See also:CAPITULATIONS (from See also:Lat. ca put, or its See also:Low-Latin diminutive capitulum, as indicating the See also:form in which these acts were set down in chapters "; the Gr. See also:equivalent cephaleosis, KediaXalwocc, is occasionally used in See also:works of the 17th See also:century)
, See also:treaties granted by a See also:state and conferring the See also:privilege of extra-territorial See also:jurisdiction within its boundaries on the subjects of another state
.
Thus, in the 9th See also:century, the See also:caliph See also:Harun-al-Rashid engaged to See also:- GRANT (from A.-Fr. graunter, O. Fr. greanter for creanter, popular Lat. creantare, for credentare, to entrust, Lat. credere, to believe, trust)
- GRANT, ANNE (1755-1838)
- GRANT, CHARLES (1746-1823)
- GRANT, GEORGE MONRO (1835–1902)
- GRANT, JAMES (1822–1887)
- GRANT, JAMES AUGUSTUS (1827–1892)
- GRANT, ROBERT (1814-1892)
- GRANT, SIR ALEXANDER
- GRANT, SIR FRANCIS (1803-1878)
- GRANT, SIR JAMES HOPE (1808–1895)
- GRANT, SIR PATRICK (1804-1895)
- GRANT, U
- GRANT, ULYSSES SIMPSON (1822-1885)
grant guarantees and commercial facilities to such
See also:Franks, subjects of the See also:emperor See also:Charlemagne, as should visit the See also:East with the authorization of their emperor
.
After the break-up of the See also:Frank See also:empire, similar concessions were made to some of the practically See also:independent See also:Italian See also:city states that See also:grew up on its ruins
.
Thus, in 1og8, the See also:prince of See also:Antioch granted a See also:charter of this nature to the city of See also:Genoa; the See also:- KING
- KING (O. Eng. cyning, abbreviated into cyng, cing; cf. O. H. G. chun- kuning, chun- kunig, M.H.G. kiinic, kiinec, kiinc, Mod. Ger. Konig, O. Norse konungr, kongr, Swed. konung, kung)
- KING [OF OCKHAM], PETER KING, 1ST BARON (1669-1734)
- KING, CHARLES WILLIAM (1818-1888)
- KING, CLARENCE (1842–1901)
- KING, EDWARD (1612–1637)
- KING, EDWARD (1829–1910)
- KING, HENRY (1591-1669)
- KING, RUFUS (1755–1827)
- KING, THOMAS (1730–1805)
- KING, WILLIAM (1650-1729)
- KING, WILLIAM (1663–1712)
king of See also:Jerusalem extended the same privilege to See also:Venice in 1123 and to See also:Marseilles in 1136
.
Salah-ud-din (See also:Saladin), See also:sultan of See also:Babylon (See also:Cairo), granted a charter to the See also:town of See also:Pisa in 1173
.
The See also:Byzantine emperors followed this example, and Genoa, Pisa and Venice all obtained See also:capitulations
.
The explanation of the practice is to be found in the fact that the See also:sovereignty of the state was held in those ages to apply only to its subjects; foreigners were excluded from its rights and obligations
.
The privilege of citizenship was considered too See also:precious to be extended to the See also:alien, who was See also:long practically an outlaw
.
But when the See also:numbers, See also:wealth and See also:power of foreigners residing within the state became too See also:great, it was found to be politic to subject them to some See also:law, and it was held that this law should be their own
.
When the See also:Turkish See also:rule was substituted for that of the Byzantine emperors, the See also:system already in existence was continued; the various non-Moslem peoples were allowed their semi-See also:autonomy in matters affecting their See also:personal status, and the Genoese of Galata were confirmed in their privileges
.
But the first See also:capitulation concluded with a See also:foreign state was that of 1535 granted to the See also:French
.
Lest it should be imagined that this was a concession wrested by the victorious See also:Christian monarch from the decadent Turk, it should be See also:borne in mind that See also:Turkey was then at the height of her power, and that See also:Francis I. had shortly before sustained a disastrous defeat at See also:Pavia
.
His only See also:hope of assistance See also:lay in See also:Suleiman I., whose attack on See also:Vienna had been checked by the victorious See also:Charles V
.
The See also:appeal to Suleiman on the ground of the See also:common See also:interest of See also:France and Turkey in over-coming Charles V.'s overweening power was successful; the See also:secret See also:mission of Frangipani, an unofficial See also:envoy who could be disowned in See also:case of failure, paved the way for De la See also:Forest's See also:embassy in 1534, and in 1536 the capitulations were signed.' They amounted to a treaty of See also:commerce and a treaty allowing the See also:establishment of Frenchmen in Turkey and fixing the jurisdiction to be exercised over them: individual and religious See also:liberty is guaranteed to them, the king of France is empowered to appoint consuls in Turkey, the consuls are recognized as competent to See also:judge the See also:civil and criminal affairs of French subjects in Turkey according to French law, and the consuls may appeal to the See also:officers of the sultan for their aid in the See also:execution of their sentences
.
This, the first of the capitulations, is practically the prototype of its successors
.
Five years later, similar capitulations were concluded with Venice
.
The capitulations were at first held to be in force only during the lifetime of the sultan by whom they were granted; thus in 1569 Sultan See also:Selim II. renewed the French capitulations granted by his predecessor
.
In 1583 See also:England obtained her first capitulation, until which See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time France had been the See also:official See also:protector of all Europeans established in Turkey
.
Later on, England claimed to protect the subjects of other nations, a claim which is rejected in the French capitulations of 1597, 1604 and 1607, the last-named of which explicitly See also:lays down that the subjects of all nations not represented at See also:Constantinople by an See also:ambassador shall be under French See also:protection
.
In 1613 See also:- HOLLAND
- HOLLAND, CHARLES (1733–1769)
- HOLLAND, COUNTY AND PROVINCE OF
- HOLLAND, HENRY FOX, 1ST BARON (1705–1774)
- HOLLAND, HENRY RICH, 1ST EARL OF (1S9o-,649)
- HOLLAND, HENRY RICHARD VASSALL FOX, 3RD
- HOLLAND, JOSIAH GILBERT (1819-1881)
- HOLLAND, PHILEMON (1552-1637)
- HOLLAND, RICHARD, or RICHARD DE HOLANDE (fl. 1450)
- HOLLAND, SIR HENRY, BART
Holland obtained her first capitulation, with the assistance of the French ambassador, anxious to help a commercial See also:rival of England
.
In 1673 the French, represented by the See also:marquis de Nointel, succeeded in obtaining the renewal of the capitulations which, for various reasons, had remained unconfirmed since 1607
.
See also:- LOUIS
- LOUIS (804–876)
- LOUIS (893–911)
- LOUIS, JOSEPH DOMINIQUE, BARON (1755-1837)
- LOUIS, or LEWIS (from the Frankish Chlodowich, Chlodwig, Latinized as Chlodowius, Lodhuwicus, Lodhuvicus, whence-in the Strassburg oath of 842-0. Fr. Lodhuwigs, then Chlovis, Loys and later Louis, whence Span. Luiz and—through the Angevin kings—Hungarian
Louis XIV. had been anxious to secure the See also:protectorate of all Catholics in Turkey, but was obliged to content himself with the recognition of his right to protect all Latins of non-Turkish See also:nationality; his claims for the restoration to the Catholics of the See also:Holy Places usurped by the Greeks was also rejected, the sultan only undertaking to promise to restore their churches to the Jesuit See also:Capuchins
.
An important
1La Forest, a See also:knight of St See also:John of Jerusalem, was the first See also:resident ambassador of France at Constantinople
.
He died in 1JJ7.commercial gain was the reduction of the import duties from 5 to 3 %; and all suits the value of which exceeded 4000 aspres in which French subjects sued, or were sued by, an See also:Ottoman subject, were to be heard not by the See also:ordinary tribunals but at the See also:Porte itself
.
Later, France's friendship secured for Turkey a successful negotiation of the See also:peace of See also:Belgrade in 1739, and the result was the capitulation of 1740; this is no longer limited in duration to the sultan's lifetime but is made perpetual, and, moreover, declares that it cannot be modified without the assent of the French
.
It conferred on the French ambassador See also:precedence over his colleagues
.
See also:Austria had obtained capitulations in 1718, modified in 1784; See also:Russia secured similar privileges- in 1784
.
In the course of the 18th century nearly every See also:European power had obtained these, and such newly-established countries as the See also:United States of See also:America, See also:Belgium and See also:Greece followed in the ,9th century
.
The See also:chief privileges granted under the capitulations to foreigners resident in Turkey are the following: liberty of See also:residence, inviolability of See also:domicile, liberty to travel by See also:land and See also:sea, freedom of commerce, freedom of See also:religion, See also:immunity from See also:local jurisdiction See also:save under certain safeguards, exclusive extra-territorial jurisdiction over foreigners of the same nationality, and competence of the See also:forum of the See also:defendant in cases in which two foreigners are concerned (though the See also:Sublime Porte has long claimed to exercise jurisdiction in criminal cases in which two foreigners of different nationality are concerned—the capitulations are silent on the point and the claim is resisted by the See also:powers)
.
The same system has been followed by such countries as See also:Persia, See also:China, See also:Japan and See also:Siam
.
The See also:practical result of the capitulations in Turkey is to See also:form each See also:separate foreign See also:colony into a sort of imperium in imperio, and to hamper the local jurisdiction very considerably
.
As the state granting the capitulations progresses in See also:civilization it chafes under these restraints in its sovereignty
.
Turkey's former vassals, See also:Rumania and See also:Servia, though theoretically See also:bound to respect the capitulations so long as they formed See also:part of Turkey, had practically abrogated them long before securing their See also:independence through the treaty of See also:Berlin in 1878
.
The same may be said of See also:Bulgaria
.
Japan was liberated from the See also:burden of the capitulations some years ago
.
The extra-territorial jurisdiction exercised by the foreign powers over their subjects in Turkey and other countries where capitulations exist is regulated by See also:special legislative enactments; in the case of the United See also:Kingdom by orders in See also:council
.
In Turkey the capitulations are practically the only treaties in force with the powers, since the expiration about 1889 of the commercial treaties ,concluded in 1861-1862
.
As they all contain the " most-favoured nation " clause, the privileges in any one apply to all the powers, though not always claimed
.
Thus America and Belgium claim under their treaties with Turkey the right to try all their subjects, even if accused of offences against Ottoman subjects—a claim recently made by Belgium in the case of the Belgian subject See also:Joris, accused of participation in the See also:bomb See also:outrage of 1905 at Yildiz
.
One See also:peculiar privilege granted in the capitulations of 1675 (See also:Art
.
74) authorizes the king of England to buy in Turkey with his own See also:money two cargoes of See also:figs and raisins, in fertile and abundant years and not in times of dearth or scarcity, and provides that after a See also:duty of 3% has been paid thereon no obstacle or hindrance shall be given thereto
.
End of Article: