|
CRUELTY (through the O. Fr. crualte, mod. cruaute, from the See also: pain or suffering
.
It is only necessary to See also: deal here with the legal relations involved
.
Statutory See also: provision for the prevention of cruelty to those who are unable to protect themselves has been particularly marked in the 19th century
.
The increase of legislation for the See also: protection of See also: children, lunatics and animals is a proof of the growing humanitarianism of the age
.
There was at one See also: time a tendency among jurists to question whether, for instance, the prevention of cruelty to animals was not a recognition of a certain quasi-right in animals, or whether it was merely that such exhibitions as bull- and bear-baiting, See also: cock-fights, &c., were demoralizing to the public generally
.
The true fact seems to be that the first introduction of such legislation was undoubtedly due to the See also: desire for the promotion of humanity, but that the principle, for the recognition of which the time was not yet ripe, had to be excused in the eyes of the public by the plea that cruelty had a demoralizing effect upon spectators (see A
.
V
.
See also: Dicey, See also: Law and Opinion in See also: England, p
.
188; T
.
E
.
See also: Holland,
See also: Jurisprudence, loth ed., p
.
372)
.
Cruelty to Animals.—The See also: English See also: common law has never taken cognizance of the commission of acts of cruelty upon animals, and See also: direct legislation upon the subject, dating from the 19th century, was due in a See also: great measure to public agitation, supported by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (founded in 1824)
.
Various acts were passed in 1822 (known as See also: Martin's
See also: Act), 1835 and 1837, and these were amended and consolidated by the Cruelty to Animals Acts 1849 and 1854, which, with the See also: Wild Animals in Captivity Protection Act 1900, are the See also: main acts upon the subject
.
There are also, in addition, many other acts that impose certain liabilities in respect of animals and indirectly prevent cruelty
.
The Cruelty to Animals Acts 1849 and 1854 render liable to See also: prosecution and See also: fine practically any act of cruelty to an animal; such acts as dubbing a cock, cropping the ears of a See also: dog or dishorning cattle, are offences
.
The latter practice, however, is allowed both in Scotland and See also: Ireland, the courts having held that the advantages to be obtained from dishorning outweigh the pain caused by the operation
.
The word " animal " is defined as meaning " any domestic animal " of whatever kind or See also: species, and whether a quadruped or not
.
The act of 1849 also forbids bull- and bear-baiting, or fighting between any kinds of animals; requires the provision of See also: food and See also: water to animals impounded; See also: lays down regulations as to the treatment of animals sent for slaughter, and imposes a See also: penalty for improperly conveying animals
.
The Wild Animals in Captivity Protection Act 1900 extends to wild animals in captivity that protection which the acts of 1849 and 1854 conferred on domestic animals, making exception of any act done or any omission in the preparation of animals for the food of See also: man or for sport
.
The word "animal" in the act includes See also: bird, beast, See also: fish or reptile
.
The See also: Dogs Act 1865 rendered owners of dogs liable for injuries to cattle and See also: sheep; the Dogs Act 1906 extended the owner's liability for injury done to any cattle by a dog, and further, where a dog is proved to have injured cattle or chased sheep it may be treatedas a dangerous dog and must be kept under proper control or be destroyed
.
The Drugging of Animals Act 1876 imposes a penalty on giving poisonous drugs to any domestic animal unlawfully
.
The Cruelty to Animals Act 1876 was passed for the purpose of regulating the practice of See also: vivisection (q.v.)
.
The Ground See also: Game Act 188o, prohibits See also: night See also: shooting, or the use of spring traps above ground or See also: poison
.
The Injured Animals Act 1907 enables police constables to cause any animal when mortally or seriously injured to be slaughtered
.
The Diseases of Animals Act 1894 and orders under it are for'; ,,.the purpose of securing animals from unnecessary suffering, as well as from disease
.
Finally, the Wild Birds Protection Acts 188o to 1904, with various game acts (see GAME See also: LAWS), extend the protection of the law to wild birds
.
The acts establish a close time for wild birds and impose penalties for shooting or taking them within that time; prohibit the exposing or offering for sale within certain See also: dates any wild bird recently killed or taken unless bought or received from some See also: person residing out of the See also: United See also: Kingdom; the taking or destroying of wild birds' eggs, the setting of See also: pole traps, and the taking of a wild bird by means of a See also: hook or other similar instrument
.
For the law See also: relating to the prevention of cruelty to children see CHILDREN, LAW RELATING TO; for cruelty in the sense of such conduct as entitles a See also: husband or wife to judicial separation see See also: DIVORCE
.
(T
.
A
.
|
|
|
[back] ALEXANDER CRUDEN (1701-1770) |
[next] GEORGE CRUIKSHANK (1792–1878) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.