Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also: His fundamental theoretic position relates. to the See also:antithesis of See also:wealth and value . Carey held that land, as we are concerned with it in See also:industrial life, is really an See also:instrument of See also:production which has been formed as such by man, and that its value is due to the labour expended on it in the past—though measured, not by the sum of that labour, but by the labour necessary under existing conditions to bring new land to the same See also:stage of productiveness . He studied the occupation and reclamation of land with See also:peculiar See also:advantage as an American, for whom the traditions of first See also:settlement were living and fresh, and before whose eyes the See also:process was indeed still going on . The difficulties of adapting a See also:primitive See also:soil to the work of yielding organic products for man's use can be lightly estimated only by an inhabitant of a country long under cultivation . It is, in Carey's view, the overcoming of these difficulties by arduous and continued effort that entitles the first occupier of land to his See also:property in the soil . Its See also:present value forms a very small See also:pro-portion of the cost expended on it, because it represents only what would be required, with the science and appliances of our See also:time, to bring the land from its primitive into its present See also:state . Property in land is therefore only a See also:form of invested See also:capital—a quantity of labour or the fruits of labour permanently incorporated with the soil; for which, like any other capitalist, the owner is compensated by a See also:share of the produce . He is not rewarded for what is done by the See also:powers of nature, and society is in no sense defrauded by his See also:sole See also:possession . The so-called Ricardian theory of See also:rent is a speculative See also:fancy, contradicted by all experience . Cultivation does not in fact, as that theory supposes, begin with the best, and move downwards to the poorer soils in the See also:order of their inferiority . The See also:light and dry higher lands are first cultivated; and only when population has becomedense and capital has accumulated, are the See also:low-lying lands, with their greater fertility, but also with their morasses, inundations, and miasmas,- attacked and brought into occupation . Rent, regarded as a proportion of the produce, sinks, like all interest on capital, in process of time, but, as an See also:absolute amount, increases . The share of the labourer increases, both as a pro-portion and an absolute amount . And thus the interests of these different social classes are in See also:harmony . But, Carey proceeded to say, in order that this harmonious progress may be realized, what is taken from the land must be given back to it . All the articles derived from it are really separated parts of it, which must be restored on See also:pain of its exhaustion . Hence the producer and the consumer must be See also:close to each other; the products must not be exported to a See also:foreign country in See also:exchange for its manufactures, a nd thus go to enrich as manure a foreign soil . In immediate exchange value the landowner may gain by such exportation, but the productive powers of the land will suffer . Carey, who had set out as an See also:earnest See also:advocate of See also:free See also:trade, accordingly arrived at the doctrine of protection: the " co-ordinating See also:power" in society must intervene to prevent private advantage from working public See also:mischief . He attributed his See also:conversion on this question to his observation of the effects of liberal and protective tariffs respectively on American prosperity . This observation, he says, threw him back on theory, and led him to see that the intervention referred to might be necessary to remove (as he phrases it) the obstacles to the progress of younger communities created by the action of older and wealthier nations . But it seems probable that the See also:influence of See also:List's writings, added to his own deep-rooted and hereditary See also:jealousy and dislike of See also:English predominance, had something to do with his See also:change of attitude (see PROTECTION) . |
|
|
[back] HENRY CAREY (d. 1743) |
[next] WILLIAM CAREY (1761-1834) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.