Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

COURT

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V04, Page 595 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

COURT  YARD PkOP See also:

STREET soo STREET _ .rlss//eAt.E w/lN j%FEET a/z.a.s iririi i 1 so HO See also:loo antiquaries, and certainly unconnected with See also:Roman See also:Britain (see See also:ERMINE STREET) . Instead, we may distinguish four See also:main See also:groups of roads radiating from See also:London, and a fifth which runs obliquely . One road ran See also:south-See also:east to See also:Canterbury and the Kentish ports, of which Richborough (Rutupiae) was the most frequented . A second ran See also:west to See also:Silchester, and thence by various branches to See also:Winchester, See also:Exeter, See also:Bath, See also:Gloucester and South See also:Wales . - A third, known afterwards to the See also:English as Watling Street, ran by St Albans See also:Wall near See also:Lichfield (Letocetum), to Wroxeter and See also:Chester . It also gave See also:access by a See also:branch to See also:Leicester and See also:Lincoln . A See also:fourth served See also:Colchester, the eastern counties, Lincoln and See also:York . The fifth is that known to the English as the See also:Fosse, which joins Lincoln and Leicester with See also:Cirencester, Bath and Exeter . Besides these five groups, an obscure road, called by the See also:Saxons Akeman Street, gave alternative access from London through Alchester (outside of See also:Bicester) to Bath, while another obscure road winds south from near See also:Sheffield, past See also:Derby and See also:Birmingham, and connects the See also:lower See also:Severn with the See also:Humber . By these roads and their various branches the See also:Romans provided adequate communications throughout the lowlands of Britain . IV . The End of Roman Britain.—See also:Early in the 4th See also:century it was necessary to establish a See also:special See also:coast See also:defence, reaching from the See also:Wash to Spithead, against Saxon pirates: there were forts at Brancaster, See also:Borough See also:Castle (near See also:Yarmouth), Bradwell (at the mouth of the See also:Colne and See also:Blackwater), Reculver; See also:Rich-borough, See also:Dover and Lymme (all in See also:Kent), See also:Pevensey in See also:Sussex, Porchester near See also:Portsmouth, and perhaps also at See also:Felixstowe in See also:Suffolk .

After about 350, See also:

barbarian assaults, not only of Saxons but also of Irish (Scoti) and Picts, became commoner and more terrible . At the end of the century See also:Magnus See also:Maximus, claiming to be See also:emperor, withdrew many troops from Britain and a later pretender did the same . Early in the 5th century the See also:Teutonic See also:conquest of See also:Gaul cut the See also:island off from See also:Rome . This does not mean that there was any See also:great " departure of Romans." The central See also:government simply ceased to send the usual See also:governors and high See also:officers . The Romano-See also:British were See also:left to themselves . Their position was weak . Their fortresses See also:lay in the See also:north and west, while the Saxons attacked the east and south . Their trained troops, and even their own See also:numbers, must have been few . It is intelligible that they followed a precedent set by Rome in that See also:age, and hired Saxons to repel Saxons . But they could not command the fidelity of their mercenaries, and the Saxon peril only See also:grew greater . It would seem as if the Romano-Britons were speedily driven from the east of the island . Even Wroxeter on the Welsh border may have been finally destroyed before the end of the 5th century .

It seems that the Saxons though apparently unable to maintain their hold so far to the west, were able to prevent the natives from recovering the lowlands . Thus driven from the centres of Romanized See also:

life, from the region of walled cities and civilized houses, into the hills of Wales and the north-west, the provincials underwent an intelligible See also:change . The See also:Celtic See also:element, never quite See also:extinct in those hills and, like most forms of barbarism, reasserting itself in this See also:wild age—not without reinforcement from See also:Ireland—challenged the remnants of Roman See also:civilization and in the end absorbed them . The Celtic See also:language reappeared; the Celtic See also:art emerged from its shelters in the west to develop in new and See also:medieval fashions . Of See also:modern See also:works the best See also:summary for Roman Britain and for See also:Caesar's invasions is T . R . See also:Holmes, See also:Ancient Britain (1907), who cites numerous authorities . See also See also:Sir See also:John See also:Evans, See also:Stone Implements,589 See also:Bronze Implements, and Ancient British Coins (with suppl.) ; See also:Boyd See also:Dawkins, Early See also:Man in Britain (188o) ; J . Rhys, Celtic Britain (3rd ed., 1904) . For See also:late Celtic art see . J . M .

