|
CONATION (from See also: term, originally chosen by 'See also: Sir See also: William
See also: Hamilton (Lectures on
See also: Metaphysics, pp
.
127 See also: foil.), used generally of an attitude of mind involving a tendency to take See also: action, e.g. when one decides to remove an See also: object which is causing a painful sensation, or to try to interrupt' an unpleasant train of thought
.
This use of the word tends to See also: lay emphasis on the mind as self-determined in relation to See also: external See also: objects
.
Another less See also: common use of the word is to describe the pleasant or painful sensations which accompany See also: muscular activity; the conative phenomena, thus regarded, are psychic changes brought about by external causes
.
The chief difficulty in connexion with Conation is that of distinguishing it from Feeling, a term of very vague significance both in technical and in common usage
.
Thus the See also: German psychologist F
.
Brentano holds that no real distinction can be made
.
He argues that the See also: mental See also: process from sorrow or dissatisfaction, through hope for a change and courage to See also: act, up to the voluntary determination which issues in action, is a single homogeneous whole (Psycltologie, pp
.
308-309)
.
The See also: mere fact, however, that the series is continuous is no ground for not distinguishing its parts; if it were so, it would be impossible to distinguish by See also: separate names the various See also: colours in the solar spectrum, or indeed perception from conception
.
A more material objection, moreover, is that, in point of fact, the feeling of pleasure or See also: pain roused by a given stimulus is specifically different from, and indeed may not be followed by, the determination to modify or remove it
.
Pleasure and pain, i.e. hedonic sensation per se, are essentially distinct from appetition and aversion; the pleasures of hearing See also: music or enjoying See also: sun-shine are not in general accompanied by any volitional activity
.
It is true that painful sensations are generally accompanied by definite aversion or a tendency to take action, but the cases of See also: positive pleasure are amply sufficient to support a distinction
.
Therefore, though in ordinary language such phrases as " feeling aversion " are quite legitimate, accurate psychology compels us to confine " feeling " to states of consciousness in which no conative activity is See also: present, i.e. to the psychic phenomena of pleasure or pain considered in and by themselves
.
The study of such phenomena is specifically described as Hedonics (Gr. ikovn, pleasure) or Algedonics (Gr
.
6.X•ynbeev, pain); the latter term was coined by H
.
R
.
See also: Marshall (in Pain, Pleasure and See also: Aesthetics, 1894), but has not been generally used
.
The problem of conation is closely related to that of See also: Attention (q.v.), which indeed, regarded as active consciousness, implies conation (G
.
T
.
See also: Ladd, Psychology, 1894, p
.
213)
.
Thus, whenever the mind deliberately focusses itself upon a particular object, there is implied a psychic effort (for the relation between Attention and Conation, see G
.
F
.
Stout, Analytic Psychology, bock i.See also: chap. vi.)
.
All conscious action, and in a less degree even unconscious or reflex action, implies attention; when the mind" attends " to any given external object, the See also: organ through the See also: medium of which information regarding that object is conveyed to the mind is set in motion
.
|
|
|
[back] THOMAS JEFFERSON CONANT (1802-1891) |
[next] SEBASTIANO CONCA (1679-1764) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.