Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
ARMS AND See also:ARMOUR (See also:Lat. arma, from the See also:Aryan See also:root ar, to join or See also:fit; cf. Gr. &ppbs, See also:joint; the See also:form armour, from Lat. armatura, should strictly be armure) . Under this heading are included weapons of offence (See also:army) and defensive equipment (See also:armour) . The See also:history of the development of arms and armour begins with that of the human See also:race; indeed, combined with domestic implements, the most See also:primitive weapons which have been found constitute the most important; if not the only, tangible See also:evidence on which the history of primitive See also:man is based . It is largely from the materials and characteristics of the weapons and utensils found in caves, tombs and various strata of the See also:earth's crust, coupled with See also:geological considerations, that the ethnological and See also:chronological classifications of prehistoric man have been deduced . For a detailed See also:account of this See also:classification and the evidence see See also:ARCHAEOLOGY; See also:BRONZE See also:AGE; See also:FLINT IMPLEMENTS, &e., and articles on See also:special weapons . Offensive weapons may be classified roughly, according to their shape (i.e. the See also:kind of See also:blow or See also:wound which they are intended ctasslf!- to inflict), and the way in which they are used, as cation . follows:—(1) Arms which are wielded by See also:hand at See also:close quarters . These are subdivided into (a) cleaving weapons, e.g. axes; (b) crushing, e.g. clubs, maces and all See also:hammer-like arms; (c) thrusting, e.g. pointed swords and daggers; (d) cutting, e.g. sabres (such weapons frequently combine both the cut and the thrust, e.g. swords with both edge and point); (e) those weapons represented by the See also:spear, See also:lance, See also:pike, &c., which See also:deal a thrusting blow but are distinguished from (c) by their greater length . (2) Purely missile weapons, e.g. darts, javelins and spears . Frequently these weapons are used also at close quarters as thrusting weapons; the typical example of these is the See also:medium-length spear of not more than about 6 ft. in length . (3) Arms which See also:discharge missiles, e.g. bows, catapults and See also:fire-arms generally . (See See also:ARCHERY and See also:section Fire-arms below.) The weapons in (2) and (3) are designed to avoid hand-to-hand fighting .
Weapons are also classified in a variety of other ways
.
Thus we have small-arms, i.e. all weapons in classes (1) and (2) with those in (3) which do not require carriages
.
See also:Side-arms are those which, when not in use, are worn at the side, e.g. daggers, swords, bayonets
.
Armes blanches is a See also:term used for offensive weapons of See also:iron and See also:steel which are used at close quarters
.
Defensive armour consists of See also:body armour, protections for the See also:head and the limbs, and various types of See also:shield
.
1
.
See also:
Later on we find polished implements (See also:Neolithic) progressively more elaborate in See also:design and workmanship, such as socketed stones with wooden handles and knives or daggers of flaked flint with handles
.
Besides flint the commonest materials are See also:diorite, greenstone, See also:serpentine and indurated See also:clay-See also:slate; there are also weapons of See also:horn and See also:bone (daggers and spear-heads)
.
Spear-heads and arrow-points (See also:leaf-shaped, See also:lozenge-shaped, tanged and triangular) were chipped in flint with such skill as to be little inferior to their See also:metal successors
.
They have accurately flaked barbs and tangs, and in some cases their edges are minutely chipped
.
The heads appear to have been fastened to the shafts by See also:vegetable fibre and See also:bitumen
.
See also:Knife-daggers of flint, though practically of one single type, exhibit much variety of form
.
They vary in See also:size also, but seldom exceed 12 in. in length
.
They are sometimes obtuse-edged like a scraping-See also:tool, sometimes delicately chipped to a straight edge, while the flakes are so regularly removed from the See also:convex See also:part of the blade as to give a wavy See also:surface, and the corners of the handle are delicately crimped
.
The daggers attain their highest perfection in the See also:short, leaf-shaped form,—the precursor of the leaf-shaped See also:sword which is peculiarly characteristic di the Bronze Age,—and, the curved knives found especially in See also:Great See also:Britain and See also:Russia, and also in See also:Egypt
.
The precise See also:object of the sharpening of both convex and See also:con-
See also:cave edges in the curved variety is not clear
.
There have also been found See also:sling-stones, and, in See also:Scotland and See also:Ireland, balls of stone with their " surfaces divided into a number of more or less projecting circles with channels between them.” These latter, See also:Sir See also: Of defensive armour of stone there is none . The only approximation is to be found in the small rectangular plates of slate, &c., perforated with holes at the corners, which are supposed to have been See also:bound on to the See also:arm to protect it from the recoil of the See also:bow-See also:string . Similar wristlets or bracers are in use among the Eskimos (of bone) and in See also:India (of See also:ivory) . These plates measure generally about 4 in. by 11 in . 2 . Bronze Age.—It is impossible to assign any date as the beginning, of the Bronze Age; indeed, archaeology has shown that the See also:adoption of metal for weapons was very See also:gradual . Tie stone weapon perseveres alongside the bronze, and there exist stone axes which, by their shape, suggest that they have been copied from metal axes . In the earliest interments in which the weapons deposited with the dead are of other materials than stone, a See also:peculiar form of bronze See also:dagger occurs . It consists of a well-finished, thin, knife-like blade, usually about 6 in. in length, broad at the hilt and tapering to the point, and attached to the handle by massive rivets of bronze . It has been found associated with stone cells; both of the roughly chipped and the highly polished kind, showing that these had not been entirely disused when bronze became available . A later type of bronze dagger is a broad, heavy, curved weapon, usually from 9 to 15 in. in length; with massive rivets for See also:attachment to an equally massive handle . The leaf-shaped sword, however, is the characteristic weapon of the Bronze Age . It is found all over Europe, from See also:Lapland to the Mediterranean . No warlike weapon of any See also:period is more graceful in form or more beautifully finished . The finish seems to have been given in the See also:mould without the aid of hammer or See also:file, the edge being formed by suddenly reducing the thickness of the metal, so as to produce a narrow border of extreme thinness along Dagger . both sides of the blade from hilt to point . The handle-See also:plate and blade were See also:cast in one piece, and the handle itself was formed by side plates of bone, horn or See also:wood, riveted through the handle-plates . There was no guard, and the weapon, though short, was well balanced, but more fitted for stabbing and thrusting than for cutting with the edge . The Scandinavian variety is not so decidedly leaf-shaped, and is longer and heavier than the See also:common See also:British form; and instead of a handle-plate, it was furnished with a tang on which a See also:round, See also:flat-topped handle was fastened, like that of the See also:modern Highland See also:dirk, sometimes surmounted by a See also:crescent-like See also:ornament of bronze . A narrow, See also:rapier-shaped variety, tapering from hilt to point, was made without a handle-plate, and attached to the hilt by rivets like the bronze daggers already mentioned . This form is more common in the British Isles than in Scandinavia, and is most abundant in Ireland . The spear-heads of the Bronze Age See also:present a considerable variety of form, though the leaf-shaped predominates, and barbed examples are extremely rare . Some British weapons of this form occasion-ally reach a length of 27 in . The larger varieties are often beautifully designed, having segmental openings on both sides of the central See also:ridge of the blade, and elaborately ornamented with See also:chevron patterns of chased or inlaid See also:work both on the socket and blade . Arrow-points are much rarer in bronze than in flint . ' In all See also:probability the flint arrow-point (which was equally effective and much more easily replaced when lost) continued to be used throughout the Bronze Age . See also:Shields of bronze, circular, with hammered-up bosses, concentric ridges and rows of studs, were held in the hand by a central handle underneath the See also:boss . The transition period between the Bronze and Iron Ages in central Europe is well defined by the occurrence of iron swords, which are simple copies of the leaf-shaped weapon, sometimes with flat handle-plate of bronze . These have been found associated with articles assigned to the 3rd or 4th See also:century B.C . An important distinction between the characteristic bronze swords peculiar to See also:southern peoples and the swords both of iron and of bronze found together in the See also:Hallstatt cemeteries Hallstatt (in the Salzkarnmergut, See also:Austria, See also:ancient See also:Noricum) is weapons . that whereas the former invariably have short handles (2; to 21 in.), the latter are provided with handles from 3 to 32 in. See also:long, terminating in a round or See also:oval See also:pommel; the grip of one of the bronze swords even reaches a length of 4 in . The hilts are decorated with ivory, See also:amber, wood, bronze, horn, and the decoration of blade and See also:scabbard is often elaborate . The length of these swords is sometimes as much as 30 to 33 in . Again at La Tene on See also:Lake See also:Neuchatel iron swords have been found to the number of one See also:hundred, with handles of 4 to 71 in. long and a See also:total length varying from 30 to 38 in . Similar remains have been found in See also:France at See also:Bibracte and See also:Alesia, and even in Ireland (cf . See also:Munro, The Lake-dwellings of Europe, pp .
282, 383)
.
The occurrence at Hallstatt of bronze swords together with iron, having the characteristic long handle, has led to the hypo-thesis that the See also:graves are those of an immigrant (probably See also:Celtic) See also:people of See also:northern extraction which had conquered and overlaid a smaller-framed Bronze Age people, and had introduced the use of iron while continuing to use the bronze of their predecessors with the necessary modifications
.
This theory derived from tangible remains is corroborated by See also:literary evidence
.
Thus See also:Polybius (ii
.
33, iii
.
114) describes the Celtic peoples as fighting with a long pointless iron sword, which easily See also:bent and was in any See also:case too large to be used easily in a melee
.
The graves at Hallstatt yielded in addition to these important swords a much larger number of spears
.
Of these two only were of bronze, the head of the larger being 71 in. long
.
The much more numerous iron heads range up to as much as 2 ft. in length, and are all fastened to the See also:shaft by rivets
.
All the arrow-headsfound are of bronze, while of the axes the great See also:majority are of iron; a few have iron edges fitted in a See also:bed of bronze
.
These examples are sufficient to show that the transition from bronze to iron was very slow
.
The fact that they were found in a See also:district which is known to have been directly in the See also:line of See also: See Sir John Evans, Ancient Stone Implements tend. ed,, 1897), Bronze Implements; W . Ridgeway, See also:Early Age of See also:Greece; and See also:works quoted under ARCHAEOLOGY . 3 . Early See also:Greek Weapons,—The See also:character of the weapons used by the early peoples of the See also:Aegean in the periods known as Minoan, Mycenaean and Homeric is a problem which has given rise of See also:recent years to much discussion . The Mycenaean controversy is an important part of the Homeric an :merle. question as a whole, and the various theories of the weapons used in the Trojan See also:War See also:hinge on wider theories as to the date and authorship of the Homeric poems . One widely accepted See also:hypothesis, based on the important monograph by Dr Wolfgang Reichel, UberhomerischeWaffen . Archaologische Untersuchungen (See also:Vienna, 1894), is that the Homeric heroes, like those who created the See also:civilization known as Mycenaean, had no defensive armour except the Mycenaean shield, and used weapons of bronze . This view is derived to a great extent from the Homeric poems them-selves, in which the metal most frequently mentioned is xa)vcos (bronze), and involves the See also:assumption that all passages which describe the use of corslets, breastplates, small shields and See also:greaves are later interpolations . It is maintained on the other hand (e.g. by Prof . W . Ridgeway, Early Age of Greece, i. See also:chap . 3), that the Homeric See also:Achaeans (whom he regards as the descendants of the central See also:European peoples, the makers of the Hallstatt iron swords) were far advanced into the Iron Age, and that the use of bronze weapons is merely another instance of the fact that the introduction of a new See also:element does not necessarily banish the older . This theory would See also:separate the Homeric from the Mycenaean altogether, and is part of a much more comprehensive ethnological hypothesis . According to another hypothesis, the Homeric poems are true descriptions of a single age, or, in other words, the weapons of the Homeric age were far more diverse and elaborate than is supposed by Reichel . Very few traces of iron have been found in the Mycenaean settlements, nor have any examples of body armour been found except the ceremonial See also:gold breastplates at See also:Mycenae . The Mycenaean soldiers carried apparently a bronze spear, a bronze sword and a bow and arrows . The arrow-heads are first of See also:obsidian and later of bronze . It would appear that only the chief warriors used spear and shield, while the majority fought with bows . The swords found at Mycenae are two-edged, of rigid bronze, and as long as 3 ft. or even more; from representations of battles it would seem that they were perhaps used for thrusting mainly . They are highly ornamented and some have hilts of wood, bone or ivory, or even gold mounting . Later swords became shorter and of a type like that of early iron swords found in Greece; Moreover in a few cases there have been found in pre-Mycenaean (See also:late Minoan III.) tombs a few examples of short iron swords together with bronze remains . All Mycenaean spears are of bronze and, apparently, their shafts, unlike the Homeric, had no See also:butt-piece . In the See also:absence of any metal helmets in the tombs we may perhaps assume that the Mycenaean See also:helmet was a See also:leather cap, possibly strengthened with tusks, such as appears in See also:Homer (Iliad, x.) also . The Mycenaean shield (generally, perhaps, made of leather) has given rise to much controversy, which hinges largely on the See also:interpretation of the evidence provided by the See also:representation on the See also:Warrior See also:Vase and the Painted See also:Stele from Mycenae and pottery found at See also:Tiryns .
See also:Professor Ridgeway regards these as describing See also:post-Mycenaean conditions, and maintains that the true Mycenaean shield was always long (from See also:neck to feet), and that it was either in the form of a figure-of-eight targe, or rectangular and sometimes incurved like the section of a See also:cylinder; whereas the Homeric shield was round (e.g
.
KwKX67-Epos, €v,weXOS, &c.)
.
Dr Reichel's followers believe that the Homeric shield was long ("like a See also:tower") and
incurved in the centre like the Mycenaean, that Homer knew nothing of the small round shield, and that the epithets implying roundness used in the poems are to be explained as meaning " well-balanced " or as late interpolations
.
On the whole we must conclude that the Mycenaean age is by no means a single homogeneous whole (see AEGEAN CIVILIZATION), and that the weapons are not exclusively of bronze, nor of any single type
.
The Homeric warrior in full armour, according to the Homeric poems, wore: (I) shield (&Oafs, o'aKOS), (2) greaves (KV77µtSES), (3) See also:band (N,ua), (4) See also:belt (("worilp)and See also:mitre, (5) See also:tunic (Xcruw), (6) helmet (KOpis), (7) breastplate (Bwprl ), (8) sword (ti os)
.
The Xacvijiov was a See also:protection worn by the archers in See also:place of a shield
.
According to the usual view, the Homeric shield was, as we have seen, bent in about See also:half way up each side (in the form of a figure-of-eight) to give freedom to the arms, and large enough to protect the whole body
.
The two curves were held rigid by two wooden (probably) staves inside
.
It was composed of layers of ox-hide overlaid with bronze, forming a boss in the centre, and sometimes had studs upon it
.
Reichel's view is that it was the See also:weight of these huge shields which led to the use of the See also:chariot as a means of going rapidly from one part of the See also:
On the other hand Mycenaean bronze greaves have been found at Enkomi (See also:Cyprus) and at Glassinatz (Glasinac), and therefore it is not necessary, following Reichel, to cut out Homer's references to the " bronze-greaved " Achaeans (Iliad, vii
.
41), a phrase which has been taken as evidence for regarding the passage as See also:spurious
.
The See also:tin greaves of See also:Achilles are obviously exceptional
.
The thorex again is the subject of controversy
.
Reichel, arguing that the great shield rendered any breastplate unnecessary, regarded the word as a See also:general term for body clothing, but Ridgeway strongly maintains the older theory that it was a bronze breastplate, and See also:Andrew See also:Lang points out that, on Reichel's theory, a word which originally meant the " See also:breast " was transferred to mean " See also:loin-See also:cloth " (which, to See also:judge from the See also:artistic representations, was all that the Mycenaean warrior wore), and subsequently in historic times returned to its natural use for the breastplate—a most unlikely See also:evolution
.
The passages in Homer which describe it as a breastplate are regarded by Reichel's school as later interpolations
.
See also: The sword has already been mentioned . Ridgeway, in spite of the almost invariable mention of bronze as the material of the Homeric weapons, believes that it was generally .of iron, but, while the presence of iron in the Homeric age is admitted in the case of implements, it is generally held that weapons were all of bronze . Except for one arrow-head (Iliad, iv . 123), and the See also:mace of Areithoiis, mentioned as a unique example by See also:Nestor (Iliad, vii . 141), no reference to an iron weapon proper occurs in the Homeric poems . 13ut the sword was used only when the favourite spear or See also:javelin had failed to decide the contest . It must be admitted that the problem of pre-Homeric armour and Homeric armour must always be largely a matter of inference, based on a See also:comparative study of the evidence literary and archaeological . Unless we are prepared to adopt the theory that the Homeric poems consist of a See also:mosaic of See also:interpolation informed by an archaizing editor, we must assume that they describe a single period of transition intermediate between the Mycenaean See also:prime and the See also:dawn of history proper . In this case we shall believe that the Homeric warrior has so far adapted to changing conditions the simple appliances of the Mycenaean that he has evolved a feeble corslet with See also:minor pieces of body armour, while retaining the big See also:double-bellied shield as a protection against the arrows which are still the chief weapon of the See also:rank and file and are even used on occasion by the chiefs . If we further believe that the iron at his disposal was similar to that used by the Celts of Polybius, it is natural to believe also that he preferred the harder bronze for his weapons, though iron was common for domestic and other implements . On early Greek arms in general see, besides Reichel and Ridgeway op. cit.: A . Lang, Homer and his Age (See also:London, 1906; and criticisms in Classical See also:Review, See also:February 1907); G . G . A . Murray, The Rise of the Greek Epic (See also:Oxford, 1907), chap. vi,; R . M . Burrows, Discoveries in See also:Crete (2nd ed., London, 1907); Leaf and Bayfield, Iliad, i.–xii . Appendix A (follows Reichel) ; W . Helbig, Homerische Epos (1884 and 1899), and La Question mycenienne (1896); C . See also:Robert, Studien zur Ilias (See also:Berlin, 1901); Chr . Tsountas and J . I . Manatt, The Mycenaean Age (1897); V . See also:Berard, See also:Les Pheniciens et l'Odyssee (See also:Paris, 1902) ; Cauer, Grundfrager d . Homerkritik (See also:Leipzig, 1895) ; much valuable discussion will be found in articles in Journ . See also:Hell, See also:Stud., Classical Rev. and Journ. of Anthropol . Instit . ; see also See also:editions of Iliad and Odyssey (espec . D . B . See also:Monro), and works quoted under AEGEAN CIVILIZATION; HOMER; MYCENAE . 4 . Greek, See also:Historical.—The equipment does not differ generic-ally from that described in the Homeric poems, except when we come to the reforms of the Macedonians . The hoplites, who formed the See also:main army, wore helmet, body armour, greaves and shield, and fought with pike and sword . The helmets were (1) the Corinthian, which covered the See also:face to the See also:chin, with slits for the eyes, and often had no plume or See also:crest; (2) the Athenian, which did not See also:cover the face (though sometimes it had cheek-plates which could be turned up if necessary), had crests, some-times triple, with plumes of feathers, horsehair or leather; (3) a steel cap (See also:ram) without crest, plumes or cheek-plates . The last seems to have been most common in the Spartan army . The body armour consisted of breast and back plates fastened together by thongs or straps and buckles; sometimes poverty compelled a man to be content with a leather See also:jerkin (OaoXas). partly strengthened by metal plates, or even a quilted See also:linen or stuffed shirt . Greaves were.of pliant bronze fastened at the back above the See also:ankle and below the knee . Shields were of the small round or oval type, adapted to the new conditions in which the bow and arrow had given place to hand-to-hand fighting . They were held by means of two handles (6xava), the See also:left hand being thrust through the first and grasping the second . In the 5th and 4th centuries the shield See also:bore a See also:device or initial representing the See also:state and also the individual's own crest . The hoplite's pike, about 8 ft. long, unlike the Homeric weapon, was hardly ever thrown . In the Macedonian See also:phalanx a pike (ae.pcosra), certainly 18 ft., and perhaps later in the 3rd and 2nd centuries even 24 ft. long, was introduced . The sword was straight, See also:sharp-pointed, short, sometimes less than zo in., and rarely more than 2 ft. long . It was double-edged and used for both cut and thrust . A less common type was the s6. acpa or curved sabre used by the Spartans, with one sharp edge . The hoplite had no other offensive weapons . The See also:cavalry were heavy-armed like the hoplites except that they carried a smaller shield, or, more usually, none at all . They were armed with a lance which they wielded freely (i.e. not " in See also:rest ") and occasionally threw . The Macedonian cavalry had a o•icpu r ra . The See also:light-armed (yuµvi rec, tiGcXoi.) were (I) &See also:Kovno-See also:rat, armed with a javelin (3 to 5 ft. long) and a small shield; (z) ro orat, archers; and (3) vOEVSovilrac, slingers, whose missiles were balls of See also:lead, stones and hardened clay pellets . Between the heavy and the light armed were the peltasts . The pelta, from which they took the name, was a light shield or See also:target, made of skin or leather on a wooden or wickerwork See also:frame . The Athenian See also:Iphicrates armed them with linen corslet and a larger spear and sword than those of the hoplites; he also invented a new footgear (called after him iphicratules) to replace the older greaves . 5 . See also:Roman.—The equipment of the Roman soldier, like the organization of the army (see ROMAN ARMY), passed through a great number of changes, and it is quite impossible to summarize it as a single subject . In the period of the See also:kings the See also:legion was the old Greek phalanx with Greek armour; the front ranks wore the Greek See also:panoply and fought with long spears and the circular Argolic shield . The early Roman sword, like that of the Greeks, Egyptians and Etruscans, was of bronze . We have no See also:direct statement as to its form, but in all probability it was of the See also:ordinary leaf-shape . We gather from the monuments that, in the 1st century B.C., the Roman sword was short, worn on the right side (except by See also:officers, who carried no shield), suspended from a See also:shoulder-belt (balteus) or a See also:waist-belt (cingutum), and reaching from the hollow of the back to the See also:middle of the thigh, thus representing a length of from 22 in. to 2 ft . The blade was straight, double-edged, obtusely-pointed . On the See also:Trajan See also:column (A.D . 114) it is considerably longer, and under the See also:Flavian emperors the long, single-edged spatha appears frequently along with the short sword . The second period ending with the Punic See also:wars witnessed a See also:change . The hastati and the principes are both heavily armed, but the round shield has given way to the oblong (scutum), except for one-third of the hastati who bore only the spear and the light javelin (gaesa) . The third period—that described by Polybius—is characterized by greater complexity of armour, due no doubt in part to the experience gained in conflicts with a wider range of peoples, and in part to the assimilation of the methods peculiar to the new See also:Italian See also:allies . Thus we find the skirmishers (velites) armed with a light javelin 3 ft. long and 1 in. thick, with an iron point g in. long; this point was so fragile that it was rendered useless by the first cast . For See also:defence they wore a hide-covered headpiece and a round buckler 3 ft. in See also:diameter . The heavy-armed carried a scutum formed of two boards glued together, covered with See also:canvas and skin, and incurved into the shape of a half-cylinder; its upper and lower edges were strengthened with iron rims and its centre with a boss (umbo) . A g |