See also:DODO (from the PortugueseDhudo, a simpleton)
, a-large See also:bird formerly inhabiting the See also:island of See also:Mauritius, but now See also:extinct—the Didus ineptus of See also:Linnaeus
.
When, in 1507, the Portuguese discovered the island which we now know as Mauritius they named it Ilha do See also:Cane', from a notion that it must be the island of that name mentioned by See also:Pliny; but most authors have insisted that it was known to the See also:seamen of that nation as Ilha do Cisneperhaps but a corruption of Cerne, and brought about by their finding it stocked with large fowls, which, though not aquatic, they likened to swans, the most See also:familiar to them of bulky birds
.
In 1598 the Dutch, under See also:Van See also:Neck, took See also:possession of the island and renamed it Mauritius
.
A narrative of this voyage was published, in 16or, if not earlier, and has been often reprinted
.
Here we have birds spoken of as big as swans or bigger, with large heads, no wings, and a tail consisting of a few See also:curly feathers
.
The Dutch called them Walgvogels(the word is variously spelled), i.e. nauseous birds, either because no cooking made them palatable, or because this island-See also:paradise afforded an abundance of fare so much See also:superior
.
De See also:Bry gives two admirably See also:quaint prints of the doings of the Hollanders, and in one of them the Walgvogel appears, being the earliest published See also:representation of its unwieldy See also:form, with a footnote stating that the voyagers brought an example alive to See also:- HOLLAND
- HOLLAND, CHARLES (1733–1769)
- HOLLAND, COUNTY AND PROVINCE OF
- HOLLAND, HENRY FOX, 1ST BARON (1705–1774)
- HOLLAND, HENRY RICH, 1ST EARL OF (1S9o-,649)
- HOLLAND, HENRY RICHARD VASSALL FOX, 3RD
- HOLLAND, JOSIAH GILBERT (1819-1881)
- HOLLAND, PHILEMON (1552-1637)
- HOLLAND, RICHARD, or RICHARD DE HOLANDE (fl. 1450)
- HOLLAND, SIR HENRY, BART
Holland
.
Among the See also:company there was a draughtsman, and from a See also:sketch of his, Clusius, a few years after, gave a figure of the bird, which he vaguely called " Gallinaceus See also:Gallus peregrinus," but described rather fully
.
- Meanwhile two other Dutch fleets had visited Mauritius
.
One of them had rather an accomplished artist on See also:board, and his drawings fortunately still exist (see See also:article BIRD)
.
Of the- other a See also:journal kept by one of the skippers was subsequently published
.
This in the See also:main corroborates what has been before said of the birds, but adds the curious fact that they were now called by some Dodaarsen and by
others Dronten.l
Henceforth Dutch narrators, though several times mentioning
the bird, fail to See also:supply any important fact in its See also:history
.
Their navigators, however, were not idle, and found See also:work for their naturalists and painters
.
Clusius says that in 16o5 he saw at Pauw's See also:House in See also:Leyden a See also:dodo's See also:foot,2 which he minutely describes
.
In a copy of Clusius's work in the high school of See also:Utrecht is pasted an See also:original See also:drawing by Van de Venne super-scribed " See also:Vera See also:effigies huius avis Walghvogel (quae & a nautis Dodaers propter foedam posterioris partis crassitiem nuncupatur), qualis viva Amsterodamum perlata est ex insulalVIauritii
.
See also:Anno M.DC.See also:XXVL" Now a See also:good many paintings of the dodo See also:drawn from See also:life by Roelandt Savery (1576-1639) exist; and the paintings by him at See also:Berlin and See also:Vienna—dated 1626 and 1628—as
1 The See also:etymology of these names has been much discussed
.
That of the latter, which has generally been adopted by See also:German and See also:French authorities, seems to defy investigation, but the former has been shown by Prof
.
See also:Schlegel (Versl. en Mededeel
.
X
.
Akad
.
Wetensch. it. pp
.
255 et seq.) to be the homely name of the dal:chick or little See also:grebe (Podiceps See also:minor), of which the Dutchmen were reminded by the See also:round stern and tail diminished to a tuft that characterized the dodo
.
The same learned authority suggests that dodo is a corruption of Dodaars, but, as will presently be seen, we herein think him mistaken
.
2 What has become of the specimen (which may have been a relic of the bird brought See also:home by Van Neck's See also:squadron) is not known
.
Brodetipand
.