See also:

Kemble and A . W . See also:Franks' Horae Ferales (1863), and See also:Arthur J . Evans in Archaeologia, vols . M.-Iv . Celtic See also:ethnology and See also:philology (see See also:CELT) are still in the " age of discussion." For ancient earthworks sec A . See also:Hadrian Allcroft, Earthwork of See also:England (1909) . For Roman Britain see, in See also:general, Prof . F . Haverfield, The Romanization of Roman Britain (See also:Oxford, 1906), and his articles in the See also:Victoria See also:County See also:History; also the See also:chapter in See also:Mommsen's Roman Provinces; and an See also:article in the See also:Edinburgh See also:Review, 1899 . For the wall of Hadrian see John See also:Hodgson, History of See also:Northumberland (184o) ; J . C .

See also:

Bruce, Roman Wall (3rd ed., 1867) ; reports of excavations by Haverfield in the See also:Cumberland Archaeological Society Transactions (1894-1904) ; and R . C . Bosanquet, Roman See also:Camp at Housesteads (See also:Newcastle, 1904) . For the Scottish Excavations see Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of See also:Scotland, xx.-xl., and especially J . See also:Macdonald, See also:Bar See also:Hill (reprint, See also:Glasgow, 1906) . For other forts see R . S . See also:Ferguson; Cumberland See also:Arch . See also:Soc . Trans. xii., on Hardknott; and J . See also:Ward, Roman Fort ofGellygaer (London, 1903) . For the Roman occupation of Scotland see Haverfield in Antonine Wall See also:Report (1899) ; J .

Macdonald, Roman Stones in Hunterian See also:

Miss . (1897) ; and, though an older See also:work, See also:Stuart's See also:Caledonia See also:Romana (1852) . For Silchester, Archaeologia (1890-19o8); for Caerwent (ib . 1901-1908); for London, See also:Charles See also:Roach See also:Smith, Roman London (1859); for See also:Christianity in Roman Britain, Engl . Hist . Rev . (1896); for the villages, Gen . See also:Pitt-See also:Rivers' Excavations in Cranborne See also:Chase, &c . (4 vols., 1887-1908), and Proc . Soc. of See also:Ant. xviii . For the end of Roman Britain see Engl . Hist .

Rev . (1904); Prof . See also:

Bury's Life of St See also:Patrick (1905) ; Haverfield's Romanization (cited above) ; and P . See also:Vinogradoff, Growth of the See also:Manor (1905), bk. i . (F . J . H.) ANGLO-SAXON BRITAIN r . History.—The history of Britain after the withdrawal of the Roman troops is extremely obscure, but there can be little doubt that for many years the inhabitants of the provinces were exposed to devastating raids by the Picts and Scots . " According to See also:Gildas it was for See also:protection against these incursions that the Britons decided to See also:call in the Saxons . Their See also:allies soon obtained a decisive victory; but subsequently they turned their arms against the Britons themselves, alleging that they had not received sufficient See also:payment for their services . A somewhat different See also:account, probably of English origin, may be traced in the Historia Brittonum, according to which the first leaders of the Saxons, See also:Hengest and See also:Horse., came as exiles, seeking the protection of the British See also:king, See also:Vortigern . Having embraced his service they quickly succeeded in expelling the See also:northern invaders .

Eventually, however, they overcame the Britons through treachery, by inducing the king to allow them to send for large bodies of their own countrymen . It was to these adventurers, according to tradition, that the See also:

kingdom of Kent owed its origin . The See also:story is in itself by no means improbable, while the See also:dates assigned to the first invasion by various Welsh, Gaulish and English authorities, with one exception all fall within about' a See also:quarter of a century, viz. between the See also:year 428 and the See also:joint reign of Martian and Valentinian III . (450-455) . For the subsequent course of the invasion our See also:information is of the most meagre and unsatisfactory See also:character . According to the Anglo-Saxon See also:Chronicle the kingdom of Sussex was founded by a certain See also:Ella or IElle, who landed in 477, while Wessex owed its origin to See also:Cerdic, who arrived some eighteen years later . No value, however, can be attached• to these dates; indeed, in the latter See also:case the story itself is open to suspicion on several grounds (see WESSEX) . For the movements which led to the See also:foundation of the more northern kingdoms we have no See also:evidence See also:worth See also:consideration, nor do we know even approximately when they took See also:place . But the view that the invasion was effected through-out by small bodies of adventurers acting independently of one another, and that each of the various kingdoms owes its origin to a See also:separate enterprise, has little See also:probability in its favour . See also:Bede states that the invaders belonged to three different nations, Kent and See also:southern See also:Hampshire being occupied by See also:Jutes (q.v.), while See also:Essex, Sussex and Wessex were founded by the Saxons, and' the remaining kingdoms by the See also:Angli (q.v.) . The peculiarities of social organization in Kent certainly tend to show that this kingdom had a different origin from the See also:rest; but the evidence for the distinction between the Saxons and the Angli is of a much less satisfactory character (see ANGLO-SAXONS) . 590 The royal See also:family of Essex may really have been of Saxon origin (see EssEx), but on the other See also:hand the West Saxon royal family claimed to be of the same stock as that of See also:Bernicia, and their connexions in the past seem to have lain with the Angli .

We need not doubt that the first invasion was followed by a See also:

long See also:period of warfare between the natives and the invaders, in which the latter gradually strengthened their hold on the conquered territories . It is very probable that by the end of the 5th century all the eastern See also:part of Britain, at least as far as the Humber, was in their hands . The first important check was received at the See also:siege of " See also:Mons Badonicus " in the year 517 (See also:Ann . Cambr.), or perhaps rather some fifteen or twenty years earlier . According to Gildas this event was followed by a period of See also:peace for at least See also:forty-four years . In the latter part of the 6th century, however, the territories occupied by the invaders seem to have been greatly extended . In the south the West Saxons are said to have conquered first See also:Wiltshire and then all the upper part of the See also:Thames valley, together with the See also:country beyond as far as the Severn . The northern frontier also seems to have been pushed considerably farther forward, perhaps into what is now Scotland, and it is very probable that the See also:basin of the See also:Trent, together with the central districts between the Trent and the Thames, was conquered about the same See also:time, though of this we have no See also:record . Again, the 'destruction of Chester about 615 was soon followed by the overthrow of the British kingdom of Elmet in south-west See also:Yorkshire, and the occupation of See also:Shropshire and the Lothians took place perhaps about the same period, that of See also:Herefordshire probably somewhat later . In the south, See also:Somerset is said to have been conquered by the West Saxons shortly after the See also:middle of the 7th century . See also:Dorset had probably been acquired by them before this time, while part of See also:Devon seems to have come into their hands soon afterwards . The See also:area thus conquered was occupied by a number of separate kingdoms, each with a royal family of its own .

The districts north of the Humber contained two kingdoms, Bernicia (q.v.) and See also:

