|
CROSS , and CRUCIFIXION ( See also: Lat. crux, crucis')
.
The meaning ordinarily attached to the word " cross " is that of a figure composed of two or more lines which intersect, or touch each other transversely
.
Thus, two pieces of See also: wood, or other material, so placed in juxtaposition to one another, are understood to See also: form a cross
.
It should be noted, however, that Lipsius and other writers speak of the single upright stake to which criminals were bound as a cross, and to such a stake the name of crux
simplex has been applied
.
The usual conception, however, of a cross is that of a compound figure
.
Punishment by crucifixion was widely employed in See also: ancient times
.
It is known to have been used by nations such as those of See also: Assyria, See also: Egypt, See also: Persia, by the Greeks, Carthaginians,
' Derivatives of the Latin crux appear in many forms in See also: European See also: languages, cf
.
Ger
.
Kreuz, Fr
.
Croix, It. croce, &c.; the See also: English form seems Norse in origin (O.N
.
Krosse, mod
.
Kors)
.
The O.E. name was See also: rod, rood (q.v.)
.
Macedonians, and from very early times by the See also: Romans
.
It has been thought, too, that crucifixion was also used by the Jews themselves, and that there is an allusion to it (Dent. xxi
.
22, 23) as a punishment to be inflicted
.
Two methods were followed in the infliction of the punishment of crucifixion
.
In both of these the criminal was first of all usually stripped naked, and bound to an upright stake, where he was so cruelly scourged with an implement, formed of strips of See also: leather having pieces of iron, or some other hard material, at their ends, that not merely was the flesh often stripped from the bones, but even the entrails partly protruded, and the anatomy of the See also: body was disclosed
.
In this pitiable See also: state he was reclothed, and, if able to do so, was made to drag the stake to the place of execution, where he was either fastened to it, or impaled upon it, and See also: left to die
.
In this method, where a single stake was employed, we have the crux simplex of Lipsius
.
The other method is that with which we are more See also: familiar, and which is described in the New Testament account of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ
.
In such a See also: case, after the scourging at the stake, the criminal was made to carry a gibbet, formed of two transverse bars of wood, to the place of execution, and he was then fastened to it by iron nails driven through the outstretched arms and through the ankles
.
Sometimes this was done as the cross See also: lay on the ground, and it was then lifted into position
.
In other cases the criminal was made to ascend by a ladder, and was then fastened to the cross
.
Probably the feebleness, or state of collapse, from which the criminal must often have suffered, had much to do in deciding this . It is not quite clear which of these two plans was followed in the case of the crucifixion of Christ, but the more general opinion has been that He was nailed to the cross on the ground, and that it was then lifted into position . The contrary opinion, has, however, prevailed to some extent, and there are representations of the crucifixion which depict Him as mounting a ladder placed against the cross . Such representations may, however, have been due to a piousSee also: desire, on the See also: part of their authors, to emphasize the voluntary offering of Himself as the Saviour of the See also: World, rather than as being intended for actual pictures of the scene itself
.
It may be noted, however, that among the " Emblems of the Passion," as they are called, and which were very favourite devices in the See also: middle ages, the ladder is not infrequently found in See also: con-junction with the See also: crown of thorns, nails, spear, &c
.
From its simplicity of form, the cross has been used both as a religious See also: symbol and as an See also: ornament, from the dawn of See also: man's See also: civilization
.
Various See also: objects, dating from periods long anterior to the Christian era, have been found, marked with crosses of different designs, in almost every part of the old world
.
See also: India, See also: Syria, Persia and Egypt have all yielded number-less examples, while numerous instances, dating from the later See also: Stone Age to Christian times, have been found in nearly every part of
See also: Europe
.
The use of the cross as a religious symbol in
pre-Christian times, and among non-
Christian peoples, may probably be
~, regarded as almost universal, and in
very many cases it was connected
with some form of nature worship
.
FIG
.
2
.
Two of the forms of the pre-Christian
cross which are perhaps most frequently met with are the tau cross, so named from its resemblance to the See also: Greek capital letter T, and the svastika or fylfot' 9 , also called " Gammadion " owing to its form being that of four Greek capital letters See also: gamma r placed together
.
The tau cross ' The acceptance of this word as the EnglishSee also: equivalent for this See also: peculiar form of the cross rests only, according to the New English See also: Dictionary, on a MS. of about 1500 in the Lansdowne collection, which gives details for the erection of a memorial stained-See also: glass
window, "
.
. the fylfot in the nedermost pane under ther I
knele
.
"; in the sketch given with the instructions a cross occupies the space indicated
.
It is a question, therefore, whether " fylfot " is a name for any See also: device suitable to" fill the See also: foot " of any design, or the name peculiar to this particular form of cross
.
The word is not, as was formerly accepted, a corruption of the O
.
Eng. feowerfete, four-footed
.
is a See also: common See also: Egyptian device, and is indeed often called the Egyptian cross
.
The svastika has a very wide range of distribution, and is found on all kinds of objects
.
It was used as a religious emblem in India and See also: China at least ten centuries before the Christian era, and is met with on Buddhist corns and inscriptions from various parts of India
.
A See also: fine sepulchral urn found at Shropham in See also: Norfolk, and now in the See also: British Museum, has three bands of cruciform ornaments round it
.
The two uppermost of these are plain circles, each of which contains a plain cross; the lowest See also: band is formed of a series of squares, in each of which is a svastika
.
In the Vatican Museum there is an See also: Etruscan fibula of gold which is marked with the svastika, but it is a device of such common occurrence on objects of pre-Christian origin, that it is hardly necessary to specify individual instances
.
The cross, as a device in different forms, and often enclosed in a circle, is of frequent occurrence on coins and medals of pre-Christian date in See also: France and elsewhere
.
Indeed, objects marked with pre-Christian crosses are to be seen in every important museum
.
The See also: death of Christ on a cross necessarily conferred a new significance on the figure, which had hitherto been associated with a conception of See also: religion not merely non-Christian, but in its essence often directly opposed to it
.
The Christians of early times were wont to trace, in things around them, hidden prophetical allusions to the truth of their faith, and such a testimony they seem to have readily recognized in the use of the cross as a religious emblem by those whose employment of it betokened a belief most repugnant to their own
.
The adoption by them of such forms, for example, as the tau cross and the svastika or fylfot was no doubt influenced by the idea of the occult Christian significance which they thought they recognized in those forms, and which they could use with a See also: special meaning among them-selves, without at the same See also: time arousing the See also: ill-feeling or shocking the sentiment of those among whom they lived
.
It was not till the time of See also: Constantine that the cross was publicly used as the symbol of the Christian religion
.
Till then its employment had been restricted, and private among the Christians themselves
.
Under Constantine it became the acknowledged symbol of See also: Christianity, in the same way in which, long afterwards, the See also: crescent was adopted as the symbol of the See also: Mahommedan religion
.
Constantine's See also: action was no doubt influenced by the vision which he believed he saw of the cross in the sky with the accompanying words Ev roUrw visa, as well as by the See also: story of the See also: discovery of the true cross by his See also: mother St See also: Helena in the See also: year 326
.
The See also: legend is that, when visiting the See also: holy places in See also: Palestine, St Helena was guided to the site of the crucifixion by an aged See also: Jew who had inherited traditional knowledge as to its position
.
After the ground had been dug to a considerable See also: depth, three crosses were found, as well as the superscription placed over the Saviour's See also: head on the cross, and the nails with which he had been crucified
.
The cross of the See also: Lord was distinguished from the other two by the working of a miracle on a crippled woman who was stretched upon it
.
This finding, or " invention," of the holy cross by St Helena is commemorated by a festival on the 3rd of May, called the " Invention of the Holy Cross." The legend was widely accepted as true, and is related by writers such as St See also: Ambrose, See also: Rufinus, Sulpicius Severna and others, but it is discounted by the existence of an older legend, according to which the true cross was found in the reign of Tiberius, and while St See also: James the
See also: Great was See also: bishop of Jerusalem, by Protonice, the wife of See also: Claudius
.
In See also: recent times an attempt has been made to reconcile the two accounts, by attributing to St Helena the rediscovery of the true cross, originally found by Protonice, and which had been buried again on the spot
.
A change was made in 1895 in the Diario Romano, when the word Ritrovamento was substituted for that of Invenzione, in the name of the festival of the 3rd of May
.
After St Helena's discovery a See also: church was built upon the site, and in it she placed the greater portion of the cross
.
The remaining portion she conveyed to
See also: Byzantium, and thence Constantine sent a piece to See also: Rome, where it is said to be still preserved in the church of S
.
Croce in Gerusalemme,
Fro
.
1
.
which was built to receive so precious a relic
.
It is exposed for the veneration of the faithful on See also: Good Friday, 3rd of May, and the third See also: Sunday in Lent, each year
.
Another festival of the holy cross is kept on the 14th of See also: September, and is known as the " Exaltation of the Holy Cross." It seems to have originated with the dedication, in the year 335, of the churches built on the sites of the crucifixion and the holy sepulchre
.
The observance of this festival passed from Jerusalem to Constantinople, and thence to Rome, where it appears to have been introduced in the 7th century
.
By some it is thought that the feast of the Exaltation of the Cross had its origin in Constantine's vision of the cross in the sky in the year 317, but whether it originated then, or, as is more generally supposed, at the dedication of the churches at Jerusalem, there is no doubt that it was afterwards kept with much greater solemnity in consequence of the recovery of the portion of the cross St Helena had left at Jerusalem, which had been taken away in the Persian victory, and was restored to Jerusalem by Heraclitus in 627
.
See also: Pope See also: Clement VIII
.
(1592–1604) raised the festival of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross to the dignity, liturgically known as that of a Greater See also: Double
.
Before leaving the story of St Helena and the cross, it may be convenient to allude briefly to the superscription placed over the Saviour's head, and the nails, which it is said that she found with the cross
.
The earlier tradition as to the superscription is obscure, but it would seem that it ought to,be considered part of the relic which Constantine sent to Rome
.
By some means it was entirely lost sight of until the year 1492, when it is said that it was accidentally found in a vault in the church of S
.
Croce in Gerusalemme at Rome
.
Pope See also: Alexander III. published a bull certifying to the truth of this re-discovery of the relic, and authenticated its character
.
As regards the nails, a question has arisen whether there were three or four
.
In the earliest pictures of the Crucifixion the feet are shown as separately nailed to the cross, but at a later
See also: period they are crossed, and a single nail fixes them
.
In the former case there would be four nails, and in the latter only three
.
Four is the number generally accepted, and it is said that one was cast by St Helena into the See also: sea, during a See also: storm, in See also: order to subdue the waves, another is said (but the legend cannot be traced far back) to have been beaten out into the iron circlet of the crown of See also: Lombardy, while the remaining two are reputed to be preserved among the See also: relics at Milan and See also: Trier respectively
.
The employment of the cross as the Christian symbol has been so manifold in its variety and application, and the different forms to which the figure has been adapted and elaborated are so complex, that it is only possible to See also: deal with the outline of the subject
.
We learn from See also: Tertullian and other early Christian writers of the See also: constant use which the Christians of those days made of the sign of the cross
.
Tertullian (De See also: Cor
.
Mil. cap. iii.) says: " At each journey and progress, at each coming in and going out, at the putting on of shoes, at the See also: bath, at meals, at the kindling of See also: lights, at bedtime, at sitting down, whatsoever occupation engages us, we mark the brow with the sign of the cross." With so frequent an employment of the sign of the cross in their domestic See also: life, it would be See also: strange if we did not find that it was very frequently used in the public worship of the church
.
The earliest liturgical forms are comparatively See also: late, and are without rubrics, but the allusions by different writers in early times to the ceremonial use of the sign of the cross in the public services are so numerous, and so much importance was attached to it, that we are left in no manner of doubt on the point
.
St Augustine, indeed, speaks of the sacraments as not duly ministered if the use of the sign of the cross were absent from their ministration (See also: Horn. cxviii. in S
.
See also: Joan.)
.
Of the later liturgical use of the sign of the cross there is little need to speak, as a reference to the service books of the Greek and Latin churches will plainly indicate the frequency of, and the importance attached to, its employment
.
Its occasional use is retained by the See also: Lutherans, and in the Church of See also: England it is authori-tatively used at See also: baptism, and at the " sacring " or See also: anointing of the See also: sovereign at the See also: coronation
.
Passing from the sign to the material figures of the cross, a very usual See also: classification distinguishes three See also: main forms: (I) the crux immissa, or capitata t (fig
.
3) known also as the Latin cross, or if each See also: limb is of the same length, + (fig
.
4) as the Greek cross; (2) the crux decussata, formed like the letter X, and (3) the crux commissa or tau cross,
already mentioned
.
It was on a crux immissa
that Christ is believed to have been crucified
.
The crux decussata is known as St Andrew's cross, from the tradition that St Andrew was put to death on a cross of that form . The FIG . 3 . FIG . 4• crux commissa is often called St Anthony's cross, probably only because it resembles the crutch with which the greatSee also: hermit is generally depicted
.
The cross in one form or other appears, appropriately, on the flags and ensigns of many Christian countries
.
The English cross of St See also: George is a plain red cross on a See also: white ground, the Scottish cross of St Andrew is a plain diagonal white cross on a blue ground, and the Irish cross of St Patrick is a plain diagonal red cross on a white ground
.
These three crosses are combined in the Union
See also: Jack (see See also: FLAG)
.
The cross has also been adopted by many orders of See also: knighthood
.
Perhaps the best known of these is the cross of the knights of See also: Malta
.
It is a white cross of eight points on a black ground (fig
.
5) and is the proper Maltese cross, a name which is often wrongly applied to the cross patee (fig
.
6) . The knights of the Garter use the cross of St George, as do those of the order of St Michael and St George, the knights of theSee also: Thistle use St Andrew's cross, and those of St Patrick the cross of St Patrick charged with a shamrock leaf
.
The cross of the Danish order of the Dannebrog (fig
.
7) affords a good example of this use of the cross
.
|
|
|
[back] HOWARD CROSBY (1826–1891) |
[next] CROSS RIVER |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.