Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

DEODAND (Lat. Deo dandum, that which ...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V08, Page 55 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

DEODAND (See also:Lat. Deo dandum, that which is to be given to See also:God)  , in See also:English See also:law, was a See also:personal See also:chattel (any See also:animal or thing) which, on See also:account of its having caused the See also:death of a human being, was forfeited to the See also:king for pious uses . See also:Blackstone, while tracing in the See also:custom an expiatory See also:design, alludes to analogous Jewish and See also:Greek See also:laws,' which required that what occasions a See also:man's death should be destroyed . In such usages the notion of the See also:punishment of an animal or thing, or of its being morally affected from having caused the death of a man, seems to be implied . The See also:forfeiture of the offending See also:instrument in no way depends on the See also:guilt of the owner . This imputation of guilt to inanimate See also:objects or to the See also:lower animals is not inconsistent with what we know of the ideas of uncivilized races . In English law, deodands came to be regarded as See also:mere forfeitures to the king, and' the rules on which they depended were not easily explained by any See also:key in the See also:possession of the old commentators . The law distinguished, for instance, between a thing in See also:motion and a thing See also:standing still . If a See also:horse or other animal in motion killed a See also:person, whether See also:infant or adult, or if a See also:cart ran over him, it was forfeited as a See also:deodand . On the other See also:hand, if death were caused by falling from a cart or a horse at See also:rest, the law made the chattel a deodand if the person killed were an adult, but not if he were below the years of discretion . Blackstone accounts for the greater severity against things in motion by saying that in such cases the owner is more usually at See also:fault, an explanation which is doubtful in point of fact, and would certainly not account for other instances of the same tendency . Thus, where a man's death is caused by a thing not in motion, that See also:part only which is the immediate cause is forfeited, as " if a man be climbing up the See also:wheel of a cart, and is killed by falling from it, the wheel alone is a deodand"; whereas, if the cart were in motion, not only the wheel but all that moves along with it (as the cart and the loading) are forfeited . A similar distinction is to be found in See also:Britton .

Where a man is killed by a See also:

vessel at rest the See also:cargo is not deodand; where the vessel is under See also:sail, See also:hull and cargo are both deodand . For the distinction between the death of a See also:child and the death of an adult Blackstone accounts by suggesting that the child " was presumed incapable of actual See also:sin, and therefore needed no deodand to See also:purchase propitiatory masses; but every adult who died in actual sin stood in need of such See also:atonement, according to the humane superstition of the founders of the English law." See also:Sir See also:Matthew See also:Hale's explanation was that the child could not take care of himself, whereon Blackstone asks why the owner should See also:save his forfeiture on account of the imbecility of the child, which ought to have been an additional See also:reason for caution . The finding of a See also:jury was necessary to constitute a deodand, and the investigation of the value of the instrument by which death was caused occupied an important See also:place among the provisions of See also:early English criminal law . It became a necessary part of an See also:indictment to See also:state the nature and value of the weapon employed —as, that the stroke was given by a certain penknife, of the value of sixpence—so that the king might have his deodand . Accidents on the high seas did not cause forfeiture, being beyond the domain of the See also:common law; but it would appear that in the See also:case of See also:ships in fresh See also:water the law held See also:good . The king might See also:grant his right to deodands to another . In later times these forfeitures became extremely unpopular; and juries, with the connivance of See also:judges, found deodands of trifling value, so as to defeat the inequitable claim . At last, by an See also:act of 1846 they were abolished, the date noticeably coinciding with the introduction of See also:railways and See also:modern See also:steam-engines .

End of Article: DEODAND (Lat. Deo dandum, that which is to be given to God)
[back]
DENVER
[next]
DEOGARH

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.