See also:CONFIRMATION OF BISHOPS
.
In See also:canon See also:law See also:confirmation is the See also:act by which the See also:election of a new See also:bishop receives the assent of the proper ecclesiastical authority
.
In the See also:early centuries of the See also:history of the See also:- CHURCH
- CHURCH (according to most authorities derived from the Gr. Kvpcaxov [&wµa], " the Lord's [house]," and common to many Teutonic, Slavonic and other languages under various forms—Scottish kirk, Ger. Kirche, Swed. kirka, Dan. kirke, Russ. tserkov, Buig. cerk
- CHURCH, FREDERICK EDWIN (1826-1900)
- CHURCH, GEORGE EARL (1835–1910)
- CHURCH, RICHARD WILLIAM (1815–189o)
- CHURCH, SIR RICHARD (1784–1873)
Church the election or See also:appointment of a See also:suffragan bishop was confirmed and approved by the See also:metropolitan and his suffragans assembled in See also:synod
.
By the 4th canon of the first See also:council of See also:Nicaea (A.D
.
325), however, it was decreed that the right of confirmation should belong to the metropolitan bishop of each See also:province, a See also:rule confirmed by the 12th canon of the council of Laodicaea
.
For the appointment of a metropolitan no papal confirmation was required either in the See also:West or See also:East; but the practice which See also:grew up, from the 6th See also:century onwards, of the popes presenting the See also:pallium (q.v.), at first honoris causa, to newly appointed metropolitans gradually came to symbolize the See also:licence to exercise metropolitan See also:jurisdiction
.
By the 8th and 9th centuries the papal right of confirmation by this means was strenuously asserted; yet as See also:late as the 13th century there were instances of metropolitans exercising their functions without receiving the pallium, and it was not till after this date that the See also:present rule and practice of the See also:Roman
See also:Catholic Church was definitively established (see See also:Hinschius, Kirchenrecht, ii. p
.
28 and notes)
.
The canonical right of the metropolitan to confirm the election of his suffragans was still affirmed by See also:Gratian; but from the See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time of See also:Pope See also:Alexander III
.
(1159—1181) the canon lawyers, under the See also:influence of the False See also:Decretals, began to claim this right for the pope (Febronius, De statu ecclesiae, 2nd ed., 1765, cap. iv
.
§ 3, 2)
.
From the 13th century onwards it was effectively exercised, though the all but universal practice of the popes of reserving and providing to vacant bishoprics, initiated by See also:Clement V., obscured the issue, since in the See also:case of papal nominations no confirmation was required
.
The question, however, was raised, in connexion with that of the papal reservations and provisions, at the See also:councils of See also:Constance and See also:Basel
.
The former shelved it in the interests of See also:peace; but the latter once more formulated the principle that elections in the churches were to be See also:free and their result confirmed according to the provisions of the See also:common law (juxta See also:juris communis dispositionem), i.e. by " the immediate See also:superior " to whom the right of confirmation belonged (Febronius, op. cit
.
Appendix, p
.
784)
.
In See also:England, where the abuse of provisors had been most acutely See also:felt, the See also:matter was dealt with during the vacancy of the See also:Holy See between the deposition of See also:John See also:XXIII. at Constance (May 1415) and the election of See also:- MARTIN (Martinus)
- MARTIN, BON LOUIS HENRI (1810-1883)
- MARTIN, CLAUD (1735-1800)
- MARTIN, FRANCOIS XAVIER (1762-1846)
- MARTIN, HOMER DODGE (1836-1897)
- MARTIN, JOHN (1789-1854)
- MARTIN, LUTHER (1748-1826)
- MARTIN, SIR THEODORE (1816-1909)
- MARTIN, SIR WILLIAM FANSHAWE (1801–1895)
- MARTIN, ST (c. 316-400)
- MARTIN, WILLIAM (1767-1810)
Martin V
.
(See also:November 1417)
.
During the See also:interval the only possible way of appointing a bishop was by the See also:ancient method of canonical election and confirmation
.
Shortly after the deposition of John XXIII., See also:- HENRY
- HENRY (1129-1195)
- HENRY (c. 1108-1139)
- HENRY (c. 1174–1216)
- HENRY (Fr. Henri; Span. Enrique; Ger. Heinrich; Mid. H. Ger. Heinrich and Heimrich; O.H.G. Haimi- or Heimirih, i.e. " prince, or chief of the house," from O.H.G. heim, the Eng. home, and rih, Goth. reiks; compare Lat. rex " king "—" rich," therefore " mig
- HENRY, EDWARD LAMSON (1841– )
- HENRY, JAMES (1798-1876)
- HENRY, JOSEPH (1797-1878)
- HENRY, MATTHEW (1662-1714)
- HENRY, PATRICK (1736–1799)
- HENRY, PRINCE OF BATTENBERG (1858-1896)
- HENRY, ROBERT (1718-1790)
- HENRY, VICTOR (1850– )
- HENRY, WILLIAM (1795-1836)
Henry V. assented to an See also:ordinance that during the voidance of the Holy See bishops-elect should be confirmed by their metropolitans (Rotuli Parliamentorum, iv. p
.
71); but the ordinance was not recorded on the See also:Statute See also:Roll
.
Three bishops only, namely, John Chaundeler of See also:Salisbury, See also:Edmund de Lacey of See also:Hereford and John Wakering of See also:Norwich, were confirmed by the See also:archbishop of See also:Canterbury during the papal vacancy
.
When Martin V. was elected pope in 1417 he resumed the practice of providing bishops, and from this time until the See also:Reformation the canonical election and confirmation of a bishop in England was a rare exception
.
In Roman Catholic countries the See also:complete See also:control of the papacy over the election and appointment of bishops has since the Reformation become firmly established, in spite of the efforts of Gallicans and " Febronians " to reassert what they held to be the more Catholic usage (see See also:GALLICANISM; See also:FEBRONIANISM; BISHOP)
.
In England at the Reformation the See also:share of the papacy in appointing bishops was abolished, but the confirmation became almost formal in See also:character
.
By 25 See also:Hen, VIII. c
.
20, s
.
4, it is provided that after an episcopal election a royal See also:mandate shall issue to the archbishop of the province " requiring him to confirm the said election," or, in case of an archbishop-elect, to one See also:arch-bishop and two bishops, or to four bishops, " requiring and commanding " them " with all See also:speed and celerity to confirm " it
.
This practice still prevails in the case of dioceses which have chapters to elect
.
The confirmation has usually been performed by the archbishop's See also:vicar-See also:general, and, in the See also:southern province, at the church of St See also:Mary-le-See also:Bow, See also:London; but since 1901 it has been performed, in See also:part, at the Church See also:House, See also:Westminster, in consequence of the disorder in the proceedings at Bow church on the confirmation there of Dr Winnington See also:Ingram as bishop of London
.
Allobjectors are cited toappearon See also:pain of See also:contumacy after the old See also:form; but although the knowledge that opposition might be offered has been a safeguard against improper nominations, e.g. in the case of Dr See also:- CLARKE, ADAM (1762?—1832)
- CLARKE, CHARLES COWDEN (1787-1877)
- CLARKE, EDWARD DANIEL (1769–1822)
- CLARKE, JAMES FREEMAN (1810–1888)
- CLARKE, JOHN SLEEPER (1833–1899)
- CLARKE, MARCUS ANDREW HISLOP (1846–1881)
- CLARKE, MARY ANNE (c.1776–1852)
- CLARKE, SAMUEL (1675–1729)
- CLARKE, SIR ANDREW (1824-1902)
- CLARKE, SIR EDWARD GEORGE (1841– )
- CLARKE, THOMAS SHIELDS (1866- )
- CLARKE, WILLIAM BRANWHITE (1798-1878)
Clarke the Arian, confirmation has never been refused since the Reformation
.
In 1628 Dr See also:Rives, acting for the vicar-general, declined to receive objections made to See also:Richard Montague's election to the see of See also:Chichester on the ground that they were not made in legal form
.
An informal protest against the confirmation of Dr See also:Prince See also:- LEE
- LEE (or LEGIT) ROWLAND (d. 1543)
- LEE, ANN (1736–1784)
- LEE, ARTHUR (1740–1792)
- LEE, FITZHUGH (1835–1905)
- LEE, GEORGE ALEXANDER (1802-1851)
- LEE, HENRY (1756-1818)
- LEE, JAMES PRINCE (1804-1869)
- LEE, NATHANIEL (c. 1653-16g2)
- LEE, RICHARD HENRY (1732-1794)
- LEE, ROBERT EDWARD (1807–1870)
- LEE, SIDNEY (1859– )
- LEE, SOPHIA (1950-1824)
- LEE, STEPHEN DILL (1833-1908)
Lee of See also:Manchester in 1848 was almost immediately followed by another in due form against that of Dr See also:Hampden, elect of Hereford
.
The vicar-general refused to receive the objections, and an application to the See also:queen's See also:bench for a See also:mandamus was unsuccessful, the See also:judges being divided, two against two
.
In 1869, at the
confirmation of Dr See also:Temple's election as bishop of See also:Exeter, the vicar-general heard counsel on the question whether he could receive objections, and decided that he could not
.
When the same See also:prelate was elected to Canterbury, the course here laid down was followed, as also at the confirmation, of Dr Mandell See also:Creighton's election to the see of London
.
Objections were again raised, in 1902, against Dr See also:Charles See also:Gore, elect of See also:Worcester; and an application was made to the See also:- KING
- KING (O. Eng. cyning, abbreviated into cyng, cing; cf. O. H. G. chun- kuning, chun- kunig, M.H.G. kiinic, kiinec, kiinc, Mod. Ger. Konig, O. Norse konungr, kongr, Swed. konung, kung)
- KING [OF OCKHAM], PETER KING, 1ST BARON (1669-1734)
- KING, CHARLES WILLIAM (1818-1888)
- KING, CLARENCE (1842–1901)
- KING, EDWARD (1612–1637)
- KING, EDWARD (1829–1910)
- KING, HENRY (1591-1669)
- KING, RUFUS (1755–1827)
- KING, THOMAS (1730–1805)
- KING, WILLIAM (1650-1729)
- KING, WILLIAM (1663–1712)
king's bench for a mandamus against the archbishop and his vicar-general when the latter declined to entertain them
.
By a unanimous See also:judgment (See also:February io) the See also:court, consisting of the See also:lord See also:chief See also:justice (Lord See also:Alverstone) and Justices See also:Wright and See also:Ridley, refused the mandamus
.
Without deciding that objections (e.g. to the identity of the elect, or the genuineness of documents) could never be investigated by the vicar-general or the archbishop, it held that they could not even entertain objections of the See also:kind alleged
.
At the confirmation of Dr Cosmo See also:Gordon See also:Lang's election as archbishop of See also:York, held in the Church House on the 2oth of See also:January 1909, objections were raised on behalf of the See also:Protestant Truth Society to the confirmation, on the ground that the archbishop-elect had, while bishop suffragan of See also:Stepney, connived at and encouraged flagrant breaches of the law as to church See also:ritual, taken part in illegal ceremonies, and the like
.
The objectors were heard by the archbishop of Canterbury and the other commissioners in See also:chambers, the decision being that, in accordance with the judgment of the court of king's bench above cited, the objections could not lawfully be received since they did not fall within the province of the commissioners
.
The archbishop also pointed out that the form of See also:citation (to objectors) had been modified since 1902, but suggested that it was "a matter for See also:consideration whether the terminology of the citation could be altered so as to bring everything into complete accordance with the law of the Church and See also:realm " (see The Times, January 21, 1909)
.
Formerly the archbishop had the right of See also:option, i.e. of choosing any one piece of preferment in the See also:gift of a bishop confirmed by him, and bestowing it upon whom he would; but this has been held to be abolished by a clause in the See also:Cathedral Act of 1840 (3 & 4 Viet
.
C
.
113, s
.
42)
.
And the election of a See also:dean by a cathedral See also:chapter used to receive the bishop's confirmation (Oughton, Ordo Judiciorum, No. cxxvii.)
.
End of Article: