See also:CONFESSION OF See also:AUGSBURG
, the most important See also:Protestant statement of belief See also:drawn up at the See also:Reformation
.
In summoning a See also:diet for See also:April 1530, See also:Charles V. offered a See also:fair See also:hearing to all religious parties in the See also:Empire
.
See also:Luther, Justus See also:Jonas, See also:Melanchthon and Johann See also:Bugenhagen were appointed to draw up a statement 'of the Saxon position
.
These " See also:Torgau Articles " (See also:March 1530) tell merely why See also:Saxony had abolished certain ecclesiastical abuses
.
Melanchthon, however, soon found.that, owing to attacks by Johann See also:Eck of See also:Ingolstadt (" 404 Articles "); Saxony must See also:state its position in doctrinal matters as well
.
Taking the Articles of See also:Marburg (see MARBURG, COLLOQUY ok') and of See also:Schwabach as the point of departure, he repudiated all connexion with heretics condemned by the See also:ancient See also:- CHURCH
- CHURCH (according to most authorities derived from the Gr. Kvpcaxov [&wµa], " the Lord's [house]," and common to many Teutonic, Slavonic and other languages under various forms—Scottish kirk, Ger. Kirche, Swed. kirka, Dan. kirke, Russ. tserkov, Buig. cerk
- CHURCH, FREDERICK EDWIN (1826-1900)
- CHURCH, GEORGE EARL (1835–1910)
- CHURCH, RICHARD WILLIAM (1815–189o)
- CHURCH, SIR RICHARD (1784–1873)
church
.
On the 11th of May he sent the draft to Luther, who approved it, adding that he himself " could not tread so softly and gently." On the 23rd of See also:June the See also:Confession, originally intended as the statement of Electoral Saxony alone, was discussed and signed by a number of other Protestant princes and cities, and read before the diet on the 25th of June
.
Articles 1-21 See also:attempt to show that the Evangelicals had deviated from current See also:doctrine only in See also:- ORDER
- ORDER (through Fr. ordre, for earlier ordene, from Lat. ordo, ordinis, rank, service, arrangement; the ultimate source is generally taken to be the root seen in Lat. oriri, rise, arise, begin; cf. " origin ")
- ORDER, HOLY
order to restore the pure and See also:original teaching of the church
.
In spite of significant omissions (the See also:sole authority of scripture; rejection of See also:transubstantiation), the Confession contains nothing contradictory to Luther's position, and in its emphasis on See also:justification by faith alone enunciates a See also:cardinal concept of the Evangelical churches
.
Articles 22-28 describe and defend the reformation of various " abuses." On the 3rd of See also:August, shorn of much of its original bitterness, the so-called Confutatio pontificia was read; it well expresses the views approved in substance by the See also:emperor and all the See also:Catholic party
.
In See also:answer, Melanchthon was ordered to prepare an See also:Apology of the Confession, which the emperor refused to receive; so Melanchthon enlarged it and published the editio princeps of both Confession and Apology in 1531
.
As he See also:felt See also:free to make slight changes, the first edition does not represent the exact See also:text of 1530; the edition of 1533 was further improved, while that of 1540, rearranged and in See also:part rewritten, is known as the Variata
.
Dogmatic changes in this seem to have drawn forth no protest from Luther or See also:Brenz, so Melanchthon made fresh alterations in 1542
.
Later, the Variata of 1340 became the creed of the Melanchthonians and even of the Crypto-calvinists; so the framers of the See also:Formula of See also:Concord, promulgated in 1580, returned to the text handed in at the Diet
.
By See also:mistake they printed from a poor copy and not from the original, from which their See also:German text varies at over 45o places
.
Their Latin text, that of Melanchthon's editio princeps, is more nearly accurate
.
The textus receplus is that of the Formula of Concord, the divergent Latin and German forms being equally binding
.
See also:Acceptance of the Confession and Apology was made a See also:condition of membership in the See also:Schmalkalden See also:League
.
The
See also:Wittenberg Concord (1536) and the Articles of Schmalkalden (1J37) reaffirmed them
.
The Confession was the ultimate source of much of the See also:Thirty-nine Articles
.
The Religious See also:Peace of See also:Augsburg (1555) recognized no Protestants See also:save adherents of the Confession; this was modified in 1648
.
To-See also:day the Invariata is of symbolical authority among See also:Lutherans generally, while the Variata is accepted by the Reformed churches of certain parts of See also:Germany (see Lober, pp
.
79-83.)
See also:Editions of the received text: J
.
T
.
See also:- MULLER, FERDINAND VON, BARON (1825–1896)
- MULLER, FRIEDRICH (1749-1825)
- MULLER, GEORGE (1805-1898)
- MULLER, JOHANNES PETER (18o1-1858)
- MULLER, JOHANNES VON (1752-1809)
- MULLER, JULIUS (18oi-1878)
- MULLER, KARL OTFRIED (1797-1840)
- MULLER, LUCIAN (1836-1898)
- MULLER, WILHELM (1794-1827)
- MULLER, WILLIAM JAMES (1812-1845)
Muller, See also:Die symbolischen See also:Bucher der evangelisch-lutherischen Kirche (loth ed., See also:Gutersloh, 1907), with a valuable See also:historical introduction by Th
.
Kolde; Theodor Kolde, Die Augsburgische Konfession (See also:Gotha, 1896), (contains also the Marburg, Schwabach and Torgau Articles, the Confutatlo and the Variata of 1540)
.
For See also:translations of these, as well as of See also:Zwingli's Reckoning of his Faith, and of the Tetrapolitan Confession, see H
.
E
.
See also:Jacobs, The See also:Book of Concord (See also:Philadelphia, 1882-83)
.
The texts submitted to the emperor, lost before 1570, are reconstructed and compared with the textus receplus by P
.
Tschackert, Die unveranderte Augsburgische Konfession (See also:Leipzig, 1901)
.
For the See also:genesis of the Confession, see Th
.
Kolde, Die alteste Redaktion der Augsburger Konfession (Gutersloh, 1906), also Kolde's See also:article, " Augsburger Bekenntnis," in See also:Herzog-Hauck, Realencyklopadie (3rd ed., vol. ii., Leipzig, 1897)
.
The See also:standard commentary is still G
.
L
.
Plitt, Einleitung in die Augustana (See also:Erlangen, 1867 ff.) ; compare also J
.
Ficker, Die Konfutation See also:des Augsburgischen Bekenntnisses in ihrer ersten Gestalt (Leipzig, 1891); also A
.
Petzold, Die Konfutation des Vierstadtebekenntnisses (Leipzig, 1900)
.
On its See also:present use see G
.
Lober, Die See also:im evangelischen Deutschland geltenden Ordinationsverpflichtungen geschichtlich geordnet (Leipzig, 1905), 79 if
.
(W
.
W
.
End of Article: