Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

JOHN DUNS SCOTUS (1265 or 1275-1308)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V08, Page 683 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

JOHN See also:DUNS SCOTUS (1265 or 1275-1308)  , one of the foremost of the schoolmen . His birthplace has been variously given as See also:Duns in See also:Berwickshire, Dunum (Down) in See also:Ulster, and Dunstane in See also:Northumberland, but there is not sufficient See also:evidence to See also:settle the question . He joined the Franciscan See also:order in See also:early See also:life, and studied at Merton See also:College, See also:Oxford, of which he is said to have been a See also:fellow . He. became remarkably proficient in all branches of learning, but especially in See also:mathematics . When his See also:master, See also:William Varron, removed to See also:Paris in 1301, Duns Scotus was appointed to succeed him as See also:professor of See also:philosophy, and his lectures attracted an immense nurnber of students . Probably in 1304 he went to Paris, in 1307 he received his See also:doctor's degree from the university, and in the same See also:year was appointed See also:regent of the theological school . His connexion with the university was made memorable by his See also:defence of the See also:doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, in which he displayed such dialectical ingenuity as to win for himself the See also:title Doctor Subtilis . The doctrine See also:long continued to be one of the See also:main subjects in dispute between the Scotists and the Thomists, or, what is almost the same thing, between the See also:Franciscans and the See also:Dominicans . The university of Paris was so impressed by his arguments, that in 1387 it formally condemned the Thomist doctrine, and a See also:century afterwards required all who received the doctor's degree to bind themselves by an See also:oath to defend the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception . In 1308 Duns Scotus was sent by the See also:general of his order to See also:Cologne, with the twofold See also:object of engaging in a controversy with the Beghards and of assisting in the See also:foundation of a university; according to some, his removal was due to See also:jealousy . He was received with See also:enthusiasm by the inhabitants but died suddenly (it was said, of See also:apoplexy) on the 8th of See also:November in the same year . There was also a tradition that he had been buried alive .

His philosophical position was determined, or at least very greatly influenced, by the antagonism between the Dominicans and the Franciscans . Further, while the See also:

genius of See also:Aquinas was constructive, that of Duns Scotus was destructive; Aquinas was a philosopher, Duns a critic . The latter has been said to stand to the former in the relation of See also:Kant to See also:Leibnitz . In the See also:matter of Universals, Duns was more of a realist and less of an eclectic than Aquinas . Theologically, the Thomistic See also:system approximates to See also:pantheism, while that of Scotus inclines distinctly to Pelagianism . The doctrine of the Immaculate Conception was the See also:great subject in dispute between the two parties; it was strenuously opposed by Aquinas, and supported by Duns Scotus, although not without reserve . There were, however, See also:differences of a wider and deeper See also:kind . In opposition to Aquinas, who maintained that See also:reason and See also:revelation were two See also:independent See also:sources of knowledge, Duns Scotus held that there was no true knowledge of anything knowable apart from See also:theology as based upon revelation . In conformity with this principle he denied that the existence of See also:God was capable of being proved, or that the nature of God was capable of being comprehended . He therefore rejected as worthless the ontological See also:proof offered by Aquinas . Another See also:chief point of difference with Aquinas was in regard to the freedom of the will, which Duns Scotus maintained absolutely . He reconciled See also:free-will and See also:necessity by representing the divine See also:decree not as temporarily antecedent, but as immediately related to the See also:action of the created will .

He maintained, in opposition to Aquinas, that the will was independent of the understanding, that only will could affect will . From this difference as to the nature of free-will followed by necessary consequence a difference with the Thomists as to the operation of divine See also:

grace . In See also:ethics the distinction he See also:drew between natural and theological virtues is See also:common to him with the See also:rest of the schoolmen . (Cf . AQUINAS.) Duns Scotus strongly upheld the authority of the See also:church, making it the ultimate authority on which that of Scripture depends . (See also See also:SCHOLASTICISM.) The most important of his See also:works consisted of questions and commentaries on the writings of See also:Aristotle, and on the Sentences of Lombard, the so-called See also:Opus Oxoniense or Anglicanum . See also:Complete works, edited by See also:Luke See also:Wadding (13 vols., See also:Lyons, 1639) and at Paris (26 vols., 1891-1895) . There is an edition of his De modis significandi or Grammatica speculativa, the first See also:attempt to investigate the general See also:laws of See also:language, by F . M . See also:Fernandez See also:Garcia (Quaracchi, See also:Florence, 1902) . On Duns Scotus generally, see life by Wadding in vol. i. of the works (full, however, of legendary absurdities) ; J . See also:Muller, Biographisches fiber Duns Scotus (progr., Cologne, 1881) ; W .

Phoenix-squares

J . Townsend, The Great Schoolmen (1881); K . See also:

Werner, See also:Die Scholastik See also:des spdteren Mittelalters, i . (1881) ; J . M . See also:Rigg, in See also:Dictionary of See also:National See also:Biography . On his theology: C . Frassen, Scotus Academicus (1744, new edition, 1900) ; Hieronymus de Montefortino (See also:Jerome de Fortius), Scoti summa theologica (1728-1738, new edition, 1900) ; L . F . O . See also:Baumgarten-See also:Crusius, De theologia Scoti (1826) ; R . Seeberg, Die Theologie des J .

Duns Scotus (1900), and in See also:

Herzog-Hauck, ReaZencyklopddie ffir protestantische Theologie (1898), with See also:bibliog. refs; F . See also:Morin, Dictionnaire de philosophie et de theologie scolastiques [= J . P . See also:Migne, Troisieme encyclopedie theologique, xxi., xxii., 1857]; C . R . See also:Hagenbach, See also:History of Doctrines (Eng. tr., if., 1880) . On his philosophy: E . Pluzanski, Essai sur la philosophie de Duns See also:Scot (1887) ; A . Schmid, Die Thomistische and Scotistische Gewissheitlehre (1859); M . Schneid, Die Korperlehre des J . Duns Scotus—its relation to Thomism and Atomism (1879); P . Minges, " Ist Duns Scotus Indeterminist?" in Beitrdge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Bd. v .

Heft 4 (1905) ; W . Kahl, Die Lehre vom Primal des Willens bei Augustinus, Duns Scotus, and See also:

Descartes (1886) .

End of Article: JOHN DUNS SCOTUS (1265 or 1275-1308)
[back]
DUNS
[next]
DUNSINANE

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.