Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

BUTLER (or BOTELER), SAMUEL (1612–168o)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V04, Page 887 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

BUTLER (or BOTELER), See also:SAMUEL (1612–168o)  , See also:English poet, author of Hudibras, son of See also:Samuel See also:Butler, a small See also:farmer, was baptized at Strensham, See also:Worcestershire, on the 8th of See also:February 1612 . He was educated at the See also:King's school, See also:Worcester, under See also:Henry See also:Bright, the See also:record of whose zeal as a teacher is preserved by See also:Fuller (Worthies, Worcestershire) . After leaving school he served a Mr Jeffereys of See also:Earl's Croome, Worcestershire, in the capacity of See also:justice's clerk, and is supposed to have thus gained his knowledge of See also:law and law terms . He also employed himself at Earl's Croome in See also:general study, and particularly in See also:painting, which he is said to have thought of adopting as a profession . It is probable, however, that See also:art has not lost by his See also:change of mind, for, according to one of his editors, in 1774 his pictures " served to stop windows and See also:save the tax; indeed they were not See also:fit for much else." He was then recommended to See also:Elizabeth, countess of See also:Kent . At her See also:home at Wrest, See also:Bedfordshire, he had See also:access to a See also:good library, and there too he met See also:Selden, who some-times employed him as his secretary . But his third sojourn, with See also:Sir Samuel See also:Luke at Cople Hoo, Bedfordshire, was not only apparently the longest, but also much the most important in its effects on his career and See also:works . We are nowhere informed in what capacity Butler served Sir Samuel Luke, or how he came to reside in the See also:house of a noted Puritan and See also:Parliament See also:man . In the See also:family of this "valiant Mamaluke," who, whether he was or was not the See also:original of Hudibras, was certainly a rigid Presbyterian, "a See also:colonel in the See also:army of the Parliament, scoutmaster-general for Bedfordshire and See also:governor of See also:Newport Pagnell," Butler must have had the most abundant opportunities of studying from the See also:life those who were to be the victims of his See also:satire; he is supposed to have taken some hints for his See also:caricature from Sir Henry Rosewell of See also:Ford See also:Abbey, See also:Devonshire . But we know nothing See also:positive of him until the Restoration, when he was appointed secretary to See also:Richard See also:Vaughan, 2nd earl of Carbery, See also:lord See also:president of the principality of See also:Wales, who made him steward of See also:Ludlow See also:Castle, an See also:office which he held from See also:January 1661 to January 1662 . About this See also:time he married a See also:rich See also:lady, variously described as a See also:Miss See also:Herbert and as a widow named See also:Morgan . His wife's See also:fortune was afterwards, however, lost .

See also:

Early in 1663 Hudibras: The First See also:Part: written in the Time of the See also:Late See also:Wars, was published, but this, the first genuine edition, had been preceded in 1662 by an unauthorized one . On the 26th of See also:December See also:Pepys bought it, and though neither then nor afterwards could he see the wit of " so See also:silly an abuse of the See also:Presbyter See also:knight going to the wars," he repeatedly testifies to its extraordinary popularity . A See also:spurious second part appeared within the See also:year . This determined the poet to bring out the second part (licensed on the 7th of See also:November 1663, printed 1664), which if possible exceeded the first in popularity . From this time till 1678, the date of the publication of the third part, we hear nothing certain of Butler . On the publication of Hudibras he was sent for by Lord See also:Chancellor See also:Hyde (See also:Clarendon), says See also:Aubrey, and received many promises, none of which was fulfilled . He is said to have received a See also:gift of L300 from See also:Charles II., and to have been secretary to See also:George See also:Villiers, 2nd See also:duke of See also:Buckingham, when the latter was chancellor of the university of See also:Cambridge . Most of his biographers, in their eagerness to prove the See also:ill-treatment which Butler is supposed to have received, disbelieve both these stories, perhaps without sufficient See also:reason . Butler's satire on Buckingham in his Characters (Remains, 1759) shows such an intimate knowledge that it is probable the second See also:story is true . Two years after the publication of the third part of Hudibras he died, on the 25th of See also:September 1680, and was buried by his friend See also:Longueville, a bencher of the See also:Middle See also:Temple, in the See also:churchyard of St See also:Paul's, Covent See also:Garden . He was, we are told, "of a leonine-coloured See also:hair, sanguine, choleric, middle-sized, strong." A portrait by See also:Lely at See also:Oxford and others elsewhere represent him as somewhat hard-featured . Of the neglect of Butler by the See also:court something must be said .

It must be remembered that the complaints on the subject sup-posed to have been uttered by the poet all occur in the spurious See also:

posthumous works, that men of letters have been at all times but too prone to complain of lack of patronage, that Butler's actual service was rendered when the See also:day was already won, and that the pathetic stories of the poet starving and dying in want are contradicted by the best authority—Charles Longueville, son of the poet's friend—who asserted that Butler, though often disappointed, was never reduced to anything like want or beggary and did not See also:die in any See also:person's See also:debt . But the most significant notes on the subject are Aubrey's,1 that " he might have had preferments at first, but would not accept any but very good, so at last he had none at all, and died in want "; and the memorandum of the same author, that " satirical wits disoblige whom they converse with, &c., consequently make to themselves many enemies and few See also:friends, and this was his manner and See also:case." Three monuments have been erected to the poet's memory—the first in See also:Westminster Abbey in 1721, by See also:John See also:Barber, See also:mayor of See also:London, who is spitefully referred to by See also:Pope for daring to connect his name with Butler's . In 1786 a tablet was placed in St Paul's, Covent Garden, by residents of the See also:parish . This was destroyed in 1845 . Later, another was set up at Strensham by John See also:Taylor of that See also:place . Perhaps the happiest See also:epitaph on him is one by John See also:Dennis, which calls Butler " a whole See also:species of poets in one." Hudibras itself, though probably quoted as often as ever, has dropped into the class of books which are more quoted than read . In See also:reading it, it is of the utmost importance to comprehend clearly and to See also:bear constantly in mind the purpose of the author in See also:writing it . This purpose is evidently not See also:artistic but polemic, to show in the most unmistakable characters the vileness and folly of the See also:anti-royalist party . Anything like a See also:regular See also:plot—the See also:absence of which has often been deplored or excused—would have been for this end not merely a superfluity but a See also:mistake, as likely to divert the See also:attention and perhaps even enlist some sympathy for the heroes . Anything like regular See also:character-See also:drawing would have been equally unnecessary and dangerous ' Letters written by Eminent Persons .. , and Lives of Eminent Men, by John Aubrey, Esq . (2 vols., 1813) .

for to represent anything but monsters, some alleviating strokes must have been introduced . The problem, therefore, was to produce characters just sufficiently unlike See also:

lay-figures to excite and maintain a moderate See also:interest, and to set them in See also:motion by dint of a few incidents not absolutely unconnected,—meanwhile to subject the principles and See also:manners of which these characters were the incarnation to ceaseless satire and raillery . The triumphant See also:solution of the problem is undeniable, when it has once been enunciated and understood . Upon a See also:canvas thus prepared and outlined, Butler has embroidered a collection of See also:flowers of wit, which only the utmost fertility or See also:imagination could devise, and the utmost See also:patience of See also:industry elaborate . In the See also:union of these two qualities he is certainly without a parallel, and their See also:combination has produced a See also:work which is unique . The poem is of considerable length, extending to more than ten thousand verses, yet See also:Hazlitt hardly exaggerates when he says that " See also:half the lines are got by See also:heart "; indeed a diligent student of later English literature has read See also:great part of Hudibras though he may never have opened its pages . The tableaux or situations, though few and See also:simple in construction, are ludicrous enough . The knight and See also:squire setting forth on their See also:journey; the routing of the bear-baiters; the disastrous renewal of the contest; Hudibras and See also:Ralph in the See also:stocks; the lady's See also:release and conditional See also:acceptance of the unlucky knight; the latter's deliberations on the means of eluding his See also:vow; the Skimmington; the visit to Sidrophel, the astrologer; the See also:attempt to cajole the lady, with its woeful consequences; the consultation with the lawyer, and the immortal pair of letters to which this gives rise, See also:complete the See also:argument of the whole poem . But the story is as nothing; throughout we have little really kept before us but the sordid vices of the sectaries, their See also:hypocrisy, their churlish ungraciousness, their greed of See also:money and authority, their fast and loose morality, their inordinate See also:pride . The extraordinary felicity of the means taken to place all these things in the most ridiculous See also:light has never been questioned . The doggerel See also:metre, never heavy or coarse, but framed as to be the very See also:voice of mocking See also:laughter, the astounding similes and disparates, the rhymes which seem to chuckle and to sneer of themselves, the wonderful learning with which the abuse of learning is rebuked, the subtlety with which subtle See also:casuistry is set at nought can never be missed . Keys like those of L'Estrange are therefore of little use .

