PIERRE

See also:

• PIERRE CHARRON (1541-1603)

CHARRON (1541-1603)  , French philosopher, born in Paris, was one of the twenty-five children of a bookseller . After studying law he practised at Paris as an advocate, but, having met with no great success, entered the church, and soon gained the highest popularity as a preacher, rising to the dignity of canon, and being appointed preacher in ordinary to Marguerite, wife of Henry IV. of Navarre . About 1588, he determined to fulfil a vow which he had once made to enter a cloister; but being rejected by the Carthusians and the Celestines, he held himself absolved, and continued to follow his old profession . He delivered a course of sermons at Angers, and in the next year passed to Bordeaux, where he formed a famous friendship with Montaigne . At the death of Montaigne, in 1592, Charron was requested in his will to bear the Montaigne arms . In 1594 Charron published (at first anonymously, afterwards under the name of " Benoit Vaillant, Advocate of the Holy Faith," and also, in a594, in his own name) Les Trois Verites, in which by methodical and orthodox arguments, he seeks to prove that there is a God and a true religion, that the true religion is the Christian, and that the true church is the Roman Catholic . The last book (which is three-fourths of the whole work) is chiefly an answer to the famous Protestant work entitled Le Traite de l'Eglise by Du Plessis Mornay; and in the second edition (1595) there is an elaborate reply to an attack made on the third Verite by a Protestant writer . Les Trois Verites ran through several editions, and obtained for its author the favour of the bishop of Cahors, who appointed him grand vicar and theological canon . It also led to his being chosen deputy to the general assembly of the clergy, of which body he became chief secretary . It was followed in 160o by Discours chrestiens, a book of sermons, similar in tone, half of which treat of the Eucharist . In 16or Charron published at Bordeaux his third and most remarkable work—the famous De la sagesse, a complete popular system of moral philosophy . Usually, and so far correctly, it is coupled with the Essays of Montaigne, to which the author is under very extensive obligations .

There is, however, distinct individuality in the book . It is specially interesting from the

time when it appeared, and the man by whom it was written . Conspicuous as a champion of orthodoxy against atheists, Jews and Protestants—without resigning this position, and still upholding practical orthodoxy—Charron suddenly stood forth as the representative of the most complete intellectual scepticism . The De la sagesse, which represented a considerable advance on the standpoint of the Trois Verites, brought upon its author the most violent attacks, the chief being by the Jesuit Francois Garasse (1585-1631), who described him as a "brutal atheist." It received, however, the warm support of Henry IV. and of the president Pierre Jeannin (1540-1622) . A second edition was soon called for . In 1603, notwithstanding much opposition, it began to appear; but only a few pages had been printed when Charron died suddenly in the street of apoplexy . His death was regarded as a judgment for his impiety . Charron's psychology is sensationalist . With sense all our knowledge commences, and into sense all may be resolved . The soul, located in the ventricles of the brain, is affected by the temperament of the individual; the dry temperament produces acute intelligence; the moist, memory; the hot, imagination . Dividing the intelligent soul into these three faculties, he shows—after the manner which Francis Bacon subsequently adopted—what branches of science correspond with each . With regard to the nature of the soul he merely quotes opinions .

The belief in its

immortality, he says, is the most universal of beliefs, but the most feebly supported by reason . As to man's power of attaining truth his scepticism is decided; and he plainly declares that none of our faculties enable us to distinguish truth from error . In comparing man with the lower animals, Charron insists that there are no breaks in nature . The latter have reason; nay, they have virtue; and, though inferior in some respects, in others they are superior . The estimate formed of man is not, indeed, flattering . His most essential qualities are vanity, weakness, inconstancy, presumption . Upon this view of human nature and the human lot Charron founds his moral system . Equally sceptical with Montaigne, and decidedly more cynical, he is distinguished by a deeper and sterner tone . Man comes into the world to endure; let him endure then, and that in silence . Our compassion should be like that of God, who succours the suffering without sharing in their pain . Avoid vulgar errors; cherish universal sympathy . Let no passion or attachment become too powerful for restraint .

Follow the customs and

laws which surround you . Morality has no connexion with religion . Reason is the ultimate criterion . Special interest attaches to Charron's treatment of religion . He insists on the diversities in religions; he dwells also on what would indicate a common origin . All grow from small beginnings and increase by a sort of popular contagion; all teach that God is to be appeased by prayers, presents, vows, but especially, and most irrationally, by human suffering . Each is said by its devotees to have been given by inspiration . In fact, however, a man is a Christian, Jew, or Mahommedan, before he knows he is a man . One religion is built upon another . But while he openly declares religion to be " strange to common sense," the practical result at which Charron arrives is that one is notto sit in judgment on his faith, but to be " simple and obedient," and to allow himself to be led by public authority . This is one rule of wisdom with regard to religion; and another equally important is to avoid superstition, which he boldly defines as the belief that God is like a hard judge who, eager to find fault, narrowly examines our slightest act, that He is revengeful and hard to appease, and that therefore He must be flattered and importuned, and won over by pain and sacrifice . True piety, which is the first of duties, is, on the other hand, the knowledge of God and of one's self, the latter knowledge being necessary to the former .

It is the abasing of man, the exalting of God,—the belief that what He sends is all

good, and that all the bad is from ourselves . It leads to spiritual worship; for external ceremony is merely for our advantage, not for His glory . Charron is thus the founder of modern secularism . His political views are neither original nor independent . He pours much hackneyed scorn on the common herd, declares the sovereign to be the source of law, and asserts that popular freedom is dangerous . A summary and defence of the Sagesse, written shortly before his death, appeared in 1606 . In 1604 his friend Michel de la Rochemaillet prefixed to an edition of the Sagesse a Life, which depicts Charron as a most amiable man of purest character . His complete works, with this Life, were published in 1635 . An excellent abridgment of the Sagesse is given in Tennemann's Philosophic, vol. ix.; an edition with notes by A . Duval appeared in 1820 . See Liebscher, Charron u. sein Werk, De la sagesse (Leipzig, 1890) ; H . T .

Buckle, Introd. to History of Civilization in England, vol. ii . 19; Abbe Lezat, De la predication sous Henri IV. c. vi . ; J . M . Robertson, Short History of Free Thought (London, 1906), vol. ii. p . 19; J . Owen, Skeptics of the French Renaissance (1893); Lecky, Rationalism in Europe (1865) .