Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

ATHEISM (from Gr. as, privative, and ...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V02, Page 828 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

ATHEISM (from Gr. as, privative, and Oebs, See also:God)  , literally a See also:system of belief which denies the existence of See also:God . The See also:term as generally used, however, is highly ambiguous . Its meaning varies (a) according to the various See also:definitions of deity, and especially (b) according as it is (i.) deliberately adopted by a thinker as a description of his own theological standpoint, or (ii.) applied by one set of thinkers to their opponents . As to (a), it is obvious that See also:atheism from the standpoint of the See also:Christian is a very different conception as compared with atheism as understood by a Deist, a Positivist, a follower of See also:Euhemerus or See also:Herbert See also:Spencer, or a Buddhist . But the ambiguities arising from the points of view described in (b) are much more difficult both intellectually and in their See also:practical social issues . Thus See also:history shows how readily the term has been used in the most haphazard manner to describe even the most trivial divergence of See also:opinion concerning points of See also:dogma . In other words, " atheism " has been used generally by the orthodox adherents of one See also:religion, or even of a single See also:sect, for all beliefs which are different or even differently expressed . It is in fact in these cases, like " heterodoxy," a term of purely negative significance, and its intellectual value is of the slightest . The distinction between the terms " religion " and " magic " is, in a similar way, often due merely to rivalry between the adherents of two or more mutually exclusive religions brought together in the same community . When the psalmist declares that " the See also:fool hath said in his See also:heart, there is no God," he probably does not refer to theoretical denial, but to a practical disbelief in God's See also:government of human affairs, shown in disobedience to moral See also:laws . See also:Socrates was charged with " not believing in the gods the See also:city believes in." The cry of the See also:heathen populace in the See also:Roman See also:empire against the Christians was " Away with the atheists ! To the lions with the Christians!" The ground for the See also:charge was probably the lack of See also:idolatry in all Christian See also:worship .

See also:

Spinoza, for whom God alone existed, was persecuted as an atheist . A See also:common designation of See also:Knox was " the atheist," although it was to him " See also:matter of See also:satisfaction that our most See also:holy religion is founded on faith, not on See also:reason." In its most scientific and serious usage the term is applied to that See also:state of mind which does not find deity (i.e. either one or many gods) in or above the See also:physical universe . Thus it has been applied to certain See also:primitive savages, who have been thought (e.g. by See also:Lord See also:Avebury in his Prehistoric Times) to have no religious belief; it is, however, the better opinion that there are no peoples who are entirely destitute of some rudimentary religious belief . In the second See also:place, and most usually, it is applied to a purely intellectual, metaphysical disbelief in the existence of any god, or of anything supernatural . In this connexion it is usual to distinguish three types of atheism—the dogmatic, which denies the existence of God positively; the sceptical, which distrusts the capacity of the human mind to discover the existence of God; and the See also:critical, which doubts the validity of the theistic See also:argument, the proofs for the existence of God . That the first type of atheism exists, in spite of the denials of those who favour the second or the third, may be proved by the utterances of men like See also:Feuerbach, See also:Flourens or See also:Bradlaugh . " There is no God," says Feuerbach, "it is clear as the See also:sun and as evident as the See also:day that there is no God, and still more that there can be none." With greater See also:passion Flourens declares " Our enemy is God . Hatred of God is the beginning of See also:wisdom . If mankind would make true progress, it must be on the basis of atheism." Bradlaugh maintained against See also:Holyoake that he would fight until men respected the name " atheist." The See also:answer to dogmatic atheism, that it implies See also:infinite knowledge, has been well stated in See also:John See also:Foster's Essays, and restated by See also:Chalmers in his Natural See also:Theology, and its force is recognized in Holyoake's careful qualification of the sense in which See also:secularism accepts atheism, " always explaining the term atheist to mean ` not seeing God' visually or inferentially, never suffering it to be taken for See also:anti-See also:theism, that is, hating God, denying God—as hating implies See also:personal knowledge as the ground of dislike, and denying implies infinite knowledge as the ground of disproof." But dogmatic atheism is rare compared with the sceptical type, which is identical with See also:agnosticism (q.v.) in so far as it denies the capacity of the mind of See also:man to See also:form any conception of God, but is different from it in so far as the agnostic merely holds his See also:judgment in suspense, though, in practice, agnosticism is See also:apt to result in an attitude towards religion which is hardly distinguishable from a passive and unaggressive atheism . The third or critical type may be illustrated by A Candid Examination of Theism by"Physicus" (G . J . See also:Romanes), in which the writer endeavours to establish the weakness of the proofs for the existence of God, and to substitute for theism Spencer's physical explanation of the universe, and yet admits how unsatisfying to himself the new position is .

" When at times I think, as think at times I must, of the appalling contrast between the hallowed See also:

glory of that creed which once was mine, and the lonely See also:mystery of existence as now I find it—at such times I shall ever feel it impossible to avoid the sharpest pang of which my nature is susceptible." Atheism has to meet the protest of the heart as well as the argument of the mind of mankind . It must be judged not only by theoretical but by practical arguments, in its relations either to the individual or to a society . See also:Voltaire himself, speaking as a practical man rather than as a metaphysician, declared that if there were no God it would be necessary to invent one; and if the See also:analysis is only carried far enough it will be found that those who deny the existence of God (in a conventional sense) are all the See also:time setting up something in the nature of deity by way of an ideal of their own, while fighting over the meaning of a word or its conventional misapplication .

End of Article: ATHEISM (from Gr. as, privative, and Oebs, God)
[back]
ATHARVA VEDA
[next]
ATHELM (d. 923)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.