Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

THOMAS CRANMER (1489-1556)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V07, Page 377 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

THOMAS See also:CRANMER (1489-1556)  , See also:archbishop of See also:Canterbury, See also:born at Aslacton or Aslockton in See also:Nottinghamshire on the 2nd of See also:July 1489, was the second son of See also:Thomas See also:Cranmer and of his wife See also:Anne See also:Hatfield . He received his See also:early See also:education, according to Morice his secretary, from " a marvellous severe and cruel schoolmaster," whose discipline must have been severe indeed to deserve this See also:special mention in an See also:age when no schoolmaster See also:bore the See also:rod in vain . The same authority tells us that he was initiated by his See also:father in those See also:field See also:sports, such as See also:hunting and hawking, which formed one of his recreations in after See also:life . To early training he also owed the skilful See also:horsemanship for which he was conspicuous . At the age of fourteen he was sent by his See also:mother, who had in 1501 become a widow, to See also:Cambridge . Little is known with certainty of his university career beyond the facts that he became a See also:fellow of Jesus See also:College in 1510 or 1511, that he had soon after to vacate his fellowship, owing to his See also:marriage to " See also:Black See also:Joan," a relative of the landlady of the See also:Dolphin See also:Inn, and that he was reinstated in it on the See also:death of his wife, which occurred in childbirth before the See also:lapse of the See also:year of See also:grace allowed by the statutes . During the brief See also:period of his married life he held the See also:appointment of lecturer at See also:Buckingham See also:Hall, now Magdalene College . The fact of his marrying would seem to show that he did not at the See also:time intend to enter the See also:church; possibly the death of his wife caused him to qualify for See also:holy orders . He was ordained in 1523, and soon after he took his See also:doctor's degree in divinity . According to See also:Strype, he was invited about this time to become a fellow of the college founded by See also:Cardinal See also:Wolsey at See also:Oxford; but See also:Dean See also:Hook shows that there is some See also:reason to doubt this . If the offer was made, it was declined, and Cranmer continued at Cambridge filling the offices of lecturer in divinity at his own college and of public examiner in divinity to the university . It is interesting, in view of his later efforts to spread the knowledge of the See also:Bible among the See also:people, to know that in the capacity of examiner he insisted on a thorough acquaintance with the Holy Scriptures, and rejected several candidates who were deficient in this qualification .

It was a somewhat curious concurrence of circumstances that transferred Cranmer, almost at one step, from the quiet seclusion of the university to the din and bustle of the See also:

court . In See also:August 1529 the See also:plague known as the sweating sickness, which prevailed throughout the See also:country, was specially severe at Cambridge, and all who had it in their See also:power forsook the See also:town for the country . Cranmer went with two of his pupils named See also:Cressy, related to him through their mother, to their father's See also:house at See also:Waltham in See also:Essex . The See also:king (See also:Henry VIII.) happened at the time to be visiting in the immediate neighbourhood, and two of his See also:chief counsellors, See also:Gardiner, secretary of See also:state, afterwards See also:bishop of See also:Winchester, and See also:Edward See also:Fox, the See also:lord high See also:almoner, afterwards bishop of See also:Hereford, were lodged at Cressy's house . See also:Meeting with Cranmer, they were naturally led to discuss the king's meditated See also:divorce from See also:Catherine of See also:Aragon . Cranmer suggested that if the canonists and the See also:universities should decide that marriage with a deceased See also:brother's widow was illegal, and if it were proved that Catherine had been married to See also:Prince See also:Arthur, her marriage to Henry could be declared null and void by the See also:ordinary ecclesiastical courts . The See also:necessity of an See also:appeal to See also:Rome was thus dispensed with, and this point was at once seen by the king, who, when Cranmer's See also:opinion was reported to him, is said to have ordered him to be summoned in these terms: " I will speak to him . Let him be sent for out of See also:hand . This See also:man, I trow, has got the right sow by the See also:ear." At their first interview Cranmer was commanded by the king to See also:lay aside all other pursuits and to devote himself to the question of the divorce . He was to draw up a written See also:treatise, stating the course he proposed, and defending it by argumentsfrom scripture, the fathers and the decrees of See also:general See also:councils . His material interests certainly did not suffer by compliance . He was commended to the hospitality of Anne See also:Boleyn's father, the See also:earl of See also:Wiltshire, in whose house at See also:Durham See also:Place he resided for some time; the king appointed him See also:archdeacon of See also:Taunton and one of his chaplains; and he also held a parochial See also:benefice, the name of which is unknown .

When the treatise was finished Cranmer was called upon to defend its See also:

argument before the universities of Oxford and Cambridge, which he visited, accompanied by Fox and Gardiner . Immediately afterwards he was sent to plead the cause before a more powerful if not a higher tribunal . An See also:embassy, with the earl of Wiltshire at its See also:head, was despatched to Rome in 1530, that " the See also:matter of the divorce should be disputed and ventilated," and Cranmer was an important member of it . He was received by the See also:Pope with marked See also:courtesy, and was appointed " See also:Grand See also:Penitentiary of See also:England," but his argument, if he ever had the opportunity of stating it, did not See also:lead to any See also:practical decision of the question . Cranmer returned in See also:September 1530, but in See also:January 1531 he received a second See also:commission from the king appointing him " Conciliarius Regius et ad Caesarem Orator." In the summer of 1531 he accordingly proceeded to See also:Germany as See also:sole See also:ambassador to the See also:emperor . He was also to See also:sound the Lutheran princes with a view to an See also:alliance, and to obtain the removal of some restrictions on See also:English See also:trade . At See also:Nuremberg he became acquainted with See also:Osiander, whose somewhat isolated theological position he probably found to be in many points analogous to his own . Both were convinced that the old See also:order must See also:change; neither saw clearly what the new order should be to which it was to give place . They had frequent interviews, which had doubtless an important See also:influence on Cranmer's opinions . But Osiander's house had another attraction of a different See also:kind from theological sympathy . His niece See also:Margaret won the See also:heart of Cranmer, and in 1532 they were married . Hook finds in the fact of the marriage corroboration of Cranmer's statement that he never expected or desired the primacy; and it seems probable enough that, if he had foreseen how soon the primacy was to be forced upon him, he would have avoided a disqualification which it was difficult to conceal and dangerous to disclose .

Expected or not, the primacy was forced upon him within a very few months of his marriage . In August 1532 Archbishop See also:

Warham died, and the king almost immediately afterwards intimated to Cranmer; who had accompanied the emperor in his See also:campaign against the See also:Turks, his nomination to the vacant see . Cranmer's conduct was certainly consistent with his profession that he did not See also:desire, as he had not expected, the dangerous promotion . He sent his wife to England, but delayed his own return in the vain See also:hope that another appointment might be made . The papal bulls of See also:confirmation were dated See also:February and See also:March 1533, and the See also:consecration took place on the 3oth March . One peculiarity of the ceremony had occasioned considerable discussion . It was the See also:custom for the archbishop elect to take two oaths, the first of episcopal See also:allegiance to the pope, and the second in recognition of the royal supremacy . The latter was so wide in its See also:scope that it might fairly be held to supersede the former in so far as the two were inconsistent . Cranmer, however, was not satisfied with this . He had a special protest recorded, in which he formally declared that he swore allegiance to the pope only in so far as that was consistent with his supreme See also:duty to the king . The morality of this course has been much canvassed, though it seems really to involve nothing more than an See also:express See also:declaration of what the two oaths implied . It was the course that would readily suggest itself to a man of timid nature who wished to secure himself against such a See also:fate as Wolsey's .

It showed weakness, but it added nothing to whatever immorality there might be in successively taking two incompatible oaths . In the last as in the first step of Cranmer's promotion Henry had been actuated by one and the same See also:

motive . The business of the divorce—or rather, of the legitimation of Anne Boleyn's expected issue—had now become very urgent, and in the new archbishop he had an See also:agent who might be expected to forward it with the needful haste . The celerity and skill with which 376 Cranmer did the See also:work intrusted to him must have fully satisfied his See also:master . During the first See also:week of See also:April See also:Convocation sat almost from See also:day to day to determine questions of fact and See also:law in relation to Catherine's marriage with Henry as affected by her previous marriage with his brother Arthur . Decisions favourable to the See also:object of the king were given on these questions, though even the despotism of the most despotic of the Tudors failed to secure See also:absolute unanimity . The next step was taken by Cranmer, who wrote a See also:letter to the king, praying to be allowed to remove the anxiety of loyal subjects as to a possible See also:case of disputed See also:succession, by finally determining the validity of the marriage in his archiepiscopal court . There is See also:evidence that the See also:request was prompted by the king, and his consent was given as a matter of course . See also:Queen Catherine was residing at See also:Ampthill in See also:Bedford-See also:shire, and to suit her convenience the court was held at the priory of See also:Dunstable in the immediate neighbourhood . Declining to appear, she was declared contumacious, and on the 23rd of May the archbishop gave See also:judgment declaring the marriage null and void from the first, and so leaving the king See also:free to marry whom he pleased . The See also:Act of Appeals had already prohibited any appeal from the archbishop's court . Five days later he pronounced the marriage between Henry and Anne—which had been secretly celebrated about the 25th of January 1533—to be valid .

On the 1st of See also:

June he crowned Anne as queen, and on the loth of September stood godfather to her See also:child, the future Queen See also:Elizabeth . The See also:breach with Rome and the subjection of the church in England to the royal supremacy had been practically achieved before Cranmer's appointment as archbishop: and he had little to do with the other constitutional changes of Henry's reign . But his position as chief See also:minister of Henry's ecclesiastical See also:jurisdiction forced him into unpleasant prominence in connexion with the king's matrimonial experiences . In 1536 he was required to revise his own See also:sentence in favour of the validity of Henry's marriage with Anne Boleyn; and on the 17th of May the marriage was declared invalid . The ground on which this sentence is pronounced is fairly clear . Anne's See also:sister, See also:Mary Boleyn, had been Henry VIII.'s See also:mistress; this by See also:canon law was a See also:bar to his marriage with Anne—a bar which had been removed by papal See also:dispensation in 1527, but now the papal power to dispense in such cases had been repudiated, and the See also:original objection revived . The sentence was grotesquely legal and unjust . With Anne's condemnation by the House of Lords Cranmer had nothing to do . He interceded for her in vain with the king, as he had done in the cases of See also:Fisher, More and the monks of See also:Christchurch . His See also:share in the divorce of Anne of See also:Cleves was less prominent than that of Gardiner, though he did preside over the Convocation in which nearly all the dignitaries of the church signified their approval of that measure . To his next and last interposition in the matrimonial affairs of the king no discredit attaches itself . When he was made cognizant of the charges against Catherine See also:Howard, his duty to communicate them to the king was obvious, though painful .

Phoenix-squares

Meanwhile Cranmer was actively carrying out the policy which has associated his name more closely, perhaps, than that of any other ecclesiastic with the See also:

Reformation in England . Its most important feature on the theological as distinct from the See also:political See also:side was the endeavour to promote the circulation of the Bible in the See also:vernacular, by encouraging See also:translation and procuring an order in 1538 that a copy of the Bible in English should be set up in every church in a convenient place for See also:reading . Only second in importance to this was the re--See also:adjustment of the creed and See also:liturgy of the church, which formed Cranmer's See also:principal work during the latter See also:half of his life . The progress of the archbishop's opinion towards that See also:middle Protestantism, if it may be so called, which he did so much to impress on the formularies of the Church of England, was See also:gradual, as a brief enumeration of the successive steps in that progress will show . In 1538 an embassy of See also:German divines visited England with the See also:design, among other things, of forming a See also:common See also:confession for the two countries . This proved impracticable, but the frequent conferences Cranmer had with the theologians composing the embassy had doubtless a See also:great influence in modifying his views . Both in See also:parliament andin Convocation he opposed the Six Articles of 1539, but he stood almost alone . During the period between 1540 and 1543 the archbishop was engaged at the head of a commission in the revision of the " Bishop's See also:Book " (1537) or Institutions of a See also:Christian Man, and the preparation of the Necessary Erudition (1543) known as the " King's Book," which was a modification of the former work in the direction of See also:Roman See also:Catholic See also:doctrine . In June 1545 was issued his See also:Litany, which was substantially the same as that now in use, and shows his mastery of a rhythmical English See also:style . The course taken by Cranmer in promoting the Reformation exposed him to the See also:bitter hostility of the reactionary party or " men of the old learning," of whom Gardiner and See also:Bonner were leaders, and on various occasions—notably in 1543 and 1545—conspiracies were formed in the See also:council or elsewhere to effect his overthrow . The king, however, remained true to him, and all the conspiracies signally failed . It illustrates a favourable trait in the archbishop's See also:character that he forgave all the conspirators .

He was, as his secretary Morice testifies, " a man that delighted not in revenging." Cranmer was See also:

present with Henry VIII. when he died (1547) . By the will of the king he was nominated one of a council of regency composed of sixteen persons, but he acquiesced in the arrangement by which See also:Somerset became lord See also:protector . He officiated at the See also:coronation of the boy king Edward VI., and is supposed to have instituted a sinister change in the order of the ceremony, by which the right of the monarch to reign was made to appear to depend upon See also:inheritance alone, without the concurrent consent of the people . But Edward's See also:title had been expressly sanctioned by act of parliament, so that there was no more See also:room for See also:election in his case than in that of See also:George I., and the real motive of the changes was to shorten the weary ceremony for the frail child . During this reign the work of the Reformation made rapid progress, the sympathies both of the Protector and of the See also:young king being decidedly See also:Protestant . Cranmer was therefore enabled without let or hindrance to See also:complete the preparation of the church formularies, on which he had been for some time engaged . In 1547 appeared the Homilies prepared under his direction . Four of them are attributed to the archbishop himself—those on Salvation, Faith, See also:Good See also:Works and the Reading of Scripture . His translation of the German See also:Catechism of Justus See also:Jonas, known as Cranmer's Catechism, appeared in the following year . Important, as showing his views on a cardinal doctrine, was the See also:Defence of the True and Catholic Doctrine of the See also:Sacrament, which he published in 1550 . It was immediately answered from the side of the " old learning " by Gardiner . The first See also:prayer-book of Edward VI. was finished in See also:November 1548, and received legal See also:sanction in March 1549; the second was completed and sanctioned in April 1552 .

The archbishop did much of the work of compilation personally . The See also:

forty-two articles of Edward VI. published in 1553 owe their See also:form and style almost entirely to the hand of Cranmer . The last great undertaking in which he was employed was the revision of his codification of the canon law, which had been all but completed before the death of Henry . The task was one eminently well suited to his See also:powers, and the See also:execution of it was marked by great skill in See also:definition and arrangement . It never received any authoritative sanction, Edward VI. dying before the See also:proclamation establishing it could be made, and it remained unpublished until 1571, when a Latin translation by Dr See also:Walter Haddon and See also:Sir See also:John See also:Cheke appeared under the title Reformatio legum ecclesiasticarum . It laid down the lawfulness and necessity of persecution to the death for See also:heresy in the most absolute terms; and Cranmer himself condemned Joan Bocher to the flames . But he naturally loathed persecution, and was as tolerant as any in that age . Cranmer stood by the dying See also:bed of Edward as he had stood by that of his father, and he there suffered himself to be persuaded to take a step against his own convictions . He had pledged himself to respect the testamentary disposition of Henry VIII. by which the succession devolved upon Mary, and now he violated his See also:oath by See also:signing Edward's " See also:device " of the See also:crown to See also:Lady Jane See also:Grey . On grounds of policy and morality alike the act was quite indefensible; but it is perhaps some palliation of his See also:perjury that it was committed to satisfy the last urgent wish of a dying man, and that he alone remained true to the nine days' queen when the others who had with him signed Edward's device deserted her . On the See also:accession of Mary he was summoned to the council—most of whom had signed the same device—reprimanded for his conduct, and ordered to confine himself to his See also:palace at See also:Lambeth until the queen's See also:pleasure was known . He refused to follow the See also:advice of his See also:friends and avoid the fate that was clearly impending over him by See also:flight to the See also:continent .

Any See also:

chance of safety that lay in the friendliness of a strong party in the council was more than nullified by the bitter See also:personal enmity of the queen, who could not forgive his share in her mother's divorce and her own disgrace . On the 14th of September 1553 he was sent to the See also:Tower, where See also:Ridley and See also:Latimer were also confined . The immediate occasion of his imprisonment was a strongly worded declaration he had written a few days previously against the See also:mass, the celebration of which, he heard, had been re-established at Canterbury . He had not taken steps to publish this, but by some unknown channel a copy reached the council, and it could not be ignored . In November, with Lady Jane Grey, her See also:husband, and two other Dudleys, Cranmer was condemned for See also:treason . See also:Renard thought he would be executed, but so true a Romanist as Mary could scarcely have an ecclesiastic put to death in consequence of a sentence by a See also:secular court, and Cranmer was reserved for treatment as a heretic by the highest of clerical tribunals, which could not act until parliament had restored the papal jurisdiction . Accordingly in March 1554 he and his two illustrious fellow-prisoners, Ridley and Latimer, were removed to Oxford, where they were confined in the Bocardo or common See also:prison . Ridley and Latimer were unflinching, and suffered bravely at the stake on the 16th of See also:October 1555 . Cranmer had been tried by a papal commission, over which Bishop See also:Brooks of See also:Gloucester presided, in September 1555 . Brooks had no power to give sentence, but reported to Rome, where Cranmer was summoned, but not permitted, to attend . On the 25th of November he was pronounced contumacious by the pope and excommunicated, and a commission was sent to England to degrade him from his See also:office of archbishop . This was done with the usual humiliating ceremonies in See also:Christ Church, Oxford, on the 14th of February 1556, and he was then handed over to the secular power .

About the same time Cranmer subscribed the first two of his " recantations." His difficulty consisted in the fact that, like all Anglicans of the 16th See also:

century, he recognized no right of private judgment, but believed that the state, as represented by See also:monarchy, parliament and Convocation, had an absolute right to determine the See also:national faith and to impose it on every Englishman . All these authorities had now legally established Roman Catholicism as the national faith, and Cranmer had no logical ground on which to resist . His early "recantations " are merely recognitions of his lifelong conviction of this right of the state . But his See also:dilemma on this point led him into further doubts, and he was eventually induced to revile his whole career and the Reformation . This is what the See also:government wanted . See also:Northumberland's recantation had done much to discredit the Reformation, Cranmer's, it was hoped, would complete the work . Hence the enormous effect of Cranmer's recovery at the final See also:scene . On the 21st of March he was taken to St Mary's church, and asked to repeat his recantation in the See also:hearing of the people as he had promised . To the surprise of all he declared with dignity and emphasis that what he had recently done troubled him more than anything he ever did or said in his whole life; that he renounced and refused all his recantations as things written with his hand, contrary to the truth which he thought in his heart; and that as his hand had offended, his hand should be first burned when he came to the See also:fire . As he had said, his right hand was steadfastly exposed to the flames . The See also: