Online Encyclopedia

COMPROMISE MEASURES OF 1850

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V06, Page 814 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

COMPROMISE
See also:
MEASURES OF 1850
  , in
See also:
American
See also:
history, a series of
See also:
measures the
See also:
object of which was the settlement of five questions in dispute between the
See also:
pro-
See also:
slavery and anti-slavery factions in the
See also:
United States . Three of these questions grew out of the annexation of
See also:
Texas and the acquisition of western territory as a result of the Mexican War . The settlers who had flocked to California after the
See also:
discovery of gold in 1848 adopted an anti-slavery state constitution on the 13th of
See also:
October 1849, and applied for
See also:
admission into the Union . In the second place it was necessary to form a territorial government for the remainder of the territory acquired from Mexico, including that now occupied by Nevada and
See also:
Utah, and parts of
See also:
Wyoming,
See also:
Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico . The fundamental issue was in regard to the admission of slavery into, or the exclusion of slavery from, this region . Thirdly, there was a dispute over the western boundary of Texas . Should the Rio Grande be the
See also:
line of division north of Mexico, or should an arbitrary boundary be established farther to the eastward; in other words, should a considerable
See also:
part of the new territory be certainly opened to slavery as a part of Texas, or possibly closed to it as a part of the organized territorial section ? Underlying all of these issues was of course the
See also:
great moral and
See also:
political problem as to whether slavery was to be confined to the south-eastern section of the country or be permitted to spread to the Pacific . The two questions not growing out of the Mexican War were in regard to the abolition of. the slave trade in the
See also:
District of
See also:
Columbia, and the passage of a new fugitive slave law . Congress met on the 3rd of December 1849 . Neither faction was strong enough in both houses to carry out its own programme, and it seemed for a time that nothing would be done . On the 29th of
See also:
January 185o Henry Clay presented the famous
See also:
resolution which constituted the basis of the ultimate compromise .

His

idea was to combine the more conservative elements of both sections in favour of a settlement which would concede the
See also:
Southern view on two questions, the
See also:
Northern view on two, and balance the fifth . Daniel Webster supported the plan in his great speech of the 7th of March, although in doing so he alienated many of his former admirers . Opposed to the conservatives were the extremists of the North, led by William H . Seward and Salmon P . Chase, and those of the South, led by Jefferson Davis . Most of the measures were rejected and the whole plan seemed likely to fail, when the situation was changed by the
See also:
death of President Taylor and the accession of Millard Fillmore on the 9th of
See also:
July 1850 . The influence of the administration was now thrown in favour of the compromise . Under a tacit understanding of the moderates to
See also:
vote together, five
See also:
separate bills were passed, and were signed, by the president between 9th and loth September 1850 . California was admitted as a
See also:
free state, and the slave trade was abolished in the District of Columbia; these were concessions to the North . New Mexico (then including the
See also:
present Arizona) and Utah were organized without any prohibi= tion of slavery (each being
See also:
left free to decide for or against, on admission to statehood), and a rigid fugitive slave law was enacted; these were concessions to the South . Texas (q.v.) was compelled to give up much of the western
See also:
land to which it had a good claim, and received in return $1o,000,000 . This legislation had several important results .

It helped to postpone

See also:
secession and
See also:
Civil War for a decade, during which time the North-West was growing more wealthy and more populous, and was being brought into closer relations with the North-East . It divided the Whigs into " Cotton Whigs " and " Conscience Whigs," and in time led to the downfall of the party . In the third place, the rejection of the Wilmot Proviso and the acceptance (as regards New Mexico and Utah) of " Squatter
See also:
Sovereignty " meant the adoption of a new principle in dealing with slavery in the territories, which, although it did not apply to the same territory, was antagonistic to the
See also:
Missouri Compromise of 182o . The sequel was the repeal of the Missouri Compromise in the Kansas-
See also:
Nebraska
See also:
Bill of 1854 . Fourthly, the enforcement of the fugitive slave law aroused a feeling of bitterness in the North which helped eventually to bring on the war, and helped to make it, when it came, quite as much an anti-slavery crusade as a struggle for the preservation of the Union . Finally, although Clay for his support of the compromises and Seward and Chase for their opposition have gained in reputation, Webster has been selected as the
See also:
special target for hostile criticism . The Compromise Measures are sometimes spoken of collectively as the Omnibus Bill, owing to their having been grouped originally—when first reported (May 8) to the Senate—into one bill . The best account of the above Compromises is to be found in J . F . Rhodes, History of the United States from the Compromise of r8fo, vol. i . (New York, 1896) . (W .

R .

End of Article: COMPROMISE MEASURES OF 1850
[back]
COMPROMISE (pronounced compromize; through Fr. from...
[next]
COMPSA (mod. Conza)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.