Dr See also:- GRAY
- GRAY (or GREY), WALTER DE (d. 1255)
- GRAY, ASA (1810-1888)
- GRAY, DAVID (1838-1861)
- GRAY, ELISHA (1835-1901)
- GRAY, HENRY PETERS (1819-18/7)
- GRAY, HORACE (1828–1902)
- GRAY, JOHN DE (d. 1214)
- GRAY, JOHN EDWARD (1800–1875)
- GRAY, PATRICK GRAY, 6TH BARON (d. 1612)
- GRAY, ROBERT (1809-1872)
- GRAY, SIR THOMAS (d. c. 1369)
- GRAY, THOMAS (1716-1771)
Gray have suggested its identity. with that now in the See also:British Museum, but on what grounds is not apparent.well as the picture by Goiemare, belonging to the See also:duke- of See also:Northumberland, dated 1627, may be with greater plausibility than ever considered portraits of a See also:captive bird
.
It is even probable that this was not the first example painted in See also:Europe, In the private library of the See also:emperor See also:Francis I. of See also:Austria was a See also:series of pictures of various animals, supposed to be by theDutch artist See also:Hoefnagel, who was See also:born about 1545
.
One of these represents a dodo, and, if there be no See also:mistake in Von See also:Frauenfeld's ascription, it must almost certainly have been painted before 1626, while there is See also:reason to think that the original may have been kept in the vivarium of the emperor See also:Rudolf II., and that the portion of a dodo's See also:head, which was found in the museum at See also:Prague about 1850, belonged to this example
.
The other pictures by Roelandt Savery, like those in the possession of the Zoological Society of See also:London and others, are undated, but were probably all painted about the same See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time—1626-1628
.
The large picture in the British Museum, once belonging to See also:Sir Hans See also:Sloane, by an unknown artist, but supposed to be by Roelandt Savery, is also undated; while the still larger one at See also:- OXFORD
- OXFORD, EARLS OF
- OXFORD, EDWARD DE VERE, 17TH EARL
- OXFORD, JOHN DE VERE, 13TH EARL OF (1443-1513)
- OXFORD, PROVISIONS OF
- OXFORD, ROBERT DE VERE, 9TH EARL OF (1362-1392)
- OXFORD, ROBERT HARLEY, 1ST
Oxford (considered to be by the younger Savery) bears a much later date, 165 i
.
Undated also is a picture in Holland said to be by Pieter Holsteyn
.
In 1628 we have the See also:evidence of the first See also:English observer of the bird—one Emanuel Altham, who mentions it in two letters written on the same See also:day from Mauritius to his See also:brother at home (Prot
.
Zool
.
See also:Soc
.
1874, pp
.
447-449)
.
In one he says: " You shall receue
.
. . a See also:strange fowle: which I had at the See also:Band Mauritius called by ye portingalls a Do Do: which for the rareness thereof I See also:hope wilbe welcome to you." The passage in the other See also:letter is to the same effect, with the addition of the words " if it liue." In the same See also:fleet with Altham sailed Sir See also:- THOMAS
- THOMAS (c. 1654-1720)
- THOMAS (d. 110o)
- THOMAS, ARTHUR GORING (1850-1892)
- THOMAS, CHARLES LOUIS AMBROISE (1811-1896)
- THOMAS, GEORGE (c. 1756-1802)
- THOMAS, GEORGE HENRY (1816-187o)
- THOMAS, ISAIAH (1749-1831)
- THOMAS, PIERRE (1634-1698)
- THOMAS, SIDNEY GILCHRIST (1850-1885)
- THOMAS, ST
- THOMAS, THEODORE (1835-1905)
- THOMAS, WILLIAM (d. 1554)
Thomas See also:Herbert, whose Travels ran through several See also:editions
.
It is See also:plain that he could not have reached Mauritius till 1629, though 1627 has been usually assigned as the date of his visit
.
The fullest See also:account he gives of the bird is in his edition of 1638: " The Dodo comes first to a description: here, and in Dygarrois 3 (and no where else, that ever I could see or heare of) is generated the Dodo (a Portuguize name it is, and has reference to her simpleness,) a Bird which for shape and rareness might be See also:call'd a See also:Phoenix (wer't in See also:Arabia:) " &c
.
Herbert was weak as an etymologist, but his See also:positive statement, corroborated as it is by Altham, cannot be set aside, and hence we do not hesitate to assign a Portuguese derivation for the word.4 Herbert also gave a figure of the bird
.
Proceeding chronologically we next come upon a curious See also:bit of evidence
.
