Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:CORPORATION (from See also:Lat. corporare, to See also:form into a See also:body, corpus, corporis) , in See also:English See also:law, an association of persons which is treated in many respects as if it were itself a See also:person . It has rights and duties of its own which are not the rights and duties of the individual members thereof . Thus a See also:corporation may own See also:land, but the individual members of the corporation have no rights therein . A corporation may owe See also:money, but the corporators as individuals are under no See also:obligation to pay the See also:debt . The rights and duties descend to the successive members of the corporation . This capacity of perpetual See also:succession is regarded as the distinguishing feature of corporations as compared with other See also:societies . One of the phrases most commonly met with in law-books describes a corporation as a society with perpetual succession and a See also:common See also:seal . The latter point, however, is not conclusive of the corporate See also:character . The legal attributes of a corporation have been worked out with See also:great fulness and ingenuity in English law, but the conception has been taken full-grown from the law of See also:Rome . The See also:term in See also:Roman law corresponding to the See also:modern corporation is collegium; a more See also:general term is universitas . A collegium or corpus must have consisted of at least three persons, who were said to be corporati—habere corpus . They could hold See also:property in common and had a common See also:chest . They might See also:sue and be sued by their See also:agent (syndicus or actor) . There was a See also:complete separation in law between the rights of the collegium as a See also:body and those of its individual members . The collegium remained in existence although all its See also:original members were changed . It was governed by its own by-See also:laws, provided these were not contrary to the common law . The See also:power of forming collegia was restrained, and societies pretending to See also:act as corporations were often suppressed . In all these points the collegia of Roman closely resemble the corporations of English law . There is a similar parallel between the purposes. for which the formation of such societies is authorized in English and in Roman law . Thus among the Roman collegia the following classes are distinguished: (r) Public governing bodies, or municipalities, civitates; (2) religious societies, such as the collegia of priests and Vestal Virgins ; (3) See also:official societies, e.g. the scribae, employed in the See also:administration of the See also:state ; (4) See also:trade societies, e.g. fabri, pictores, navicularii, &c . This class shades down into the societates not incorporated, just as our own trading corporations partake largely of the character of See also:ordinary partnerships . In the later Roman law the distinction of corporations into See also:civil and ecclesiastical, into See also:lay and eleemosynary, is recognized . The latter could not alienate without just cause, nor take land without a See also:licence—a restriction which may be compared with modern statutes of See also:mortmain . All these privileged societies are what we should See also:call corporations aggregate .
The corporation See also:sole (i.e. consisting of only a single person) is a later refinement, for although Roman law held that the corporation subsisted in full force, notwithstanding that only one member survived, it did not impute to the successive holders of a public See also:office the character of a corporation
.
When a public officer in English law is said to be a corporation sole, the meaning is that the rights acquired by him in that capacity descend to his successor in office, and not (as the See also:case is where a public officer is not a corporation) to his ordinary legal representative
.
The best known instances of
corporation sole are the See also:
The reform of municipal corporations has also restricted the operation of the principles of the older corporation law
.
These principles, however, still apply when special statutes have not intervened
.
The legal origin of corporation is ascribed by J
.
See also:
Great use was made of this power of the crown in the reigns of See also:
In corporations which have a head (as colleges), although the head cannot See also:veto the See also:resolution of the majority, he is still considered an integral part of the society, and his See also:death suspends its existence, so that a head cannot devise or bequeath to the corporation, nor can a grant be made to a corporation during vacancy of the headship
.
A corporation. has power to make such regulations (by-laws) as are necessary for carrying out its purposes, and these are
binding on its members and on persons within its See also:local See also:jurisdiction if it has any
.
The power to acquire and hold land was incident to a corporation at common law, but its restriction by the statutes of mortmain See also:dates from a very See also:early See also:period
.
The English law against mortmain was dictated by the jealousy of the feudal lords, who lost the services they would otherwise have been entitled to, when their land passed into the hands of a perpetual corporation
.
