Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

ROGER BACON (c. 1214-c. 1294)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V03, Page 156 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

ROGER See also:BACON (c. 1214-c. 1294)  , See also:English philosopher and See also:man of See also:science, was See also:born near See also:Ilchester in See also:Somerset . His See also:family appears to have been in See also:good circumstances, but in the stormy reign of See also:Henry III. their See also:property was despoiled and several members of the family were driven into See also:exile . See also:Roger completed his studies at See also:Oxford, though not, as current traditions assert, at Merton or at Brasenose, neither of which had then been founded . His abilities were speedily recognized by his contemporaries, and he enjoyed the friendship of such eminent men as See also:Adam de Marisco and See also:Robert See also:Grosseteste, See also:bishop of See also:Lincoln . Very little is known of See also:Bacon's See also:life at Oxford; it is said he took orders in 1233, and this is not improbable . In the following See also:year. or perhaps later, he crossed over to See also:France and studied at the university of See also:Paris, then the centre of intellectual life in See also:Europe, The two See also:great orders, See also:Franciscans and See also:Dominicans, were in the vigour of youth, and had already begun to take the See also:lead in theological discussion . See also:Alexander of See also:Hales was the See also:oracle of the Franciscans, while the See also:rival See also:order rejoiced in Albertus See also:Magnus and See also:Thomas See also:Aquinas . The scientific training which Bacon had received, mainly from the study of the Arab writers, showed him the manifold defects in the systems reared by these doctors . See also:Aristotle was known but in See also:part, and that part was rendered well-nigh unintelligible through the vileness of the See also:translations; yet not one of those professors would learn See also:Greek . The Scriptures read, if at all, in the erroneous versions were being deserted for the Sentences of See also:Peter Lombard . See also:Physical science, if there was anything deserving that name, was cultivated, not by experiment in the Aristotelian way, but by arguments deduced from premises resting on authority or See also:custom . Everywhere there was a show of know-ledge concealing fundamental See also:ignorance .

Bacon, accordingly, withdrew from the scholastic routine and devoted himself to See also:

languages and experimental See also:research . The only teacher whom he respected was a certain Petrus de Maharncuria Picardus, or of See also:Picardy, probably identical with a certain mathematician, Petrus Peregrinus of Picardy, who is perhaps the author of a MS. See also:treatise, De Magnete, contained in the Bibliotheque Imperiale at Paris . The contrast between the obscurity of such a man an) the fame enjoyed by the fluent See also:young doctors roused Bacon's indignation . In the See also:Opus Minus and Opus Tertium he pours forth a violent tirade against Alexander of Hales, and another See also:professor, not mentioned by name, but spoken of as alive, and blamed even more severely than Alexander . This See also:anonymous writer,' he says, acquired his learning by teaching others, and adopted a dogmatic See also:tone, which has caused him to be received at Paris with See also:applause as the equal of Aristotle, See also:Avicenna, or See also:Averroes . Bacon, during his stay in Paris, acquired considerable renown . He took the degree of See also:doctor of See also:theology, and seems to have received the complimentary See also:title of doctor mirabilis . In 1250 he was again at Oxford, and probably about this See also:time entered the Franciscan order . His fame spread at Oxford, though it was mingled with suspicions of his dealings in the See also:black arts and with some doubts of his orthodoxy . About 1257, See also:Bonaventura, See also:general of the order, interdicted his lectures at Oxford, and commanded him to See also:place himself under the superintendence of the See also:body at Paris . Here for ten years he remained under supervision, suffering great privations and strictly prohibited from See also:writing anything for publication . But his fame had reached the ears of the papal See also:legate in See also:England, See also:Guy de Foulques, who in 1265 became See also:pope as See also:Clement IV .

In the following year he wrote to Bacon, ordering him notwithstanding any injunctions from his superiors, to write out and send to him a treatise on the sciences which he had already asked of him when papal legate . Bacon, whose previous writings had been mostly scattered tracts, capitula quaedam, took fresh courage from this command of the pope . He set at naught the See also:

jealousy of his superiors and See also:brother friars, and despite the want of funds, See also:instruments, materials for copying and skilled copyists, completed in about eighteen months three large See also:treatises, the Opus Majus, Opus Minus and Opus Tertium, which, with some other tracts, were despatched to the pope . We do not know what See also:opinion Clement formed of them, but before his See also:death he seems to have bestirred himself on Bacon's behalf, for in 1268 the latter was permitted to return to Oxford . Here he continued his labours in experimental science and also in the See also:composition of See also:complete treatises . The See also:works sent to Clement he regarded as preliminaries, laying down principles which were afterwards to be applied to the sciences, The first part of an encyclopaedic See also:work probably remains to us in the Compendium Studii Philosophiae (1271) . In this work Bacon makes a vehement attack upon the ignorance and vices of the See also:clergy and monks, and generally upon the insufficiency of the existing studies . In 1278 his books were condemned by See also:Jerome de See also:Ascoli, general of the Franciscans, afterwards Pope See also:Nicholas IV., and he himself was thrown into See also:prison for fourteen years . During this time, it is said, he wrote the small See also:tract De Retardandis Senectutis Accidentibus, but this is merely a tradition . In 1292, as appears from what is probably his latest composition, the Compendium Studii Theologiae, he was again at See also:liberty . The exact time of his death cannot be determined; 1294 is probably as accurate a date as can be fixed upon . Works and See also:Editions.—See also:Leland said that it is easier to collect the leaves of the Sibyl than the titles of the works written by Roger Bacon; and though the labour has been somewhat lightened by the publications of See also:Brewer and See also:Charles, referred to below, it is no easy See also:matter even now to See also:form an accurate See also:idea of his actual productions .

An enormous number of See also:

MSS. are known to exist in See also:British and See also:French See also:libraries, and probably ' Brewer thinks this unknown professor is See also:Richard of See also:Cornwall, but the little we know of Richard is not in See also:harmony with the terms in which he is elsewhere spoken of by Bacon . See also:Erdmann conjectures Thomas Aquinas, which is extremely improbable, as Thomas was unquestionably not the first of his order to study See also:philosophy . See also:Cousin and Charles think that Albertus Magnus is aimed at, and certainly much of what is said applies with See also:peculiar force to him . But some things do not at all cohere with what is otherwise known of See also:Albert . It is See also:worth pointing out that Brewer, in transcribing the passage bearing on this (Op . Ined. p . 327), has the words fratrum puerulus, which in his marginal See also:note he interprets as applying to the Franciscan order . In this See also:case, of course, Albert could not be the See also:person referred to, as he was a Dominican . But Charles, in his transcription, entirely omits the important word fratrum.not all have yet been discovered . Many are transcripts of works or portions of works already published and, therefore, require no See also:notice.' The works hitherto printed (neglecting reprints) are the following: (1) See also:Speculum Alchimiae (1541)—translated into English (1597); French, A See also:Poisson (189o); (2) De Mirabili Potestate Artis et Naturae (1542)—English See also:translation (1659); (3) Libellus de Retardandis Senectutis Accidentibus (1590)—translated as the " Cure of Old See also:Age," by Richard See also:Brown (See also:London, 1683); (4) Sanioris Medicinae Magistri D . Rogeri Baconis Anglici de Arte Chymiae Scripta (See also:Frankfort, 1603)—a collection of small tracts containing Excerpta de Libro Avicennae de Anima, Breve Breviarium, Verbum Abbreviatum,3 Secretum Secretorum, Tract at us Trium Verborum, and , Speculum Secretorum; (5) Perspectiva (1614), which is the fifth part of the Opus Majus; (6) Specula Mathematica, which is the See also:fourth part of the same; (7) Opus Majus ad Clementem IV., edited by S . See also:Jebb (1733) and J .

H . See also:

Bridges (London, 1897); (8) See also:Opera hactenus Inedita, by J . S . Brewer (1859), containing the Opus Tertium, Opus Minus, Compendium Studii Philosophiae and the De Secretis Operibus Naturae; (9) De Morali Philosophia (See also:Dublin, 186o, see below); (1o) The Greek See also:Grammar of R . Bacon and a Fragment of his See also:Hebrew Grammar, edited with introduction and notes by E . S . Nolan and S . A . See also:Hirsch (1902); (i1) Metaphysica Fratris Rogeri, edited by R . See also:Steele, with a See also:preface (1905); (12) Opera hactenus inedita, by Robert Steele (1905) . How these works stand related to one another can only be determined by See also:internal See also:evidence . The smaller works, chiefly on See also:alchemy, are unimportant, and the See also:dates of their composition cannot be ascertained .

It is known that before the Opus Majus Bacon had already written some tracts, among which an. unpublished work, Computus Naturalium,. on See also:

chronology, belongs probably to the year 1263; while, if the See also:dedication of the De Secretis Operibus be See also:authentic, that See also:short treatise must have been composed before 1249 . It is, however, with the Opus Majus that Bacon's real activity begins . It has been called by See also:Whewell at once the See also:Encyclopaedia and the Organum of the 13th See also:century . Part I . (pp . 1—22), which is sometimes designated De Utilitate Scientiarum, treats of the four off endicula, or causes of See also:error . These are, authority, custom, the opinion of the unskilled many, and the concealment of real ignorance with pretence of knowledge . The last error is the most dangerous, and is, in a sense, the cause of all the others . The offendicula have sometimes been looked upon as an anticipation of See also:Francis Bacon's Idola, but the two classifications have little in See also:common . In the See also:summary of this part, contained in the Opus Tertium, Bacon shows very clearly his See also:perception of the unity of science and the See also:necessity of encyclopaedic treatment . Part II . (pp .

Phoenix-squares

23—43) treats of the relation between philosophy and theology . All true See also:

wisdom is contained in the Scriptures, at least implicitly; and the true end of philosophy is to rise from the imperfect knowledge of created things to a knowledge of the Creator . See also:Ancient philosophers, who had not the Scriptures, received See also:direct See also:illumination from See also:God, and only thus can the brilliant results attained by them be accounted for . Part III . (pp . 44—57) treats of the utility of grammar, and the necessity of a true linguistic science for the adequate comprehension either of the Scriptures or of books on philosophy . 2 The more important MSS. are:—(1) The extensive work on the fundamental notions of physics, called Communia Naturalium, which is found in the See also:Mazarin library at Paris, in the British Museum, and in the Bodleian and University See also:College libraries at Oxford; (2) on the fundamental notions of See also:mathematics, De Cornmunibus Mathematicae, part of which is in the See also:Sloane collection, part in the Bodleian; (3) Baconis Physica, contained among the additional MSS. in the British Museum; (4) the fragment called Quinta Pars Compendii Theologiae, in the British Museum; (5) the Compendium Studii Theologiae, in the British Museum; (6) the logical fragments, such as the Summulae Dialectices, in the Bodleian, and the glosses upon Aristotle's physics and See also:metaphysics in the library at See also:Amiens . See Little, The See also:Grey Friars in Oxford (1892) . 3 At the See also:close of the Verb . Abbrev. is a curious note, concluding with the words, " ipse Rogerus fuit discipulus fratris See also:Alberti!" The necessity of accurate acquaintance with any See also:foreign See also:language and of obtaining good texts, is a subject Bacon is never weary of descanting upon . A translator should know thoroughly the language he is translating from, the language into which he is translating, and the subject of which the See also:book treats . Part IV .

(pp . 57-255) contains an elaborate treatise on mathematics, " the See also:

alphabet of philosophy," maintaining that all the sciences See also:rest ultimately on mathematics, and progress only when their facts can be subsumed under mathematical principles . This fruitful thought he illustrates by showing how See also:geometry is applied to the See also:action of natural bodies, and demonstrating by geometrical figures certain See also:laws of physical forces . He also shows how his method may be used to determine some curious and See also:long-discussed problems, such as the See also:light of the stars, the ebb and flow of the See also:tide, the See also:motion of the See also:balance . He then proceeds to adduce elaborate and sometimes slightly See also:grotesque reasons tending to prove that mathematical knowledge is essential in theology, and closes this See also:section of his work with two comprehensive sketches of See also:geography and See also:astronomy . That on geography is particularly good, and is interesting as having been read by See also:Columbus, who lighted on it in Petrus de Alliaco's Imago lfundi, and was strongly influenced by its reasoning . Part V . (pp . 256-357) treats of See also:perspective . This was the part 9f his work on which Bacon most prided himself, and in it, we may"add, he seems to owe most to the Arab writers Kindi and See also:Alhazen . The treatise opens with an able See also:sketch of See also:psychology, founded upon, but in some important respects varying foam, Aristotle's De Anima . The See also:anatomy of the See also:eye is next described; this is done well and evidently at first See also:hand, though the functions of the parts are not given with complete accuracy .

Many other points of physiological See also:

optics are touched on, in general erroneously . Bacon then discusses See also:vision in a right See also:line, the laws of reflection and See also:refraction, and the construction of mirrors and lenses . In this part of the work, as in the preceding, his reasoning depends essentially upon his peculiar view of natural agents and their activities . His fundamental physical See also:maxims are matter and force ; the latter he calls virtus, See also:species, imago agentis, and by numberless other names . See also:Change, or any natural phenomenon, is produced by the impression of a virtus or species on matter—the result being the thing known . Physical action is, therefore, impression, or transmission of force in lines, and must accordingly be explained geometrically . This view of nature Bacon considered fundamental, and it lies, indeed, at the See also:root of his whole philosophy . To the short notices of it given in the 4th and 5th parts of the Opus Majus, he subjoined two, or perhaps three, extended accounts of it . We possess at least one of these in the tract De Multiplicatione Specierum, printed as part of the Opus Majus by Jebb (pp . 358-444) . We cannot do more than refer to Charles for discussions as to how this theory of nature is connected with the metaphysical problems of force and matter, with the logical See also:doctrine of universals, and in general with Bacon's theory of knowledge . Part VI .

(pp . 445-477) treats of experimental science, domina omnium scientiarum . There are two methods of knowledge: the one by See also:

argument, the other by experience . See also:Mere argument is never sufficient ; it may decide a question, but gives no See also:satisfaction or certainty to the mind, which can only be convinced by immediate inspection or See also:intuition . Now this is what experience gives . But experience is of two sorts, See also:external and internal ; the first is that usually called experiment, but it can give no complete knowledge even of corporeal things, much less of spiritual . On the other hand, in inner experience the mind is illuminated by the divine truth, and of this supernatural enlightenment there are seven grades . Experimental science, which in the Opus Tertium (p . 46) is distinguished from the speculative sciences and the operative arts in a way that forcibly reminds us of Francis Bacon, is said to have three great prerogatives over all other sciences:—(1) It verifies their conclusions by direct experiment; (2) It discovers truths which they could never reach; (3) It investigates the secrets of nature, and opens to us a knowledge of past and future . As an instance of his method, Bacon gives an investigation intothe nature and cause of the See also:rainbow, which is really a very See also:fine specimen of inductive research . The seventh part of the Opus Majus (De Morali Philosophia), not given in Jebb's edition, is noticed at considerable length in the Opus Tertium (cap. xiv.) . Extracts from it are given by Charles (pp .

339-348)• As.has been seen, Bacon had no sooner finished this elaborate work than he began to prepare a summary to be sent along with it . Of this summary, or Opus Minus, part has come down and is published in Brewer's Op . Ined . (313-389), from what appears to be the only MS . The work was intended to contain an abstract of the Opus Majus, an See also:

account of the See also:principal vices of theology, and treatises on speculative and See also:practical alchemy . At the same time, or immediately after, Bacon began a third work as a pre-amble to the other two, giving their general See also:scope and aim, but supplementing them in many points . The part of this work, generally called Opus Tertium, is printed by Brewer (pp . 1-310), who considers it to be a complete treatise . Charles, however, has given good grounds for supposing that it is merely a preface, and that the work went on to discuss grammar, See also:logic (which Bacon thought of little service, as reasoning was innate), mathematics, general physics, metaphysics and moral philosophy . He founds his argument mainly on passages in the Communia Naturalium, which indeed prove distinctly that it was sent to Clement, and cannot, therefore, form part of the Compendium, as Brewer seems to think . It must be confessed, however, that nothing can well be more confusing than the references in Bacon's works, and it seems well-nigh hopeless to See also:attempt a complete arrangement of them until the texts have been collated and carefully printed . All these large works Bacon appears to have looked on as preliminaries, introductions, leading to a great work which should embrace the principles of all the sciences .

This great work, which is perhaps the frequently-referred-to See also:

Liber See also:Sex Scientiarum, he began, and a few fragments still indicate its outline . First appears to have come the treatise now called Compendium Studii Philosophiae (Brewer pp . 393-519), containing an account of the causes of error, and then entering at length upon grammar . After that, apparently, logic was to be treated; then, possibly, mathematics and physics; then speculative alchemy and experimental science . It is, however, very difficult, in the See also:present See also:state of our knowledge of the MSS., to See also:hazard even conjectures as to the contents and nature of this last and most comprehensive work . Bacon's fame in popular estimation has always rested on his See also:mechanical discoveries . Careful research has shown that very little can with accuracy be ascribed to him . He certainly describes a method of constructing a See also:telescope, but not so as to lead one to conclude that he was in See also:possession of that See also:instrument . Burning-glasses were in common use, and See also:spectacles it does not appear he made, although he was probably acquainted with the principle of their construction . His wonderful predictions (in the De See also:Sardis) must be taken cum grano salis; he believed in See also:astrology, in the doctrine of signatures, and in the philosopher's See also:stone, and knew that the circle had been squared . For his work in connexion with See also:gunpowder, the invention of which has been claimed for him on the ground of a passage in his De mirabili potestate artis et naturae, see GUNPOWDER . Summary.—The 13th century, an age peculiarly See also:rich in great men, produced few, if any, who can take higher See also:rank than Roger Bacon .

He is in every way worthy to be placed beside Albertus Magnus, Bonaveiftura, and Thomas Aquinas . These had an infinitely wider renown in their See also:

day, but See also:modern See also:criticism has restored the balance in his favour, and is even in danger of erring in the opposite direction . Bacon, it is now said, was not appreciated by his age because he was in advance of it; he is no schoolman, but a modern thinker, whose conceptions of science are more just and clear than are even those of his more celebrated namesake.' In this view there is certainly some truth, but it is much exaggerated . As a general See also:rule, no man can be completely dissevered from his See also:national antecedents and ' See See also:Duhring, Kritische Ges. d . Phil . 192, 249-251 . 156 surroundings, and Bacon is not an exception . Those who take up such an extreme position regarding his merits have known too little of the state of contemporary science, and have limited their comparison to the works of the scholastic theologians . We never find in Bacon himself any consciousness of originality; he is rather a keen and systematic thinker, working in a well-beaten track, from which his contemporaries were being See also:drawn by theology and metaphysics .

End of Article: ROGER BACON (c. 1214-c. 1294)
[back]
LEONARD BACON (1802–1881)
[next]
SIR NICHOLAS BACON (1509-1579)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.