also:bay, were found to have forged suits of plate for them-selves out of sheets of See also:boiler-iron . Ancient arms and armour are now eagerly sought by European and See also:American collectors, and high prices are paid down for every noteworthy piece . The See also:supply is assisted by the efforts of many forgers of false pieces, the most cunning of whom bring Co/See also:tea all archaeological skill to their aid, and few great dons. national or private collections are free from some example of this See also:industry . For the genuine pieces competition runs high . Suits of plate of the earliest period may be sought in vain, and the greatest collectors may hardly See also:hope for such a panoply of the late See also:Gothic period as that which is the ornament of the See also:Wallace collection . Even this famous harness is not wholly free from suspicion of restoration . Armour of the latter half of the 16th century, however, often appears in the See also:sale-rooms and is found in many private collections, although the " ancestral armour " which decorates so many ancient halls in England is generally the plates and pots which served the pike-men of the 17th-century See also:militia . It is not hard to understand this scarcity of ancient pieces . In the first place it must be remembered that the fully armed man was always a rare figure in war, and only the rich could engage in the costly follies of the later tournaments . The novelists have done much to encourage the belief that most men of See also:gentle rank rode to the wars lance in hand, locked up in full harness of plate; but the country See also:gentleman, serving as light horseman or mounted See also:archer, would hold himself well armed had he a quilted See also:jack or See also:brigandine and a basinet or salet . Men armed cap a pee See also:crowd the illuminations of See also:chronicle books, the artists having the same tastes as the boy who decorates his Latin See also:grammar with battles which are hand-to-hand conflicts of epauletted generals .
Monuments and brasses also show these fully armed men, but here again we must recognize the tendency which made the last of the cheap miniaturists endow their clients lavishly with heavy See also:watch-chains and rings
.
As late as the 18th century the portrait painters See also:drew their military or See also:naval sitters in the breastplates and pauldrons, vambraces and rerebraces of an earlier age
.
Ancient See also:wills and inventories, save those of great folk or military adventurers, have scanty reference to complete harnesses
.
Ringed hawberks, in a See also:damp northern See also:climate, will not survive
From The Compleat Body of the Art Military, by Lieut.-See also:Col
.
Elton (1668)
.
way to the See also:magazine rifle about 1886-1890
.
(See RIFLE.) Neither breech-loaders nor revolvers, however, are inventions of modern date
.
Both were known in See also:Germany as early as the close of the 15th century
.
There are in the Musee d'Artillerie at Paris See also:wheel-See also:lock arquebuses of the 16th century which are breech-loaders; and there is, in the Tower armoury, a revolver with the old matchlock, the date of which is about 1550
.
A German See also:arquebus of the 16th century, in the museum of See also:Sigmaringen, is a revolver of seven barrels
.
Nor is rifling a new thing in fire-arms, for there was a rifled arquebus of the 15th century, in which the balls were driven See also:home by a See also:mallet, and a patent was taken out in England
an See also:interest in medieval antiquities became common amongst for rifling in 1635
.
All these systems were thus known at an early educated men, and for most contemporaries of Dr See also: (O . BA.) 7 . Fire-arms . (For the development of See also:cannon, see See also:ARTILLERY and See also:ORDNANCE.)—Hand-cannons appear almost simultaneously with the larger bombards . They were made by the Flemings in the 14th century . An early instance of the use of hand fire-arms in England is the See also:siege of Huntercombe See also:Manor in 1375 . These were simply small cannon, provided' with a stock of wood, and fired by the application of a match to the See also:touch-hole . During the 15th century the hand-See also:gun was steadily improved, and its use became more general . Edward IV., landing in England in 1471 to reconquer his See also:throne, brought with him a force of Burgundian hand-gun men (mercenaries), and in 1476 the Swiss at See also:Morat had no less than 6000 of their men thus armed . The prototype of the modern military weapon is the arquebus (q.v.), a form of which was afterwards called in England the See also:caliver . Various See also:dates are given for the introduction .of the arquebus, which owed many of its details to the perfected cross-bow which it superseded . The Spanish army in the Italian wars at the beginning of the 16th century was the first to make full and effective use of the new weapon, and thus to make the fire See also:action of infantry a serious See also:factor in the decision of battles .
The Spaniards also took the next step in advance
.
The See also:musket (q.v.) was heavier and more powerful than the arquebus, and, in the hands of the duke of See also:Alva's army in the See also:Netherlands, so conclusively proved its superiority that it at once replaced its See also:rival in the armies of Europe
.
Both the arquebus and the musket had a touch-hole on the right side of the barrel, with a See also:pan for the priming, with which a lighted See also:quick match was brought in contact by pressing a trigger
.
The musket, on account of its weight, was provided with a long rest, forked in the upper part and furnished with a spike to stick in the ground
.
The matchlock (long-barrelled matchlocks are still used by various uncivilized peoples, notably in India) was the typical weapon of the soldier for two centuries
.
The class of hand! fire-arms provided with an arrangement for striking a spark; to ignite the See also:powder charge begins with the wheel-lock
.
This See also:Wick was in-vented at See also:Nuremberg in 1515, but was seldom applied tothe arquebus and musket on account of the costliness of its mechanism and the uncertainty of its action
.
The early forms of flint-lock (snaphance) were open to the same objections, and the fire-lock (as the flint-lock was usually called) remained for many years after its introduction the armament of special troops only, till about the beginning of the 18th century it finally superseded the old matchlock
.
Thenceforward the fire-lock (called familiarly in England " See also: The muzzle-loading rifle, employed by special troops since about 1800, came into general use in the armies of Europe about 1854-1860 . It was superseded, as a result of the success of the needle-gun in the war of 1866, by the breech-loading rifle, this in its turn giving long neglect, and many of them must have been cut in pieces for burnishers or for the mail skirts and gussets attached to the later arming doublets . As the fashion of plate armour changed, the smith might adapt an old harness to the new taste, but more often it would be cast aside . Men to whom the sight of a steel coat called up the business of their daily life wasted no sentimentality over an obsolete piece . The early antiquaries might have saved us many priceless things, but it was not until a few virtuosi of the 18th century were taken with the Gothic See also:fancy that popular archaeology dealt with aught but Greek statuary and Roman See also:inscriptions . The loth century was well advanced before accurate 'workmanship required and, above all, of a satisfactory firing arrangement, they were left in an undeveloped state until modern times . The earliest pistols were merely shorter hand-guns, modified for mounted men, and provided with a straight stock which was held against the breastplate (poitrinal or See also:petronel) . The long-barrelled See also:pistol was the typical weapon of the cavalry of the 16th century . (See CAVALRY.) With the revival of See also:shock See also:tactics initiated by Gustavus See also:Adolphus the length of the pistol barrel became less and less, and its stock was then shaped for the hand alone . (See PISTOL.) (C . F . |
|
|
[back] PHILIP DANFORTH ARMOUR (1832-1901) |
[next] HENRY HUGH ARMSTEAD (1828-1005) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.