Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
THE AFFAIR OF THE See also:DIAMOND NECKLACE
, a mysterious incident at the See also:court of See also:
She persuaded him that she had been received by the queen and enjoyed her favour; and Rohan resolved to use her to regain the queen's See also:good will
.
The comtesse de Lamotte assured the cardinal that she was making efforts on his behalf, and soon announced to him that he might send his See also:justification to Marie Antoinette
.
This was the beginning of a pretended See also:correspondence between Rohan and the queen, the adventuress duly returning replies to Rohan's notes, which she affirmed to come from the queen
.
The See also:tone of the letters became very warm, and the cardinal, convinced that Marie Antoinette was in love with him, became ardently enamoured of her
.
He begged the countess to obtain a See also:secret interview for him with the queen, and a See also:meeting took place in See also:August 1784 in a See also: On the 21st of See also:January 1785 she announced that the queen would buy the necklace, but that not wishing to treat directly, she See also:left the affair to a high personage . A little while later Rohan came to negotiate the See also:purchase of the famous necklace for the 1,600,000 livres, payable in instalments . He said that he was authorized by the queen, and showed the jewellers the conditions of the bargain approved in the See also:handwriting of Marie Antoinette . The necklace was given up . Rohan Wok it to the countess's See also:house, where a man, in whom Rohan believed he recognized a See also:valet of the queen, came to fetch it . Madame de Lamotte had told the cardinal that Marie Antoinette would make him a sign to indicate her thanks, and Rohan believed that she did make him a sign . Whether it was so, or merely See also:chance or illusion, no one knows . But it is certain that the cardinal, convinced that he was acting for the queen, had engaged the jewellers to thank her; that Boehmer and Bassenge, before the See also:sale, in order to be doubly sure, had sent word to the queen of the negotiations in her name; that Marie Antoinette had allowed the bargain to be concluded, and that after she had received a letter of thanks from Boehmer, she had burned it . Meanwhile the " comte de Lamotte " appears to have started at once for See also:London, it is said with the necklace, which he See also:broke up in order to sell the stones . When the time came to pay, the comtesse de Lamotte presented the cardinal's notes; but these were insufficient, and Boehmer complained to-the queen, who told him that she had received no necklace and had never ordered it . She had the See also:story of the negotiations repeated for her . Then followed a coup de See also:theatre . On the 15th of August 1785, See also:Assumption See also:day, when the whole court was awaiting the king and queen in order to go to the See also:chapel, the cardinal de Rohan, who was preparing to officiate, was arrested and taken to the See also:Bastille . He was able, however, to destroy the correspondence exchanged, as he thought, with the queen, and it is not known whether there was any connivance of the officials, who did not prevent this, or not . The comtesse de Lamotte was not arrested until the 18th of August, after having destroyed her papers . The See also:police set to See also:work to find all her accomplices, and arrested the girl Oliva and a certain Reteaux de See also:Villette, a friend of the countess, who confessed that he had written the letters given to Rohan in the queen's name, and had imitated her See also:signature on the conditions of the bargain . The famous See also:charlatan See also:Cagliostro was also arrested, but it was recognized that he had taken no See also:part in the affair . The cardinal de Rohan accepted the See also:parlement of See also:Paris as See also:judges . A sensational trial resulted (May 31, 1786) in the acquittal of the cardinal, of the girl Oliva and of Cagliostro . The comtesse de Lamotte was condemned to be whipped, branded and shut up in the Salpetriere . Her See also:husband was condemned, in his See also:absence, to the galleys for See also:life . Villette was banished . Public See also:opinion was much excited by this trial . It is generally believed that Marie Antoinette was stainless in the See also:matter, that Rohan was an See also:innocent dupe, and that the Lamottes deceived both for their own ends . People, however, persisted in the belief that the queen had used the countess as an See also:instrument to satisfy her hatred of, the cardinal de Rohan . Various circumstances fortified this belief, which contributed to render Marie Antoinette very unpopular—her disappointment at Rohan's acquittal, the fact that he was deprived of his charges and exiled to the See also:abbey of la See also:Chaise-Dieu, and finally the See also:escape of the comtesse de Lamotte from the Salpetriere, with the connivance, as people believed, of the court . The adventuress, having taken See also:refuge abroad, published Memaires in which she accused the queen . Her husband also wrote Memoires, and lived until 1831, after having, it is said, received subsidies from Louis XVIII . See M . See also:Tourneux, Marie Antoinette devant l'histoire: Essai bibliographique (2nd ed., Paris, 1901) ; Emile Campardon, MarieAntoinette et le proces du See also:collier (Paris, 1863) ; P . See also:Audebert, L'Affaire du collier de la reine, d'apres la correspondance inedite du See also:chevalier de Pujol (See also:Rouen, 1901); F. d'Albini, Marie Antoinette and the See also:Diamond See also:Neck-See also:lace from another Point of View (London, 1900) ; Funck-See also:Brentano, L'Affaire du collier (1903); A . See also:Lang, See also:Historical Mysteries (1904) . See also:Carlyle's See also:essay on The Diamond Necklace (first published in 1837 in See also:Fraser's See also:Magazine) is of historical See also:literary See also:interest . |
|
|
[back] DIAMOND CUTTING |
[next] DIANA |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.