Online Encyclopedia

BANGORIAN CONTROVERSY

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V03, Page 317 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

BANGORIAN CONTROVERSY  , a theological dispute in the

early 18th century which originated in 1716 with the
See also:
posthumous publication of George Hickes's (bishop of
See also:
Thetford) Constitution of the Christian Church, and the Nature and Consequences of
See also:
Schism, in which he excommunicated all but the non-juringchurchmen . Benjamin Hoadly (q.v.), the newly-appointed bishop of Bangor, scented the opportunity and wrote a speedy and able reply, Preservative against the Principles and Practices of Non-Jurors, in which his own Erastian position was recommended and sincerity proposed as the only test of truth . This was followed by his famous sermon, preached before George I. on the 31st of March 1717, on The Nature of the
See also:
Kingdom or Church of Christ . In this discourse " he impugned the idea of the existence of any visible church at all, ridiculed the value of any tests of orthodoxy, and poured contempt upon the claims of the church to govern itself by means of the state." He identified the church with the kingdom of Heaven—it was therefore " not of this
See also:
world," and Christ had not delegated His authority to any representatives . Both
See also:
book and sermon were reported on by a committee appointed by the
See also:
Lower House of Convocation in May, and steps would have been taken by the archbishop and bishops had not the government stepped in (Hoadly denied that this was at his request) and prorogued Convocation till November . Hoadly himself wrote A Reply to the Representations of Convocation and also answered his
See also:
principal critics, among whom were Thomas Sherlock (q.v.), then dean of
See also:
Chichester, Andrew Snape, provost of
See also:
Eton, and Francis Hare, then dean of Worcester . These three men, and another opponent, Robert
See also:
Moss, dean of Ely, were deprived of their royal chaplaincies . Hoadly was shrewd enough not to answer the rnost brilliant, though comparatively unknown, of his antagonists, William Law . Though the controversy went on, its most important result had already been achieved in the silencing of Convocation, for that
See also:
body, though it had just " seemed to be settling down to its proper
See also:
work in dealing with the real exigencies of the church" when the Hoadly dispute arose, did not meet again for the despatch of business for nearly a century and a
See also:
half .

End of Article: BANGORIAN CONTROVERSY
[back]
BANGOR (formerly BANGOR FAWR, as distinguished from...
[next]
BANGWEULU

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.