|
KARL GOTTLIEB BRETSCHNEIDER (1776—1848) , See also: German See also: scholar and theologian, was See also: born at Gersdorf in See also: Saxony
.
In 1794 he entered the university of See also: Leipzig, where he studied See also: theology for four years
.
After some years of hesitation he resolved to be ordained, and in 1802 he passed with See also: great distinction the examination for candidatus theologiae, and attracted the regard of F
.
V
.
Reinhard, author of the See also: System der christlichen Moral x'.1788—1815), then See also: court-preacher at See also: Dresden, who became hiswarm friend and See also: patron during the See also: remainder of his See also: life
.
In 1804—1806 Bretschneider was Privat-docent at the university of See also: Wittenberg, where he lectured on philosophy and theology
.
During this See also: time he wrote his See also: work on the development of dogma, Systematische Entwickelung aller in der Dogmatik vorkommenden Begriffe nach den symbolischen Schriften der evangelisch-lutherischen and ref ormirten Kirche (1805, 4th ed
.
1841), which was followed by others, including an edition of Ecclesiasticus with a Latin commentary
.
On the advance of the French army under See also: Napoleon into Prussia, he determined to leave Wittenberg and abandon his university career
.
Through the See also: good offices of Reinhard, he became pastor of See also: Schneeberg in Saxony (1807)
.
In 1808 he was promoted to the office of See also: superintendent of the See also: church of
See also: Annaberg, in which capacity he had to decide, in accordance with the See also: canon See also: law of Saxony, many matters belonging to the department of ecclesiastical law
.
But the See also: climate did not agree with him, and his official duties interfered with his theological studies
.
With a view to a change he took the degree ofSee also: doctor of theology in Wittenberg in See also: August 1812
.
In 1816 he was appointed general superintendent at See also: Gotha, where he remained until his See also: death in 1848
.
This was the great See also: period of his See also: literary activity
.
In 1820 was published his See also: treatise on the gospel of St See also: John, entitled Probabilia de Evangelii el Epistolarum Joannis Apostoli
See also: indole et origine, which attracted much See also: attention
.
In it he collected with great fulness and discussed with marked moderation the arguments against Johannine authorship
.
This called forth a number of replies
.
To the astonishment of every one, Bretschneider announced in the preface to the second edition of his Dogmatik in 1822, that he had never doubted the authenticity of the gospel, and had published his Probabilia only to draw attention to the subject, and to See also: call forth a more See also: complete defence of its genuineness
.
Bretschneider remarks in his auto-biography that the publication of this work had the effect of preventing his See also: appointment as successor to Karl C
.
Tittmann in Dresden, the See also: minister Detlev von Einsiedel (1773—1861) denouncing him as the "slanderer of John" (Johannisschander)
.
His greatest contribution to the science of exegesis was his See also: Lexicon Manuale Graeco-Latinum in libros Novi Testasnenti (1824, 3rd ed
.
1840)
.
This work was valuable for the use which its author made of the See also: Greek of the Septuagint, of the Old and New Testament Apocrypha, of See also: Josephus, and of the apostolic fathers, in See also: illustration of the language of the New Testament
.
In 1826 he published Apologie der neuern Theologie See also: des evangelischen Deutschlands
.
Hugh See also: James
See also: Rose had published in See also: England (1825) a See also: volume of sermons on the rationalist See also: movement (The See also: State of the See also: Protestant See also: Religion in See also: Germany), in which he classed Bretschneider with the rationalists; and Bretschneider contended that he himself was not a rationalist in the ordinary sense of the See also: term, but a " rational supernaturalist." Some of his numerous dogmatic writings passed through several See also: editions
.
An See also: English See also: translation of his See also: Manual of the Religion and See also: History of the Christian Church appeared in 1857
.
His dogmatic position seems to be intermediate between the extreme school of naturalists, such as Heinrich Paulus, J
.
F
.
Rohr and See also: Julius Wegscheider on the one See also: hand, and D
.
F
.
Strauss and F
.
C
.
Baur on the other
.
Recognizing a supernatural See also: element in the See also: Bible, he nevertheless allowed to the full the critical exercise of reason in the interpretation of its dogmas (cp
.
See also: Otto See also: Pfleiderer, Development of Theology, PP
.
89 ff.) . See his autobiography, Aus meinem Leben: Selbstbiographie von K . G . Bretschneider (Gotha, 1851), of which a translation, with notes, by ProfessorSee also: George E
.
See also: Day, appeared in the Bibliotheca Sacra and See also: American Biblical Repository, Nos
.
36 and 38 (1852, 1853); Neu-decker in Die allgemeine Kirchenzeitung (1848), No
.
38; Wustemann, Brelschneideri Memoria (1848); A
.
G
.
See also: Farrar, Critical History of See also: Free Thought (See also: Bampton Lectures, 1862) ; Herzog-Hauck, Realencyklopadie (ed
.
1897)
.
|
|
|
[back] JULES ADOLPHE BRETON |
[next] BRETTEN |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.