Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:CASUISTRY (from the See also:Lat. casus, a point of See also:law)
, the See also:art of bringing See also:general moral principles to See also:bear on particular actions
.
It is, in See also:short, applied morality; anybody is a casuist who reflects about his duties and tries to bring them into See also:line with some intelligible moral See also:standard
.
But morality at different times has worn very different dresses
.
It has sometimes been thought of as an outward See also:law, sometimes as an inward disposition; and each of these See also:rival conceptions has See also:developed a casuistical method of its own
.
Believers in law have put their See also:trust in authority or See also:logic; while believers in disposition chiefly look to our instinctive faculties—See also:conscience, See also:common-sense or sentiment
.
The legal is the older See also:group, and to it the name of casuist is often exclusively reserved, generally with the implication that its methods are too purely technical to commend themselves to mankind at large
.
But common-sense and See also:con-See also:science are quite as definite guides as logic or authority; and there seems no See also:good See also:reason for refusing to give the name of See also:casuistry to their operations
.
The casuistry of See also:primitive See also:man is uncompromisingly legal
.
His morality is not yet separated from his See also:religion; and religion for him means the cult of some See also:superior being—the See also: Elaborate rules are accordingly See also:drawn up to secure the maximum of benefit, and the minimum of inconvenience, from this sacred fire; and in the application of these rules does See also:savage casuistry consist . At a higher See also:stage of See also:civilization the See also:god is no longer See also:present in person but issues to his worshippers categorical commands . These logic must seize upon and develop as far as they will go; for the breach of some trifling consequence of a See also:rule might mean the loss of the deity's favour . Hence the rise of sacred books among most Eastern peoples . On the Jewish See also:Decalogue, for instance, follows the law, and on the law the rabbinical See also:schools . Some of these will be stricter, and some laxer; but on the whole all tend to " aggravate " the law—down to the point of forbidding the faithful to See also:wear a See also:girdle, or to kill a noxious See also:insect on the See also:Sabbath . Though indeed we might look nearer See also:home than the See also:Talmud for similar absurdities; most Puritan communities could furnish See also:strange freaks of Sabbatarian casuistry . Nor have the Catholics been one whit behind them . Their scholastic doctors gravely discuss whether—since See also:water is the " See also:matter " of See also:baptism—a soul can be made regenerate by See also:milk, or See also:rose-water or See also:wine . At the opposite See also:pole stood See also:ancient See also:Greece . Here ceremonial 48 6 casuistry found no See also:place, because there were no sacred books . " Among the Greeks See also:writing never attained the See also:consecration of religion . No See also:system of See also:doctrine and observance, no manuals containing authoritative rules of morality, were ever transmitted in documentary See also:form . In conduct they shrank from formulae . Unvarying rules petrified See also:action; the need of flexibility, of perpetual See also:adjustment, was strongly See also:felt" (See also:Butcher, The See also:Greek See also:Genius, p . 182) . For this reason their See also:interest in ethical speculations was all the keener; their See also:great thinkers were endlessly engaged in settling what the relation ought to be between See also:duty and self-interest . Ought one to See also:swallow up the other—and, if so, which should prevail ? Or was it possible to patch up a See also:compromise between them ? The great Stoic philosophers took the austerest line, and held that duty should always and everywhere be our only law . But it was one thing to enunciate such magnificent theories in a lecture, and quite another to apply them in the See also:market-place . Casuistry came to the aid of See also:average human nature—that is to say, pupils began to confront the See also:master with hard cases taken from daily See also:life . And more than one master was disposed to make large—even startlingly large—concessions to the exigencies of practice . This See also:concrete See also:side of moral See also:philosophy came specially into See also:evidence when Stoicism was transplanted to See also:Rome .
See also:Cicero's De Officiis abounds in the kind of question afterwards so warmly discussed by Dr See also:
In their hands casuistry became the art of finding such exceptions
.
From the Greek See also:sophists they borrowed ingenious ways of playing off one duty against another, or duty in general against self-interest—leaving the doubter in the alternative of neglecting the one and being a See also:knave, or neglecting the other and being a See also:fool
.
Or else they raised a subtle distinction between the See also:act and the intention
.
To get drunk for the See also:sake of the drink was the See also:mark of a beast; but wine was a powerful stimulant to the See also:brain, and to fuddle oneself in See also:order to think great thoughts was worthy of a See also:sage
.
No doubt these See also:airy paradoxes were not always seriously taken; but it is significant that a common Roman See also:proverb identified " philosophizing " (philosophatur) with thinking out some dirty See also:trick
.
See also:Christianity swept the whole discussion on to a higher See also:plane
.
All the stress now See also:fell on the disposition, not on the outward act
.
The good deeds of a just man were a natural consequence of his See also:justice; whereas a See also:bad man was no whit the better, because he now and then deviated into doing right
.
Actions, in short, were of no See also:account whatever, apart from the character that produced them
.
" All things are lawful unto me," said St See also:Paul,,
but all are not expedient." And St See also:Augustine sums the whole matter up in the famous phrase: " Have charity, and do as See also:thou wilt." Narrow-minded See also:Christian consciences, however, could not stay See also:long on this level; law was so very much more satisfying a guide than vague, elusive charity
.
And law inplenty was forthcoming, so soon as the See also: Libri Poenitentiales began to appear—detailed lists of all possible sins, with the forfeit to be exacted from each . As public See also:penance finally decayed, and auricular See also:confession took its place, these were superseded by the Summae de Poenilentia,—law-books in the strictest sense . These were huge digests of all that popes, See also:councils, primitive fathers had decided on every kind of question pertaining to the See also:confessional—what exactly is a See also:sin, what kind of questions the priests must ask, under what conditions he could give See also:absolution . As such, they were eagerly welcomed by the See also:clergy; for a single See also:magistrate, sitting in See also:secret without See also:appeal, necessarily grasps at whatever will lighten his See also:burden of responsibility . Nor was their complexity a stumbling-See also:block . The See also:medieval mind was only too prone to look on morality as a highly technical art, quite as difficult as See also:medicine or See also:chancery law—a path where wayfaring men were certain to err, with no guide but their unsophisticated conscience . What could they possibly do but cling to their priest with a "See also:blind and unexpressed faith" ? Against this See also:state of things the See also:Reformation was a violent protest . Catholicism increasingly took for granted that a man imperilled his soul by thinking for himself; Protestantism replied that he could certainly lose it, if he See also:left his thinking to another . For it is to the individual conscience that God speaks; through the struggles of the individual conscience He builds up a strong and See also:stable Christian character " A man may be a heretic in the truth," says See also:Milton in his Areopagitica (1644), " if he believes things only because his pastor says so, or the See also:Assembly so determines, without knowing other reason, though his belief be true, yet the very truth he holds becomes his See also:heresy . There is not any burden that some would not gladlier See also:post off to another than the See also:charge and care of their religion . A wealthy man, addicted to his pleasures and his profits, finds religion to be a See also:traffic so entangled, and of so many piddling accounts, that of all mysteries he cannot skill to keep a stock going upon that See also:trade . What does he therefore but resolve to give over toiling, and find himself some See also:factor, to whose care and conduct he may commit the whole managing of his religious affairs—some divine of See also:note and estimation that must be . To him he adheres, resigns the whole warehouse of his religion with all the locks and keys into his custody, and indeed makes the very person of that man his religion . So that a man may say his religion is now no more within himself, but is become a dividual moveable, which goes or comes near him, according as that good man frequents the See also:house . " Twelve years after the Areopagitica appeared Pascal's Provincial Letters (1656–1657) . These See also:deal with the casuists of the See also:Counter–Reformation in the spirit of Milton, laying especial stress on the artificiality of their methods and the laxity of their results . Not, of course, that they meant deliberate evil; Pascal expressly credits them with good intentions . But they were drawn, almost to a man, from See also:Italy or See also:Spain, the two countries least alive to the spirit of the Reformation; and most of them were See also:Jesuits, the order that set out to be nothing Protestantism was, and everything that Protestantism was not . Hence they were resolutely opposed to any See also:idea of reform; for to begin making changes in the Church's system would be a tacit See also:admission that See also:Luther had some show of reason on his side . On the other hand, they would certainly lose their hold on the laity, unless some kind of See also:change were made; for many of the Church's rules were obsolete, and others far too severe to impose on the See also:France of See also:Montaigne or even the Spain of Cervantes . Thus caught between two fires the casuists developed a highly ingenious method, not unlike that of the Roman See also:Stoics, for eviscerating the substance of a rule while leaving its See also:shadow carefully intact . The next step was to force the confessors to accept their lax See also:interpretation of the law; and this was accomplished by their famous theory of See also:probabilism—first taught in Spain about 1580 . This made it a See also:grave sin in the priest to refuse absolution, whenever there was some good reason for giving it even when there were other and better reasons for refusing it . This principle does not deserve all the abuse that has been lavished upon it . It secured uniformity in the confessional, and thereby protected the penitent from the caprices of individual priests; and by depriving these of responsibility, it forced the penitent back on himself . But the gain was more than counterbalanced by the evil . The less the Church could expect from its penitents, the more it was driven to trust to the miraculous efficiency of sacra-See also:mental See also:grace . Once get a sinner to confession, and the whole See also:work was done . However bad his natural disposition, the magical words of absolution would make him a new man . As for most penitents, all they cared for was to scrape through by the skin of their See also:teeth . Casuistry might insist that it only proposed to See also:fix the minimum of a minimum, and beg them for their soul's sake to aim a little higher . Human nature seldom resists the charms of a fixed standard—least of all when it is applied by a live See also:judge in a visible See also:court . If the priest must be satisfied with little, why be at the trouble of offering more ? For this reason, probabilism found vigorous opponents in See also:Bossuet and other eminent divines; and various of its excesses were condemned by the popes during the latter See also:half of the 17th century . After a long See also:eclipse it was finally re-established, though in a very modified form, by Alfonso See also:Liguori about the See also:middle of the 18th century .
In See also:Protestant countries casuistry shrank and dwindled, though See also:works on the subject continued to be written both in See also:Germany and See also:England during the 17th century
.
The best known of the See also:Anglican books is See also:Jeremy See also:
During the last two centuries See also:deduction has gone steadily out, and See also:psychology come in
.
Ethics have become more distinctively a science, instead of an awkward hybrid between a science and an art; their business has been to investigate what moral conduct is, not to See also:lay down the law as to what it ought to be
.
Hence they deliberately refuse to engage in casuistry of the old-fashioned sort
.
Further, it is increasingly felt that ethical judgments do not depend on reason alone, but involve every See also:element in our character; and that the real problem of practical morality is to establish a harmonious See also:balance between the intelligence and the feelings —to make a man's " I think this is right " correspond with his " I feel that it is so." Whether systematic training can do anything to make the attainment of this balance easier is a
question that has lately engaged the See also:attention of many educational reformers; and whatever future casuistry may still have before it would seem to lie along the lines indicated by them
.
There is'an excellent study of the ancient casuists by M
.
See also:Raymond 'Thamin, Un Probleme moral dans l'antiquite (See also:Paris, 1884)
.
For the Roman See also:Catholic casuists see Dellinger and See also:Reusch, Moralstreitsgkeiten See also:im siebzehnten Jahrhundert (2 vols., N6rdlingen, 1889), and various articles (" Casuistik," " Ethik," " Moralsysteme," &c.) in Wetzer and Welte's Kirchenlexicon (See also:Freiburg, 1880-1896)
.
See also the See also:editions of Pascal's Provincial Letters, by See also: H . See also:Bradley in his Ethical Studies (London, 1876) . See also See also:Hastings Rashdall, Theory of Good and Evil (2 vols., See also:Oxford, 1907) . (ST . |
|
|
[back] CASUARINA |
[next] CASUS BELLI |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.