Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:CONVOCATION (See also:Lat. convocatio, a calling together)
, an See also:assembly of persons met together in See also:answer to a See also:summons
.
The See also:term is more usually applied in a restricted sense to assemblies of the See also:clergy or of the graduates of certain See also:universities
.
In the See also:American See also:Protestant Episcopal See also:
The existing constitution of the convocation of the province of Canterbury—and the same observation will apply to that of the province of York—in respect of its comprising representatives of the chapters and of the beneficed clergy, in addition to the bishops and other dignitaries of the church, would thus appear to be of even more See also:ancient date than the existing constitution of the parliament of the realm
.
From this period down to the eleventh year of the reign of Edward III. there were continual contests between the spirituality of the realm and the crown,—the spirituality contest contending for their constitutional right to See also:vote their between subsidies in their provincial convocations; the crown, spiritu_ on the other See also:hand, insisting on the immediate attend- aiity and ance of the clergy in parliament
.
The resistance of the crown clergy to the innovation of the "praemunientes " clause had so far prevailed in the reign of Edward II. that the crown consented to summon the clergy to parliament through their metropolitans, and a See also:special form of provincial writ was for that purpose framed; but the clergy protested against this writ, and the struggle was maintained between the spirituality and the crown until 1337 (11 Edward III.), when the crown reverted to the ancient practice of commanding the metropolitans to See also:call together their clergy in their provincial assemblies, where their subsidies were voted in the manner as accustomed before the " praemunientes " clause was introduced
.
The " praemunientes " clause, however, was continued in the See also:parliamentary writs issued to the several bishops of both provinces, whilst the bishops were permitted to neglect at their See also:pleasure the See also:execution of the writs
.
The See also:history of the convocation of the province of Canterbury, as at present constituted, is full of stirring incidents, and it resolves itself readily into five periods
.
The first
period, by which is meant the first period which See also:dates ac See also:char cte ristic
from an See also:epoch of authentic history, is the period of its periods. greatest freedom, but not of its greatest activity
.
It
extends from the reign of Edward I
.
(1283) to that of Henry VIII
.
The second period is the period of its greatest activity and of its greatest usefulness, and it extends from the twenty-fifth year of the reign of Henry VIII. to the reign of See also:
The
See also:fourth period extends from the third year of the reign of George I
.
(1716) to the fifteenth year of the reign of See also:Queen See also:Victoria
.
This was a period of torpid inactivity, during which it was customary for convocation to be summoned and to meet See also:pro forma, and to be continued and prorogued indefinitely
.
The fifth period maybe considered to have commenced in the fifteenth year of the reign of Queen Victoria (1852)
.
During the first of the five periods above mentioned, it would appear from the records preserved at See also:Lambeth and at York that the metropolitans frequently convened congregations (so called) of their clergy without the authority of a royal writ, which were constituted precisely as the convocations were constituted, when the metropolitans were commanded to call their clergy together pursuant to a writ from the crown
.
As soon, however, as King Henry VIII. had obtained from the clergy their See also:acknowledgment of the supremacy of the crown in all ecclesiastical causes, he constrained the spirituality to declare, by what has been termed the See also:Act of Submission on behalf of the clergy, that the convocation " is, always has been, and ought to be summoned by authority of a royal writ "; and this See also:declaration was embodied in a See also:statute of the realm (25 Henry VIII. c
.
19), which further enacted that the convocation " should thenceforth make no provincial canons, constitutions or ordinances without the royal assent and See also:licence." The spirituality was thus more closely incorporated than heretofore in the See also:body politic of the realm, seeing that no deliberations on its See also:part can take See also:place unless the crown has previously granted its licence for such deliberations
.
It had been already provided during this period by 8 Henry VI. c
.
1, that the prelates and other clergy, with their servants and attendants, when called to the convocation pursuant to the king's writ, should enjoy the same See also:liberty and See also:defence in coming, tarrying and returning as the magnates and the See also:commons of the realm enjoy when summoned to the king's parliament
.