The vast increase in the estates of ecclesiastical corporations
constituted by itself a danger which might well justify the operation of the restricting statutes
.
The Mortmain Acts applied only to cases of See also:alienation inter vivos
.
There was no power to devise lands by will until 32 See also: The law was consolidated by the Mortmain and Charitable Uses Act 1888, and the result is simply that corporations cannot take land for any purpose without a licence, and no licence in mortmain is granted by the crown, except in certain statutory cases in the interests of See also:religion, charity or other definite public See also:object . The power of corporations at common law to alienate their property is usually restricted, as is their power to See also:lease it for more than a. certain number of years, except by See also:sanction of a public authority . The more important classes of corporations, how-ever, are now governed by special statutes which exclude or modify the operation of the common law principles . The most considerable class of societies still unaffected by such special legislation are the See also:Livery Companies (q.v.) . Under See also:COMPANY will be found an See also:account of the important enactments regulating See also:joint-stock companies . The question to what extent the common law incidents of a corporation have been interfered with by special legislation has become one of much importance, especially under the acts See also:relating to joint-stock companies . The most important case on this subject is that of Riche v . The Ashbury Railway See also:Carriage Company, 1875 (L.R . 9 Ex . 224; L.R . 7 H.L . 653), in. which, the See also:judges of the See also:exchequer chamber being equally divided, the decision of the See also:court below was affirmed . The view taken by the affirming judges, viz. that the common law incidents of a corporation adhere unless expressly removed by the legislature, may be ' Devises to colleges are excepted from the operation of the act, but such devises must be for purposes identical with or closely resembling the original purposes of the See also:college; and the exception from this act does not supersede the See also:necessity for a licence in mortmain . illustrated by a See also:short See also:extract from the See also:judgment of Mr See also:Justice See also:Blackburn: " If I thought it was at common law an incident to a corporation that its capacity should be limited by the See also:instrument creat;ng it, I should agree that the capacity of a company incorporated under the act of 1862 was limited to the object in the memorandum of association . But if I am right in the See also:opinion which I have already expressed, that the general power of contracting is an incident to a corporation which it requires an indication of intention in the legislature to take away, I see no such indication here . If the question was whether the legislature had conferred on a corporation, created under this act, capacity to enter into contracts beyond the provisions of the See also:deed, there could be only one See also:answer . The legislature did not confer such capacity . But if the question be, as I apprehend it is, whether the legislature have indicated an intention to take away the power of contracting which at common law would be incident to a body corporate, and not merely to limit the authority of the managing body and the majority of the See also:share-holders to bind the minority, but also to prohibit and make illegal contracts made by the body corporate, in such a manner that they would be binding on the body if incorporated at common law, I think the answer should be the other way." On the other See also:hand, the See also:House of Lords, agreeing with the three dissentient judges in the exchequer chamber, pronounced the effect of the Companies Act to be the opposite of that indicated by Mr Justice Blackburn . " It was the intention of the legislature, not implied, but actually expressed, that the corporations, should not enter, having regard to this memorandum of association, into a contract of this description . The contract in my judgment could not have been ratified by the unanimous assent of the whole corporation." In such companies, therefore, See also:objects beyond the See also:scope of the memorandum of association are ultra vires of the corporation . The See also:doctrine of ultra vires, as it is called, is almost wholly of modern and judicial creation . The first emphatic recognition of it appears to have been in the case of companies created for special purposes with extraordinary powers, by act of parliament, and, more particularly, railway companies . The funds of such companies, it was held, must be applied to the purposes for which they were created, and to no other . Whether this doctrine is applicable to the older or, as they are sometimes called, ordinary corporations, appears to be doubtful . S . Brice (Ultra Vires) writes: " Take, as a strong instance, a university or a See also:London guild . |
|
|
[back] CORPORAL PUNISHMENT |
[next] CORPS (pronounced as in French, from which it is ta... |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.