Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

DEVIL (Gr. &a,3oXos, " slanderer," fr...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V08, Page 123 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

DEVIL (Gr. &a,3oXos, " slanderer," from &ctflisXX See also:sty, to See also:slander)  , the generic name for a spirit of evil, especially the supreme spirit of evil, the foe of See also:God and See also:man . The word is used for See also:minor evil See also:spirits in much the same sense as " demon." From the various characteristics associated with this See also:idea, the See also:term has come to be applied by See also:analogy in many different senses . From See also:DEVIL I2 I the idea of evil as degraded, contemptible and doomed to failure, the term is applied to persons in evil See also:plight, or of slight See also:consideration . In See also:English legal phraseology " devil " and " devilling " are used of barristers who See also:act as substitutes for others . Any remuneration which the legal " devil " may receive is purely a See also:matter of private arrangement between them . In the See also:chancery See also:division such remuneration is generally in the proportion of one See also:half of the See also:fee which the client pays; " in the See also:king's See also:bench division remuneration for ` devilling' of briefs or assisting in drafting and opinions is not See also:common " (see See also:Annual Practice, 1907, p . 717) . In a similar sense an author may have his materials collected and arranged by a See also:literary hack or " devil." The term " printer's devil " for the errand boy in a See also:printing See also:office probably combines this idea with that of his being See also:black with See also:ink . The common notions of the devil as black, See also:ill-favoured, malicious, destructive and the like, have occasioned the application of the term to certain animals (the Tasmanian devil, the devil-See also:fish, the See also:coot), to See also:mechanical contrivances (for tearing up See also:cloth or separating See also:wool), to pungent, highly seasoned dishes, broiled or fried . In this See also:article we are concerned with the See also:primary sense of the word, as used in See also:mythology and See also:religion . The See also:primitive See also:philosophy of See also:animism involves the ascription of all phenomena to See also:personal agencies . As phenomena are See also:good or evil, produce See also:pleasure or See also:pain, cause weal or woe, a distinction in the See also:character of these agencies is gradually recognized; the agents of good become gods, those of evil, demons .

A tendency towards the simplification and organization of the evil as of the good forces, leads towards belief in outstanding leaders among the forces of evil . When the divine is most completely conceived as unity, the demonic is also so conceived; and over against God stands Satan, or the devil . Although it is in connexion with See also:

Hebrew and See also:Christian mono-See also:theism that this belief in the devil has been most fully See also:developed, yet there are approaches to the See also:doctrine in other religions . In Babylonian mythology " the old See also:serpent goddess ` the See also:lady Nina' was transformed into the embodiment of all that was hostile to the See also:powers of See also:heaven " (See also:Sayce's Hibbert Lectures, p . 283), and was confounded with the See also:dragon Tiamat, " a terrible See also:monster, reappearing in the Old Testament writings as Rahab and See also:Leviathan, the principle of See also:chaos, the enemy of God and man " (See also:Tennant's The Fall and See also:Original See also:Sin, p . 43), and according to Gunkel (Schopfung and Chaos, p . 383) " the original of the ` old serpent' of Rev. xii . 9." In See also:Egyptian mythology the serpent Apap with an See also:army of monsters strives daily to See also:arrest the course of the See also:boat of the luminous gods . While the See also:Greek mythology described the See also:Titans as " enchained once for all in their dark dungeons " yet See also:Prometheus' See also:threat remained to disturb the tranquillity of the Olympian See also:Zeus . In the See also:German mythology the army of darkness is led by See also:Hel, the personification of See also:twilight, sunk to the goddess who enchains the dead and terrifies the living, and Loki, originally the god of See also:fire, but afterwards "looked upon as the See also:father of the evil powers, who strips the goddess of See also:earth of her adornments, who robs See also:Thor of his fertilizing See also:hammer, and causes the See also:death of See also:Balder the beneficent See also:sun." In See also:Hindu mythology the Maruts, See also:Indra, See also:Agni and See also:Vishnu wage See also:war with the serpent Ahi to deliver the See also:celestial cows or spouses, the See also:waters held See also:captive in the caverns of the clouds . In the Trimurti, Brahma (the impersonal) is manifested as Brahma (the personal creator), Vishnu (the preserver), and See also:Siva (the destroyer) . In Siva is perpetuated the belief in the god of Vedic times See also:Rudra, who is represented as " the See also:wild See also:hunter who storms over the earth with his bands, and See also:lays See also:low with arrows the men who displease him " (Chantepie de la Saussaye's Religionsgeschichte, and ed., vol. ii. p .

25) . The evil character of Siva is reflected in his wife, who as See also:

Kali (the black) is the wild and cruel goddess of destruction and death . The opposition of good and evil is most fully carried out in Zoroastrianism . Opposed to Ormuzd, the author of all good, is See also:Ahriman, the source of all evil; and the opposition runs through the whole universe (D'Alviella's Hibbert Lectures, pp . 158-164) . The conception of Satan (Heb. itV, the adversary, Gr . Earavas, or Xarav, 2 See also:Cor. xii . 7) belongs to the See also:post-exilic See also:period of Hebrew development, and probably shows traces of the See also:influence of See also:Persian on Jewish thought, ,but it has also its roots in much older beliefs . An " evil spirit " possesses See also:Saul (r Sam. xvi . 14), but it is " from the See also:Lord." The same agency produces discord between See also:Abimelech and the Shechemites (See also:judges ix . 23) . "A lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets" as Yahweh's messenger entices See also:Ahab to his See also:doom (1 See also:Kings xxii .

22) . Growing human corruption is traced to the fleshy See also:

union of angels and See also:women (Gen. vi . 1-4) . But generally evil, whether as misfortune or as sin, is assigned to divine causality (I Sam. xviii. re); 2 Sam. See also:xxiv . 1; r Kings xxii . 20; Isa. vi . Io, lxiii . 17) . After the See also:Exile there is a tendency to protect the divine transcendence by the introduction of mediating angelic agency, and to See also:separate all evil from God by ascribing its origin to Satan, the enemy of God and man . In the prophecy of See also:Zechariah (iii . 1-2) he stands as the adversary of See also:Joshua, the high See also:priest, and is rebuked by Yahweh for desiring that See also:Jerusalem should be further punished . In the See also:book of See also:Job he presents himself before the Lord among the sons of God (ii .

1), yet he is represented both as accuser and tempter . He disbelieves in Job's integrity, and desires him to be so tried that he may fall into sin . While, according to 2 Sam. xxiv . 1, God himself tests See also:

David in regard to the numbering of the See also:people, according to r Chron. xxi, r it is Satan who tempts him . The development of the conception continued in later Judaism, which was probably more strongly influenced by Persian See also:dualism . It is doubtful, however, whether the See also:Asmodeus (q.v.) of the book of See also:Tobit is the same as the Aeshma Daewa of the Bundahesh . He is the evil spirit who slew the seven husbands of Sara (iii . 8), and the name probably means " Destroyer." In the book of See also:Enoch Satan is represented as the ruler of a See also:rival See also:kingdom of evil, but here are also mentioned Satans, who are distinguished from the fallen angels and who have a threefold See also:function, to tempt, to accuse and to punish . Satan possesses the ungodly (See also:Ecclesiasticus xxi . 27), is identified with the serpent of Gen. iii . (See also:Wisdom ii . 24), and is probably also represented by Asmodeus, to whom lustful qualities are assigned (Tobit vi .

14); Gen. iii. is probably referred to in See also:

Psalms of See also:Solomon xvii . 49, " a serpent speaking with the words of transgressors, words of deceit to pervert wisdom." The Book of the Secrets of Enoch not only identifies Satan with the Serpent, but also describes his revolt against God, and See also:expulsion from heaven . In the Jewish Targums Sammael, " the highest See also:angel that stands before God's See also:throne, caused the serpent to seduce the woman "; he coalesces with Satan, and has inferior Satans as his servants . The See also:birth of See also:Cain is ascribed to a union of Satan with See also:Eve . As accuser affecting man's See also:standing before God he is greatly feared . This doctrine, stripped of much of its grossness, is reproduced in the New Testament . Satan is the ScW3oAos (Matt. xiii . 39; See also:John xiii . 2; Eph. iv . 27; Heb. ii . 14; Rev. ii. lo), slanderer or accuser, the sreap4wv (Matt. iv . 3; I Thess. iii .

