Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

ANTHONY COLLINS (1676-1729)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V06, Page 692 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

ANTHONY See also:COLLINS (1676-1729)  , See also:English deist, was See also:born at Heston, near See also:Hounslow in See also:Middlesex, on the 21st of See also:June 1676 . He was educated at See also:Eton and See also:King's See also:College, See also:Cambridge, and was for some See also:time a student at the See also:Middle See also:Temple . The most interesting See also:episode of his See also:life was his intimacy with See also:Locke, who in his letters speaks of him with See also:affection and admiration . In 1715 he settled in See also:Essex, where he held the offices of See also:justice of the See also:peace and See also:deputy-See also:lieutenant, which he had before held in Middlesex . He died at his See also:house in Harley See also:Street, See also:London, on the 13th of See also:December 1729 . His writings are important as gathering together the results of previous English Freethinkers . The imperturbable See also:courtesy of his See also:style is in striking contrast to the violence of his opponents; and it must be remembered that, in spite of his unorthodoxy, he was not an atheist or even an agnostic . In his own words, "See also:Ignorance is the See also:foundation of See also:atheism, and freethinking the cure of it " (Discourse of Freethinking, 105): His first See also:work of See also:note was his See also:Essay concerning the Use of See also:Reason in Propositions the See also:Evidence whereof depends on Human Testimony (1707), in which he rejected the distinction between above reason and contrary to reason, and demanded that See also:revelation should conform to See also:man's natural ideas of See also:God . Like all his See also:works, it was published anonymously, although the identity of the author was never See also:long concealed . Six years later appeared his See also:chief work, A Discourse of Freethinking, occasioned by the Rise and Growth of a See also:Sect called Freethinkers (x713) . Notwithstanding the See also:ambiguity of its See also:title, and the fact that it attacks the priests of all churches without moderation, it contends for the most See also:part, at least explicitly, for no more than must be admitted by every See also:Protestant . Freethinking is a right which cannot and must not be limited, for it is the only means of attaining to a knowledge of truth, it essentially contributes to the well-being of society, and it is not only permitted but enjoined by the See also:Bible .

In fact the first introduction of See also:

Christianity and the success of all missionary enterprise involve freethinking (in its etymological sense) on the part of those converted . In See also:England this essay, which was regarded and treated as a plea for See also:deism, made a See also:great sensation, calling forth several replies, among others from See also:William See also:Whiston, See also:Bishop See also:Hare, Bishop See also:Hoadly, and See also:Richard See also:Bentley, who, under the See also:signature of Phileleutherus Lipsiensis, roughly handles certain arguments carelessly expressed by See also:Collins, but triumphs chiefly by an attack on trivial points of scholarship, his own pamphlet being by no means faultless in this very respect . See also:Swift also, being satirically referred to in the See also:book, made it the subject of a See also:caricature . In 1724 Collins published his Discourse of the Grounds and Reasons of the See also:Christian See also:Religion, with An See also:Apology for See also:Free Debate and See also:Liberty of See also:Writing prefixed . Ostensibly it is written in opposition to Whiston's See also:attempt to show that the books of the Old Testament did originally contain prophecies of events in the New Testament See also:story, but that these had been eliminated or corrupted by the See also:Jews, and to prove that the fulfilment of prophecy by the events of See also:Christ's life is all " secondary, See also:secret, allegorical, and mystical," since the See also:original and literal reference is always to some other fact . Since, further, according to him the fulfilment of prophecy is the only valid See also:proof of Christianity, he thus secretly aims a See also:blow at Christianity as a revelation . The canonicity of the New Testament he ventures openly to deny, on the ground that the See also:canon could be fixed only by men who were inspired . No less than See also:thirty-five answers were directed against this book, the most noteworthy of which were those of Bishop See also:Edward See also:Chandler, See also:Arthur Sykes and See also:Samuel See also:Clarke . To these, but with See also:special reference to the work of Chandler, which maintained that a , number of prophecies were literally fulfilled in Christ, Collins replied by his See also:Scheme of Literal Prophecy Considered (1727) . An appendix contends against Whiston that the book of See also:Daniel was forged in the time of See also:Antiochus Epiphanes (see DErsM) . In See also:philosophy, Collins takes a foremost See also:place as a defender of Necessitarianism . His brief Inquiry Concerning Human Liberty (1715) has not been excelled, at all events in its See also:main outlines, as a statement of the determinist standpoint .

One of his arguments, however, calls for special See also:

criticism his assertion that it is self-evident that nothing that has a beginning can be without a cause is an unwarranted See also:assumption of the very point at issue . He was attacked in an elaborate See also:treatise by Samuel Clarke, in whose See also:system the freedom of the will is made essential to religion and morality . During Clarke's lifetime, fearing perhaps to be branded as an enemy of religion and morality, Collins made no reply, but in 1729 he published an See also:answer, entitled Liberty and See also:Necessity . Besides these works he wrote A See also:Letter to Mr See also:Dodwell, arguing that it is conceivable that the soul maybe material, and, secondly, that if the soul be immaterial it does not follow, as Clarke had contended, that it is immortal; Vindication of the Divine Attributes (1710); Priestcraft in Perfection (1709), in which he asserts that the clause "the See also:Church . . . Faith" in the twentieth of the Thirty-nine Articles was inserted by See also:fraud . See See also:Kippis, Biographia Britannica; G . See also:Lechler, Geschichte See also:des englischen Deismus (1841); J . See also:Hunt, Religious Thought in England, ii . (1871); See also:Leslie See also:Stephen, English Thought in the 18th See also:Century, i . (1881); A . W .

Benn, Hist. of English See also:

Rationalism in the 19th Century (London, 1906), vol. i. ch. iii . ; J . M . See also:Robertson, See also:Short See also:History of Freethought (London, 1906) ; and DEISM .

End of Article: ANTHONY COLLINS (1676-1729)
[back]
BARON CUTHBERT COLLINGWOOD COLLINGWOOD (1750-,8,o)
[next]
JOHN CHURTON COLLINS (1848-1908)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.