The second period, which dates from 1533 to 1664, has been
distinguished by four important assemblies of the spirituality
of the realm in pursuance of a royal writ—the two
first of which occurred in the reign of Edward VI.,
the third in the reign of Queen See also: Meanwhile the convocation of 1603 had framed a body of canons for the governance of the clergy . Another convocation requires a passing See also:notice, in which certain canons were See also:drawn up in 1640, but by See also:reason of an irregularity in the proceedings of this convocation (chiefly, on the ground that its sessions were continued for some See also:time after the parliament of the realm had been dissolved), its canons are not held to have any binding See also:obligation on the clergy . The convocations had up to this time maintained their liberty of voting the subsidies of the clergy in the form of " benevolences " See also:separate and apart from the " aids " granted by the laity in parliament, and one of the objections taken to the proceedings of the convocation of 1640 was that it had continued to sit and to vote its subsidies to the crown after the parliament itself had been dissolved . It is not, therefore, surprising on the restoration of the See also:monarchy in 1661 that the spirituality was not anxious to retain the liberty of taxing itself apart from the laity, seeing that its ancient liberty was likely to prove of questionable See also:advantage to it . It voted, however, a benevolence to the crown on the occasion of its first assembling in 1661 after the restoration of King Charles II., and it continued so to do until 1664, when an arrangement was made between See also:Archbishop See also:Sheldon and See also:Lord See also:Chancellor See also:Hyde, under which the spirituality silently waived its See also:long-asserted The most important and the last work of the convocation during this second period of its activity was the revision of the See also:Book of Common See also:Prayer which was completed in the latter part of 1661 . The Revolution in 1688 is the most important epoch in the third period of the history of the synodical proceedings of the spirituality, when the convocation of Canterbury, Third having met in 1689 in pursuance of a royal writ, period obtained a licence under the great See also:seal, to prepare certain alterations in the See also:liturgy and in the canons, and to deliberate on the reformation of the ecclesiastical courts . A feeling, however, of panic seemseto have come over the Lower House, which took up a position of violent antagonism to the Upper House . This circumstance led to the See also:prorogation of the convocation and to its subsequent See also:discharge without any See also:practical See also:fruit resulting from the king's licence . Ten years elapsed during which the convocation was prorogued from time to time without any See also:meeting of its members for business being allowed . The next convocation which was permitted to meet for business, in 1700, was marked by great turbulence and in-subordination on the part of the members of the Lower House, who refused to recognize the authority of the archbishop to prorogue their sessions . This controversy was kept up until the discharge of the convocation took place concurrently with the See also:dissolution of the parliament in the autumn of that year . The proceedings of the Lower House in this convocation were disfigured by excesses which were clearly violations of the constitutional See also:order of the convocation .
The Lower House refused to take notice of the archbishop's See also:schedule of prorogation, and adjourned itself by its own authority, and upon the See also:demise of the crown it disputed the fact of its sessions having expired, and as parliament was to continue for a See also:short time, prayed that its sessions might be continued as a part of the parliament under the " praemunientes " clause
.
The next convocation was summoned in the first year of Queen See also:Anne, when the Lower House, under the leadership of See also:Dean See also:Aldrich, its prolocutor, challenged the right of the archbishop to prorogue it, Claim o! and presented a See also:petition to the queen, praying her Lower
See also:majesty to call the question into her own presence
.
House to The question was thereupon examined by the queen's sit mndecouncil, when the right of the See also:president to prorogue pendently both houses of convocation by a schedule of prorogation was held to be proved, and further, that it could not be altered except by an act of parliament
.
During the remaining years of the reign of Queen Anne the two Houses of convocation were engaged either in internecine strife, or in censuring sermons or books, as teaching latitudinarian or heretical doctrines; and, when it had been assembled concurrently with parliament on the accession of King George I., a great See also:breach was before long created between the two houses by the Bangorian controversy
.
Dr See also:Hoadly, See also:bishop of See also:Bangor, having preached a See also:sermon before the king, in the Royal See also:Chapel at St See also: The spirituality at last aroused itself from its long repose in 1852, and on this occasion the Upper House took the See also:lead . The active spirit of the See also:movement was See also:Samuel Wilber- Fifth force, bishop of See also:Oxford, but the See also:master mind was period . Henry See also:Phillpotts, bishop of See also:Exeter . On the convoca- tion assembling several petitions were presented to both houses, praying them to take steps to procure from the crown the necessary licence for their meeting for the despatch of business, and an address to the Upper House was brought up from the Lower House, calling the See also:attention of the Upper House to the reasonableness of the prayer of the various petitions . After some discussion the Upper House, influenced mainly by the See also:argument of Henry, bishop of Exeter, consented to receive the address of the Lower House, and the convocation was there-upon prorogued, shortly after which it was discharged concurrently with the dissolution of parliament . On the assembling of the next convocation of the province of Canterbury, no royal writ of exoneration having been sent by the crown to the metropolitan, the sessions of the convocation were continued for several days; and from this time forth convocation may, be considered to have resumed its See also:action as a consultative body, whilst it has also been permitted on more than one occasion to exercise its functions as a deliberative body . In 1865, under licence from the crown, the Convocations of Canterbury and York framed new canons in place of the 36th, 37th, 38th and 4oth canons of 1603, and amended the 62nd and Io2nd canons in 1888 . In 1872 convocation was empowered by letters of business from the crown to See also:frame resolutions on the subject of public See also:worship, which resolutions were afterwards incorporated in the Act of Uniformity See also:Amendment Act 1872 . As a deliberative body, convocation has done much useful work, but it suffers considerably from its unrepresentative nature . The non-beneficed clergy still remain without the See also:franchise, but the See also:establishment of Houses of Laymen (see LAYMEN, HousEs oF) for both provinces has, to a certain extent, secured the co-operation of the See also:lay See also:element . Several attempts have been made to promote legislation to enable the convocations to reform their constitutions and to enable them to unite for special purposes; in 1905 a See also:bill was introduced into the House of Lords . It did not, however, get beyond a first See also:reading . In 1896 a departure was made in holding See also:joint sessions of both convocations, in See also:conjunction with the two Houses of Laymen, for See also:con-sultative purposes . This body is now termed the Representative Church Council, and it adopted a Constitution in See also:November 1905 . All formal business is transacted in the separate convocations . It is usual for convocation to meet three times a year . The order of convening the convocation of the province of Canter-See also:bury is as follows . A writ issues from the crown, addressed to the metropolitan archbishop of Canterbury, commanding him " by reason of certain difficult and urgent affairs concerning us, the See also:security and defence of our Church of England, and the See also:peace and tranquillity, public See also:good and defence of our See also:kingdom, and our subjects of the same, to call together with all convenient See also:speed, and in lawful manner, the several bishops of the province of Canterbury, and deans of the cathedral churches, and also the archdeacons, chapters and colleges, and the whole clergy of every diocese of the said province, to appear before the said metropolitan in the cathedral church of St See also:Paul, London, on a certain day, or elsewhere, as shall seem most expedient, to treat of, agree to and conclude upon the premises and other things, which to them shall then at the same place be more clearly explained on our behalf." In case the metropolitical see of Canterbury should be vacant, the writ of the crown is ad-dressed to the dean and chapter of the metropolitical church of Canterbury in similar terms, as being the guardians of the spiritualities of the see during a vacancy . Thereupon the metropolitan, or, as the case may be, the dean and chapter of the metropolitical church, issue a See also:mandate to the bishop of London, as dean of the province, and if the bishopric of London should be vacant, then to the bishop of See also:Winchester as subdean, which embodies the royal writ, and directs the bishop to cause all the bishops of the province to be cited, and through them the deans of the cathedral and collegiate churches, and the archdeacons and other dignitaries of churches, and each chapter by one, and the clergy of each diocese by two sufficient proctors, to appear before the metropolitan or his See also:commissary, or, as the case may be, before the dean and chapter of the metropolitical church or their commissary, in the chapter-house of the cathedral church of St Paul, London, if that place be named in the mandate, or elsewhere, with continuation and prorogation of days next following, if that should be necessary, to treat upon arduous and weighty affairs, which shall concern the See also:state and welfare, public good and defence of this kingdom and the subjects thereof, to be then and there seriously laid before them, and to give their good counsel and assistance on the said affairs, and to consent to such things as shall happen to be wholesomely ordered and appointed by their common advisement, for the See also:honour of See also:God and the good of the church . The provincial dean, or the subdean, as the case may be, there-upon issues a See also:citation to the several bishops of the province, which embodies the mandate of the metropolitan or of the dean and chapter of the metropolitical church, as the case may be, and admonishes them to appear, and to cite and admonish their clergy, as specified in the metropolitical mandate, to appear at the time and place mentioned in the mandate . The bishops thereupon either summon directly the clergy of their respective dioceses to appear before them or their commissaries to elect two proctors, or they send a citation to their archdeacons, according to the See also:custom of the diocese, directing them to summon the clergy of their respective archdeaconries to elect a proctor . The practice of each diocese in this See also:matter is the See also:law of the convocation, and the practice varies indefinitely as regards the See also:election of proctors to represent the beneficed clergy . As regards the deans, the bishops send special writs to them to appear in See also:person, and to cause their chapters to appear severally by one proctor . Writs also go to every archdeacon, and on the day named in the royal writ, which is always the day next following that named in the writ to summon the parliament, the convocation assembles in the place named in the archbishop's mandate .
There-upon, after the See also:Litany has been sung or said, and a Latin sermon preached by a preacher appointed by the metropolitan, the clergy are praeconized or summoned by name to appear before the metropolitan or his commissary; after which the clergy of the Lower House are directed to withdraw and elect a prolocutor to be presented to the metropolitan for his approbation
.
The convocation thus constituted resolves itself at its next meeting into two houses, and it is in a See also:fit state to proceed to business
.
The constitution of the convocation of the province of York differs slightly from that of the convocation of the province of Canterbury, as each archdeaconry is represented by two proctors, precisely as in parliament formerly under the Praemunientes clause
.
There are some anomalies in the diocesan returns of the two convocations, but in all such matters the consuetudo of the diocese is the governing See also:rule
.
See also:BIBLIOGRAPIiy.—See also:Wilkins, Concilia Magnae Britannia et Hiberniae (4 vols. See also:folio, 1737) ; See also:Gibson, Codex See also:Juris Ecclesiastici Anglicani (2 vols. folio, 1713) ; See also: T.; T . A . |
|
|
[back] CONVOCATION |
[next] CONVOLVULACEAE |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.