|
See also: born at Bethune in See also: Artois
.
He studied in See also: Paris under See also: William of
See also: Occam
.
He was professor of philosophy in the university of Paris, was rector in 1327, and in 1345 was deputed to defend its interests before See also: Philip of Valois and at
See also: Rome
.
He was more than sixty years old in 1358, but the See also: year of his See also: death is not recorded
.
The tradition that he was forced to flee from See also: France along with other nominalists, and founded the university of Vienna in 1356, is unsupported and in contradiction to the fact that the university was founded by See also: Frederick II. in I.237
.
An See also: ordinance of See also: Louis XI., in 1473, directed against the nominalists, prohibited the
See also: reading of his See also: works
.
In philosophy Buridan was a rationalist, and followed Occam in denying all See also: objective reality to universals, which he regarded as See also: mere words
.
The aim of his logic is represented as having been the devising of rules for the See also: discovery of syllogistic See also: middle terms; this See also: system for aiding slow-witted persons became known as the pons asi'wrum
.
The parts of logic which he treated with most minuteness are modal propositions and modal syllogisms
.
In commenting on See also: Aristotle's See also: Ethics he dealt in a very See also: independent manner with the question of See also: free will, his conclusions being remarkably similar to those of See also: John
See also: Locke
.
The only liberty which he admits is a certain power of suspending the deliberative See also: process and determining the direction of the intellect
.
Otherwise the will is entirely dependent on the view of the mind, the last result of examination
.
The comparison of the will unable to See also: act between two equally balanced motives to an ass dying of See also: hunger between two equal and equidistant bundles of See also: hay is not found in his works, and may have been invented by his opponents to ridicule his determinism
.
That he was not the originator of the theory known as " liberty of indifference " (liberum arbitrium indiferentiae) is shown in G
.
Fonsegrive's Essai sur le libre arbitre, pp
.
119, 199 (1887)
.
His works are :—Summula de dialectica (Paris, 1487) ; Compendium logicae (Venice, 1489) ; Quaestiones in viii. libros physicorum (Paris, 1516) ; In Aristotelis Metaphysica (1518) ; Quaestiones in x. libros ethicorum Aristotelis (Paris, 1489; See also: Oxford, 1637); Quaestiones in viii. libros politicorum Aristotelis (1500)
.
See K
.
Prantl's Gesehichte
der Logik, bk. iv
.
14-38; St8ckl's Gesehichte der Philosophie See also: des
Mittelalters, ii
.
1023-1028; Herzog-Hauck, Realencyklopadie, s.v
.
(1897)
.
|
|
|
[back] BURIATS |
[next] BURKE |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.