Phoenix-squares

It signifies nothing whether Hudibras was Sir Samuel Luke of Bedfordshire or Sir Henry Rosewell of See also:

Devon-See also:shire, still less whether Ralph's name in the flesh was See also:Robinson or Pendle, least of all that Orsin was perhaps Mr Gosling, or Trulla possibly Miss See also:Spencer . Butler was probably as little indebted to See also:mere copying for his characters as for his ideas and See also:style . These latter are in the highest degree original . The first notion of the See also:book, and only the first notion, Butler undoubtedly received from See also:Don Quixote . His obligations to the Satyre Menippee have been noticed by See also:Voltaire, and though English writers have sometimes ignored or questioned them, are not to be doubted . The art, perhaps the most terrible of all the weapons of satire, of making characters without any great violation of See also:probability represent themselves in the most atrocious and despicable light, was never perhaps possessed in perfection except by See also:Pithou and his colleagues and by Butler . Against these great merits some defects must certainly be set . As a whole, the poem is no doubt tedious, if only on See also:account of the very See also:blaze of wit, which at length almost wearies us by its ceaseless demands on our attention . It should, however, be remembered that it was originally issued in parts, and therefore, it may be supposed, intended to be read in parts, for there can be little doubt that the second part was written before the first was published . A more real defect, but one which Butler shares with all his See also:con-temporaries, is the tendency to delineate humours instead of characters, and to draw from the outside rather than from within . Attempts have been made to trace the manner and versification of Hudibras to earlier writers, especially in See also:Cleveland's satires and in the Musarum Deliciae of Sir John Mennis (Pepys's Minnes) and Dr See also:James See also:Smith (1605-1667) . But if it had few ancestors it had an abundant offspring .

A See also:

list of twenty-seven See also:direct imitations of Hudibras in the course of a See also:century may be found in the Aldine edition (1893) . Complete See also:translations of considerable excellence have been made into See also:French (London, 1757 and 1819) by John See also:Townley (1697-1782), a member of the Irish See also:Brigade; and into See also:German by D . W . Soltau (See also:Riga, 1787); specimens of both may be found in R . See also:Bell's edition . Voltaire tried his See also:hand at a compressed version, but not with happy results . Other pieces published separately and ascribed to Butler are: A See also:Letter from Mercurius Civicus to Mercurius Rusticus, or London's See also:Confession but not repentance . . . (1643), represented in vol. iv. of See also:Somers's tracts; See also:Mole Asinarum, on the unreasonable and insupportable burthen now pressed . . . upon this groaning nation . . . (1659), included in his posthumous works, which is supposed to have been written by John See also:Prynne, though See also:Wood ascribes it to Butler; The Acts and monuments of our late parliament .

. . (1659, printed 1710), of which a continuation appeared in 1659; a " character " of Charles I . (1671); A New Ballad of King See also:

Edward and Jane See also:Shore (1671); A Congratulatory poem . . . to Sir See also:Joseph See also:Sheldon . . (1675) ; The See also:Geneva Ballad, or the occasional conformist display'd (1674); The See also:Secret See also:history of the Calves See also:head See also:club, compleat . . (4th edition, 1707) ; The See also:Morning's Salutation, or a friendly See also:conference between a puritan preacher and a family of his See also:flock . . . (reprinted, See also:Dublin, 1714) . Two tracts of his appear in Somers's Tracts, vol. vii . ; he contributed to See also:Ovid's Epistles translated by several hands (168o) ; and works by him are included in See also:Miscellaneous works, written by . George Duke of Buckingham . . . also See also:State Poems .

. . (by various hands) (1704); and in The See also:

Grove . . . (1721), a poetic See also:miscellany, is a " Satyr against See also:Marriage," not found in his works . The life of Butler was written by an See also:anonymous author, said by See also:William See also:Oldys to be Sir James Astrey, and prefixed to the edition of 1704 . The writer professes to supplement and correct the See also:notice given by See also:Anthony a Wood in Athenae Oxonienses . Dr Threadneedle Russel See also:Nash, a Worcestershire antiquarian, supplied some additional facts in an edition of 1793 . See the Aldine edition of the Poetical Works of Samuel Butler (1893), edited by Reginald Brimley See also:Johnson, with complete See also:bibliographical See also:information . There is a good reprint of Hudibras (edited by Mr A . R . See also:Waller, 1905) in the Cambridge See also:Classics .

End of Article: BUTLER (or BOTELER), SAMUEL (1612–168o)
[back]
BUTLER
[next]
BUTLER (through the O. Fr. bouteillier, from the La...

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.