Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

CRITICISM (from the Gr. KpiTrlS, a ju...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V07, Page 470 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

CRITICISM (from the Gr. KpiTrlS, a See also:judge, Kpivew, to decide, to give an authoritative See also:opinion)  , the See also:art of judging the qualities and values of an aesthetic See also:object, whether in literature or the See also:fine arts.' It involves, in the first instance, the formation and expression of a See also:judgment on the qualities of anything, and See also:Matthew See also:Arnold defined it in this See also:general sense as " a disinterested endeavour to learn and propagate the best that is known and thought in the See also:world." It has come, however, to possess a secondary and specialized meaning as a published See also:analysis of the qualities and characteristics of a See also:work in literature or fine art, itself taking the See also:form of See also:independent literature . The sense in which See also:criticism is taken as implying censure, the " picking holes " in any statement or See also:production, is frequent, but it is entirely unjustifiable . There is nothing in the proper See also:scope of criticism which presupposes blame . On the contrary, a work of perfect beauty and fitness, in which no See also:fault could possibly be found with See also:justice, is as proper a subject for criticism to See also:deal with as a work of the greatest imperfection . It may be perfectly just to See also:state that a See also:book or a picture is " beneath criticism," i.e. is so wanting in all qualities of originality and technical excellence that See also:time would merely be wasted in analysing it . But it can never be properly said that a work is " above criticism," although it may be " above censure," for the very complexity of its merits and the fulness of its beauties tempt the skill of the analyser and See also:reward it . It is necessary at the See also:threshold of an examination of the See also:history of criticism to expose this laxity of speech, since nothing is more confusing to a clear conception of this art than to suppose that it consists in an effort to detect what is blameworthy . Candid criticism should be neither benevolent nor adverse; its See also:function is to give a just judgment, without partiality or See also:bias . A critic (KptTnKOS) is one who exercises the art of criticism, who sets himself up, or is set up, as a See also:judge of See also:literary and See also:artistic merit . The irritability of mankind, which easily forgets and neglects praise, but cannot forgive the rankling See also:poison of blame, has set upon the word critic a See also:seal which is even more unamiable than that of criticism . It takes its most See also:savage form in See also:Benjamin Disraeli's celebrated and deplorable dictum, " the critics are the men who have failed in literature and art." It is See also:plain that such names as those of See also:Aristotle, See also:Dante, See also:Dryden, See also:Joshua See also:Reynolds, Sainte-Beuve and Matthew Arnold are not to be thus swept by a reckless fulmination . There have been ' It is in this general sense that the subject is considered in this See also:article .

The See also:

term is, however, used in more restricted senses, generally with some word of qualification, e.g . " textual criticism " or " higher criticism "; see the article TEXTUAL CRITICISM and the article See also:BIBLE for an outstanding example of both " textual " and " higher." many critics who brought from failure in imaginative See also:composition a cavilling, jealous and ignoble See also:temper, who have mainly exercised their function in indulging the evil See also:passion of envy . But, so far as they have done this, they have proved themselves See also:bad critics, and neither See also:minute care, nor a basis of learning, nor wide experience of literature, salutary as all these must be, can avail to make that criticism valuable which is founded on the See also:desire to exaggerate fault-finding and to emphasize censure unfairly . The examination of what has been produced by other ages of human thought is much less liable to this dangerous See also:error than the See also:attempt to estimate contemporary See also:works of art and literature . There are few indeed whom See also:personal passion can See also:blind to the merits of a picture of the 15th or a poem of the 17th See also:century . In the higher branches of See also:historical criticism, See also:prejudice of this ignoble sort is hardly possible, and therefore, in considering criticism in its ideal forms, it is best to leave out of See also:consideration that invidious and fugitive See also:species which bears the general name of " reviewing." This pedestrian criticism, indeed, is useful and even indispensable, but it is, by its very nature, ephemeral, and it is liable to a multitude of drawbacks . Even when the reviewer is, or desires to be, strictly just, it is almost impossible for him to stand far enough back from the object under See also:review to see it in its proper See also:perspective . He is dazzled, or scandalized, by its novelty; he has formed a pre-conceived notion of the degree to which its author should be encouraged or depressed; he is himself, in all cases, an See also:element in the See also:mental See also:condition which he attempts to judge, and if not positively a See also:defendant is at least a juryman in the See also:court over which he ought to preside with remote impartiality . It may be laid down as the See also:definition of criticism in its pure sense, that it should consist in the application, in the most competent form, of the principles of literary composition . Those principles are the general See also:aesthetics upon which See also:taste is founded; they take the See also:character of rules of See also:writing . From the days of Aristotle the existence of such rules has not been doubted, but different orders of mind in various ages have given them diverse application, and upon this diversity the fluctuations of taste are founded . It is now generally admitted that in past ages critics have too often succumbed to the temptation to regulate taste rigidly, and to See also:lay down rules that shall match every See also:case with a See also:formula .

Over-legislation has been the bane of See also:

official criticism, and originality, especially in works of creative See also:imagination, has been condemned because it did not conform to existing rules . Such instances of want of contemporary appreciation as the reception given to See also:William See also:Blake or See also:Keats, or even See also:Milton, are quoted to prove the futility of criticism . As a See also:matter of fact they do nothing of the See also:kind . They merely prove the immutable principles which underlie all judgment of artistic products to have been misunderstood or imperfectly obeyed during the See also:life-times of those illustrious men . False critics have built domes of See also:glass, as See also:Voltaire put it, between the heavens and themselves, domes which See also:genius has to shatter in pieces before it can make itself comprehended . In See also:critical application formulas are often useful, but they should be held lightly; when the formula becomes the See also:tyrant where it should be the servant of thought, fatal error is imminent . What is required above all else by a critic is knowledge, tempered with See also:good sense, and combined with an exquisite delicacy of taste . He who possesses these qualities may go wrong in certain instances, but his error cannot become See also:radical, and he is always open to correction . It is not his business crudely to pronounce a composition "good " or " bad "; he must be able to show why it is " good " and wherein it is " bad "; he must admire with See also:independence and blame with careful candour . He must above all be assiduous to See also:escape from pompous generalizations, which conceal lack of thought under a flow of words . The finest criticism should take every circumstance of the case into consideration, and hold it necessary, if possible, to know the author as well as the book . A large See also:part of the See also:reason why the criticism of productions of the past is so much more fruitful than See also:mere contemporary reviewing, is that by remoteness from the See also:scene of See also:action the critic is able to make himself See also:familiar with all the elements ofage, See also:place and See also:medium which affected the writer at the moment of his composition .

In See also:

short, knowledge and even taste are not sufficient for perfect criticism without the infusion of a still rarer quality, breadth of sympathy . Criticism has been one of the latest branches of literature to reach maturity, but from very See also:early times the See also:instinct which induces mankind to review what it has produced led to the composition of imperfect but often extremely valuable bodies of See also:opinion . What makes these early criticisms tantalizing is that the moral or See also:political aspects of literature had not disengaged themselves from the purely intellectual or aesthetic . To pass to an historical examination of the subject, we find that in antiquity Aristotle was regarded as the See also:father and almost as the founder of literary criticism . Yet before his See also:day, three See also:Greek writers of See also:eminence had examined, in more or less fulness, the principles of composition; these were See also:Plato, Isocrates and See also:Aristophanes . The See also:comedy of The Frogs, by the latter, is the earliest specimen we possess of hostile literary criticism, being devoted to ridicule of the plays of See also:Euripides . In the cases of Plato and Isocrates, criticism takes the form mainly of an examination of the rules of See also:rhetoric . We reach, however, much firmer ground when we arrive at Aristotle, whose Poetics and Rhetoric are among the most valuable See also:treatises which antiquity has handed down to us . Of what existed in the literature of his See also:age, extremely See also:rich in some branches, entirely empty in others, Aristotle speaks with extraordinary authority; but Mr G . See also:Saintsbury has justly remarked that as his criticism of See also:poetry was injuriously affected by the non-existence of the novelist, so his criticism of See also:prose was injuriously affected by the omnipresence of the orator . This continues true of all See also:ancient criticism . A work by Aristotle on the problems raised by a study of See also:Homer is lost, and there may have been others of a similar nature; in the two famous treatises which remain we have nothing less important than the See also:foundation on which all subsequent See also:European criticism has been raised .

It does not appear that any of the numerous disciples of Aristotle understood his attitude to literature, nor do the later philosophical See also:

schools offer much of See also:interest . The Neoplatonists, however, were occupied with analysis of the Beautiful, on which both See also:Proclus and See also:Plotinus expatiated; still more purely literary were some of the treatises of See also:Porphyry . There seems to be no doubt that See also:Alexandria possessed, in the third century, a vivid school of critic-grammarians; the names of See also:Zenodotus, of See also:Crates and of See also:Aristarchus were eminent in this connexion, but of their writings nothing substantial has survived . They were followed by the scholiasts, and they by the mere rhetoricians of the last Greek schools, such as See also:Hermogenes and See also:Aphthonius . In the 2nd century of our era, Dio See also:Chrysostom, See also:Aristides of See also:Smyrna, and See also:Maximus of See also:Tyre were the See also:main representatives of criticism, and they were succeeded by See also:Philostratus and See also:Libanius . The most See also:modern of See also:post-See also:Christian Greek critics, however, is unquestionably See also:Dionysius of See also:Halicarnassus, who leads up to See also:Lucian and See also:Cassius See also:Longinus . The last-mentioned name calls for See also:special See also:notice; in " the lovely and magnificent See also:personality of Longinus " we find the most intelligent judge of literature who wrote between Aristotle and the moderns . His book On the See also:Sublime (Hepi iikvs), probably written about A.D . 260, and first printed in 1554, is of extreme importance, while his intuitions and the splendour of his See also:style combine to lift Longinus to the highest See also:rank among the critics of the world . In See also:Roman literature criticism never took a very prominent position . In early days the rhetorical works of See also:Cicero and the famous Art of Poetry of See also:Horace exhaust the See also:category . During the later Augustan See also:period the only literary critic of importance was the See also:elder See also:Seneca .

Phoenix-squares

Passing over the valuable allusions to the art of writing in the poets, especially in See also:

Juvenal and See also:Martial, we reach, in the See also:Silver Age, See also:Quintilian, the most accomplished of all the Roman critics . His Institutes of See also:Oratory has been described as the fullest and most intelligent application of criticism to literature which the Latin world produced, and one which places the name of Quintilian not far below those of Aristotle and Longinus . He was followed by Aulus See also:Gellius . by See also:Macrobius (whose reputation was See also:great in the See also:middle ages), by Servius (the great'commentator on See also:Virgil), and, after a See also:long See also:interval, by Martianus See also:Capella . Latin criticism sank into mere pedantry about rhetoric and See also:grammar . This continued throughout the Dark Ages, until the 13th century, when rhythmical treatises, of which the Labyrinthus of See also:Eberhard (1212?) and the Ars rhythmica of See also:John of Garlandia (John See also:Garland) are the most famous, came into See also:fashion . These writings testified to a growing revival of a taste for poetry . It is, however, in the masterly technical See also:treatise De vulgari eloquio, generally attributed to Dante, the first printed (in See also:Italian) in 1529, that modern poetical criticism takes its first step . The example of this admirable book was not adequately followed; throughout the 14th and 15th centuries, criticism is mainly indirect and accidental . See also:Boccaccio, indeed, is the only figure worthy of mention, between Dante and See also:Erasmus . With the See also:Renaissance came a blossoming of Humanist criticism in See also:Italy, producing such excellent specimens as the Sylvae of Poliziano, the Poetics (1527) of See also:Vida, and the Poetica of Trissino, the best of a whole See also:crop of critical works produced, often by famous names, between 1525 and 156o . These were followed by sounder scholars and acuter theorists: by See also:Scaliger with his See also:epoch-making Poetices (1561) ; by L .

Castelvetro, whose Poetica (1570) started the modern cultivation of the Unities and asserted the value of the Epic; by See also:

Tasso with his Discorsi (1587); and by See also:Francesco See also:Patrizzi in his Poetica (1586) . In See also:France, the earliest and for a long time the most important specimen of literary criticism was the Defense et See also:illustration de la langue franfaise, published in 1549 by See also:Joachim du Bellay . See also:Ronsard, also, wrote frequently and ably on the art of poetry . The theories of the Pleiade were summed up in the Art poetique of See also:Vauquelin de la Fresnaye, which belongs to 1574 (though not printed until 16o5) . In See also:England, the earliest literary critic of importance was See also:Thomas See also:Wilson, whose Art of Rhetoric was printed in 1553, and the earliest student of poetry, See also:George See also:Gascoigne, whose Instruction appeared in 1575 . Gascoigne is the first writer who deals intelligently with the subject of See also:English See also:prosody . He was followed by Thomas Drant, See also:Harvey, See also:Gosson, See also:Lodge and See also:Sidney, whose controversial See also:pamphlets belong to the period between 1575 and 1580 . Among Elizabethan " arts " or " de-fences " of English poetry are to be mentioned those of William See also:Webbe (1586), George See also:Puttenham (1589), Thomas See also:Campion (1602), and See also:Samuel See also:Daniel (1603) . With the tractates of See also:Ben See also:Jonson, several of them lost, the criticism of the Renaissance may be said to See also:close . A new era began throughout See also:Europe when See also:Malherbe started, about 1600, a taste for the neo-classic or See also:anti-romantic school of poetry, taking up the See also:line which had been foreshadowed by Castelvetro . Enfin Malherbe See also:vint, and he was supported in his revolution by See also:Regnier, See also:Vaugelas, See also:Balzac, and finally by See also:Corneille himself, in his famous prefatory discourses . It was Boileau, however, who more than any other See also:man stood out at the close of the 17th century as the See also:law-giver of See also:Parnassus .

The rules of the neo-See also:

classics were See also:drawn together and arranged in a See also:system by Rene See also:Rapin, whose authoritative treatises mainly appeared between 1668 and 1674 . It is in writings of this man, and of the See also:Jesuits, Le See also:Bossu and See also:Bouhours, that the preposterous rigidity of the formal classic criticism is most plainly seen . The See also:influence of these three critics was, however, very great through-out Europe, and we trace it in the writings of Dryden, See also:Addison and See also:Rymer . In the course of the 18th century, when the neo-classic creed was universally accepted, See also:Pope, See also:Blair, Karnes, See also:Harris, See also:Goldsmith and Samuel See also:Johnson were its most distinguished exponents in England, while Voltaire, See also:Buffon (to whom we owe the phrase " the style is the man "), See also:Marmontel, La Harpe and Suard were the types of See also:academic opinion in France . Modern, or more properly Romantic, criticism came in when the neo-classic tradition became bankrupt throughout Europe at the very close of the 18th century . It has been heralded in See also:Germany by the writings of See also:Lessing, and in France by those of See also:Diderot . Of the reconstruction of critical opinion in the 19th century it is impossible to speak here with any fulness, it is contained in the See also:record of the See also:recent literature of each European See also:language . It is noticeable, in England, that the predominant place in it was occupied, in violent contrast with Disraeli's dictum, by those who had obviously not failed in imaginative composition, by See also:Wordsworth, by See also:Shelley, by Keats, by See also:Landor, and pre-eminently by S . T . See also:Coleridge, who was one of the most penetrative, See also:original and imaginative critics who have ever lived . In France, the importance of Sainte-Beuve is not to be ignored or even qualified; after manifold changes of taste, he remains as much a See also:master as he was a precursor . He was followed by See also:Theophile See also:Gautier, See also:Saint-Marc, See also:Girardin, See also:Paul de Saint See also:Victor, and a See also:crowd of others, down to See also:Taine and the latest school of individualistic critics, comparable with Matthew Arnold, See also:Pater, and their followers in England .

See G . Saintsbury, A History of Criticism (3 vols., 1902—1904) ; J . E . Spingarn, A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance (2nd ed . 1908) ; Thery, Histoire See also:

des opinions litteraires (1849) ; J . A . See also:Symonds, The Revival of Learning (1877) ; Matthew Arnold, Essays in Criticism, i . (1865), ii . (1868) ; Bourgoin, See also:Les Maritres de la critique au X VII° siecle (1889) ; Paul Hamelius, See also:Die Kritik in der englischen Literatur (1897) ; S . H . See also:Butcher, The Poetics of Artistotle (1898) ; H . L .

Havell and See also:

Andrew See also:Lang, Longinus on the Sublime (189o) . See also the writings of Sainte-Beuve, Matthew Arnold, F . Brunetiere, Anatole France, See also:Walter Pater, passim . (E .

End of Article: CRITICISM (from the Gr. KpiTrlS, a judge, Kpivew, to decide, to give an authoritative opinion)
[back]
CRITICISM
[next]
CRITIUS

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.