Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:CHRONOLOGY (Gr. xpovo?oyfa, computation of See also:time, xp6vos) , the See also:science which treats of See also:time, its See also:object being to arrange and exhibit the various events which have occurred in the See also:history of the See also:world in the See also:order of their See also:succession, and to ascertain the intervals of time between them . The See also:term " See also:chronology " is also used of the order in time itself, as adopted, and of the See also:system by which the order is fixed . The preservation of any See also:record, however See also:rude, of the See also:lapse of time implies some knowledge of the See also:celestial motions, by which alone time can be accurately measured, and some See also:advancement in the arts of civilized See also:life, which could be attained only by the accumulated experience of many generations (see TIME) . Before the invention of letters the memory of past transactions could not be preserved beyond a few years with any tolerable degree of accuracy . Events which greatly affected the See also:physical See also:condition of the human See also:race, or were of a nature to make a deep impression on the minds of the rude inhabitants of the See also:earth, might be vaguely transmitted through several ages by traditional narrative; but intervals of time, expressed by abstract See also:numbers, and these constantly varying besides, would soon See also:escape the memory . The invention of the See also:art of See also:writing afforded the means of substituting precise and permanent records for vague and evanescent tradition; but in the See also:infancy of the world, mankind had learned neither to estimate accurately the duration of time, nor to refer passing events to any fixed See also:epoch . For these reasons the See also:attempt at an accurate chronology of the See also:early ages of the world is only of See also:recent origin . After See also:political relations began to be established, the See also:necessity of preserving a See also:register of passing seasons and years would soon be See also:felt, and the practice of recording important transactions must have grown up as a necessary consequence of social life . But of these deliberate early records a very small portion only has escaped the ravages of time and barbarism . The earliest written See also:annals of the Greeks, Etruscans and See also:Romans are irretrievably lost . The traditions of the See also:Druids perished with them . A See also:Chinese See also:emperor has the See also:credit of burning " the books " extant in his See also:day (about 220 B.C.), and of burying alive the scholars who were acquainted with them .
And a See also:Spanish adventurer destroyed the picture records which were found in the See also:pueblo of Montezuma
.
Of the more formal See also:historical writings in which the first ineffectual attempts were made in the direction of systematic chronology we have no knowledge at first-See also:hand
.
Of See also:Hellanicus, the See also:Greek logographer, who appears to have lived through the greater See also:part of the 5th See also:century B.C., and who See also:drew up a See also:chronological See also:list of the priestesses of Here at See also:Argos; of See also:Ephorus, who lived in the 4th century B.C., and is distinguished as the first Greek who attempted the See also:composition of a universal history ; and of See also:Timaeus, who in the following century wrote an elaborate history of See also:Sicily, in which he set the example of using the Olympiads as the basis of chronology, the See also:works have perished and our meagre knowledge of their contents is derived only from fragmentary citations in later writers
.
The same See also:fate has befallen the works of See also:Berossus and See also:Manetho, Eratosthenes and See also:Apollodorus
.
Berossus, a See also:priest of Belus living at See also:Babylon' in the 3rd century B.c., added to his historical See also:account of Babylonia a chronological list of its See also:kings, which he claimed to have compiled from genuine archives preserved in the See also:temple
.
Manetho, likenise a priest, living at Sebennytus in See also:Lower See also:Egypt in the 3rd century B.C., wrote in Greek a history of Egypt, with an account of its See also:thirty dynasties of sovereigns, which he professed to have See also:drawn from genuine archives in the keeping of the priests
.
Of these works fragments only, more or less copious and accurate, have been preserved
.
Eratosthenes, who in the latter See also:half of the and century B.C. was keeper of the famous Alexandrian library, not only made himself a See also:great name by his important See also:work on See also:geography, but by his See also:treatise entitled Chronographia, one of the first attempts to establish an exact See also:scheme of See also:general chronology, earned for himself the See also:title of " See also:father of chronology." His method of See also:procedure; however, was usually conjectural; and guess-work, however careful, acute and plausible, is still guess-work and not testimony
.
Apollodorus, an Athenian who flourished in the See also:middle of the and century B.c., wrote a metrical See also:chronicle of events, ranging from the supposed See also:period of the fall of See also:Troy to his own day
.
These writers were followed by other investigators and systematizers in the same See also: There can be no exact computation of time orplacing of events without a fixed point or epoch from which the reckoning takes its start . It was See also:long before this was apprehended . When it began to be seen, various epochs were selected by various writers; and at first each small See also:separate community had its own epoch and method of time-reckoning . Thus in one See also:city the reckoning was by succession of kings, in another by archons or See also:annual magistrates, in a third by succession of priests . It seems now surprising that vague counting by generations should so long have prevailed and satisfied the wants of inquiring men, and that so See also:simple, precise and seemingly obvious a See also:plan as counting by years, the largest natural See also:division of time, did not occur to any investigator before Eratosthenes . Precision, which was at first unattainable for want of an epoch, was afterwards no less unattainable from the multiplicity, and sometimes the variation, of epochs . But by a natural See also:process the See also:mischief was gradually and partially remedied . The ex-tension of intercourse between the various small See also:groups or See also:societies of men, and still more their See also:union in larger groups, made a See also:common epoch necessary, and led to the See also:adoption of such a starting point by each larger See also:group . These leading epochs continued in use for many centuries . The task of the chronologer was thus simplified and reduced to a study and comparison of See also:dates in a few leading systems . The most important of these systems in what we See also:call See also:ancient times were the Babylonian, the Greek and the See also:Roman . The See also:Jews had no general era, properly so called . In the history of Babylonia, the fixed point from which time was reckoned was the era of Nabonassar, 747 B.C . Among the Greeks the reckoning was by Olympiads, the point of departure being the See also:year in which Coroebus was See also:victor in the Olympic See also:Games, 776 B.C . The Roman chronology started from the See also:foundation of the city, the year of which, however, was variously given by different authors . The most generally adopted was that assigned by See also:Varro, 753 B.C . It is noteworthy how nearly these three great epochs approach each other,—all lying near the middle of the 8th century B.C . But it is to be remembered that the beginning of an era and its adoption and use as such are not the same thing, nor are they necessarily synchronous . Of the three ancient eras above spoken of, the earliest is that of the Olympiads, next that of the foundation of See also:Rome, and the latest the era of Nabonassar . But in order of adoption and actual usage the last is first . It is believed to have been in use from the year of its origin . It is not known when the Romans began to use their era . The Olympiads were not in current use till about the middle of the 3rd century B.C., when Timaeus, as already mentioned, set the example of reckoning by them . Even after the adoption in See also:Europe of the See also:Christian era, a great variety of methods of dating—See also:national, provincial and ecclesiastical—See also:grew up and prevailed for a long time in different countries, thus renewing in See also:modern times the difficulties experienced in ancient times from diversities of reckoning . An acquaintance with these various methods is indispensable to the student of the charters, See also:chronicles and legal See also:instruments of the middle ages . In reckoning years from any fixed epoch in See also:constant succession, the number denoting the years is necessarily always on the increase . But rude nations and illiterate See also:people seldom attach any definite See also:idea to large numbers . Hence it has been a practice, very extensively followed, to employ cycles or periods, consisting of a moderate number of years, and to distinguish and reckon the years by their number in the See also:cycle . The Chinese and other nations of See also:Asia reckon, not only the years, but also the months and days, by cycles of sixty . The See also:Saros of the Chaldaeans, the See also:Olympiad of the Greeks, and the Roman Indiction are instances of this mode of reckoning time . Several cycles were formerly known in Europe; but most of them were invented for the purpose of adjusting the See also:solar and lunar divisions of time, and were rather employed in the regulation of the See also:calendar than as chronological eras . They are frequently, however, of very great use in fixing dates that have been otherwise imperfectly expressed, and consequently See also:form important elements of chronology . (W . L . R . C.) Modern Results of Archaeological See also:Research . When See also:Queen See also:Victoria came to the See also:English See also:throne, 4004 B.C. was still accepted, in all sobriety, as the date of the creation of the world . Perhaps no single statement could more vividly emphasize the See also:change in the point of view from which scholars regard the chronology of ancient history than the See also:citation of this indisputable fact . To-day, though Bibles are still printed with the year 4004 B.C. in the margin of the first See also:chapter of See also:Genesis, no See also:scholar would pretend to regard this reference seriously . On the contrary, the scholarship of to-day regards the fifth See also:millennium B.C. as well within the historical period for such nations as the Egyptians and the Babylonians . It has come to be fully accepted that when we use such a phrase as " the See also:age of the world " we are dealing with a period that must be measured not in thousands but in millions of years; and that to the age of See also:man must be allotted a period some hundreds of times as great as the five thousand and See also:odd years allowed by the old chronologists . This changed point of view, needless to say, has not been reachedwithout ardent and even See also:bitter controversy . Yet the transformation is unequivocal; and the revised conception no longer seems to connote the theological implications that were at first ascribed to it . It has now become obvious that the data afforded by the See also:Hebrew writings should never have been regarded as sufficiently accurate for the purpose of exact historical computations: that, in See also:short, no historian working along modern scientific lines could well have made the See also:mistake of supposing that the genealogical lists of the See also:Pentateuch afforded an adequate chronology of world-history . But it should not be forgotten that to many generations of See also:close scholarship these genealogical lists seemed to convey such knowledge in the most precise terms, and that at so recent a date as, for example, the year in which Queen Victoria came to the throne, it was nothing less than a See also:rank See also:heresy to question the historical accuracy and finality of chronologies which had no other source or foundation . This changed point of view regarding the chronology of history may without hesitation be ascribed to the See also:influence of See also:evidence obtained in a single field of inquiry, the field, namely, of See also:archaeology . No doubt the evidence as to the age of the earth and as to the antiquity of man was gathered by a class of workers not formally included in the ranks of the archaeologist: workers commonly spoken of as palaeontologists, anthropologists, ethnologists and the like . But the distinction scarcely covers a real difference .
The See also:scope of the archaeologist's studies must include every See also:department of the ancient history of man as preserved in antiquities of whatever See also:character, be they tumuli along the Baltic, fossil skulls and graven bones from the caves of See also:France, the See also:flint implements, pottery, and mummies of Egypt, tablets and bas-reliefs from See also:Mesopotamia, coins and sculptures of See also:Greece and Rome, or See also:inscriptions, waien tablets, See also:parchment rolls, and papyri of a relatively See also:late period of classical antiquity
.
If at one time the monuments of Greece and Rome claimed the almost undisputed See also:attention of the archaeologist, that time has long since passed
.
For the most important historical records that have come to us in recent decades we have to thank the Orientalist, though the classical explorer has been by no means idle
.
It will be sufficient here to point out in general terms the import of the See also:message of archaeological See also:discovery in the Victorian Era in its See also:bearings upon the great problems of world-history
.
A start was made through the efforts of the palaeontologists and geologists, with only indirect or incidental aid from the chron- archaeologists
.
The new See also:movement began actively ()logy of with See also: A fresh See also:volume of evidence required to be gathered, and a new controversy to be waged, before the old data for the creation of man could be abandoned . Lyell again was in the forefront of the progressive movement, and his work on The Antiquity of Man, published in 1863, gave currency for the first time to the new opinions . The evidence upon which these opinions were based had been gathered by such anthropologists as See also:Schmerling, See also:Boucher de See also:Perthes and others, and it had to do chiefly with the finding of implements of human construction associated with the remains of See also:extinct animals in the beds of caves, and with the recovery of similar antiquities from alluvial deposits the great age of which was demonstrated by their See also:depth . Every See also:item of the evidence was naturally subjected to the closest See also:scrutiny, but at last the conservatives were forced reluctantly to confess themselves beaten . Their traditional arguments were powerless before the See also:array of data marshalled by the new science of prehistoric archaeology . Looking back even at the short remove of a single See also:generation, it is difficult to appreciate how revolutionary was the conception of the antiquity of man thus inculcated . It rudely shocked the traditional attitude of scholarship towards the history of our race . It disturbed the most cherished traditions and the most sacred themes . It seemed to threaten the very See also:foundations of See also:religion itself . Yet the See also:present generation accepts the antiquity of man as a See also:mere See also:matter of fact . Here; as so often elsewhere, the heresy of an See also:elder day has come to seem almost an axiomatic truth . If we go back in See also:imagination to the beginning of the Victorian era and ask what was then known of the history of Ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia and Asia See also:Minor, we find ourselves See also:con-fronted with a startling paucity of knowledge .
The See also: In such circumstances nothing less than a See also:miracle could enable human ingenuity to See also:fathom the See also:secret . Yet the feat pronounced impossible by See also:mid-century See also:scepticism was accomplished by contemporary scholarship, amidst the clamour of opposition and incredulity . Its success contains at once a warning to those doubters who are always crying out that we have reached the limitations of knowledge, and an encouragement and stimulus to would-be explorers of new intellectual realms . In a few words the manner of the discovery was this . It appears at a glance that the Assyrian written character consists of groups of See also:horizontal, See also:vertical or oblique strokes .. The characters thus composed, though so simple as to their basal unit, are appallingly complex in their elaboration . The Assyrians with all their culture, never attained the See also:stage of See also:analysis which demonstrates that only a few fundamental sounds are involved in human speech, and hence that it is possible to See also:express all the niceties of utterance with an See also:alphabet of little more than a See also:score of letters . Halting just short of this analysis, the Assyrian ascribed syllabic values to the characters of his script, and hence, instead of finding twenty odd characters sufficient, he required about five See also:hundred . There was a further complication in that each one of these characters had at least two different phonetic values; and there were other intricacies of usage which, had they been foreknown by inquirers in the middle of the 9th century, might well have made the problem of decipherment seem an utterly hopeless one . Fortunately it chanced that another people, the Persians, had adopted the Assyrian See also:wedge-shaped stroke as the foundation of a written character, but making that analysis of which the Assyrians had fallen short, had borrowed only so many characters as were necessary to represent the alphabetical sounds . This made the problem of deciphering See also:Persian inscriptions a relatively easy one . In point of fact this problem had been partially solved in the early days of the 19th century, thanks to the sagacious guesses of the See also:German philologist See also:Grotefend .
Working with some inscriptions from See also:Persepolis which were found to contain references to See also:Darius and See also:Xerxes, Grotefend had established the phonetic values of certain of the Persian characters, and his successors were perfecting the discovery just about the time when the new Assyrian finds were made
.
It chanced that there existed on the polished See also:surface of a cliff at See also:Behistun in western See also:Persia a tri-lingual inscription which, according to Diodorus, had been made by Queen See also:Semiramis of Nineveh, but which, as is now known, was really the work of See also: In r857 the new scholarship was put to a famous test, in which the See also:challenge thrown down by Sir See also:George Cornewall See also:Lewis and Ernest See also:Renan was met by Rawlinson, See also:Hincks, See also:Oppert and See also:Fox See also:Talbot in a conclusive manner . The sceptics had declared that the new science of Assyriology was itself a myth: that the investigators, self-deceived, had in reality only invented a language and read into the Assyrian inscriptions something utterly See also:alien to the minds of the Assyrians themselves . But when a See also:committee of the Royal See also:Asiatic Society, with George See also:Grote at its See also:head, decided that the See also:translations of an Assyrian See also:text made independently by the scholars just named were at once perfectly intelligible and closely in See also:accord with one another, scepticism was silenced, and the new science was admitted to have made See also:good its claims . Naturally the early investigators did not fathom all the niceties of the language, and the work of grammatical investigation has gone on continuously under the auspices of a constantly growing See also:band of workers . Doubtless much still remains to be done; but the essential thing, from the present standpoint, is that a sufficient knowledge of the Assyrian language has been acquired to ensure trustworthy translations of the See also:cuneiform texts . Meanwhile, the material found by Botta and Layard, and other successors, in the ruins of Nineveh, has been constantly augmented through the efforts of companies of other investigators, and not merely Assyrian, but much earlier Babylonian and Chaldaean texts in the greatest profusion have been brought to the various museums of Europe and See also:America . The study of these different inscriptions has utterly revolutionized our knowledge of See also:Oriental history . Many of the documents are strictly historical in their character, giving full and accurate contemporary accounts of events that occurred some thousands of years ago . Exact dates are fixed for long See also:series of events that previously were quite unknown . Monarchs whose very names had been forgotten are restored to history, and the records of their deeds inscribed under their very eyes are before us,—contemporary documents such as neither Greece nor Rome could boast, nor any other nation, with the single exception of Egypt, until strictly modern times . There are, no |