Deira (q.v.), which were eventually See also:united in See also:Northumbria . South of the Humber, See also:Lindsey seems to have had a See also:dynasty of its own, though in See also:historical times it was apparently always subject to the See also:kings of Northumbria or See also:Mercia . The upper basin of the Trent formed the See also:nucleus of the kingdom of Mercia (q.v.), while farther down the east coast was the kingdom of East Anglia (q.v.) . Between these two lay a territory called Middle Anglia, which is sometimes described as a kingdom, though we do not know whether it ever had a separate dynasty . Essex, Kent and Sussex (see articles on these kingdoms) preserve the names of ancient kingdoms, while the old See also:diocese of See also:Worcester grew out of the kingdom of the See also:Hwicce (q.v.), with which it probably coincided in area . The south of England, between Sussex and " West Wales " (eventually reduced to See also:Cornwall), was occupied by Wessex, which originally also possessed some territory to the north of the Thames . Lastly, even the Isle of See also:Wight appears to have had a dynasty of its own . But it must not be supposed that all these kingdoms were always, or even normally, See also:independent . When history begins, IEthelberht, king of Kent, was supreme over all the kings south of the Humber . He was followed by the East Anglian king Raedwald, and the latter again by a See also:series of Northumbrian kings with an even wider supremacy . Before eEthelberht a similar position had been held by the West Saxon king See also:Ceawlin, and at a much earlier period, according to tradition, by Ella or iElle, the first king of Sussex . The nature of this supremacy has been much discussed, but the true explanation seems to be furnished by that principle of See also:personal See also:allegiance which formed such an important element in Anglo-Saxon society .

2 . Government.—Internally the various states seem to have been organized on very similar lines . In every case we find kingly government from the time of our earliest records, and there is no doubt that the institution goes back to a date anterior to the invasion of Britain (see See also:

OFFA; See also:WERMUND) . The royal See also:title, however, was frequently See also:borne by more than one See also:person . Sometimes we find one supreme king together with a number of under-kings (subreguli) ; sometimes again, especially in the smaller kingdoms, Essex, Sussex and Hwicce, we meet with twoor more kings, generally See also:brothers, reigning together apparently on equal terms . During the greater part of the 8th century Kent seems to have been divided into two kingdoms; but as a See also:rule such divisions did not last beyond the lifetime of the kings between whom the arrangement had been made . The kings were, with very rare exceptions, chosen from one particular family in each See also:state, the ancestry of which was traced back not only to the founder of the kingdom but also, in a remoter degree, to a See also:god . The members of such families were entitled to special wergilds, apparently six times as great as those of the higher class of nobles (see below) . The only other central authority in the state was the king's See also:council or court (See also:bend, wilan, See also:plebs, concilium) . This See also:body consisted partly of See also:young warriors in See also:constant attendance on the king, and partly of See also:senior officials whom he called together from time to time . The terms used for the two classes by Bede are milites (ministri) and comites, for which the Anglo-Saxon version has pegnas and gesi 5as respectively . Both classes alike consisted in part of members of the royal family .

But they were by no means confined to such persons or even to See also:

born subjects of the king . Indeed, we are told that popular kings like Oswine attracted young nobles to their service from all quarters . The functions of the council have been much discussed, and it has been claimed that they had the right of electing and deposing kings . This view, however, seems to involve the existence of a greater feeling for constitutionalism than is warranted by the information at our disposal . The incidents which have been brought forward as evidence to this effect may with at least equal probability be interpreted as cases of profession or transference of personal allegiance . In other respects the functions of the council seem to have been of a deliberative character . It was certainly customary for the king to seek their See also:advice and moral support on important questions, but there is nothing to show that he had to abide by the See also:opinion of the See also:majority . For administrative purposes each of the various kingdoms was divided into a number of districts under the See also:charge of royal See also:reeves (cyninges gerefa, praefectus, praepositus) . These officials seem to have been located in royal villages (cyninges See also:tun, See also:villa regalis) or fortresses (cyninges See also:burg, urbs regis), which served as centres and See also:meeting-places (markets, &c.) for the inhabitants of the See also:district, and to which their dues, both in payments and services had to be rendered . The usual See also:size of such districts in early times seems to have been 300, 600 or 1200 hides) . In addition to these districts we find mention also of much larger divisions containing 2000, 3000, 5000 or 7000 hides . To this See also:category belong the shires of Wessex (Hampshire, Wiltshire, See also:Berkshire, &c.), each of which had an See also:earl (aldermen, princeps, See also:dux) of its own, at all events from the 8th century onwards .

Many, if not all, of these persons were members of the royal family, and it is not unlikely that they originally See also:

bore the kingly title . At all events they are sometimes described as subreguli . 3 . Social Organization.—The officials mentioned above, whether of royal See also:birth or not, were probably See also:drawn from the king's personal See also:retinue . In Anglo-Saxon society, as in that of all Teutonic nations in early times, the two most important principles were those of kinship and personal allegiance . 'If a man suffered injury it was to his relatives and his See also:lord, rather than to any public See also:official, that he applied first for protection and redress . If he was slain, a fixed sum (See also:wergild), varying according to his station, had to be paid to his relatives, while a further but smaller sum (manbot) was due to his lord . These principles applied to all classes of society alike, and though strife within the family was by no means unknown, at all events in royal families, the actual slaying of a kinsman was regarded as the most heinous of all offences . Much the same feeling applied to the slaying of a lord=an offence for which no See also:compensation could be rendered . How far the armed followers of a lord were entitled to compensation when the latter was slain 1 The hide (hid, hiwisc, familia, tributarius, cassatus, mavens, &c.) was in later times a measure of See also:land, usually 12o acres . In early times, however, it seems to have meant (1) See also:household, (2) normal amount of land appertaining to a household . is uncertain, but in the case of a king they received an amount equal to the wergild .

Another important development of the principle of allegiance is to be found in the See also:

custom of heriots . In later times this custom amounted practically to a See also:system of See also:death-duties, payable in horses and arms or in See also:money to the lord of the deceased . There can be little doubt, however, that originally it was a restoration to the lord of,the military outfit with which he had presented his man when he entered his service . The institution of thegnhood, i.e. membership of the comitatus or retinue of a See also:prince, offered the only opening by which public life could be entered . Hence it was probably adopted almost universally by young men of the highest classes . The See also:thegn was expected to fight for his lord, and generally to place his services at his disposal in both See also:war and peace . The lord, on the other hand, had to keep his thegns and See also:reward them from time to time with arms and treasure . When they were of an age to marry he was expected to provide them with the means of doing so . If the lord was a king this See also:provision took the See also:form of a See also:grant, perhaps normally ten hides, from the royal lands . Such estates were not strictly hereditary, though as a See also:mark of favour they were not unfrequently re-granted to the sons of deceased holders . The structure of society in England was of a somewhat See also:peculiar type . In addition to slaves, who in early times seem to have been numerous, we find in Wessex and apparently also in Mercia three classes, described as twelfhynde, sixhynde and twihynde from the amount of their wergilds, viz .

1200, 60o and 200 shillings respectively . It is probable that similar classes existed also in Northumbria, though not under the same names . Besides these terms there were others which were probably in use every-where, viz. gesi75cund for the two higher classes and ceorlisc for the lowest . Indeed, we find these terms even in Kent, though the social system of that kingdom seems to have been of an essentially different character . Here the wergild of the ceorlisc class amounted to zoo shillings, each containing twenty See also:

silver coins (sceattas), as against 200 shillings of four (in Wessex five) silver coins, and was thus very much greater than the latter . Again, there was apparently but one gesi5cund class in Kent, with a wergild of 300 shillings, while, on the other hand, below the ceorlisc class we find three classes of persons described as laetas, who corresponded in all probability to the liti or freedmen of the See also:continental See also:laws, and who possessed wergilds of 8o, 6o and 40 shillings respectively . To these we find nothing analogous in the other kingdoms, though the poorer classes of Welsh freemen had wergilds varying from 120 to 6o shillings . It should be added that the See also:differential treatment of the various classes was by no means confined to the case of wergilds . We find it also in the compensations to which they were entitled for various injuries, in the fines to which they were liable, and in the value attached to their oaths . Generally, though not always, the See also:pro-portions observed were the same as in the wergilds . The nature of the distinction between the gesibcund and ceorlisc classes is nowhere clearly explained; but it was certainly hereditary and probably of considerable antiquity . In general we may perhaps define them as nobles and See also:commons, though in view of the numbers of the higher classes it would probably be more correct to speak of gentry and peasants .

The distinction between the twelfhynde and sixhynde classes was also in part at least hereditary, but there is See also:

good See also:reason for believing that it arose out of the See also: