Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:COSMOGONY (from Gr. K6Qµos, See also:world and yiyvevGay to be See also:born) , a theory, however incomplete, of the origin of See also:heaven and See also:earth, such as is produced by See also:primitive races in the myth-making See also:age, and is afterwards See also:expanded and systematized by priests, poets or philosophers . Such a theory must be mythical in See also:form, and, after gods have arisen, is likely to be a theogony (See also:Behr, See also:god) as well as a See also:cosmogony (Babylonia, See also:Egypt, See also:Phoenicia, See also:Polynesia) 1 . To many the See also:interest of such stories will depend on their See also:parallelism to the Biblical See also:account in See also:Genesis i.; the anthropologist, however, will be attracted by them in proportion as they illustrate the more primitive phases of human culture . In spite of the frequent overgrowth of a luxuriant See also:imagination, the leading ideas of really primitive cosmogonies are extremely See also:simple . Creation out of nothing is nowhere thought of, for this is not at all a simple See also:idea . The pre-existence of See also:world-See also:matter is assumed; sometimes too that of heaven, as the seat of the earth-maker, and that of preternatural animals, his coadjutors . The earth-making See also:process may, among the less advanced races, be begun by a See also:bird, or some other See also:animal (whence the See also:term " theriomorphism "), for the high idea of a god is impossible, till See also:man has fully realized his own humanity . Of course, the earth-forming animal is a preternaturally gifted one, and is on the See also:line of development towards that magnified man who, in a later See also:stage, becomes the See also:demiurge.' Between the two comes the animal—man, i.e. a being who has not yet See also:shed the See also:slough of an animal shape, but combines the See also:powers— natural and preternatural—of some animal with those of a man . Let us now collect specimens of the See also:evidence for different varieties of cosmogony, ranging from those of the Red See also:Indian tribes to that of the See also:people of See also:Israel . 2 . See also:North See also:American Stories.—Theriomorphic creators are most fully attested for the Red Indian tribes, whose very backwardness renders them so valuable to an anthropologist . There is a painted See also:image from See also:Alaska, now in the museum of the university of See also:Pennsylvania, which represents such an one . We see a See also:black See also:crow tightly holding a human See also:mask which he is in the See also:act of incubating . Let us pass on to the Thlinkit See also:Indians of the N.W. See also:coast . A See also:cycle of tales is devoted to a See also:strange humorous being called Yehl or Yelch, i.e. the See also:Raven, miraculously See also:born, not to be wounded, and at once a semi-See also:developed creator and a culture See also:hero.' His See also:bitter foe is his See also:uncle; the germs of See also:dualism appear See also:early . Like some other culture-heroes, he steals See also:sun, See also:moon and stars out of a See also:box, so enlightening the dark earth . These people are at any See also:rate above the Greenlanders, but are surpassed by the Algonkins described by See also:Nicholas See also:Perrot in 1700, and by the See also:Iroquois, whom the heroic See also:Father Brebeuf (1593–1649) learned to know so well.' The earth-maker of the former was called Michabo, i.e. the See also:Great See also:Hare.4 He is the See also:leader of some animals on a raft on a shoreless See also:sea . Three of these in See also:succession are sent to dive for a little earth . A See also:grain of See also:sand is brought; out of it he makes an See also:island (See also:America?) . Of the carcases of the dead animals he makes the See also:present men (N . Americans?) . There is also a See also:Flood-See also:story, an See also:episode in which has a bearing on the "Cf . See also:Miss See also:Harrison, Prolegomena to the Study of See also:Greek See also:Religion, chaps. vi., vii., " The Making of a Goddess and of a God." 2 See Ratzel, Hist. of Mankind, ii . 147-148; Breysig, See also:Die Entstehung See also:des Gottesgedankens (1905), pp .
10-12
.
2 See See also: See also:Mexico, Babylonia, Egypt), through a hole in which Aataentsic See also:fell to the See also:water . The broad back of a See also:tortoise (cf . § 6)' on which a diving animal had placed some mud, received her . Here, being already pregnant, she gave See also:birth to a daughter, who in turn See also:bore the twins Joskeha and Tawiscara (myth of hostile See also:brothers) . By his violence (cf . Gen. See also:xxv . 22) the latter killed his See also:mother, out of whose See also:corpse See also:grew See also:plants . Tawiscara fled to the See also:west, where he rules over the dead . Joskeha made the beasts and also men . After acting as culture-giver he disappeared to the See also:east, where he is said to dwell with his grandmother as her See also:husband.6 3 . Mexican.—The most interesting feature in the Mexican cosmology is the theory of the ages of the world . See also:Greece, See also:Persia and probably See also:Babylon, knew of four such ages .? The Priestly Writer in the See also:Pentateuch also appears to be acquainted with this See also:doctrine; it is the first of four ages which begins with the Creation and ends with the Deluge . The Mexicans, however, are said to have assumed five ages called " suns." The first was the sun of earth; the second, of See also:fire; the third, of See also:air; the See also:fourth, of water; the fifth (which is the present) was unnamed . Each of these closed with a See also:physical See also:catastrophe.' The speculations which underlie the Mexican theory have not come down to us . For the Iranian parallel, see § 8, and on the See also:Hebrew Priestly Writer, Gunkel, Genesis', pp . 233 if . 4 . Peruvian.—In See also:Peru, as in Egypt, the sun-god obtained universal See also:homage . But there were creator-gods in the back-ground . A theoretical supremacy was accorded by the Incas to Pachacamac, whose See also:worship, like that of Viracocha, they appear to have already found when they conquered the See also:land . Pachacamac means, in See also:Quichua, " world-animator." 9 The " philosophers " of Peru declared that he desired no temples or sacrifices, no worship but that of the See also:heart . This is conceivable; Maui, too, in New See also:Zealand had no See also:temple or priests . But most probably this deity had another less abstract name, and the horrible worship offered in the one temple which he really had under the Incas, accorded with his true See also:cosmic significance as the god of the subterranean fire .
Viracocha too had a cosmic position; an old Peruvian hymn calls him " world-former, world-animator."10 He was connected with water
.
A third creator was Manco Capac (" the mighty man "), whose See also:sister and wife is called Mama Oello, " the mother-See also:egg." Afterwards, the creator and the mother-egg became respectively the sun and the moon, represented by the Inca See also:priest-See also: Folklore, iv . 210-213 . _ s The latest explanation of Joskeha is " dear little sprout," and of Tawiscara, " the See also:ice-one," while Aataentsic becomes " she of the swarthy See also:body." See also:Hewitt, Journ. of Amer . Folklore, x . 68 . Brebeuf (1635) says that Iouskeha gives growth and See also:fair See also:weather (See also:Tylor, See also:Prim . Cult. i . 294) . 7 See Jeremias, Das Alte Testament See also:im Lichte des See also:Alten Orients, p . 121, I ; Winckler, Die Keilinschriften and das Alte Testament', P . 333 . $ See also:Reville, Religions of Mexico and Peru, p . 129 . Garcilasso el Inca, Comment. de los Incas, See also:lib. ii. c . 2; cf . See also:Lang, The Making of Religion, pp . 262-270 . (',f10 Reville, p . 187 . 11 Reville, p . 158 . Garcilasso (lib. i. c . 18) says that Manco Capac " taught the subject nations to be men," and also founded the imperial See also:city of See also:Cuzco (= See also:navel) . 12 De las antiquas genies del Peru (ed . 1892), pp . 55, 56 . and Papa (earth) can be paralleled in See also:China, See also:India and Greece, and more remotely in Egypt and Babylonia . The son of Rangi and Papa was Tangaloa (also called Tangaroa and Taaroa), the sea-god and the father of fishes and See also:reptiles) . In other parts of Polynesia he is the Heaven God, to whom there is no like, no second . In See also:Samoa he is even called Tangaloa-Langi (Tangaloa = heaven) . And if he is the sea-god, we must remember that there is a heavenly as well as an earthly ocean; hence the clouds are sometimes called Tangalpa's See also:ships . It is true, the popular imagery is unworthy of such a god . Sometimes he is said to live in a See also:shell, by throwing off which from See also:time to time he increases the world; or in an egg, which at last he breaks in pieces; the pieces are the islands . We also hear that See also:long ago he hovered as an enormous bird over the waters, and there deposited an egg . The egg may be either the earth with the overarching vault of heaven or (as in Egypt—but this is a later view) the sun . The latter received mythical See also:representation in that most interesting god (but originallyrather culture-hero) Maui, who, in New Zealand practically supplants Tangaloa, and becomes the god of the air and of the heaven, the creator and the causer of the flood ? See also:Speculation opened the usual deep problem; whence came the gods ? It was answered that Po, i.e. darkness, was the begetter of all things, even of Tangaloa . 6 . Indian.—India, however, is the natural See also:home of a mythology recast by speculation . The classical specimen of an advanced cosmogony is to be found in the Rig Veda (x . 129); it is the hymn which begins, " There then was neither Aught nor Naught!" 3 Another such cosmogony is given in Manu . It is " the self-existent See also:Lord," who, " with a thought, created the waters, and deposited in them a See also:seed which became a See also:golden egg, in which egg he himself is born as Brahma, the progenitor of the worlds."' The doctrine of creation by a thought is characteristically Indian . In the satapatha See also:Brahmana (cf . DELUGE), we meet again with the primeval waters and the world-egg, and with the famous mythological tortoise-theory,' also found among the Algonkins (§ 2)—See also:antique beliefs gathered up by the framers of philosophic systems, who See also:felt the importance of maintaining such links with the distant past . 7 . See also:Egyptian.—In Egypt too the systematizers were busily engaged in the co-ordination of myths . They retained the belief that the germs of all things slept for ages within the dark flood, personified as See also:Nun or Nil . How they were See also:drawn forth was variously told.' In some districts the demiurge was called Khnumu; it was he who modelled the egg (of the world?) and also man.3 Elsewhere he was the artizan-god Ptah, who with his See also:hammer See also:broke the egg; sometimes See also:Thoth, the moon-god and principle of intelligence, who spoke the world into existence.' A strange episode in the See also:legend of the destruction of man by the gods tells how Ra (or Re), the first king of the world, finding in his old age that mankind ceased to respect him, first tried the remedy of See also:massacre, and then ascended the heavenly cow, and organized a new world—that of heaven.' 8 . Iranian.—The Iranian account of creation 10 is specially interesting because its religious spirit is akin to that of Genesis i . From a See also:literary point of view, indeed, it cannot compare with the dignified Hebrew narrative, but considering the misfortunes which have befallen the collection of Zoroastrian traditions now represented by the Bundahish (the Parsee Genesis) we cannot reasonably be surprised . The See also:work referred to begins by 1 See especially See also:Waitz-Gerland, Anthropologie der Naturvolker, vi . 229-302; Gill, Myths and Songs of the See also:South Pacific; Schirren, Wandersagen der Neuseelander; also an older work (See also:Sir See also:George) Grey's Polynesian Mythology . 2 See Schirren, op. cit., pp . 64-89 . 3 J . See also:Muir, Metrical See also:Translations, pp . 188-189 . J . Muir, Sanscrit Texts, iv . 26 . See Tylor, Early See also:History of Mankind, p . 34o; Primitive Culture, i . 329; Oldenberg, Religion des Veda, pp . 85 f . ' See See also:Maspero, Dawn of See also:Civilization, p . 127; also Brugoch, Religion and Mythologie der See also:alien Agypter . See See also:illustration in Maspero, p . 157 . 3 See Maspero, pp . 146-147 . Maspero, pp . 16o-169 . 10 See ZOROASTER, and cf . Ency . Bib., " Creation," § 9; " Zoroastrianism," §§ 20, 21.describing the See also:state of things in the beginning; the See also:good spirit in endless light and omniscient, and the evil spirit in endless darkness and with limited knowledge . Both produced their own creatures, which remained apart, in a spiritual or ideal state, for 3000 years, after which the evil spirit began his opposition to the good creation under an agreement that his See also:power was not to last more than 9000 years, of which only the See also:middle 3000 were to see him successful . By uttering a sacred See also:formula the good spirit throws the evil one into a state of confusion for a second 3000 years, while he produces the archangels and the material creation, including the sun, moon and stars . At the end of that See also:period the evil spirit, encouraged by the demons he had produced, once more rushes upon the good creation to destroy it . The demons carry on conflicts with each of the six classes of creation, namely, the See also:sky, water, earth, plants, animals represented by the primeval ox, and mankind represented by Gayomard or Kayumarth (the "first man"of the Avesta)." Four points to be noticed here: (I) the belief in the four periods of the world, each of 3000 years (cf . § 3); (2) the See also:comparative success for a time of See also:Angra Mainyu (the evil principle personified); (3) the See also:absence of any recognition of pre-existent matter; (4) the mention of six classes of good creatures . Each of these deserves a comment which we cannot, however, here give, and the third may seem to suggest See also:direct See also:influence of the Iranian upon the Jewish cosmogony . But though there are in Gen. i. six days of creative activity, and the creative See also:works are not six, but eight, if not ten in number, and indirect Babylonian influence is more strongly indicated . Jewish thinkers would have been attracted by the emphatic assertion of the creatorship of the One God in the royal See also:Persian See also:inscriptions more than by the traditional cosmogony . See further Ency . Bib., " Creation," § 9 . g . Phoenician and Greek.—Phoenician cosmogonies would appear, from the notices which have come down to us,12 to have been composite . The traditions are See also:pale and obscure . It is clear, however, that the primeval flood and the world-egg (out of which came heaven and earth) are referred to . See Ency . Bib., " Creation " § 7; " Phoenicia " § 15; See also:Lagrange, Religions semitiques, pp . 351 if . Greek cosmogonies (the orientalism of which is clear) will be found in See also:Hesiod, Theog . 116 ff.; See also:Aristophanes, Birds, 692 ff.; cf . Clem . Rom., Homil. vi . 4 . See Miss Harrison, Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, See also:chap. xii . " Orphic Cosmogony." 1o . Babylonian and Israelitish.—Of the Babylonian and Israelitish cosmogonies we have several more or less See also:complete records . For details as to the former, see BABYLONIAN AND See also:ASSYRIAN RELIGION . With regard to thelatter, we may See also:notice that in Gen. ii . 4b-25 we have an account of creation which, though in its present form very incomplete, is highly attractive, because it is pervaded by a breath from primitive times . It has, however, been interwoven with an account of the See also:Garden of See also:Eden from some other source (see EDEN; See also:PARADISE), and perhaps in See also:order to concentrate the See also:attention of the reader, the description of the origin of " earth and heaven " as well as of the plants and of the See also:rain, appears to have been omitted . In fact, both the creation-stories at the opening of Genesis must have undergone much editorial manipulation . Originally, for instance, Gen. i . 26 must have said that man was made out of earth; this point of contact between the two cosmogonic traditions has, however, been effaced . The other narrative, Gen. i . 1-ii . 4a, is a much more complete cosmogony, and since the theory of P . A . See also:Lagarde (1887), which ascribes it to Iranian influence (see § 8), has no very solid ground, whereas the theory which explains it as largely Babylonian is in a high degree plausible, we must now consider the relations between the Israelitish and Babylonian cosmogonies . The See also:short account of creation first translated in 1890 by T . G . Pinches is distinguished by its non-mythical See also:character; in particular, the 11 West, See also:Pahlavi Texts (S.B.E.), vol. i., introd. p. See also:xxiii . We need not deny that, See also:late as the Bundahish may be as a whole, the traditions which it contains are often old . 12 Fragments of older works are cited by See also:Philo of Byblus (in See also:Eusebius, Praep . Evang. i . 1o) and Mochas and Endemus (in See also:Damascius, De primis principiis, c . 125) . dragon of See also:chaos and darkness is conspicuous by her absence . This may illustrate the fact that the dragon is also unmentioned in the Hebrew cosmogony; to some writers the dragon-See also:element may have seemed See also:grotesque and inappropriate . We must, however, study this element in the most important Babylonian tradition, even if only for its relation to non-Semitic myths and especially to some striking passages in the See also:Bible (Isa. See also:xxvii . 1, li . 0; Ps. lxxiv . 14, lxxxix . 10, 11; See also:Job iii . 8, ix . 13, See also:xxvi . 12, 13; Rev. xii . 3, 4, XX . 1-3) . One may also be permitted to hold that the mythic figure of the dragon, if used poetically, is a highly serviceable one, and consider that " in the beginning God fought with the dragon, and slew him " would have formed an admirable illustration of the passages just now referred to, especially to those in the See also:Apocalypse . The student should, however, notice that the dragon-element is not entirely unrepresented even in the priestly Hebrew cosmogony . It is said in Gen. i . 9, 10, 14, 15, that God divided the primeval waters into two parts by an intervening " See also:firmament " or " See also:platform," on which the sun, moon and stars (See also:planets) were placed to See also:mark times and to give light . This See also:division (cp . Ps. lxxiv . 13) is really a pale version of the old mythic statement respecting the cleaving of the carcase of Tiamat (the Dragon) into two parts, one of which kept the upper waters from coming down.' And we must affirm that the technical term to hom (rendered in the See also:English Bible " the deep "), which evidently signifies the enveloping primeval flood, and which closely resembles Tiamat, the name given to the dragon or See also:serpent in the epic (cf. tiamtu and tamtu, Babylonian words for " the ocean "), can only be due to the influence—probably the very early influence—of Babylonia . But we are far from having exhausted the evidence of Babylonian influence on the Hebrew cosmogony . The description of chaos in v . 2 not only mentions the great water (tehom), but the earth, i.e. the earth-matter, out of which the earth and (potentially) its varied products (vv . 9-11), and (as we know from the Babylonian epic) the " firmament " or " platform " of the heaven were to appear . This earth-matter is called " tohu and bohu "; there is nothing like this phrase in the epic, but we may infer from Jer. iv . 23, where the same phrase occurs, that it means " devoid of living things." For a commentary on this see the opening of the Babylonian account referred to above, which refers to the period of chaos as one in which there were neither reeds nor trees, and where " the lands altogether were sea." As to the creative acts, we may admit that the creation of light does not form one of them in the epic (cf . Gen. i . 3), but the existence of light apart from the sun is presupposed; See also:Marduk the creator is in fact a god of light . Nor ought we to find a discrepancy between the Babylonian and the Hebrew accounts in the creation of the heavenly bodies after the plants, related in Gen. i . 14-18 . For the position of this creative act is due to the See also:necessity of bringing all the divine acts into the framework of six working days . On the whole, the Hebrew statement of the successive stages of creation corresponds so nearly to that in the Babylonian epic that we are See also:bound to assume that one has been influenced by the other . And if we are asked, " Which is the more See also:original ? " we See also:answer by appealing to the well-established fact of the profound influence of Babylonian culture upon See also:Canaan in remote times (see CANAAN) . An important element in this culture would be mythic, representations of the origin of things, such as the Babylonian Creation and Deluge-stories in various forms . Indeed,. not only Canaan but all the neighbouring regions must have been pervaded by Babylonian views of the universe and its origin . Myths of origins there must indeed have been in those countries before Babylonian influence became so overpowering, but, if so, these myths must have become recast when the great Teacher of the Nations See also:half-attracted and half-compelled attention . More than this we need not assert . Zimmern's somewhat different treatment of the subject in Ency . Biblica, " Creation," § 4, may be compared . Popular writers are in some danger of misrepresenting this important result . It is tempting, but incorrect, to suppose that ' See Jastrow, Religion of Babylonia and See also:Assyria, p . 428 . a docile Israelitish writer accepted one of the See also:chief forms of the Babylonian cosmogony, merely omitting its polytheism and substituting " Yahweh " for " Marduk." As we have seen, various myths of Creation may have been current both in N . See also:Arabia (whence the Israelites may have come) and in Canaan See also:prior to the great See also:extension of Babylonian influence . These myths doubtless had peculiarities of their own . From one of them may have come that remarkable statement in Gen. i . 2b, " and the spirit of God (Elohim) was hovering over the See also:face of the waters," which, until we find some similar myth nearer home, is best illustrated and explained by a Polynesian myth (see See also:Cheyne, Traditions and Beliefs of See also:Ancient Israel, ad loc.) . It is also probably to a non-Babylonian source that we owe the See also:prescription of vegetarian or See also:herb See also:diet in Gen. i . 29, 30, which has a Zoroastrian parallel2 and is evidently based on a myth of the Golden Age, See also:independent of the Babylonian cosmogony . Gen. i., therefore, has not, as it stands, been directly borrowed from Babylonia, and yet the infused Babylonian element is so considerable that the story is, in a purely formal aspect, much more Babylonian than either Israelitish or Canaanitish or N . Arabian . We say " in a purely formal aspect," because the strictness with which Babylonian mythic elements have been adapted in Gen. i. to the wants of a virtually monotheistic community is in the highest degree remarkable . On the literary See also:scheme of the Creation-story in Gen. i. see the commentaries (e.g . Dillman's and See also:Driver's) . On the other Old Testament references to creation, and on the prophetic doctrine of creation, see Ency . Bib., " Creation," §§ 27-29 . On the traces of dragon and serpent myths in the Old Testament and their significance, see Gunkel, Schopfung and Chaos (1895)—a pioneering work of the highest merit—and Ency . Bib., " See also:Behemoth," " Dragon," Rahab," " Serpent." On the connexion of the Creation and the Deluge-stories, see DELUGE . Cf. also the See also:article on BABYLONIAN AND ASSYRIAN RELIGION; and Cheyne, Traditions and Beliefs of Ancient Israel (1907) .. (T . K . |
|
|
[back] COSMIC (from Gr. Kovµos, order or universe) |
[next] COSMOPOLITAN (Gr. Kbvµos, world, and IroXirgs, cit... |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.