Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:
This connexion led to a friendship which remained unbroken till See also:Wellington's See also:death
.
The notorious See also:case of the See also:duke of See also:York in connexion with his
In 1827 he became the representative of the university of Dublin, having previously sat successively for the boroughs of See also:Athlone, See also:Yarmouth (Isle of See also:Wight), See also:Bodmin and See also:Aldeburgh
.
He was a determined opponent of the Reform See also:Bill, and vowed that he would never sit in a reformed parliament; his See also:parliamentary career accordingly terminated in 1832
.
Two years earlier he had retired from his See also:post at the See also:admiralty on a See also:pension of £1500 a year
.
Many of his See also:political speeches were published in pamphlet See also:form, and they show him to have been a vigorous and effective, though somewhat unscrupulous and often virulently See also:personal, party debater
.
Croker had been an ardent supporter of See also:Peel, but finally See also:broke with him when he began to See also:advocate the See also:repeal of the See also:Corn See also:Laws
.
He is said to have been the first to use (See also:Jan
.
1830) the See also:term " conservatives." He was for many years one of the leading contributors on See also:literary and See also:historical subjects to the Quarterly See also:Review, with which he had been associated from its See also:foundation
.
The rancorous spirit in which many of his articles were written did much to embitter party feeling
.
It also reacted unfavourably on Croker's reputation as a worker in the See also:department of pure literature by bringing political animosities into literary See also:criticism
.
He had no sympathy with the younger school of poets who were in revolt against the artificial methods of the 18th See also:century, and he was responsible for the famous Quarterly See also:article on See also:Keats
.
It is, nevertheless, unjust to See also:judge Croker by the criticisms which See also:Macaulay brought against his magnum See also:opus, his edition of See also:Boswell's See also:Life of See also: With all its defects the See also:work had merits which Macaulay was of course not concerned to point out, and Croker's researches have been of the greatest value to subsequent editors . There is little doubt that Macaulay had personal reasons for his attack on Croker, who had more than once exposed in the See also:House the fallacies that See also:lay hidden under the orator's brilliant See also:rhetoric . Croker made no immediate reply to Macaulay's attack, but when the first two volumes of the See also:History appeared he took the opportunity of pointing out the inaccuracies that abounded in the work . Croker was occupied for several years on an annotated edition of See also:Pope's See also:works . It was See also:left unfinished at the See also:time of his death, but it was afterwards completed by the Rev . Whitwell Elwin and Mr W . J . See also:Courthope . He died at St Albans See also:Bank, See also:Hampton, on the loth of See also:August 1857 . Croker was generally supposed to be the See also:original from which Disraeli See also:drew the See also:character of " See also:Rigby " in Coningsby, because he had for many years had the See also:sole management of the estates of the See also:marquess of See also:Hertford, the " See also:Lord See also:Monmouth " of the See also:story; but the comparison is a See also:great injustice to the See also:sterling See also:worth of Croker's character . The chief works of Croker not already mentioned were his Stories for See also:Children from the History of See also:England (1817), which provided the See also:model for See also:Scott's Tales of a Grandfather; Letters on the See also:Naval See also:War with See also:America; A Reply to the Letters of See also:Malachi Malagrowther (1826) ; Military Events of the French Revolution of 183o (1831); a See also:translation of See also:Bassompierre s See also:Embassy to England (1819) ; and several lyrical pieces of some merit, such as the Songs of See also:Trafalgar (1806) and The Battles of Talavera (1809) . He also edited the See also:Suffolk Papers (1823), See also:Hervey's See also:Memoirs of the See also:Court of See also:George II .
(1817), the Letters of See also:Mary Lepel, See also:Lady Hervey (1821-1822), and See also:Walpole'sLetters to Lord Hertford (1824)
.
His memoirs, diaries and See also:correspondence were edited by See also: |
|
|
[back] CROFTER |
[next] RICHARD CROKER (1843– ) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.