Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also: Dryden's contribution is signed " John Dryden of Trinity C.," as he had gone up from Westminster to See also:Cambridge in May 165o . He was elected a scholar of Trinity on the Westminster See also:foundation in See also:October of the same See also:year, and took his degree of B.A. in 1654 . The only recorded incident of his See also:college See also:residence is some unexplained See also:act of disobedience to the See also:vice-See also:master, for which he was " put out of See also:commons " and " gated " for a fortnight . His father died in 1654, leaving him master of two-thirds of a small estate near See also:Blakesley, worth about £6o a year . The next three years he is said to have spent at Cambridge . In any See also:case they were spent somewhere in study; for his first considerable poem bears indisputable marks of scholarly habits, as well as of a command of See also:verse that could not have been acquired without practice . The See also:middle of 1657 is given as the date of his leaving the university to take up his residence in See also:London . In one of his many subsequent See also:literary quarrels, it was said by See also:Shadwell that he had been clerk to Sir Gilbert Pickering, his cousin, who was chamberlain to Cromwell; and nothing is more likely than that he obtained some employment under his powerful cousin when he came to London . He is said to have lived at first in the house of his first publisher, Herringman, with whom he was connected till 1679, when See also:Jacob See also:Tonson began to publish his books . He first emerged from obscurity with his Heroic Stanzas (1659) to the memory of the Protector . That these stanzas should have made him a name as a poet does not appear surprising when we compare them with See also:Waller's verses on the same occasion . Dryden took some See also:time to consider them, and it was impossible that they should not give an impression of his intellectual strength . See also:Donne was his See also:model; it is obvious that both his See also:ear and his See also:imagination were saturated with Donne's elegiac strains when he wrote; yet when we look beneath the See also:surface we find unmistakable traces that the See also:pupil was not without decided theories that ran See also:counter to the practice of the master . It is plainly not by See also:accident that each See also:stanza contains one clear-cut brilliant point . The poem is an See also:academic exercise, and it seems to be animated by an under-current of strong contumacious protest against the To those who regard the poet as a seer with a sacred See also:mission, and refuse the name altogether to a literary manufacturer to See also:order, it comes with a certain See also:shock to find Dryden, the hereditary Puritan, the panegyrist of Cromwell, hailing the return of King Charles in See also:Astraea Redux (166o), deploring his See also:long See also:absence, and proclaiming the despair with which he had seen " the See also:rebel thrive, the loyal crost." A See also:Panegyric on the See also:Coronation followed in 1661 . From a literary point of view also, Astraea Redux is inferior to the Heroic Stanzas . Dryden was compelled to supplement his slender income by his writings . He naturally first thought of tragedy his own See also:genius, as he has informed us, inclining him rather to that See also:species of See also:composition; and in the first year of the Restoration he wrote a tragedy on the See also:fate of Henry, See also:duke of See also:Guise . But some See also:friends advised him that its construction was not. suited to the requirements of the See also:stage, so he put it aside, and used only one See also:scene of the See also:original See also:play later on, when he again attempted the subject with a more practised See also:hand . Having failed to write a suitable tragedy, he next turned his See also:attention to See also:comedy, although, as he admitted, he had little natural turn for it . " I confess," he said, in a See also:short See also:essay in his own See also:defence, printed before The See also:Indian See also:Emperor, " my See also:chief endeavours are to delight the See also:age in which I live . If the See also:humour of this be for See also:low comedy, small accidents and raillery, I will force my genius to obey it, though with more reputation I could write in verse . I know I am not so fitted by nature to write comedy; I want that gaiety of humour which is required to it . My conversation is slow and, dull; my humour saturnine and reserved; in short, I am none of those who endeavour to break jests in See also:company or make repartees .
So that those who decry my comedies do me no injury, except it be in point of profit; reputation in them is the last thing to which I shall pretend." He was really as well as ostentatiously a playwright; the age demanded comedies, and he endeavoured to See also:supply the See also:kind of comedy that the age demanded
.
His first See also:attempt was unsuccessful
.
Bustle, intrigue and coarsely humorous See also:dialogue seemed to him to be See also:part of the popular demand; and, looking about for a See also:plot, he found some-thing to suit him in a See also:Spanish source, and wrote The See also:Wild Gallant
.
The play was acted in See also:February 1663, by See also:
The undisciplined force of the man carried him to an excess from which more dexterous writers held back
.
II
After the See also:production of The Rival Ladies in 1663, Dryden assisted Sir See also:Robert See also:Howard in the composition of a tragedy in heroic verse, The Indian See also:Queen, produced with great splendour in See also:January 1664
.
He married See also:Lady See also: Rhyme was not natural, some See also:people had said; to which he answers that it is as natural as See also:blank verse, and that much of its unnaturalness is not the See also:fault of the rhyme but of the writer, who has not sufficient command of See also:language to rhyme easily . In favour of rhyme he has to say that it at once stimulates the imagination, and prevents it from being too discursive in its flights . During the Great See also:Plague, when the theatres were closed, and Dryden was living at Charlton, See also:Wiltshire, at the seat of his father-in-See also:law, the earl of Berkshire, he occupied a considerable part of his time in thinking over the principles of dramatic composition, and threw his conclusions into the See also:form of a dialogue, which he called an Essay of Dramatick Poesie and published in 1668 . The essay takes the form of a dialogue between See also:Neander (Dryden), See also:Eugenius (Charles, Lord Buckhurst, afterwards earl of See also:Dorset), Crites (Sir R . Howard), and Lisideius (Sir C . See also:Sedley), who is made responsible for the famous See also:definition of a play as a " just and lively See also:image of human nature, representing its passions and humours, and the changes of fortune to which it is subject, for the delight and instruction of mankind." Dryden's form is of course borrowed from the ancients, and his See also:main source is tha See also:critical See also:work of See also:Corneille in the prefaces and discourses contained in the edition of 1660, but he was well acquainted with the whole See also:body of contemporary See also:French and Spanish See also:criticism . Crites maintains the superiority of the classical See also:drama; Lisideius supports the exacting rules of French dramatic writing; Neander defends the English drama of the preceding generations, including, in a long speech, an examination of See also:Ben See also:Jonson's Silent Woman . Neander argues, however, that English drama has much to gain by the observance of exact methods of construction without abandoning entirely the See also:liberty which English writers had always claimed . He then goes on to defend the use of rhyme in serious drama . Howard had argued against the use of rhyme in a " preface " to Four New Plays (1665), which had furnished the excuse for Dryden's essay . Howard replied to Dryden's essay in a preface to The Duke of See also:Lerma (1668) . Dryden at once replied in a masterpiece of sarcastic See also:retort and vigorous reasoning, A Defence of an Essay of Dramatique Poesie, prefixed to the second edition (1668) of The Indian Emperor .
It is the ablest and most See also:complete statement of his views about the employment of rhymed couplets in tragedy
.
Before his return to town at the end of 1666, when the theatres (which had been closed during the disasters of 1665 and 1666) were reopened, Dryden wrote a poem on the Dutch See also:war and the Great See also:Fire entitled Annus Mirabilis
.
The poem is in quatrains, the See also:metre of his Heroic Stanzas in praise of Cromwell, which Dryden See also:chose, he tells us, " because he had ever judged it more See also:noble and of greater dignity both for the See also:sound and number than any other verse in use amongst us." The preface to the poem contains an interesting discussion of what he calls "wit-writing," introduced by the remark that " the composition of all poems is or ought to be of wit." His description of the Great Fire is a famous specimen of this wit-writing, much more careless and daring, and much more difficult to sympathize with, than the graver conceits in his panegyric of the See also:Pro= tector
.
In Annus Mirabilis the poet apostrophizes the newly founded Royal Society, of which he had been elected a member in 1662
.
From the reopening of the theatres in 1666 till See also:November 1681, the date of his See also:Absalom and Achitophel, Dryden produced nothing but plays
.
The stage was his chief source of income
.
Secret Love, or the See also:Maiden Queen, a tragi-comedy, produced in See also: He was engaged to write three plays a year, and he contributed only ten plays during the ten years of his engagement, finally exhausting the See also:patience of his partners by joining in the composition of a play for the rival house . In adapting L'Etourdi, Dryden did not catch Moliere's lightness of See also:touch; his alterations go towards making the comedy into a See also:farce . Perhaps all the more on this See also:account Sir Martin Mar-all had a great run at the theatre in See also:Lincoln's See also:Inn See also:Fields . There is always a certain coarseness in Dryden's humour, apart from the coarseness of his age,—a certain forcible roughness of touch which belongs to the See also:character of the man . His An Evening's Love, or the See also:Mock Astrologer, an adaptation from Le Feint Astrologee of the younger Corneille, produced at the King's theatre in 1668, seemed to Pepys " very smutty, and nothing so good as The Maiden Queen or The Indian Emperor of Dryden's making." See also:Evelyn thought it foolish and profane, and was grieved " to see how the stage was degenerated and polluted by the licentious times." Ladies d la Mode, another of Dryden's contract comedies, produced in 1668, was " so mean a thing," Pepys says, that it was only once acted, and Dryden never published it . Of his other comedies, Marriage a la Mode (produced 1672), The Assignation, or Love in a Nunnery (1673), The Kind Keeper, or Mr Limberham (1678), only the first was moderately successful . While Dryden met with such indifferent success in his willing efforts to supply the demand of the age for "low comedy, he struck upon a really popular and profitable vein in heroic tragedy . Tyrannic Love, or the Royal See also:Martyr, a See also:Roman play dealing with the persecution of the Christians by Maximin, in which St See also:Catherine is introduced, and with her some supernatural machinery, was produced in 1669 . It is in rhymed couplets, but the author again did not See also:trust solely for success to them; for, besides the magic incantations, the singing angels, and the view of See also:Paradise, he made Nell Gwyn, who had stabbed herself as See also:Valeria, start to life again as she was being carried off the stage, and speak a riotous epilogue, in violent contrast to the serious character of the play . Almanzor and Almahide, or the Conquest of See also:Granada, a tragedy in two parts, was written in 1669 to 1670 . The historical background is taken chiefly from Mlle de Scudery's See also:romance of Almahide, but Dryden borrows freely from other books of hers and her contemporaries . This piece seems to have given the crowning touch of provocation to the. wits, who had never ceased to ridicule the popular taste for these extravagant heroic plays .
Dryden almost invited See also:burlesque in his epilogue to the second part of The Conquest of Granada, in which he charged the comedy of the Elizabethan age with coarseness and See also:mechanical humour, and its conceptions of love and See also:honour with meanness, and claimed for his own time and his own plays an advance in these respects
.
The See also:Rehearsal, written by the duke of See also:Buckingham, with the assistance, it was said, of See also:Samuel See also:
An See also:opera which he wrote in rhymed couplets, called The See also:State of Innocence, and Fall of Man, an attempt to turn part of Paradise Lost into rhyme, as a See also:proof of its superiority to blank verse, was prefaced by an " See also:Apology for Heroique See also:Poetry and Poetique See also:Licence," and entered at Stationers' See also: Dryden gave all his strength to All for Love, writing the play for himself, as he said, and not for the public . Carrying out the See also:idea ex-pressed in the See also:title, he represents the two. lovers as being more entirely under the dominion of love than Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra . Shakespeare's Antony is moved by other impulses than the See also:passion for Cleopatra; it is his master See also:motive, but it has to maintain a struggle for supremacy; " Roman thoughts " strike in upon him even in the very height of the enjoyment of his mistress's love, he chafes under the yoke, and breaks away from her of his own impulse at the See also:call of spontaneously reawakened ambition . Dryden's Antony is so deeply sunk in love that no other impulse has See also:power to stir him; it takes much persuasion and skilful artifice to detach him from Cleopatra even in thought, and his soul returns to her violently before the rupture has been completed . On the other hand, Dryden's Cleopatra is so completely enslaved by love for Antony that she is incapable of using the calculated caprices and meretricious coquetries which Shakespeare's Cleopatra deliberately practises as the highest art of love, the surest way of maintaining her See also:empire over her great See also:captain's See also:heart . It is with difficulty that Dryden's Cleopatra will agree, on the See also:earnest solicitation of a wily counsellor, to feign a liking for See also:Dolabella to excite Antony's See also:jealousy, and she cannot keep up the pretence through a few sentences . The characters of the two lovers are thus very much contracted, indeed almost overwhelmed, beneath the pressure of the one ruling motive . And as Dryden thus introduces a greater regularity of character into the drama, so he also very much contracts the action, in order to give See also:probability to this temporary subjugation of individual character . The action of Dryden's play takes See also:place wholly in See also:Alexandria, within the See also:compass of a few days; it does not, like Shakespeare's, extend over several years, and See also:present incessant changes of scene . Dryden chooses, as it were, a fragment of a historical action, a single moment during which motives play within a narrow circle, the culminating point in the relations between his two personages . He devotes his whole play, also, to those relations; only what bears upon them is admitted . In Shakespeare's play we get a certain historical See also:perspective, in which the love of Antony and Cleopatra appears 'in its true proportions beneath the See also:firmament that overhangs human affairs .
In Dryden's play this love is our universe; all the other concerns of the world retire into a shadowy, indistinct background
.
If we rise from a comparison of the plays with an impression that the Elizabethan drama is a higher type of drama, taking Dryden's own definition of the word as " a just and lively image of human nature," we rise also with an impression of Dryden's power such as we get from nothing else that he had written since his Heroic Stanzas, twenty years before
.
It was twelve years before Dryden produced another tragedy worthy of the power shown in All for Love
.
See also:Don See also:Sebastian was acted and published in i6go
.
In the interval, to sum up briefly Dryden's work as a dramatist, he wrote See also:Oedipus (pr
.
1679) and The Duke of Guise (pr
.
1683) in See also:conjunction with Nathaniel See also:
The plot of Don Sebastian is more intricate than that of All for Love
.
It has also more of the characteristics of his heroic dramas; the extravagance of sentiment and the suddenness of impulse remind us occasionally of The Indian Emperor; but the characters are much more elaborately studied than in Dryden's earlier plays, and the verse is sinewy and powerful
.
It would be difficult to say whether Don Sebastian or All for Love is his best play; they share the See also:palm between them
.
Dryden's subsequent plays are not remarkable
.
Their titles and See also:dates are—King See also:Arthur, an opera (1691), for which See also:Purcell wrote the See also:music; Cleomenes (1692); Love Triumphant (1694)
.
Soon after Dryden's See also:abandonment of heroic couplets in tragedy, he found new and more congenial work for his favourite See also:instrument in satire
.
As usual the idea was not original to Dryden, though he struck in with his majestic step and See also:energy divine, and immediately took the See also:lead
.
The See also:pioneer was See also:Mulgrave in his Essay on Satire, an attack on See also:Rochester and the See also:court, which was circulated in MS. in 1679
.
Dryden himself was suspected of the authorship, and it is not impossible that he gave some help in revising it; but it is not likely that he attacked the king on whom he was dependent for the greater part of his income, and Mulgrave in a See also:note to his Art of Poetry in 1717 expressly asserts Dryden's See also:ignorance
.
Dryden; however, was attacked in See also:Rose Street, Covent See also:Garden, and severely cudgelled by a company of ruffians who were generally supposed to have been hired by Rochester
.
In the same year See also:Oldham's satire on the See also:Jesuits had immense popularity, chiefly owing to the excitement about the Popish plot
.
Dryden took the See also: Absalom and Achitophel produced a great stir . Nine See also:editions were sold in rapid succession in the course of a year . There was no compunction in Dryden's ridicule and invectivh . ,Delicate wit was not one of Dryden's gifts; the motions of his weapon were sweeping, and the blows hard and trenchant . The advantage he had gained by his recent studies of character was fully used in his portraits of Shaftesbury and Buckingham, Achitophel and Zimri . In these portraits he shows considerable art in the introduction of redeeeming traits to the general outline of malignity and depravity . It is not impossible that the fact that his pension had not been paid since the beginning of 168o weighed with him in writing this satire to gain the favour of the court . In a play produced in 1681, The Spanish Friar, he hadwritten on the other side, gratifying the popular feeling by attacking the Roman See also:Catholic priesthood . Three other satires followed Absalom and Achitophel, one of them hardly inferior in point of literary power . The Medall; a Satyre against See also:Sedition (March 1682) was. written in ridicule of the See also:medal struck to commemorate Shaftesbury's acquittal . Then Dryden had to take vengeance on the literary champions of the Whig party who had opened upon him with all their See also:artillery . Their See also:leader, Shadwell, had attacked him in The Medal of John Bayes, which Dryden answered in October 1682 by Mac See also:Flecknoe, or a Satyr upon the True-Blew See also:Protestant Poet, T.S .
This satire, in which Shadwell filled the title-role, served as the model of the Dunciad
.
To the second part of Absalom and Achitophel (November 1682), written chiefly by See also:Nahum See also:Tate, he contributed a long passage of invective against Robert See also:Ferguson, one of Monmouth's chief advisers, Elkanah Settle, Shadwell and others
.
Religio Laici, which appeared in the same See also:month, though nominally an exposition of a layman's creed, and deservedly admired as such, was not without a political purpose
.
It attacked the Papists, but declared the " fanatics " to be still more dangerous
.
Dryden's next poem in heroic couplets was in a different See also:strain
.
On the See also:accession of See also:
The See also:Hind and the See also:Panther, published in 1687, is an ingenious argument for Roman Catholicism, put into the mouth of " a See also:milk-See also:
See also:Ovid's Epistles translated appeared
in 168o; and numerous translations from See also:Virgil, See also:Horace, Ovid, See also:Lucretius and See also:Theocritus appeared in the four volumes of See also:Miscellany Poems—Miscellany Poems (1684), Sylvae (1685), Examen poeticism (1693), The See also:Annual Miscellany (1694 by the " most eminent hands "); in 1693 was published the verse translation of the Satires of See also:Juvenal and of See also:Persius by " Mr Dryden and several other eminent hands," which contained his " Discourse concerning the Original and Progress of Satire "; and in 1697 Jacob Tonson published his most important translation, The Works of Virgil
..
The See also:book, which was the result of three years' labour, was a vigorous, rather than a close, rendering of Virgil into the style of Dryden
.
Among other notable poems of this See also:period are the two " Songs for St See also:Cecilia's See also:Day," written for a London musical society for 1687 and 1697, and published separately
.
The second of these is the famous See also:ode on " See also: He died at his house in Gerrard Street, London, on the 1st of May 1700 and was buried on the 13th of the month in Westminster See also:Abbey . Dryden's portrait, by Sir G . See also:Kneller, is in the See also:National Portrait See also:Gallery . |
|
|
[back] DRYBURGH ABBEY |
[next] DRYOPITHECUS (Gr. bpi's, oak, atOo os, ape, " the a... |
Just some factual corrections to the introduction of your article - pertaining to the early Dryden (or Driden) family. John Driden, the original immigrant from Cumberland was already wealthy and the owner of property together with his brother Thomas Driden, before he settled at Canons Ashby in Northamptonshire. Their wealth had been generated by the wool trade, and the building of houses such as that of Canons Ashby was duplicated at a similar time by many a wealthy wool merchant. It seems that his connection with the Cope Family and his fututre father-in-law Sir John Cope was also via the wool trade. Sir John ran sheep in the village of Canons Ashby and on other proprties obtained from Henry VIII after the dissolution of the Monasteries. He also travelled abroad extensively. John Driden did not obtain the Canons Ashby Estate of the Cope family by his marriage. His property in Canons Ashby was previously known as Wilkyns farm and lay across the road from the residence called Copes Ashby, built from stome from the partly demolished monastery of Canons Ashby. It was only in 1565 after the death of his wife's brother that John Driden bought Copes Ashby together with the family church. Other property was taken on trust for his young Cope nephew. Copes Ashby was soon after demolished and the extended house on Wilkyns farm became the principal residence & took up the name of Canons Ashby house. The matter of Erasmus also needs some correction. The Philosopher died somewhere about the year 1536, a decade before John Driden came to Northamptonshire. The tradition of scholarship and the aquaintenceship with Erasmus lay instead with the Cope family. Sir John Cope's older brother Anthony Cope was one of Europe's finest Scholars and undoubtedly knew Erasmus, both in Europe and during his tenure at Universities in England. Anthony was also a Chamberlain to Queen Catherine Parr and one of those scholars whose lives was in danger for suspected treason - only for the Queeen to talk the King around. It seems quite convincing that Sir John Cope's son Erasmus Cope was baptised in honour of the Philosopher and it is quite possible that Erasmus himself was made Godfather. (We could check the location of Ersasmus' at that precise date to give some further evidence ether way). The tradition of naming sons Erasmus, then starts with the Cope family, as does (perhaps) the tradition of scholarship within the family of Dryden who descended from Elizabeth Cope. Although both families were of puritan beliefs that also included strong support for the respecting of women's rights - and it would be quite consistent for Elizabeth Cope to have held strong influence within the family. For example, Elizabeth Cope's grandaughter Anne Marbury-Hutchinson, (via daughter Bridget Dryden) has now become a rather famous as an early American puritan and proponent of Womens rights. I would be happy to communicate further on any of the early family details (I am a male line descendant of the Driden family) regards Brian Dreadon Hamilton New Zealand
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.