5), the tempter, the 7rovripos (Matt. v . 37; John xvii . 15; Eph. vi . 16), the evil one, and the ix0pos (Matt. xiii . 39), the enemy . He is apparently identified with See also:

Beelzebub (or Beelzebul) in Matt. xii . 26, 27 . Jesus appears to recognize the existence of demons belonging to a kingdom of evil under the leadership of Satan " the See also:prince of demons " (Matt. xii . 24, 26, 27), whose See also:works in demonic possessions it is his function to destroy (See also:Mark i . 34, iii . II, vi . 7; See also:Luke x .

17-20) . But he himself conquers Satan in resisting_his temptations (Matt. iv . I-11) . See also:

Simon is warned against him, and Judas yields to him as tempter (Luke xxii . 31; John xiii . 27) . Jesus's See also:cures are represented as a See also:triumph over Satan (Luke x . 18) . This Jewish doctrine is found in See also:Paul's letters also . Satan rules over a See also:world of evil, supernatural agencies, whose dwelling is in the See also:lower heavens (Eph. vi . 12) : hence he is the " prince of the See also:power of the See also:air " (ii . 2) .

He is the tempter (r Thess. iii . 5; r Cor. vii . 5), the destroyer (x . Io), to whom the offender is to be handed over for bodily destruction (v . 5), identified with the serpent (Rom. xvi . 20; 2 Ccr . Xi . 3), and probably with Beliar or Belial (vi . 15); and the surrender of man to him brought death into the world (Rom. v . 17) . Paul's own " stake in the flesh " is Satan's messenger (2 Cor. xii . 7) .

Phoenix-squares

According to See also:

Hebrews Satan's power over death Jesus destroys by dying (ii . 14) . Revela-tion describes the war in heaven between God with his angels and Satan or the dragon, the " old serpent," the deceiver of the whole world (xii . 9), with his hosts of darkness . After the over-throw of the Beast and the kings of the earth, Satan is imprisoned in the bottomless See also:pit a thousand years (xx . 2) . Again loosed to deceive the nations, he is finally See also:cast into the See also:lake of fire and See also:brimstone (xx. ro; cf . Enoch liv . 5, 6; 2 See also:Peter ii . 4) . In John's See also:Gospel and Epistles Satan is opposed to See also:Christ . Sinner and murderer from the beginning (1 John iii .

8) and liar by nature (John viii . 44), he enslaves men to sin (viii . 34), causes death (See also:

verse 44), rules the See also:present world (xiv . 30), but has no power over Christ or those who are his (xiv . 30, xvi . II; I John v . 18) . He will be destroyed by Christ with all his works (John xvi . 33; I John iii . 8) . In the common faith of the See also:Gentile churches after the Apostolic See also:Age " the present dominion of evil demons, or of one evil demon, was just as generally presupposed as man's need of redemption, which was regarded as a result of that dominion . The tenacity of this belief may be explained among other things by the living impression of the polytheism that surrounded the communities on every See also:side .

By means of this See also:

assumption too, humanity seemed to be unburdened, and the presupposed capacity for redemption could, therefore, be justified in its widest range " (See also:Harnack's See also:History of See also:Dogma, i. p . 181) . While Christ's First See also:Advent delivered believers from Satan's bondage, his overthrow would be completed only by the Second Advent . The Gnostics held that " the present world sprang from a fall of man, or from an undertaking hostile to God, and is, therefore, the product of an evil or intermediate being " (p . 257) . Some taught that while the future had been assigned by God to Christ, the devil had received the present age (p . 309) . The fathers traced all doctrines not held by the See also:Catholic See also:Church to the devil, and the virtues of heretics were regarded as an instance of the devil transforming himself into an angel of See also:light (ii . 91) . See also:Irenaeus ascribes Satan's fall to " See also:pride and arrogance and envy of God's creation "; and traces man's deliverance from Satan to Christ's victory in resisting his temptations; but also, guided by certain Pauline passages, represents the death of Christ " as a See also:ransom paid to the `See also:apostasy' for men who had fallen into captivity " (ii . 290) . He does not admit that Satan has any lawful claim on man, or that God practised a deceit on him, as later fathers taught .

This theory of the See also:

atonement was formulated by See also:Origen . " By his successful temptation the devil acquired a right over men . God offered Christ's soul for that of men . But the devil was duped, as Christ overcame both him and death " (p . 367) . It'was held by See also:Gregory of Nyssa, See also:Ambrose, who uses the phrase pia fraus, See also:Augustine, See also:Leo I., and Gregory I., who expresses it in its worst See also:form . " The humanity of Christ was the bait; the fish, the devil, snapped at it, and was See also:left See also:hanging on the invisible See also:hook, Christ's divinity " (iii . 307) . In See also:Athanasius the relation of the See also:work of Christ to Satan retires into the background, Gregory of Nazianzus and John of See also:Damascus See also:felt scruples about this view . It is expressly repudiated by See also:Anselm and See also:Abelard . Peter the Lombard asserted it, disregarding these objections . See also:Bernard represents man's bondage to Satan " as righteously permitted as a just retribution for sin," he being " the executioner of the divine See also:justice." :Another theory of Origen's found less See also:acceptance .

The devil, as a being resulting from God's will, cannot always remain a devil . The possibility of his redemption, however, was in the 5th See also:

century branded as a See also:heresy . Persian dualism was brought into contact with Christian thought in the doctrine of Mani; and it is permissible to believe that the gloomy views of Augustine regarding man's See also:condition are due in some measure to this influence . Mani taught that Satan with his demons, sprung from the kingdom of darkness, attacked the See also:realm of light, the earth, defeated man sent against him by the God of light, but was overthrown by the God of light, who then delivered the primeval man (iii . 324) . " During the See also:middle ages," says See also:Tulloch, " the belief in the devil was absorbing—See also:saints conceived themselves and others to be in See also:constant conflict with him." This superstition, perhaps at its strongest in the 13th to the 15th century, passed into Protestantism . See also:Luther was always conscious of the presence and opposition of Satan . " As I found he was about to begin again," says Luther,: I gathered together my books, and got into See also:bed . Another See also:time in the See also:night I heard him above my See also:cell walking on the See also:cloister, but as I knew it was the devil I paid no See also:attention to him and went to See also:sleep." He held that this world will pass away with its pleasures, as there can be no real improvement in it, for the devil continues in it to ply his daring and seductive devices (vii . 191) . I . A .

See also:

Dorner (Christian Doctrine, iii. p . 93) sums up See also:Protestant doctrine as follows:—" He is brought into relation with natural sinfulness, and the impulse to evil thoughts and deeds is ascribed to him . The dominion of evil over men is also represented as a See also:slavery to Satan, and this as See also:punishment . He has his full power in the extra-Christian world . But his power is broken by Christ, and by his word victory over him is to be won . The power of creating anything is also denied the devil, and only the power of corrupting substances is conceded to him . But it is only at the Last See also:Judgment that his power is wholly annihilated; he is himself delivered up to eternal punishment." This belief in the devil was specially strong in See also:Scotland among both See also:clergy and laity in the See also:lath century . " The devil was always and literally at See also:hand," says See also:Buckle, " he was haunting them, speaking to them, and tempting them . Go where they would he was there." In more See also:recent times a See also:great variety of opinions has been expressed on this subject . J . S . See also:Semler denied the reality of demonic See also:possession, and held that Christ in his See also:language accommodated himself to the views of the sick whom he was seeking to cure .

See also:

Kant regarded the devil as a personification of the See also:radical evil in man . See also:Daub in his Judas Ishcarioth argued that a finite evil presupposes an See also:absolute evil, and the absolute evil as real must be in a See also:person . See also:Schelling regarded the devil as, not a person, but a real principle, a spirit let loose by the freedom of man . See also:Schleiermacher was an uncompromising opponent of the common belief . " The problem remains to seek evil rather in self than in Satan, Satan only showing the limits of our self-knowledge." Dorner has formulated a theory which explains the development of the conception of Satan in the See also:Holy Scriptures as in See also:correspondence with an See also:evolution in the character of Satan . " Satan appears in Scripture under four leading characters:—first as the tempter of freedom, who desires to bring to decision, secondly as the accuser, who by virtue of the See also:law retorts criminality on man; thirdly as the See also:instrument of the Divine, which brings evil and death upon men; fourthly and lastly he is described, especially in the New Testament, as the enemy of God and man." He supposes " a See also:change in Satan in the course of the history of the divine See also:revelation, in conflict with which he came step by step to be a sworn enemy of God and man, especially in the New Testament times, in which, on the other hand, his power is broken at the See also:root by Christ." He argues that the world-See also:order, being in See also:process as a moral order, permits breaches everywhere into which Satan can obtain entrance " (pp . 99, 102) . H . L . See also:Martensen gives even freer See also:rein to See also:speculation . " The evil principle," he says, " has in itself no See also:personality, but attains a progressively universal personality in its kingdom; it has no individual personality, See also:save only in individual creatures, who in an especial manner make themselves its See also:organs; but among these is one creature in whom the principle is so hypostasized that he has become the centre and See also:head of the kingdom of evil " (Dogmatics, p . 199) .

A . See also:

Ritschl gives no See also:place in his constructive doctrine to the belief in the devil; but recognizes that the mutual See also:action of individual sinners on one another constitutes a kingdom of sin, opposed to the Kingdom of God (A . E . Garvie, The Ritschlian See also:Theology, p . 3o4) . Kaftan affirms that a"doctrine about Satan can as little be established as about angels, as faith can say nothing about it, and nothing is gained by it for the dogmatic explanation of evil . This whole See also:province must be left to the immediate world-view of the pious . The idea of Satan will on See also:account of the Scriptures not disappear from it, and it would be arrogant to wish to set it aside . Only let everyone keep the thought that Satan also stands under the See also:commission of the Almighty God, and that no one must suppose that by leading back his sins to a Satanic temptation he can get rid of his ownguilt . To transgress these limits is to assail faith" (Dogmatik, p . 348) . In the book entitled Evil and Evolution there is " an See also:attempt to turn the light of See also:modern See also:science on to the See also:ancient See also:mystery of evil." The author contends that the existence of evil is best explained by assuming that God is confronted with Satan, who in the process of evolution interferes with the divine designs, an interference which the instability of such an evolving process makes not incredible .

Satan is, however, held to be a creature who has by abuse of his freedom been estranged from, and opposed to his Creator, and who at last will be conquered by moral means . W . M . See also:

Alexander in his book on demonic possession maintains that " the See also:confession of Jesus as the See also:Messiah or Son of God is the classical criterion of genuine demonic possession " (p . 150), and argues that as " the Incarnation indicated the See also:establishment of the kingdom of heaven upon earth," there took place " a:See also:counter See also:movement among the powers of darkness," of which "genuine demonic possession was one of the manifestations " (p . 249) . Interesting as these speculations are, it may be confidently affirmed that belief in Satan is not now generally regarded as an essential article of the Christian faith, nor is it found to be an indispensable See also:element of Christian experience . On the one hand science has so explained many of the processes of See also:outer nature and of the inner See also:life of man as to leave no See also:room for Satanic agency . On the other hand the modern view of the See also:inspiration of the Scriptures does not necessitate the acceptance of the doctrine of the Scriptures on this subject as finally and absolutely authoritative . The teaching of Jesus even in this matter may be ac-counted for as either an See also:accommodation to the views of those with whom he was dealing, or more probably as a See also:proof of the See also:limitation of knowledge which was a necessary condition of the Incarnation, for it cannot be contended that as revealer of God and redeemer of men it was imperative that he should either correct or confirm men's beliefs in this respect . The possibility of the existence of evil spirits, organized under one See also:leader Satan to tempt man and oppose God, cannot be denied; the sufficiency of the See also:evidence for such evil agency may, however, be doubted; the See also:necessity of any such belief for Christian thought and life cannot, therefore, be affirmed . (See also See also:DEMONOLOGY; POSSESSION.) (A .

E .

End of Article: DEVIL (Gr. &a,3oXos, " slanderer," from &ctflisXX sty, to slander)
[back]
DEVICE
[next]
DEVIZES

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.