This is contained in a MS. See also:diary kept between 1626 and 164o, by Thomas Crossfield of See also:Queen's See also:College, Oxford,where, under the See also:year 1634, mention is casually made of one Mr Gosling " who bestowed the Dodar (a blacke See also:Indian bird) vpon . ye See also:Anatomy school." Nothing more is known of it
.
About 1638, Sir See also:Hamon Lestrange tells us, as he walked London streets he saw the picture of a strange See also:fowl, hung out on a See also:cloth See also:canvas, and going in to see it found a See also:great bird kept in a chamber "somewhat bigger than the largest Turky See also:cock, and so legged and footed, but shorter and thicker." The keeper called it a dodo and showed the visitors how his captive would See also:swallow " large peble stones
as bigge as nutmegs."
In 1651 Morisot published an account of a voyage made by See also:Francois Cauche, who professed to have passed fifteen days in Mauritius, or " l'isle de Saincte Apollonie," as he called it, in 1638
.
According to De See also:Flacourt the narrative is not very trustworthy, and . indeed certain statements are obviously inaccurate
.
Cauche says he saw there birds bigger than swans, which he describes so as to leave no doubt of his meaning dodos; but perhaps the most important facts (if they be facts) that he
2 i.e
.
See also:Rodriguez; an See also:error
.
4 Hence we venture to dispute Prof
.
Schlegel's supposed origin of " Dodo." The Portuguese must have been the See also:prior nomenclators, and if, as is most likely, some of their nation, or men acquainted with their See also:language, were employed to See also:pilot the Hollanders, we see at once how the first Dutch name Walghvogel would give way
.
The meaning of Doudo not being plain to the Dutch, they would, as is the See also:habit of sailors, convert it into something they did understand
.
Then Dodgers would easily suggest itself
.
relates are that they had a cry like a gosling (" it a un cry comme See also:Poison "), and that they laid a single See also:- WHITE
- WHITE, ANDREW DICKSON (1832– )
- WHITE, GILBERT (1720–1793)
- WHITE, HENRY KIRKE (1785-1806)
- WHITE, HUGH LAWSON (1773-1840)
- WHITE, JOSEPH BLANCO (1775-1841)
- WHITE, RICHARD GRANT (1822-1885)
- WHITE, ROBERT (1645-1704)
- WHITE, SIR GEORGE STUART (1835– )
- WHITE, SIR THOMAS (1492-1567)
- WHITE, SIR WILLIAM ARTHUR (1824--1891)
- WHITE, SIR WILLIAM HENRY (1845– )
- WHITE, THOMAS (1628-1698)
- WHITE, THOMAS (c. 1550-1624)
white See also:egg (" See also:gros comme un See also:pain d'un sol ") on a See also:mass of grass in the forests
.
He calls them " oiseaux de Nazaret," perhaps, as a marginal See also:note informs us, from an island of that name which was then supposed to See also:lie more to the northward, but is now known to have no existence
.
In the See also:catalogue of Tradescant's Collection of Rarities, preserved at See also:South See also:Lambeth, published in 1656, we have entered among the
See also:Cambridge, and See also:cast of a Head in Oxford
.
" Whole Birds," a " Dodar from the island Mauritius; it is not able to flie being so big." This specimen may well have been the skin of the bird seen by Lestrange some eighteen years before, but anyhow we are able to trace the specimen through See also:Willughby, See also:Edward See also:Llwyd and Thomas See also:Hyde, till it passed in or before 1684 to the Ashmolean collection at Oxford
.
In 1755 it was ordered to be destroyed, but, in accordance with the original orders of Ashmole, its head and right foot were preserved, and still See also:ornament the museum of that university
.
In the second edition of a Catalogue of many Natural Rarities, &c., " to he seen at the See also:place formerly called the See also:Music House, near the See also:West End of St See also:Paul's See also:- CHURCH
- CHURCH (according to most authorities derived from the Gr. Kvpcaxov [&wµa], " the Lord's [house]," and common to many Teutonic, Slavonic and other languages under various forms—Scottish kirk, Ger. Kirche, Swed. kirka, Dan. kirke, Russ. tserkov, Buig. cerk
- CHURCH, FREDERICK EDWIN (1826-1900)
- CHURCH, GEORGE EARL (1835–1910)
- CHURCH, RICHARD WILLIAM (1815–189o)
- CHURCH, SIR RICHARD (1784–1873)
Church," collected by one See also:Hubert See also:alias See also:Forbes, and published in 1665, mention is made of a " See also:Legge of a Dodo, a great heavy bird that cannot See also:fly; it is a Bird of the Mauricius Island." This is supposed to have subsequently passed into the possession of the Royal Society
.
