BINOCULAR

See also:

• INSTRUMENT (Lat. instrumentum, from insincere, to build up, furnish, arrange, prepare)

INSTRUMENT  , or briefly BINOCULAR,4 an apparatus through which objects are viewed with both eyes . In this article only those instruments will be considered in which solid objects or objects in space are viewed; reference should be made to the article STEREOSCOPE for the instruments in which plane representations are offered to both eyes . The natural vision is such that different central projections of the objects are communicated to both eyes; the difference of the two perspective representations arises from the fact that the projection centres are laterally separated by an interval about equal to the distance between the eyes (the inter-pupillary distance) . Binocular instruments should aid the natural spatial or stereoscopic vision, or make it possible if the eyes fail . If the objects be so far 4 The term binocular (from the Lat. bini, two at a time, and oculi, eyes) was originally an adjective used to describe things adapted for the simultaneous use of both eyes, as in " binocular vision," " a binocular telescope or microscope "; now " a binocular " is used as a noun, meaning a binocular microscope, a field-glass, &c . distant that the two perspectives formed by the naked eye are no more distinguished from each other, recourse may be had to binocular telescopes and range-finders; and if the objects be so small that, in order to observe details on them, we must bring our eyes so close to the objects that they cannot accommodate the images, recourse may be had to binocular microscopes and magnifying glasses . The construction of binocular instruments dates back over several centuries, and has now been brought to great perfection . The subject of their theory and history has been exhaustively treated by M. von Rohr, Die binokularen Instrumente (Berlin, 1907), the first publication to present a complete account of these instruments . Binocular Instruments for Observation only.—The first binocular telescope, consisting of two telescopes placed side by side, was Telescope, constructed in 1608 by Johann Lipperhey, the inventor of the ordinary or Dutch telescope . The subject was next taken up by the monks . The Capuchin Antonius Maria Schyrlaus (Schyrl) de Rheita (1597–166o) described in 1645 the construction of double terrestrial telescopes . Greater success attended the efforts of the Capuchin Cherubin d'Orleans, who flourished at about the same time, and constructed large double telescopes of the Dutch type of high magnification, for use in war, and smaller instruments of lower magnification; these instruments were provided with mechanism for adjusting to the interval between the eyes of the observer (fig .

I) . After these discoveries the subject received no more

attention until the 19th century; no improvements of these instruments are recorded in the literature of the second half of the 18th century . The re-invention of the Dutch binocular telescope apparently dates from 1823, and is to be assigned to the Viennese optician, Johann Fried- rich Voigtlander (1779–1859); but the credit of having placed these instruments on the market probably belongs to J . P . Lemiere in Paris, who, in 1825, took out a French patent for an improve- ment of the Dutch double telescope . Lemiere's instruments were furnished with a common focusing arrangement, and the adapting to the inter-pupillary distance was effected by turning the two parallel telescopes round their common axis . The development of this instrument was studied by opticians for the remainder of the first half of the 19th century; the last improvement apparently was made by P . G . Bardou in 1854, and by H . Helmholtz in 1857 when he described the telestereoscope (fig . 2) with telescopic magnification . By utilizing the telescope with prism-inversion, devised in 1851 by Ignazio Porro (1795–1875), A .

A .

Boulanger succeeded in producing a binocular of an entirely new type in 18J9 (fig . 3) . But he overlooked the possibility of increasing the distance between the objectives; Camille Nachet introduced this improvement in 1875, but, his instruments did not meet with much popularity . This was probably due to the fact that, at this time, the manufacture of the glass for the prisms was too difficult; this was overcome by E . Abbe, after the founding of the glass-works at Jena, who effected, independently of his predecessors, the wider separation of the ob- jectives (fig . 4), and increased it in the telestereoscope (fig . 5), or relief telescope, in a manner nearly approaching to Helmholtz's proposal . The first binocular microscope was invented by the previously mentioned Father Micro- Cherubin whose in- scope . strument consisted of two inverting systems, and consequently gave a totally wrong impression of depth, i.e. depressions appeared as elevations, and vice versa, or, as we must say after Charles Wheatstone, it presented a pseudoscopic impression; this quality, however, was not recognized by the microscopists of the time . The instrument subsequently fell into complete neglect for nearly two centuries, to be revived in 1852 by Charles Wheatstone, who has stated that he had previously studied the problem; the publication of his views in his second great paper "On Binocular Vision,"' in the Phil . Trans. for 1852, undoubtedly stimulated the investigation of this instrument, which was carried on with zeal and success more especially in England and the United ;t States .

In 1853 the

American J . L . Riddell (1807–1867) devised his binocular microscope, which contained the essentials of Wheatstone's pseudoscope . F . H . Wenham, another constructor, did not at first succeed in avoiding the pseudoscopic effect, but, by the application of refracting dividing prisms, he subsequently arrived at orthoscopic representations and continued the development of the different methods for producing micro-photographic stereograms; this was effected in the first case by FIG . 4 . placing a diaphragm over one half of the objective for each exposure, and in the second case by a suitable direction of the illuminating pencil (fig . 6) . Of greater benefit, how-ever, for stimulating interest in binocular microscopes, was his invention of reflecting dividing prisms (fig . 7) . Other experiments, begun by Powell and Lealand, and developed with' greater skill by Wenham, were concerned with the binocular vision of identical images .

Such an impression could not possibly be stereoscopic, and these experiments led to the construction of a non-stereoscopic binocular micro- scope . Of the other workers in this field mention may be made 1 The first

part appeared in 1838 . of Alfred Nachet, who in 1853, and subsequently in 1863, brought forward two forms of binocular microscope . The earliest stages of the development of the binocular microscope had been always confined to those instruments with one objective, in the immediate neighbourhood of which the systems for dividing the pencil were placed . At a later date attempts were made to separate the two halves of the objective by modifying the eye-piece; this led to the construction of stereoscopic eye-pieces, initiated by R . B . Tolles, E . Abbe and A . Prazmowski . Of special importance is the work of Abbe; although, as he himself has stated, his methods accidentally led to the Wenham system, he certainly was far above his predecessors in his theoretical treatment of the problem, and in the perspicuity and clearness of his explanation . To him is also due the re-establishment of the instruments, which Wenham had abandoned by reason of too great technical difficulties (fig . 8) .

The newest

form of the binocular microscope is very similar to the oldest form in which two completely separated tubes were employed . The inventor, H . S . Greenough, employs two systems for setting up the image, in order to avoid the pseudoscopic effect . After experiments in the Zeiss works, the erecting of Porro's prisms simultaneously permitted a convenient adaptation to the eye-distance of the observer . The first binocular magnifying glass or simple microscope (German, Lupe) was devised by J . L . Riddell in 1853; in this instrument (fig . 9) the pencil of light is transmitted simple to the eyes by means of two pairs of parallel mirrors . mtcro- Of the many different improvements mention may scope . be made of A . Nachet's .

H . Westien made use of two

Chevalier-Brucke's simple microscopes with their long working distances in order to form an instrument in which the curvature of the image was not entirely avoided . Mention may also be made of the binoculars of K . Fritzsch (formerly Prokesch) and E . Berger . Binocular Instruments for Range-finding.--For measur- ing purposes binocular tele- scopes with parallel axes are the only types employed . The measurement is effected by adjoin- ing to the space or interval to be measured some means of measure- ment defined; for example, by a fixed scale which extends into the space, or by a movable point (Wandermarke) . This instru- ment shows a transition to the stereoscope, inasmuch as the scale or means of measurement is not directly observed, but to each eye a plane representation is offered, just as in the stereoscope; the space to be measured, on the other hand, is portrayed in exactly the same way as in the double telescope . The method for superposing the two spaces on one another was deduced by Sir David Brewster in 1856, but he does not appear to have dealt with the problem of range-finding . The problem was attacked in 1861 by A . Rollet; later, in 1866, E . Mach published a promising idea, and finally—independently of the researches of his predecessors—Hektor de Grousilliers, in partnership with the Zeiss firm (E .

Abbe and C . Pulfrich), constructed the first stereoscopic range-finder suitable for

practical use . (O .