Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:CHRISTMAS (i.e. the See also:Mass of See also:Christ)
, in the See also:Christian See also:
In any See also:case he mentions no feast, nor was such a feast See also:congruous with the orthodox ideas of that See also:age
.
As See also:late as 245 See also:Origen, in his eighth See also:homily on See also:Leviticus, repudiates as sinful the very See also:idea of keeping the birthday of Christ " as if he were a See also: Clement himself sets it on the r7th of See also:November, 3 B.C . The author of a Latin See also:tract, called the De Pascha computus, written in See also:Africa in 243, sets it by private See also:revelation, ab ipso deo inspirati, on the 28th of March . He argues that the See also:world was created perfect, See also:flowers in See also:bloom, and trees in See also:leaf, therefore in See also:spring; also at the See also:equinox, and when the moon just created was full . Now the moon and See also:sun were created on a Wednesday . The 28th of March suits all these considerations . Christ, therefore, being the Sun of Righteousness, was born on the 28th of March . The same symbolical reasoning led Polycarp2 (before 160) to set his birth on Sunday, when the world's creation began, but his baptism on Wednesday, for it was the analogue of the sun's creation . On such grounds certain Latins as See also:early as 354 may have transferred the human birthday from the 6th of January to the 25th of December, which was then a Mithraic feast and is by the chronographer above referred to, but in another See also:part of his compilation, termed Natalia invicti See also:solis, or birthday of the unconquered Sun . See also:Cyprian (de orat. dom . 35) calls Christ Sol verus, See also:Ambrose Sol novus mister (Sermo vii . 13), and such See also:rhetoric was widespread . The Syrians and Armenians, who clung to the 6th of January, accused the See also:Romans of sun-See also:worship and See also:idolatry, contending with great See also:probability that the feast of the 25th of December had been invented by disciples of See also:Cerinthus and its lections by See also:Artemon to commemorate the natural birth of Jesus . See also:Chrysostom also testifies the 25th of December to have been from the beginning known in the See also:West, from See also:Thrace even as far as Gades . Ambrose, On Virgins, iii. ch . 1, See also:writing to his See also:sister, implies that as late as the papacy of Liberius 352—356, the Birth from the Virgin was feasted together with the See also:Marriage of See also:Cana and the Banquet of the 4000 (See also:Luke ix . 13), which were never feasted on any other day but See also:Jan . 6 . Chrysostom, in a See also:sermon preached at Antioch on Dec . 20, 386 or 388, says that some held the feast of Dec . 25 to have been held in the West, from Thrace as far as See also:Cadiz, from the beginning . It certainly originated in the West, but spread quickly eastwards . In 353—361 it was observed at the See also:court of See also:Constantius . See also:Basil of Caesarea (died 379) adopted it . See also:Honorius, See also:emperor (395—423) in the West, informed his See also:mother and See also:brother See also:Arcadius (395-408) in See also:Byzantium of how the new feast was kept in See also:Rome, See also:separate from the 6th of January, with its own troparia and sticharia .
They adopted it, and recommended it to Chrysostom, who had See also:long been in favour of it
.
See also:Epiphanius of See also:Crete was won over to it, as were also the other three patriarchs, Theophilus of Alexandria, See also: For some years in the West (as late as 353 in Rome) the birth feast was appended to the baptismal feast on the 6th of January, and in Jerusalem it altogether supplanted it from about 36o to 440, when See also:Bishop See also:Juvenal introduced the feast of the 25th of December . The new feast was about the same time (440) finally established in Alexandria . The quadragesima of Epiphany (i.e. the feast of the presentation in the See also:Temple, or hupapante) continued to be celebrated in Jerusalem on the 14th of See also:February, forty days after the 6th of January, until the reign of Justinian . In most other places it had long before been put back to the 2nd of February to suit the new Christmas . Armenian historians describe the riots, and display of armed force, without which Justinian was not able in Jerusalem to See also:transfer this feast from the 14th to the 2nd of February . The grounds on which the Church introduced so late as 350-440 a Christmas feast till then unknown, or, if known, precariously linked with the baptism, seem in the See also:main to have been the following . (I) The transition from adult to See also:infant baptism was proceeding rapidly in the See also:East, and in the West was well-nigh completed . Its natural See also:complement was a festal recognition of the fact that the divine See also:element was See also:present in Christ from the first, and was no new See also:stage of spiritual promotion coeval only with the descent of the Spirit upon him at baptism . The general See also:adoption of See also:child baptism helped to extinguish the old view that the divine See also:life in Jesus dated from his baptism, a view which led the Epiphany feast to be regarded as that of Jesus' spiritual rebirth . This aspect of the feast was therefore forgotten, and its importance in every way diminished by the new and See also:rival feast of Christmas . (2) The 4th century witnessed a rapid See also:diffusion of Marcionite, or, as it was now called, Manichaean propaganda, the See also:chief tenet of which was that Jesus either was not born at all, was a See also:mere phantasm, or anyhow did not take flesh of the Virgin See also:Mary . Against this view the new Christmas was a protest, since it was peculiarly the feast of his birth in the flesh, or as a See also:man, and is constantly spoken of as such by the fathers who witnessed its institution .
In See also:Britain the 25th of December was a festival long before the See also:conversion to See also:Christianity, for See also:Bede (De temp. See also:rat. ch
.
13) relates that " the See also:ancient peoples of the See also:Angli began the year on the 25th of December when we now celebrate the birthday of the Lord; and the very See also:night which is now so See also:holy to us, they called in their See also:tongue modranecht (m8dra niht), that is, the mothers' night, by See also:reason we suspect of the ceremonies which in that night-long See also:vigil they performed." With his usual reticence about matters See also:pagan or not orthodox, Bede abstains from recording who the mothers were and what the ceremonies
.
In 1644 the English puritans forbad any merriment or religious services by See also:act of See also:Parliament, on the ground that it was a See also:heathen festival, and ordered it to be kept as a fast
.
See also: |
|
|
[back] SIR ROBERT CHRISTISON |
[next] CHRISTMAS ISLAND |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.