At all events such a specimen is included in See also:Grew's See also:list of their treasures which was published in 1681
.
This was afterwards transferred to the British Museum
.
It is a See also:left foot, without the integuments, but it differs sufficiently in See also:size from the Oxford specimen to forbid its having been See also:part of the same individual
.
In 1666 Olearius brought out the Gottorffische Kunst Kammer, wherein he describes the head of a Walghvogel, which some sixty. years later was removed to the museum at See also:Copenhagen, and is now preserved there, having been the means of first leading zoologists, under the guidance of Prof
.
J
.
Th
.
Reinhardt, to recognize the true See also:affinities of the bird
.
We have passed over all but the See also:principal narratives of voyagers or other notices of the bird
.
A compendious bibliography, up to the year 1848, will be found in See also:Strickland's classical work,' and the list was continued by Von Frauenfeld' for twenty years later:
' The Dodo and its Kindred, by H
.
E
.
Strickland and A
.
G
.
See also:Melville (London, 1848, 4to)
.
2 Neu aufgefundene Abbildung See also:des Dronte, by Georg See also:Ritter von Frauenfeld (Wien, 1868, fol.)
.
The last evidence we have of the dodo's existence is furnished by a journal kept by Benj
.
Harry, and now in the British Museum (See also:MSS
.
Addit, 3668
.
11 D)
.
This shows its survival till 1681, but the writer's See also:sole remark upon it is that its " fflesh is very hard." The successive occupation of the island by different masters seems to have destroyed every tradition See also:relating to the bird, and doubts began to arise whether such a creature had ever existed
.
Dr See also:- HENRY
- HENRY (1129-1195)
- HENRY (c. 1108-1139)
- HENRY (c. 1174–1216)
- HENRY (Fr. Henri; Span. Enrique; Ger. Heinrich; Mid. H. Ger. Heinrich and Heimrich; O.H.G. Haimi- or Heimirih, i.e. " prince, or chief of the house," from O.H.G. heim, the Eng. home, and rih, Goth. reiks; compare Lat. rex " king "—" rich," therefore " mig
- HENRY, EDWARD LAMSON (1841– )
- HENRY, JAMES (1798-1876)
- HENRY, JOSEPH (1797-1878)
- HENRY, MATTHEW (1662-1714)
- HENRY, PATRICK (1736–1799)
- HENRY, PRINCE OF BATTENBERG (1858-1896)
- HENRY, ROBERT (1718-1790)
- HENRY, VICTOR (1850– )
- HENRY, WILLIAM (1795-1836)
Henry See also:Duncan, Scottish See also:minister and journalist, in 1828, showed how See also:ill-founded these doubts were, and some ten years later See also:- WILLIAM
- WILLIAM (1143-1214)
- WILLIAM (1227-1256)
- WILLIAM (1J33-1584)
- WILLIAM (A.S. Wilhelm, O. Norse Vilhidlmr; O. H. Ger. Willahelm, Willahalm, M. H. Ger. Willehelm, Willehalm, Mod.Ger. Wilhelm; Du. Willem; O. Fr. Villalme, Mod. Fr. Guillaume; from " will," Goth. vilja, and " helm," Goth. hilms, Old Norse hidlmr, meaning
- WILLIAM (c. 1130-C. 1190)
- WILLIAM, 13TH
William See also:John See also:Broderip with much See also:diligence collected all the available evidence into an admirable See also:essay, which in its turn was succeeded by 'Strickland's monograph just mentioned
.
But in the meanwhile little was done towards obtaining any material advance in our knowledge, Prof
.
Reinhardt's determination of its See also:affinity to the pigeons (Columbae) excepted; and it was hardly until See also:George See also:Clark's See also:discovery in 1865 of a large number of dodos' remains in the mud of a See also:pool (the See also:Mare aux Songes) that zoologists generally were prepared to accept that affinity without question
.
The !examination of See also:bone after bone by Sir R
.
See also:Owen (Trans
.
Zool
.
Soc
.
Vi. p
.
49) confirmed the See also:judgment of the Danish naturalist
.
In 1889 Th
.
Sauzier, acting for the See also:government of Mauritius, sent a great number of, bones from the same swamp to Sir Edward See also:Newton.' From these the first correctly restored and properly mounted See also:skeleton was prepared and sent to See also:Paris, to be forwarded to the museum of Mauritius
.
Good specimens are in the British Museum, at Paris and at Cambridge, See also:England
.
The huge blackish See also:bill of the dodo terminated in a large, horny See also:hook; the cheeks were partly See also:bare, the stout, See also:short legs yellow
.
The plumage was dark ash-coloured, with whitish See also:breast and tail, yellowish white wings (incapable of See also:flight)
.
The short tail formed a curly tuft
.
The dodo is said to have inhabited forests and to have laid one large white egg on a mass of grass
.
Besides See also:man, hogs and other imported animals seem to have exterminated it
.
But the dodo is not the only member of its See also:family that has vanished
.
The little island which has successively See also:borne the name of Mascaregnas, England's See also:Forest, See also:Bourbon and See also:Reunion, and lies to the southward of Mauritius, had also an allied bird,. now dead and gone
.
Of this not
~»`i'-; _~
a relic has been -
handled by any natur-
alist
.
The latest de- FIG
.
' z.—The See also:Solitaire of Rodriguez (Pezophaps solitarius)
.
From Leguat's scription of it, by Du figure
.
Bois in 1674, is very
meagre, while Bontekoe (1646) gave a figure, apparently intended to represent it
.
It was originally called the " solitaire," but this name was also applied to Pezophaps solitaries of Rodriguez by the Huguenot See also:- EXILE (Lat. exsilium or exilium, from exsul or exul, which is derived from ex, out of, and the root sal, to go, seen in salire, to leap, consul, &c.; the connexion with solum, soil, country is now generally considered wrong)
exile Leguat, who described and figured it about 1691
.
The solitaire, Didus solitaries of See also:Gmelin, referred by Strickland to a See also:district genus Pezophaps, is supposed to have lingered in the
s E
.
Newton and H
.
Gadow, Trans
.
Zool
.
Soc. xiii
.
(1893) pp
.
281-302, pls
.
island of Rodriguez until about 176r
.
Leguatl has given a delightful description of its quaint habits
.
The male stood about 2 ft
.
9 in. high; its See also:colour was brownish See also:grey, that of its See also:mate more inclined to See also:- BROWN
- BROWN, CHARLES BROCKDEN (1771-181o)
- BROWN, FORD MADOX (1821-1893)
- BROWN, FRANCIS (1849- )
- BROWN, GEORGE (1818-188o)
- BROWN, HENRY KIRKE (1814-1886)
- BROWN, JACOB (1775–1828)
- BROWN, JOHN (1715–1766)
- BROWN, JOHN (1722-1787)
- BROWN, JOHN (1735–1788)
- BROWN, JOHN (1784–1858)
- BROWN, JOHN (1800-1859)
- BROWN, JOHN (1810—1882)
- BROWN, JOHN GEORGE (1831— )
- BROWN, ROBERT (1773-1858)
- BROWN, SAMUEL MORISON (1817—1856)
- BROWN, SIR GEORGE (1790-1865)
- BROWN, SIR JOHN (1816-1896)
- BROWN, SIR WILLIAM, BART
- BROWN, THOMAS (1663-1704)
- BROWN, THOMAS (1778-1820)
- BROWN, THOMAS EDWARD (1830-1897)
- BROWN, WILLIAM LAURENCE (1755–1830)
brown, with a whitish breast
.
The wings were rudimentary, the tail very small, almost hidden, and the thigh feathers were thick and curled " like shells." A round mass of bone, " as big as a See also:musket See also:ball," was See also:developed on the wings of the See also:males, and they used it as a weapon of offence while they whirled themselves about twenty or See also:thirty times in four or five minutes, making a See also:noise with their pinions like a rattle
.
The mien was fierce and the walk stately, the birds living singly or in pairs
.
The See also:nest was a heap of See also:palm leaves a foot high, and contained a single large egg which was incubated by both parents
.
The See also:food consisted of seeds and leaves, and the birds aided digestion by swallowing large stones; these were used by the
Museum of See also:Zoology, Cambridge
.
Dutch sailors to sharpen their knives with
.
One of these stones, nearly an See also:inch and a See also:half in length, of extremely hard volcanic See also:rock, is in the Cambridge museum
.
The fighting knobs mentioned above, are very interesting, large exostoses on one of the See also:wrist-bones of either wing; they were undoubtedly covered with a thick, callous skin
.
Thousands of bones of this curious flightless See also:pigeon were collected through Sir E
.
Newton's2 exertions, and by H
.
H
.
Sclater on behalf of the Royal Society of London
.
The results are several almost See also:complete skeletons of both sexes, composed however out of the enormous mass of the dissociated bones
.
End of Article: