|
See also: David Kimhi), eclipsed the fame both of his See also: father and his See also: brother
.
From the writings of the former he quotes a See also: great number of explanations, some of which are known only from this source
.
His magnum See also: opus is the Sefer Miklol, "See also: Book of Completeness." This falls into two divisions: the grammar, to which the title of the whole, Miklol, is usually applied (first printed in Constantinople, 1532-1534, then, with the notes of See also: Elias Levita, at Venice, 1545), and the See also: lexicon, Sefer Hashorashim, "Book of Roots," which was first printed in See also: Italy before 148o, then at Naples in 1490, and at Venice in 1546 with the annotations of Elias
.
The See also: model and the See also: principal source for this See also: work of David Kimhi's was the book of R
.
Jonah (Abulwalid), which was cast in a similar bipartite See also: form; and it was chiefly due to Kiml.1i's grammar and lexicon that, while the contents of Abulwalid's See also: works were See also: common knowledge, they themselves remained in oblivion for centuries
.
In spite of this dependence on his predecessors his work shows originality, especially in the arrangement of his material
.
In the grammar he combined the paradigmatic method of his brother Moses with the procedure of the older scholars who devoted a close See also: attention to details
.
In his See also: dictionary, again, he recast the lexicological materials independently, and enriched lexicography itself, especially by his numerous etymological explanations
.
Under the title Et Soler, " See also: Pen of the Writer " (Lyk, 1864), David Kimhi composed a sort of grammatical compendium as a guide to the correct See also: punctuation of the biblical See also: manuscripts; it consists, for the most See also: part, of extracts from the Miklol
.
After the completion of his great work he began to write commentaries on portions of the Scriptures
.
The first was on See also: Chronicles, then followed one on the Psalms, and finally his exegetical masterpiece—the commentary on the prophets
.
His annotations on the Psalms are especially interesting for the polemical excursuses directed against the Christian interpretation . He was also responsible for a commentary onSee also: Genesis (ed
.
A
.
Giinsburg, Pressburg, 1842), in which he followed Moses See also: Maimonides in explaining biblical narratives as visions
.
He was an enthusiastic adherent of Maimonides, and, though far advanced in years, took an active part in the See also: battle which raged in See also: southern See also: France and See also: Spain round his philosophicoreligious writings
.
The popularity of his biblical exegesis is demonstrated by the fact that the first printed texts of the See also: Hebrew See also: Bible were accompanied by his commentary: the Psalms 1477, perhaps at Bologna; the early Prophets, 1485, See also: Soncino; the later Prophets, ibid
.
1486
.
His commentaries have been frequently reprinted, many of them in Latin See also: translations
.
A new edition of that on the Psalms was begun by Schiller-Szinessy,(First Book of Psalms, Cambridge, 1883)
.
Abr
.
Geiger wrote of the three Kimbis in the Hebrew periodical Oar Nehmad (vol. ii., 1857 =A
.
Geiger, Gesammelte Schriften, v
.
1-47) . See further the Jewish Encyclopedia . . (W . |
|
|
[back] DAVID III |
[next] DAVID TENIERS |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.