Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:ATTAINDER (from the O. Fr. ataindre, ateindre, to attain, i.e. to strike, accuse, condemn; See also:Lat. attingere, tangere, to See also:touch; the meaning has been greatly affected by the confusion with Fr. taindre, teindre, to taint, stain, Lat. tingere, to dye) , in See also:English See also:law, was the immediate and inseparable consequence from the See also:common law upon the See also:sentence of See also:death . When it was clear beyond all dispute that the criminal was no longer See also:fit to live he was called See also:attaint, and could not, before the See also:Evidence See also:Act 1843, be a See also:witness in any See also:court . This See also:attainder took See also:place after See also:judgment of death, or upon such circumstances as were See also:equivalent to judgment of death, such as judgment of See also:outlawry on a See also:capital See also:crime, pronounced for absconding from See also:justice . Conviction without judgment was not followed by attainder . The See also:con-sequences of attainder were (I) See also:forfeiture, (2) corruption of See also:blood . On attainder for See also:treason, the criminal forfeited to the See also:crown his lands, rights of entry on lands, and any See also:interest he might have in lands for his own See also:life or a See also:term of years . For See also:murder, the offender forfeited to the crown the profit of his freeholds during life, and in the See also:case of lands held in See also:fee-See also:simple, the lands themselves for a See also:year and a See also:day; subject to this, the lands escheated to the See also:lord of the fee . These forfeitures related back to the See also:time of the offence committed . Forfeitures of goods and chattels ensued not only on attainder, but on conviction for a See also:felony of any See also:kind, or on See also:flight from justice, and had no relation backwards to the time of the offence committed . By corruption of blood, " both upwards and downwards," the attainted See also:person could neither inherit nor transmit lands . The lands escheated to the lord of the fee, subject to the crown's right of forfeiture . The See also:doctrine of attainder has, however, ceased to be of mud importance . The Forfeiture Act 1870 enacted that henceforth no See also:confession, See also:verdict, See also:inquest, conviction or judgment of or for any treason or felony, or felo de se, should cause any attainder or corruption of blood, or any forfeiture or See also:escheat . Sentence of death, penal See also:servitude or imprisonment with hard labour for more than twelve months, after conviction for treason or felony, disqualifies from holding or retaining a seat in See also:parliament, public offices under the crown or otherwise, right to See also:vote at elections, &c., and such See also:disability is to remain until the See also:punishment has been suffered or a See also:pardon obtained . See also:Provision was made for the due See also:administration of convicts' estates, in the interests of themselves and their families . Forfeiture consequent on outlawry was exempted from the See also:pro-visions of the act . The See also:United States constitution (See also:Art . III . S . 3) says: " The See also:Congress shall have See also:power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall See also:work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted." Bills of Attainder, in English legal See also:procedure, were formerly a See also:parliamentary method of exercising judicial authority . They were ordinarily initiated in the See also:House of Lords and the proceedings were the same as on other bills, but the parties against whom they were brought might appear by counsel and produce witnesses in both Houses . In the case of an See also:impeachment (q.v.), the House of See also:Commons was prosecutor and the House of Lords See also:judge; but such bills being legislative in See also:form, the consent of crown, lords and commons was necessary to pass them . Bishops, who do not exercise but who claim the right to vote in cases of impeachment(q.a.), have a right to vote upon bills of attainder, but their vote is not conclusive in passing judgment upon the accused . First passed in 1459, such bills were employed, more particularly during the reigns of the Tudor See also:kings, as a See also:species of extrajudicial procedure, for the See also:direct punishment of See also:political offences .
Dispensing with the See also:ordinary judicial forms and precedents, they took away from the accused whatever advantages he might have gained in the courts of law; such evidence only was admitted as might be necessary to secure conviction; indeed, in many cases bills of attainder were passed without any evidence being produced at all
.
In the reign of See also: |
|
|
[back] ATTACHMENT |
[next] WRIT OF ATTAINT |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.