Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:DUALISM (from rare See also:Lat. dualis, containing two, from duo) , a philosophical See also:term applied to all theories which See also:attempt to explain facts by reference to two coexistent principles . The term plays an important See also:part in metaphysical, ethical and theological See also:speculation . In See also:Metaphysics.—Metaphysical See also:dualism postulates the eternal coexistence of mind and See also:matter, as opposed to See also:monism both idealistic and materialistic . Two forms of this dualism are held . On the one See also:hand it is said that mind and matter are absolutely heterogeneous, and, therefore, that any causal relation between them is ex hypothesi impossible . On the other hand is a hypothetical dualism, according to which it is held that mind cannot See also:bridge over the chasm so far as to know matter in itself, though it is compelled by its own See also:laws of cause and effect to postulate matter as the origin, if not the See also:motive cause, of its sensations . It follows that, for the thinking mind, matter is a necessary See also:hypothesis . Hence the theory is a See also:kind of monism, inasmuch as it confessedly does not assert the existence of matter See also:save as an intellectual postulate for the thinking mind . Matter, in other words, must be assumed to exist, though mind cannot know it in itself . From this question there emerges a second and more difficult problem . Consciousness, it is held, is of two See also:main kinds, sensation and See also:reason . Sensation alone is insufficient to explain all our intellectual phenomena; all sensation is momentary and individual (cf . See also:EMPIRICISM) . How then are we to See also:account for memory and the principles of See also:necessity, similarity, universality ? It is argued that there must be in the mind an enduring, See also:primary See also:faculty whereby we retain, compare and See also:group the presentations of sense . This faculty is a priori, transcendental, and entirely See also:separate from all the data of experience and sense See also:perception . Here then we have a dualism within experience . The mind is not to be regarded as a sensitized film which automatically records the impressions of the senses . It contains within itself this modifying See also:critical faculty which reacts upon and arranges the sense-given presentations . In See also:Ethics and See also:Theology.—In the domain of morals; dualism postulates the separate existence of See also:Good and Evil, as principles of existence . In theology the See also:appearance of dualism is sporadic and has not the fundamental, determining importance which it has in metaphysics . It is a result rather than a starting-point . The old Zoroastrianism, and those See also:Christian sects (e.g . See also:Manichaeism) which were influenced by it, postulate two contending deities Ormuzd and See also:Ahriman (Good and Evil), which See also:war against one another in influencing the conduct of men .
So, in See also:Christianity, the existence of Satan as an evil See also:influence, antagonistic to See also:God, involves a kind of dualism
.
But generally speaking this dualism is permissive, inasmuch as it is always held that God will See also:triumph over Satan in His own See also:time
.
So in Zoroastrianism the dualism is not ultimate, for Ahriman and Ormuzd are represented as the twin sons of Zervana Akarana, i.e. limitless time, wherein both will be finally absorbed
.
The postulate of an Evil Being arises from the difficulty, at all times acutely See also:felt by a certain type of mind, of reconciling the existence of evil with the divine attributes of perfect goodness, full knowledge and See also:infinite See also:power
.
See also:
In See also:Plato for the first time we find a truly dualistic conception of the universe
.
Asserting that Ideas alone really exist, he yet found it necessary to postulate a second principle of not-being, the groundwork of sensuous existence and of imperfection and evil
.
Herein he identified metaphysics and ethics, combining the good with the truly existent and evil with the non-existent
.
See also:Aristotle rebels against this conception and substitutes the See also:idea of rpUirri 6X and development
.
Nevertheless he does not See also:escape from the dualism of Form and Matter, vour and Ott)
.
The scholastic philosophers naturally held dualistic views resulting from their extreme devotion to formalism
.
This See also:blind dualism found its natural consequence in the revolt of the See also:Renaissance thinkers, See also:Bruno and See also:Paracelsus, who asserted the unity of mind and matter in all existence and were the precursors of the more intelligent monism of See also:Leibnitz and the scientific metaphysics of his successors
.
The See also:birth of See also:modern See also:physical See also:science on the other hand in the investigations of See also: He never really establishes a relation between pure reason and things-in-themselves (Dinge an sick), but rather seeks See also:refuge in a dualism within consciousness, the transcendental and the empirical . Since Kant there are, therefore, two streams of dualism, dealing, one with the See also:radical problem of the relation between mind and matter, the other with the relation between the pure rational and the empirical elements within consciousness . To the first problem there is one obvious and conclusive See also:answer, namely that matter in itself is inherently unthinkable and comes within the See also:vision of the mind only as an intellectual presentation . It follows that philosophy is in a sense both dualist and monist; it is a See also:cosmic dualism inasmuch as it admits the possible existence of matter as a hypothesis, though it denies the possibility of any true knowledge of it, and is hence in regard of the only possible knowledge an idealistic monism . It is a self-destructive dualism, a confessedly one-sided monism, agnostic as to the fundamental problem . To the second problem there are two main answers, that of Associationism which denies to the mind any a priori existence and asserts that sensation is the only source of know-ledge, and that which admits the existence of both transcendental and empirical knowledge . |
|
|
[back] DTZ |
[next] DUALLA |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.