Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:BIGAMY (from See also:Lat. bis, twice, and Gr. ya,uor, See also:marriage) , in See also:English See also:law, according to the See also:statute now in force (24 and 25 Vict . C . 100, § 57), the offence committed by a See also:person who " being married shall marry any other person during the See also:life of the former See also:husband or wife." In the See also:canon law the word had a rather wider meaning, and the See also:marriage of a clerk in See also:minor orders with a widow came within its See also:scope . At the See also:council of See also:Lyons (A.D . 1274) bigamists were stripped of their See also:privilege of See also:clergy . This canon was adopted and explained by an English statute of 1276; and See also:bigamy, therefore, became a usual counterplea to the claim of benefit of clergy . However, by an See also:act of 1547 every person entitled to the benefit of clergy is to be allowed the same, " although he See also:bath been See also:divers times married to any single woman or single See also:women, or to any widow or widows, or to two wives or more." A bigamous marriage, by the ecclesiastical law of See also:England, is simply void . By a statute of 1604 the offence was made a See also:felony . This statute, after being repealed in 1828, was re-enacted and reproduced in the Offences against the Person Act 1861 . It is immaterial whether the second marriage has taken See also:place within England and See also:Ireland or elsewhere, and the offence may be dealt with in any See also:county or place where the See also:defendant shall be apprehended or be in custody . The following clause embodies the necessary exceptions to the very See also:general See also:language used in the See also:definition of the offence:—" Provided that nothing in this See also:section contained shall extend to any second marriage contracted elsewhere than in England and Ireland by any other than a See also:British subject, or to any person marrying a second See also:time whose husband or wife shall have been continuously absent from such person for the space of seven years then last past, and shall not have been known by such person to be living within that time, or shall extend to any person who at the time of such second marriage shall have been divorced from the See also:bond of the first marriage, or to any person whose former marriage shall have been declared void by any See also:court of competent See also:jurisdiction." The See also:punishment is penal See also:servitude for not more than seven nor less than five years, or imprisonment with or without hard labour, not exceeding two years . A valid marriage must be proved in the first instance in See also:order to support a See also:charge of bigamy . A voidable marriage, such as were marriages between persons within the prohibited degrees before the Marriage Act 1836, will be sufficient, but a marriage which is absolutely void as all such marriages now are, will not . For example, if a woman marry B during the lifetime of her husband A, and after A's See also:death marry C during the lifetime of B, her marriage with C is not bigamous, because her marriage with B was a nullity . In regard to the second marriage (which constitutes the offence) the English courts have held that it is immaterial whether, but for the bigamy, it would have been a valid marriage or not . An See also:uncle, for example, cannot marry his niece; but if being already married he goes through the ceremony of marriage with her he is guilty of bigamy . In an Irish See also:case, however, it has been held that to constitute the offence the second marriage must be one which, but for the existence of the former marriage, would have been valid . With reference to the case in which the parties to the first marriage have been divorced, it may be observed that no See also:sentence or act of any See also:foreign See also:country dissolving a vinculo a marriage contracted in England by persons continuing to be domiciled in England, for grounds on which it is not liable to be dissolved a vinculo in England will be recognized as a See also:divorce (R. v . Lolley 1812, R . & R . 237) . Hence, a divorce a vincula for See also:adultery, in a Scottish court, of persons married in England, is not within the statute . But if a person charged with bigamy in England can prove that he has been legally divorced by the law of the country where the divorced parties were domiciled at the time (even though the ground on which the divorce was granted was not one that would justify a divorce in England) it will be See also:good See also:defence to the charge . Criminal jurisdiction is always regarded as purely territorial, but bigamy (together with See also:homicide and See also:treason) is an exception to this See also:rule .
A British subject committing bigamy in any country may be tried for the same in the See also:United See also:Kingdom (See also:Earl See also:Russell's case, Igor)
.
In See also:Scotland, at the date of the only statute respecting bigamy, that of 1551, cap
.
19, the offence seems to have been chiefly considered in a religious point of view, as a sort of See also:perjury, or violation of the See also:solemn See also:vow or See also:oath which was then used in contracting marriage; and, accordingly, it was ordained to be punished with the proper pains of perjury
.
Bigamy was punished in England until the reign of See also: In most of the states, prosecutions for bigamy are barred after the See also:lapse of a certain number of years . The marriage wherever solemnized must be a valid marriage according to the law of the place of solemnization; if void there, no See also:prosecution for bigamy can he founded upon it . In some jurisdictions, an honest belief that a See also:prior divorce of one of the parties was valid would be a defence to a prosecution for bigamy, in others the contrary is held . On the See also:continent of See also:Europe, bigamy is punishable in most countries with varying terms of imprisonment, with or without hard labour, according to the circumstances of the case . See See also:Stephen, See also:History of Criminal Law; See also:Dicey, Conflict of See also:Laws; See also:Report of the Royal See also:Commission on Marriage Laws (1868) . |
|
|
[back] BIG RAPIDS |
[next] JOHN BIGELOW (1817- ) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.