|
See also: Parma (1753–1824), French statesman, was See also: born at See also: Montpellier on the 18th of See also: October 1753
.
He was descended from a well-known See also: family of the legal See also: nobility (noblesse de la robe)
.
He was designed for the magistracy of his province; and in 1771, when for a See also: time the provincial See also: parlement was suppressed, with the others, by the chancellor Maupeou, he refused to sit in the royal tribunal substituted for it
.
He continued, however, to study See also: law with ardour, and in 1774 succeeded his See also: father as councillor in the See also: court of accounts and finances of his native See also: town
.
Espousing the principles of the Revolution in 1789, he was commissioned by the noblesse of the province to draw up the cahier (statement of principles and grievances); and the senechaussee of Montpellier elected him deputy to the states-general of See also: Versailles; but the election was annulled on a technical point
.
Nevertheless in 1792 the new department of See also: Herault, in which Montpellier is situated, sent him as one of its deputies to the See also: Convention which assembled and proclaimed the Republic in See also: September 1792
.
In the strife which soon broke out between the Girondins and the See also: Jacobins he took no decided See also: part, but occupied himself mainly with the legal and legislative See also: work which went on almost without intermission even during the Terror
.
The See also: action of See also: Cambaceres at the time of the trial of See also: Louis XVI
.
(
See also: December 25, 1792–January 20, 1793) was characteristic of his habits of thought
.
At first he protested against the erection of the Convention into a tribunal in these words: " The See also: people has chosen you to be legislators; it has not appointed you as See also: judges." He also demanded that the See also: king should have due facilities for his defence
.
Nevertheless, when the trial proceeded, he voted with the majority which declared Louis to be guilty, but recommended that the
See also: penalty should be postponed until the cessation of hostilities, and that the See also: sentence should then be ratified by the Convention or by some other legislative See also: body
.
It is therefore inexact to count him among the regicides, as was done by the royalists after 1815
.
Early in 1793 he became a member of the Committee of General Defence, but he did not take part in the work of its more famous successor, the Committee of Public Safety, until the close of the See also: year 1794
.
In the meantime he had done much useful work, especially that of laying down, conjointly with Merlin of See also: Douai, the principles on which the legislation of the revolutionary epoch should be codified
.
At the close of 1794 he also used his tact and eloquence on behalf of the restoration of the surviving Girondins to the Convention, from which they had been driven by the coup d'etat of the 31st of May 1793
.
In the course of the year 1795, as president of the Committee of Public Safety, and as responsible especially for See also: foreign affairs, he was largely instrumental in bringing about See also: peace with See also: Spain
.
Nevertheless, not being a regicide, he was not appointed to be one of the five See also: Directors to whom the control of public • affairs was entrusted after the coup d'etat of Vendemiaire 1795; but, as before, his See also: powers of See also: judgment and of tactful debating soon carried him to the front in the council of Five See also: Hundred
.
The
moderation of his views brought him into opposition to the Directors after the coup d'etat of Fructidor (September 1797), and for a time he retired into private See also: life
.
Owing, however, to the influence of Sieyes, he became See also: minister of See also: justice in See also: July 1799
.
He gave a guarded support to See also: Bonaparte and Sieyes in their enterprise of overthrowing the See also: Directory (coup d'etat of See also: Brumaire 1799)
.
After a See also: short See also: interval Cambaceres was, by the constitution of December 1799, appointed second See also: consul of France—a position which he owed largely to his vast legal knowledge and to the conviction which Sieyes entertained of his value as a manipulator of public assemblies
.
It is impossible here to describe in detail his relations to See also: Napoleon, and the part which he played in the See also: drawing up of the See also: Civil See also: Code, later on called the Code Napoleon
.
It must suffice to say that the skilful intervention of Cambaceres helped very materially to ensure to Napoleon the consulship for life (See also: August 1, 1802); but the second consul is known to have disapproved of some of the events which followed, notably the execution of the duc d'Enghien, the rupture with See also: England, and the proclamation of the See also: Empire (May 19, 1804)
.
This last occurrence ended his title of second consul; it was replaced by that of See also: arch-chancellor of the Empire
.
To him was decreed the presidence of the Senate in perpetuity . He also became aSee also: prince of the Empire and received in 1808 the title duke of Parma
.
Apart from the important part which he took in helping to co-See also: ordinate and draft the Civil Code, Cambaceres did the See also: state See also: good service in many directions, notably by seeking to curb the impetuosity of the emperor, and to prevent enterprises so fatal as the intervention in See also: Spanish affairs (1808) and the invasion of See also: Russia (1812) proved to be
.
At the close of the See also: campaign of 1814 he shared with See also: Joseph Bonaparte the responsibility for some of the actions which zealous Bonapartists have deemed injurious to the fortunes of the emperor
.
In 1815, during the Hundred Days, he took up his duties reluctantly at the bidding of Napoleon; and after the second downfall of his master, he felt the brunt of royalist vengeance, being for a time exiled from See also: France
.
A decree of 13th May 1818 restored him to his civil rights as a citizen of France; but the last six years of his life he spent in retirement
.
He was a member of the See also: Academy till the 31st of See also: March 1816, when a decree of exclusion was passed
.
In demeanour he was quiet, reserved and tactful, but when occasion called for it he proved himself a brilliant orator
.
He was a celebrated
See also: gourmet, and his dinners were utilized by Napoleon as a useful adjunct to the arts of statecraft
.
See A
.
Aubriet, See also: Vie de Cambaceres (2nd ed., See also: Paris, 1825)
.
(J
.
HL . |
|
|
[back] CAMARINA |
[next] CAMBALUC |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.